Follow TV Tropes

Following

Broke the Rating Scale

Go To

"I am required to award stars to movies I review. This time, I refuse to do it. The star rating system is unsuited to this film. Is the movie good? Is it bad? Does it matter? It is what it is and occupies a world where the stars don't shine."
Roger Ebert, about The Human Centipede, demonstrating this trope's Logical Extreme.

On a Scale from One to Ten, this trope gets a rating of Subversion.

Basically, Off The Scale applied to reviews: the movie/video game/whatever has made such an impact on the reviewer that they are willing to break the usual rules of classification of their medium to rate it. The reviewer may consider the work a Dethroning Moment of Suck, Crowning Moment of Awesome, or even Headscratching Moment of "Huh?".

Advertisement:

There are six categories:

  • Still Within Bounds (but pushing it): This is discussed — which is to say, the reviewer openly admits to being tempted to go outside the established bounds of the rating system, but ultimately they adhere to the rating scale;
    • First To Hit The Limit: A subtype of this category refers to a limit (either upper or lower) that may have been alluded to, but never before reached.
  • Out of Bounds: The score is simply outside the established bounds of the reviewer's usual ratings scale (compare Rank Inflation and F--; note that this may even cause the rating scale to be expanded);
  • Meaningless Comparison: The score is paired with a nonsensical or unusual unit of measure, though often it's thematically relevant to whatever they're reviewing (note that a rater can use an idiosyncratic unit of measure but not qualify for this category if they make clear the scale they're using);
  • Meaningless Value: The score is itself a nonsensical value (and quite often a Take That!);
  • Impossible to Rate: The reviewer admits to having no idea what score to give it (this is essentially a shrug);
  • Advertisement:
  • Refusal to Rate: And the Logical Extreme, the reviewer simply — and usually explicitly — refuses to assign a rating at all. This can be because the reviewer found the work downright repulsive, decided that rating it would be unfair, thought the work was so personal to the artist that a rating was inappropriate, or decided that a rating was otherwise inapplicable. This could be because the work put in so little effort that it would be downright insulting to dignify it with a proper review. Sometimes overlaps with Dancing Bear, when the refusal isn't because the work is so bad, but because rating its quality would be beside the point.

May appear as part of a Critic Breakdown. Compare Readings Are Off the Scale, for when this is done with things other than reviews, or F--. Some forms of rating-breaking can involve Grade System Snark.

Advertisement:

Examples:

    open/close all folders 

Still Within Bounds ("I'd give it a zero, but I can't.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • JesuOtaku usually gives out unusual review scores (see below), but when reviewing Master of Martial Hearts, he only gave it “one greasy burger out of four” “because frankly, I don’t have a lower score.”

    Fan Fiction 
  • Present in snakesonasora’s famous sporking of the Kingdom Hearts badfic “Naga Eyes”. The rating scale (sometimes more a warning scale) is typically 1 to 5 Shadows. For particularly terrible fics, there exists a rare rating of Ansem, which includes everything from 5 Shadows plus extra-high doses of WTF-ery. “Naga Eyes” earned an Ansem, but with this addition attached:
    snakesonasora: THE ANSEM IS ONLY A FORMALITY. THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH SHADOWS, BEHEMOTHS, ANSEMS, OR XEMNASES TO PROPERLY ILLUSTRATE THE LEVEL OF HORROR PRESENT IN THIS FIC.

    Film 
  • Film critic Leonard Maltin claimed the movie Tarzan: The Ape Man starring Bo Derek was so bad it nearly convinced him to create a rating in his book lower than BOMB. He ended up simply pronouncing it a mere BOMB.
  • Alex Abad-Santos' Vox review of Pixels is either this, or extremely close to this (it got a zero; it's not clear if that's a part of the usual scale on Vox), basically implying he'd give it an even lower score if possible with this opening:
    Pixels is a movie.
    This is the nicest thing I can say about it. It is a motion picture in the same way that any space with four walls and a window is considered a bedroom in Manhattan, and in the same way that lampreys are fish. It's not so much a film as it is an all-out assault on the senses, a middle finger to anyone with a brain. It's an open taunt, daring people (and their children) to spend money on a gaping malpractice of creativity.
  • On the same movie, Moviebob (who didn't give out ratings of this kind at the time, so it's here of necessity) did a review of Pixels that explicitly states:
    Pixels is awful on a level that defies even the most negative conventions of review. Not a single joke lands, not a single performance works, the story is lazy, the stakes make no sense, the staging is limp and lifeless, and director Chris Columbus has finally made a movie worse than Nine Months. It demands some kind of new metric below the stars or thumbs number scales, like "how many fingers should the people responsible for this piece of shit be allowed to keep".

    Literature 
  • "I might have to modify our grading schedule and give it a Z except that the poor letter Z did nothing to deserve being permanently stuck on a Cassie Edwards novel." —SBSarah from romance novel review site Smart Bitches, Trashy Books, reviewing Savage Moon, which got an "F". Read the rest here.

    Live-Action TV 
  • In the Malcolm in the Middle episode "Emancipation", a new teacher creates a ranking system for Malcolm's class, forcing the students to compete against each other for the #1 slot. Malcolm at first rebels and ends up in the #12 position, but then he decides to be so good that he breaks the system. His name climbs up the ranks until he's doing so well the teacher is forced to place his name on the wall several spaces above the #1 spot (which would appear to make this an example of "Out of Bounds", but he is still technically #1).
  • The IGN review of The Mandalorian's second season finale stated a desire to break out of the scale:
    Can we all agree that this episode is an 11 out of 10? Our scoring system doesn't technically allow it, but I feel confident saying that "The Rescue" is the most momentous episode of The Mandalorian yet.

    Other 
  • An old joke has a college student asking his professor why he received an F on an exam, as he thinks he didn't deserve one. The professor replies, "I don't think you did either, but it is the lowest grade I am allowed to give."
  • Pet-based channel Clint's Reptiles gave the peregrine falcon a 1/5 for Care (as in, how easy it is to take care of one), and noted that he considered giving it a 0. He clarified that his scale actually does include a 0, but the only thing he could think of that would score a 0/5 in that category would be an actual human baby—the fact that a falcon even approaches that level of difficulty is a testament to how troublesome they are to house, feed, and train.

    Tabletop Games 

    Video Games 
  • GameCentral’s review of Postal III gave it a 0/10, though it begins with the reviewer wondering whether the game’s self-awareness should push it up to 1/10, or if the fact that the developers clearly knew they were releasing a terrible game should push it into the negatives.
  • When rating God of War, the official PS2 magazine (Greek edition) commented that they would give it an 11/10, but weren’t allowed to, so instead they settled on a 10/10
  • Nintendo Power editor Chris Slate responded to one reader that he had been tempted to award some games a 10.5 out of 10, but won’t because that will mess up the scale by making 10.5 the new standard. (At the time, only Resident Evil 4, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, and Metroid Prime 3: Corruption had received a 10.)
  • The now-defunct Gaming Intelligence Agency gave The Legend of Dragoon a 1 out of 5, and a relentlessly negative review that found basically no redeeming value in it. At one point, the Alt Text on the score graphic said that they would’ve given it a zero if their rating scale allowed it. The mirror of their site at the time of its closing no longer reflects this.
  • On Something Awful, the review giving Master Chu and the Drunkard Hu the lowest possible rating (–50) ended by saying “I hate that I can’t give this game the score it deserves because the SA rating system won’t let me use scientific notation.” It’s not the only time reviewers have expressed a wish to go below –50, with various degrees of seriousness. The absolute worst thing ever reviewed there did get a “minus infinity”, but it’s better not to speak of that.
  • Throughout Roahm Mythril’s Mega Man Perfect Run videos, he strictly adheres to a scale of 1–10 for difficulty rankings, though there are some Robot Masters that test the limits. For example, he says that giving Top Man a score of 1 is being generous, because he wants to be fair by not going any lower. Conversely, Quick Man gets a 10, after which Roahm jokes “Can I give you more?” and temporarily fills the rest of the screen with rating icons and the text “OVER 9000!!”
    • His X series successor, Kevvl14, thought that giving Blaze Heatnix from X6 a perfect 10 would almost be an insult to his time. He compromises by giving Heatnix the biggest ten he's ever given.
  • The 1996 PC fighting game Catfight, often counted today as one of the worst games ever made, got a lot of lowest-rating-we've-ever-given reviews. The wittiest came from Next Generation magazine: "Our scoring system won't let us give zeroes, so Atlantean owes us one star."
  • Dance Dance Revolution's foot rating scales initially (in 1998) went from a low of 1 to a maximum of 8, quickly amended with a 9-footer in 2nd Mix six months later, and then a 10-footer in MAX2 in 2002. Here, the rating scale stood still for quite some time, with a few new songs in every release getting harder and harder despite still being rated as 10-foot songs (compare MAX 300, the first 10, to later 10s like the Fascination and Pluto series). Eventually in 2008, Konami relented and introduced a new ratings scale in Dance Dance Revolution X, with all previous ratings inflated by about 50% and a new top-end of 20-foot for future expansion.
    • Similarly with beatmania, the difficulty rating for IIDX topped out at 7. They sort of broke it with 7+ until the 12th style, Happy Sky, which they expanded it out to 12. However, they're pretty much back where they started due to Sequel Escalation.
  • During Electronic Gaming Monthly's review of 187: Ride or Die, one reviewer said he awarded it a "4.0" as a game but as a product a "negative f*** you" because it was such a crass and blatant attempt to capitalize on gangsta culture with no appreciation for how to make it into a quality game.
  • Ceave Gaming said this of the Hammer Bro when rating Super Mario Maker 2 enemies, noting that he didn't give it a 0 because "the official competition rules require me to award each enemy at least one Fuzzy for showing up."

    Web Original 
  • Many, many reviewers on the Internet Movie Database give various shows and films a rating of "1" solely because IMDB doesn't have a "0".

    Western Animation 
  • Friendly Neighborhood Librarian operates on a one- to five-star scale, and says that she doesn’t officially give out 0 stars on the show, but for Wayside, she wishes she could. Instead, she ended up giving it one star. She also gave Dario Argento’s Phantom of the Opera movie “one star, barely.”

First To Hit The Limit ("Yes, there is a Zero.")

    Video Games 

    Web Video 

    Other 
  • At the 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal, Romanian gymnast Nadia Comăneci obtained a perfect score of 10. While this had technically been possible the whole time, it was deemed impossible to do, so scoreboards could only reach up to 9.99. Her score was displayed as an abysmal 1.00. Whoops. And then, just for good measure, she proceeded to do it six more times. She left the entire gymnastics world gaping in awe as she turned the sport upside down and inside out, and then shook it just to see what came out. It's still reeling from the aftershocks.

Out of Bounds ("On a Scale from One to Ten, this one goes Up to Eleven.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • From the Anime News Network preview guides: Jacob Chapman gave a negative five out of five to the first episode of Kiss X Sis.

    Comic Books 
  • Spiderfan.org, which rates Spider-Man comic books on a scale of 1 to 5 webs, gave 1998's The Final Chapter no webs, citing Aunt May's being brought Back from the Dead with a truly absurd explanation, and general bad writing. The review concluded by saying the story was a waste of precious paper.

    Fan Works 
  • Cupcakes: Popular fanblog Equestria Daily gave this super-gory Dark Fic a "GRIMDARK AS FUCK" tag, as opposed to usual dark fics which usually only get a "Dark" or a "Grimdark" tag. Similary, the epic-length Fallout: Equestria got the tag Legendary.
  • Rage Reviews (a review group on Fimfiction.Net) normally grades fanfics on a scale of 0% to 100% Rage, with higher percentages being worse scores. But for stories even worse, inspiring the hatred of multiple reviewers, there's the 120% Rage score. And for stories even worse than that, there's 200% Rage, which can only be awarded with permission from the group's founder. And beyond even that, the group made a "Literally Broke the Scale" score, represented by a .gif that randomly cycles through various four-digit percentages. That one was initially created just as a joke — but they wound up actually awarding it to The Rise of Spike the Dragon.

    Film 
  • When SFX magazine did their ratings from A to D-minus, rather than a star system, there was one object (a plastic, life-sized grey embryo in a jar) which they decided was worthy of an E.
    • The film Species II got an F on the same scale.
    • At the other end, when the star system came about, they gave Chuck Versus The Ring eleven stars out of five.
  • The Dread Central review of The 13th Alley: One BILLION knives out of 5 (the review thought it was a So Bad, It's Good masterpiece). Note: "Knives" are a standard unit for this site, which is why this doesn’t fit a Meaningless Comparison.
  • The book and film reviews in the Czech sci-fi/fantasy magazine Ikarie normally go from one to five stars, with zero stars reserved for “So Bad It’s Horrible” ones. (And yes, half out of five was occasionally used as well.) There was one movie for which the reviewer didn’t feel zero was enough, so it got a 00.
  • IGN’s DVD review of This is Spın̈al Tap received 11/10 instead of a real score.
  • 1000 Misspent Hours and Counting gives stars. It also gives negative stars to So Bad, It's Good movies. Zero stars are reserved for films that fail even that test.
  • Freddy Got Fingered received minus 1 star from the Toronto Star. No other movie has been rated so lowly.
  • Roger Ebert chose to remove the film Shoah from his list of candidates for the top ten films of 1985 (in its place appeared The Color Purple). He felt it deserved higher accolades.
    • On the other hand, Ebert occasionally gave zero-star ratings. These differed from his occasional "no-star" ratings in that to earn zero stars, a movie had to offend his moral sensibilities in some way. This is why The Human Centipede II got zero stars (as opposed to the first movie, which got no rating) and why the original version of Death Race got zero stars vs. the remake’s half star even though Ebert had admitted that he considered the former more competently made. Ebert talks more about his no-star rating in his review of Death Wish 2.
  • Donald Clarke of The Ticket awarded six stars (out of five) to Michael Haneke's The White Ribbon 3D, an English-language remake of the director’s own The White Ribbon. This was a joke: no such movie exists and the review was published on April Fool’s Day.
  • The Boston Globe gave The Human Centipede II no stars out of five. As did The Daily Mail. And, as noted above, Roger Ebert.
  • Video Hound Golden Movie Retriever will normally give movies a score of one to four bones. For some films that are either hilariously bad or horrendously bad, they will offer a rating of Woof!
  • Similarly, Leonard Maltin will give films that don’t rate a star and a half a BOMB rating.
  • And the "DVD & Video Guide" by Nick Martin and Marsha Porter substitutes a turkey symbol for movies that would otherwise receive one star.
  • Only one movie, Daltry Calhoun, has ever received a zero from IGN (see below for the third and first things the site considered as “utterly lifeless and dull” as this one).
  • Spill.com used to have "some ol' bullshit" as its lowest rating. The films of Seltzer and Friedberg motivated them to add an even lower "Fuck you" as its new lowest.
  • IMDb’s user rating for This is Spın̈al Tap is out of 11. Subverted, though, as the film is currently rated 8.0 out of 11.
  • Lou Lumenick, the movie critic for the New York Post, gave the sketch comedy film Movie 43 negative four stars, calling it “the worst movie I’ve ever seen”.
  • Dr. Salt, complaining that From Dusk Till Dawn received an inexplicable four stars in a television magazine, wrote that in his book it would get zero stars ("and that's only assuming I can't give negative stars"), with every other movie given one extra star just to make From Dusk Till Dawn seem worse.
  • An In-Universe example with Kung Fu Panda. Master Shifu tells Po that there's no Level 0 when it comes to kung fu training. After Po majorly fails in the training chamber, Shifu says "There is now a Level 0".
  • An "off the scale" option is implicit in the review icons long used by the Sunday edition of the (combined) San Francisco Chronicle and Examiner. Instead of stars, each option shows a cartoon figure of a little man in a movie seat. From highest to lowest: little man leaping in the air applauding wildly; little man sitting upright clapping his hands; little man slumped dully in his seat; little man fast asleep ... and, finally, an empty seat.
  • Vox rewrote the site's code to give The Emoji Movie half a star.
  • In-universe in Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping: Connor4Real's sophomore album, CONNquest, gets a -4.0 score on Pitchfork and a 💩/4 on Rolling Stone. The only "positive" review comes from The Onion.
  • Christian film website Movieguide gave South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut a content grade of -4 (could be -4 billion).
  • According to blogger "Unshaved Mouse", the fact that his daughter begged him to let her watch something else, halfway through the movie, means that Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron is a scale-breaking Epic Fail. (Ultimately subverted, however, as he ends up giving the film a final score of 34%.)
    Unshaved Mouse: Dreamworks? She's a five year old girl. If you can't sell a five year old girl a cartoon with horses, you have FAILED. You have failed more totally than it should be possible for human beings to fail. You have created a masterpiece of ineptitude. You broke the damn scale.

    Literature 
  • Maximum Ride has a house that rates "on a scale from 1 to 10—an easy 15".
  • Impish Idea writers Fair & Finn ended their spork of Nibly the Bear Visits the People Town asking the commenters what rating they would give the book (presumably out of 10). The two responses were both in this category: Swenson gave a rating of -85, whereas Brendan Rizzo went even further, with a rating of negative infinity. Then, crossing over with Refusal to Rate, he said that he couldn't give it a rating at all because it does not qualify as a story, and compared it to Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing.

    Live-Action TV 
  • On Junior Masterchef Australia, a contestant was scored an 11 (on a 10 point scale) by two judges. Clearly they thought that his dish was better than the example dish provided by the professional chef.
  • SF Debris gave the notorious Star Trek: Voyager episode "Threshold" 0 on a one-to-ten scale, with an added message "May God have mercy on your soul". This opened the floodgates, as it were, and he's since handed out another for Enterprise's "A Night in Sickbay". A few horrible episodes only missed this mark because another is worse, and he tries to preserve the Zero for the absolute worst episodes of each series — the one episode of a series that brings shame to the entire Star Trek franchise by association (the aforementioned "Threshold", "Profit and Lace" for DS9, "Code of Honor" for TNG and "And The Children Shall Lead" for TOS).
    • "My Way or JANEWAY" — Chuck measures how his own parody of Captain Janeway would handle each scene from the episode "Latent Image", then sees how Voyager’s Janeway measures up. He gives up within four minutes, after the real Captain's actions are more extreme than her parody's.
    • For his non-Star Trek reviews, Chuck does not use a numerical scale, but rather "Must See", "Strongly Recommended", "Recommended", "Fine", "Watchable" and "Avoid". Doctor Who's "The Twin Dilemma" and Stargate SG-1's "Emancipation" were rated simply "The Worst".
  • Keith D.A. Candido gave the fifth-season finale of Highlander, “Archangel,” a 0 out of a 1–10 scale, citing the episode’s introduction of an ancient Zoroastrian demon into the Highlander universe, Richie’s death scene happening as a result of him being handed the Idiot Ball, and a whole bunch of story elements that just don’t make sense.
  • The Zettai ni Oishii segments of Gaki no Tsukai ya Arahende, which feature the cast’s attempts at making a specified dish with unusual ingredients, already has built-in negative values on its ratings scale of –2 to 10. Positive scores are represented by stars, negative scores by skull marks. But on at least one occasion, a dish has been awful enough to get two full skeletons.
  • IGN gave its third zero in the site’s history to the pilot of Work It.
  • In-universe example in How I Met Your Mother, for the price of a wedding dress. The scale given is “never” to “never ever”. The rating is “never ever ever ever ever times infinity”. (It's later revealed to be $8000.)
  • For a while, back in the David Tennant run, the Doctor Who website contained episode reviews from a family who gave them a "fear factor" from 1 (mildly scary) to 5 (extremely scary), shown by the children of the family holding up scorecards. For both "Blink" and "The Impossible Planet", the children apparently made or found scorecards with sixes on them. On the website the overall scores for these episodes are listed as 5.5 ("Off the Scale") and 6 ("Beyond Fear") respectively.
  • The show MythBusters, since the second season, has a rating scale of sorts for the myths it tests: "Confirmed" (for a myth which fits the criteria within the original parameters), "Plausible" (for a myth which does not fit the original criteria but has been shown to be possible in realistic circumstances), or "Busted" (for a myth which is not possible anywhere near the original criteria, even if the concept behind it is sound). Quite a few myths have a Meaningless Comparison deviation, such as "Plausible, but ludicrous".
    • The myth of being killed by a falling bullet from a gun fired straight up was rated "all of the above", that is, Busted, Plausible, and Confirmed. This was because they determined that firing a bullet perfectly vertically would make it tumble as it fell back down, and not gain enough velocity to be lethal (Busted); but if the gun is aimed just a few degrees from vertical, the bullet won’t tumble and could kill someone when it lands (Plausible), and a doctor showed them X-ray slides of people who were actually killed in this way (Confirmed).
  • Musings of an X-Phile is a retro review page devoted to analysing The X-Files. Salome’s aim is to analyse all the episodes and both the movies. The episodes get grades like at school, and only the very best episodes have merited A-plus. The X-Files: Fight the Future review has two parts: one based on the storytelling and the plot, while the other is based on Mulder and Scully’s relationship. The latter got A-plus-plus-plus.
  • The Onion AV Club's reviews of Hostages mainly dealt out Ds and Fs, but episode eleven was so horrendous that the rating scale looped itself and Sonia Soraiya gave it an "A".
  • In-universe in the Muppet Show — Waldorf and Statler love Diana Ross so much that they freely deal negative ratings on an (implicit) 0-10 rating scale to the other acts. This also has the side effect of riling up the audience- during the episode's "UK Sketch", in which Beaker tries to sing Albert Morris' "Feelings", they boo him so much that Animal has to tell them to be quiet halfway through, and they do some Produce Pelting before Gonzo can perform his stunt, causing him to call it off and get Diana back on the stage.
  • In-universe on Friends when Joey is preparing to audition the role of a 19 year old. He wears a jersey over a t-shirt, a touque and boxers above his waistline, and says "wack" and "'sup". When he asks Chandler if he's 19, Chandler says "Yes. On a scale from one to ten, ten being the dumbest a person can look, you are definitely 19."
  • In Square One TV's Music Video "Less Than Zero" Stanley O'Toole manages to get negative scores in diving, dance, and rollerskating competitions. When he competes in the hammerthrow he throws it backwards, netting a -55 feet score.
    Less than nothing is my battle cry!
  • In the second episode of iCarly featuring Nevel Papperman, upon seeing Nevel's "nerd cave", Sam says that she used to rank nerds on a scale from 1 to Freddie but that Nevel just broke that scale.
  • Canada's Worst Driver: After a Season 3 challenge, Shelby ranks his performance.
    On a scale of one to ten, this drive was probably a zero.
  • 13 Reasons Why: New Zealand censors, when classifying the show, had to build a new classification of RP 18 (Persons under 18 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian) from scratch, created specifically for the series. The censors deemed the subject matter too important to teens for the show to be given the existing R18 rating, yet the RP 16 rating was considered to be too low of a rating and did not cover vulnerable 16 and 17 year olds in a country with the highest teen suicide rate in the OECD.
  • The House wiki maintains a 1 to 10 "zebra factor" for how improbable the diagnosis of the week is - for the episode that featured fake human parthenogenesis, they pointed out that it would have received an 11 had it been real.
  • In the eponymous series, Automan has been programmed to learn from the best person in every discipline, so when he materializes for the first time and he discusses his abilities with his creator, he says literally "In a scale from 1 to 10, think of me as an eleven".

    Music 
  • Mark Prindle gave Madonna’s American Life a zero out of ten. While he’s known for often being a Caustic Critic, this was the first (and still only) album to get a zero, and to ‘commemorate’ this he used a new graphic rather than representing the score with those tiny records as usual (in which the lowest score is 1 out of 10).
  • Thrash metal band Flotsam And Jetsam’s debut album Doomsday for the Deceiver got 6 Ks out of a possible 5 from Kerrang! magazine. Kind of a Moment of Awesome for a relatively obscure bandnote , considering no other album in the magazine’s history has ever received the honour.
  • The late, great British radio DJ John Peel ranked new songs on his programme on a 5-star system. When he first played “Teenage Kicks” by The Undertones—a song which would become his favourite song of all time (lyrics from the song are even on his tombstone)—not only did he play it twice in a row, but he gave it a score of 28 out of 5 Stars.
  • When Gogol Bordello played Roskilde Festival in 2006, one reviewer gave them 7 out of 6 stars, declaring that he’d draw the last star himself.
  • The Rap Critic gave "No Love" by Eminem (featuring Lil Wayne) six stars out of five, possibly as much from shock that Eminem was on form after several years of mediocrity and Lil Wayne showed his poetic chops in the same song as much as anything. He has since given a few songs 6 out of 5 when they surpass the potential he thinks they had or otherwise "break the barometer"—among other things, he gave The Marshal Mathers LP 2, as a whole, 5.5 stars.
  • Music and film publication Slant Magazine has given at least two zero-star ratings in its music section: to John Rich's Son of a Preacher Man and to Faith Hill's Fireflies. Both reviews read more as Jonathan Keefe venting his spleen against the artists in question than actually reviewing their product.
  • Chic's song "26" invokes this:
    On a scale of one to ten, my baby's a twenty-six.
  • Anthony Fantano once made a joke review of NOW That's What I Call Music Vol. 69. He wasn't present at all and said absolutely nothing during the review, despite the video's otherwise normal editing (including cuts to an absent Cal Chuchesta). Even so, he gave the compilation a Strong 69, presumably using his normal 10-point scale.
  • When Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was a child, he took a piano exam that was scored from 1 to 5. After he had finished, the examiner marked a 5, thought for a moment, then added three pluses, commenting "That wasn't an examination. That was a concert!"

    Professional Wrestling 
  • The star ranking system, thought up by industry insider Jim Cornette and Newsletter writer Weasel Dooley, popularized by The Wrestling Observer Newsletter, is mostly defined by three marks. 0 is dud, 2 is average, 5 cannot be improved upon. The system originally was a joke by Cornette, who compared Weasel Dooley's in depth analysis of matches to decide whether they were "good" or "bad" to TV Guide's deconstruction of movies, which it grades on four stars, because there can be no perfect movies. Jim and Weasel, while believing there can be no perfect matches either, agreed Jerry Lawler and Terry Funk put on one so good in 1981 that four simply wasn't enough, redefining the scale.
  • Dooley took it a step further by giving negative star ratings, most famously rating a match between Plowboy Frazier, and Chief Thunder Cloud “negative as many stars as there are in the Andromeda galaxy".
  • The Wrestling Observer Newsletter became famous for these simply because few reviewed matches ever get more than 3 or less than 1 from the publication, at least when the difficult to impress Dave Meltzer is the one reviewing...that was until 1984 in Madison Square Garden when David Schultz defeated Rocky Johnsonnote  in a match Dave Meltzer gave "minus 3 stars". This was surpassed at the 1985 The Wrestling Classic after Meltzer rated a match between Junkyard Dog and Moondog Spot "minus 5 stars", which presumably means cannot get any worse.
  • On the positive end, Meltzer first broke the rating scale for a June 3rd 1994 match at All Japan Pro Wrestling, which had been shooting 5 out regularly during the decade, between Mitsuharu Misawa and Toshiaki Kawada, which got 6 stars to symbolize he thought it might have been the greatest pro wrestling match of all time. Another match wouldn't get such a rating from Meltzer until the Wrestle Kingdom 11 main event between Kenny Omega and then-reigning IWGP Heavyweight champion Kazuchika Okada on January 4th 2017. Meltzer then later stated that the second match between Omega and Okada a few months later at Dominion 6.11 was better than the first, giving it 6.25 stars. A year later, at Dominion 6.9, the Omega/Okada 2 out of 3 falls title match scored seven stars.
  • WrestleCrap’s description of the Black Scorpion’s final appearance, where he landed in a spaceship, says, “On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the ultimate in stupidity, this rates 178.”
  • The infamous "MINUS. FIVE. STARS." given to the Sharmell/Jenna Morasca match at TNA's Victory Road 2009 by The Wrestling Observer Newsletter's Bryan Alvarez that eventually wound up in Botchamania's opening sequence.
  • Bryan Alvarez of Wrestling Observer rated the The Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff vs. The Bushwhackers match at the 1998 PPV, Heroes of Wrestling, "minus more stars than there are stars in the universe, and the universe is infinite". Similarly, Dave Meltzer rated the match as "Absolute Zero stars" note .
  • Meltzer was "impressed" again when he rated the abysmal main event of Hell In A Cell 2019, which ended in a no contest due to kayfabe fear of injury, as "-2 stars".

    Stand-Up Comedy 
  • A Running Gag for comedian Gabriel Iglesias is his scale of fatness. There used to be five levels on the scale: "Big", "Healthy", "Husky", "Fluffy", and "DAYUM!". Then he met people who were even fatter than "DAYUM!" and was forced to add a sixth level: "Aw HELL Naw!"
    Gabriel: What's the difference? You're still willing to work with Level 5. Example: If you're on an elevator, and you're with your friend, and this really big guy gets on, and you and your friend look at each other, and you're like, "Daaaaayum!" But you still let the big guy ride your elevator. That's the difference. Level 6? You see walking towards your elevator. [monstrous bellow] "Aw HELL naw!" [mashing the Close Door button] [bellow] "NO!" [bellow] "NO! NO!" [kicks fat guy out of elevator as doors close] That's the difference.

    Tabletop Games 
  • SandTrap, a reviewer of the early days of Pojo's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card of the Day, had a habit of doing this quite often, at one point complaining about the fact that the site disapproved of his giving bad cards ludicrously negative ratings, when all cards are supposed to be rated from 1 to 5. A notable example is in his review of Bite Shoes, a card which he gave a rating of -75 out of 5 and said that he would give anyone using it a No-Holds-Barred Beatdown until they died.
  • Mark Rosewater, head designer for Magic: The Gathering, has a "Storm Scale" of how unlikely he thinks it is for a particular mechanic to return to Standard, so named because the infamous Game Breaking mechanic "Storm" is the definition of a 10. The only mechanic he's ever given an 11 is That One Useless Useful Scrappy Mechanic, "Bands with other".

    Video Games 
  • The Angry Video Game Nerd claimed CrazyBus, a "game" (actually a tech demo) with no enemies, no obstacles, only one screen, awful graphics for a Sega Genesis game, an atrocious soundtrack, and no goal or purpose whatsoever other than driving the bus forward and backward by holding the D-Pad left or right for eternity broke the 'shit scale' and somehow managed to outclass in awfulness the two other games he had reviewed that he originally claimed were the worst games ever made, "Desert Bus" and Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing.
  • Apparently, Net Jak rewrote its code so that it could give Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing a zero.
  • For a fictional example, there’s this Penny Arcade strip. After enough bribes have been heaped up, Donkey Konga 2 winds up with an 11 out of 5 at Gamespy … (see this page for more info)
  • X-Play awarded that infamous E.T. game a ‘Zero’ out of five, measured on a scale that bottoms out at 1.
  • Guitar Hero got at least one 11/10 review.
    • Also, Super Mario Galaxy on the Italian Official Nintendo Magazine. As the magazine had always been known for being far too generous regarding scores to Nintendo games, readers’ backlash raged. Two years later, they gave its even better sequel a 10 out of 10.
  • Polish magazine CD-Action:
  • When the original Wing Commander was released in 1990, it broke several scales in the positive direction. Dragon, for example, rated it as six out of five stars.
  • Half-Life 2 was awarded an 11/10 by Maximum PC magazine. At the end of a rare-for-that-publication exclusive 5-page spread. If this took place in a gaming magazine, it would indicate an incredible amount of marketing control over the content of the magazine; as it is, with Maximum PC being a hardware-centric publication that happens to review games on occasion, and the long spreads devoted to a single game being a rarity rather than the norm, it just stands out as extreme fanboyism.
  • Computer Gaming World, which normally bottomed out at 1 star, had an ‘unholy trinity’ of games that received zero: Postal 2, Mistmare, and Dungeon Lords.
  • Electronic Gaming Monthly:
    • Averted by EGM—at the beginning and end of the column’s lifespan, "Seanbaby's Rest of the Crap" was for games that would warrant zeroes and negative scores on the normal rating scale used by the other reviewers. Pretty much the only reason he was doing this was for the humor value, since, as the very premise states, even the best of the games he reviewed were all the worst in shovelware.
    • Also played straight: The Guy Game, Mortal Kombat Advance and Ping Pals all received 0.0s from one of the 3 reviewers (with Ping Pals getting two zeroes).
  • Hex and Bajo (of Good Game) gave Robot Unicorn Attack an utterly "ridonkulous" score of 8971 rubber chickens (a standard unit on the show) out of 20.
  • Swedish gaming magazine Super PLAY gave Brütal Legend 11/10. There were likely a few reasons for this, one being that ‘this one goes to eleven’ just fits the nature of the game, the other one being that it was the last issue of the magazine and they broke quite a few rules in it.
  • IGN sometimes gives out a score of less than 1 out of 10, but only ever gave a zero once for a video game, for Olympic Hockey Nagano ’98 (the first thing they ever gave that score), because it was exactly the same game as Wayne Gretzky Hockey ’98 with a Palette Swap.
  • An in-game example of a similar system, but not used for ratings: In NetHack, wands and other magical items that have magical charges normally have some whole number of charges, between zero and a positive whole number, inclusive. If they run out by being used down to zero, they can (usually) be recharged. If you zap a wand of cancellation (whose spell is meant to erase magical effects) at them, their number of charges is set to –1: They can’t be recharged at all, even if you have scrolls of charging.
  • TOM from Toonami gave The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim a 100/10 (while the expansion Dawnguard only got an 8/10).
  • The Repton Resource Page rates the difficulty of individual Repton 3 levels on a 0–10 scale. Levels in the Expansion Packs exceeded a ‘10’ rating so often that the scale was changed to "more skulls = harder" without any specific maximum. So far, the highest rating given is 16.
  • Yahoo Games gave Batman: Arkham City a 6 out of 5.
  • Some Call Me Johnny gave Superman 64 a –64/10.
  • PC Power Play, which has a ten-point scale, gave The War Z (now known as Infestation: Survivor Stories) a rating of 0/10.
  • Zero Punctuation does not give numerical scores at all, but the original Portal still effectively broke the "scale". Yahtzee, who usually portrays games as horribly flawed and unplayable regardless of whether he likes them or not, said nothing negative about Portal and summarized his opinion as "...absolutely sublime from start to finish, and I will jam forks in my eyes if I ever use those words to describe anything else ever again."
    • Ride to Hell: Retribution won the Zero Punctuation "Lifetime Achievement Award for Total Abhorrence" in his Top 5 of 2013 episode instead of winning a slot on the Bottom 5 (led by Call of Duty: Ghosts), it being so horrible it wasn't even worthy of being the top worst game of that year. Consequently, when he later ranked his best and worst games of each year of the 2010s, Ride to Hell was listed outside of the Worst list (whose #1 was Hunt Down the Freeman) with a question mark, and pictured with a bottle of Jack Daniels in hand.
  • Game Players Magazine gave Cosmic Race a 0% (the only game to ever have this "honor") and even named the rating after the game; the next range up (1–9%) is "Shoot me" just to let the reader know how bad they felt the game was.
  • Game Pro Magazine, in the January 1997 issue, gave Battle Arena Toshinden URA for the Sega Saturn a 0.5 fun factor. Up until that point, the lowest score a game could get in ANY category (Graphics, Sound, Control, Fun Factor) was a 1.0. This (along with a rather negative fan reaction to the reviewer faces they were using at this time) was probably what prompted Gamepro to change their reviewing faces in the next issue.
  • Computer + Video Games reviewer Tim Metcalfe, who viewed bullfighting as Sick and Wrong, gave Ole, Toro a 0 (out of 10) in all categories but value, which was "less than 0."
  • In-game example: the "Turn it up to 11" achievement in Game Dev Tycoon requires that a reviewer give a score of 11/10 to one of your games. It's not easy, as you need the game to be utterly perfect to even stand a chance.
  • Amiga Concept, a French Amiga magazine, gave a -31% score to the Porting Disaster of Battletoads.
  • Each of the Downloadable Content map packs for New Super Mario Bros. 2 has a difficulty rating from one to five stars. The second hardest set, Nerve-Wrack Pack, is rated five stars. The hardest, the Impossible Pack, is rated "DANGER!"
  • The website Game Revolution often rates the video games it reviews on a five-star scale (with 1 star being the lowest). The first (and so far only) game to earn a zero-star rating from them was the Wii U minigame compilation Family Party: 30 Great Games Obstacle Arcade, citing that every single aspect of the game, right down to the title, was horrible.
  • When it comes to Pokémon's metagame, Pokémon are ranked on Smogon by tier from Uber to NU. However, Mega Rayquaza turned out to be so broken (in fact, the most broken Pokémon in the history of the franchise) that it actually got banned from Ubers and a new "tier" called Anything Goes had to be created just to house it! In short, Mega Rayquaza has in fact broke the metagame! The only other things to be banned to AG since then are Arceus in the Gen 4 metagame (albeit retroactively), Crowned Sword Zacian, and Dynamax in general.
  • Fire Emblem Awakening is another game to rate its DLC maps with a star system. One star is easy and five stars is difficult. The map known as Apotheosis forgoes this and is only described with but one word. "Insane".
  • Jimquisition usually uses .5 decimals, but the review of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess HD broke this pattern by giving it, naturally, an 8.8.
  • In Retropokon, Skapokon gave Bakushow (also known as LOL in the USA and Archime DS in Japan) a -1/10, and even refused to call it a "game".
  • In his step-by-step reviews of every single Pokémon, Bogleech typically reviews each Pokémon a scale of 'one to five Poké Balls'. Some Pokémon, however, such as Gloom or Paras among others, receive a rating of ' five gold Poké Balls', while Gallade and Lucario earn a rating of 'rotting, rancid Lucario skull' out of five.
  • NGamer gave the Nintendo DS game Secret Flirts II a score of -47, calling it "a hateful piece of software".
  • Ross's Game Dungeon usually gives out a maximum of three awards at the end of every review, usually detailing the most interesting or noteworthy aspects of the game. Maabus had so many interesting elements, that Ross decided to give it an extra fourth award: Best Story by a Six-Year-Old.
  • In one episode of Judgement Day, Tommy gave the game High Heat Baseball 2003 a 0.0. He really disliked the game and thought it had no good qualities.
  • Australian magazine N 64 Gamer gave Perfect Dark a rating of 101%, with a part of their long review dedicated to why the rating was 101% instead of just 100%.
  • Fate/Grand Order rates most Servants on a scale of one star to five stars, with (in general) the one-star Servants being the weakest and most common and the five-stars being the strongest and rarest. Angra Mainyu, though, is considered in-story and out to be so horribly weak that he is rated a zero-star Servant. (He's treated in-game as a two-star in terms of his cost and max level, and he has stats roughly on par with one, but his skillset and Noble Phantasm are so awful that they drag him down on the tier list.) Ironically, he's also regarded as even rarer than a five-star.

    Webcomics 
  • Cucumber Quest uses video-game-styled profile pictures on the cast page that list the characters’ stats. Several of them break the rating scale.
    • Cucumber’s dad has a Jerk rating that goes right off the side of the page. He's the only one who even has a "Jerk" rating.
    • The Big Bad breaks the rating scale on every possible stat!
    • All of Peridot's stats just say "better than Almond."
  • In Freefall, Raibert subverts this. When asked if something is a ten on a "How bad is it?" scale, he says 8.5 — nothing is a ten, because things can always get worse.
  • Sexy Losers is the highest scoring entry on the List Of Potentially Offensive Webcomics, having been awarded six "toilets" out of a possible five.

    Web Original 
  • One episode of Plumbing the Death Star ranks the original Super Smash Bros.'s cast's stepfathering ability on a scale of ten. Things start off pretty bad when the two Pokémon both get zeroes for being wild animals, but things get even worse with Donkey Kong, a wild ape who can't talk, and worse, comes with in-laws. He gets a negative ten out of ten.
  • On Cinema: Tim has at times given films six bags of popcorn (the show's version of star ratings) despite claiming the highest rating is 5 bags of popcorn (although, there is sometimes inconsistency with what the highest rating is).
  • In the Bogleech reviews of Pokémon characters from the Gen 1 games and anime, Wojcik apparently feels so strongly about Team Rocket that he gives them a ten... out of five.
  • Filmmaker Dan Bell has two main series on his YouTube channel: one where he explores dying/dead malls, and another where he explores creepy and/or sleazy hotels and motels across the country with his friends. They often rate the properties on a 1-5 scale with 5 being best, given how rundown they are. After discovering a motel in Maryland where the rooms were literally covered in blood, one of Bell's companions gave the room a 0.

    Web Videos 
  • When rating the use of English in a music video the Eat Your Kimchi scale is 1–5 with 5 the highest rating. Simon gave rapper G. Dragon a 37 out of 5 for the English in Get Your Crayon.
  • In Demo Reel, Jimmy Boyd's movie Jingle Sells received 0.2 stars on IMDb. The lowest rating a movie can receive is 1.
  • On That Guy with the Glasses, The Rap Critic rated Lupe Fiasco's song "Bitch Bad" a 6 out of 5, and then explains: "Yeah, I can go over the limits of my own rating system—if I can have a zero, I can have a six!" (This actually wasn't the first song he had given a rating of 6.)
  • On Atop the Fourth Wall, Linkara lists the "Top 15 Worst Comics I've Ever Reviewed." However, before he begins, he notes that Holy Terror, of course, is the worst comic he's reviewed, so he's taking that off the list just so that the #1 spot will be a surprise. Technically, this makes the list "Top 15 Worst Comics I've Ever Reviewed, Other than Holy Terror," but that wasn't as catchy.
  • Double Toasted's rating system mostly corresponds to a four-star scale: "Full Price", "Matinee", "Rental" and "Some Ol' Bullshit". They break the scale on both ends: On the "Better than good" scale, there's "Better Than Sex". On the opposite end, there's "Fuck You" — reserved for the worst of the worst or a movie that pushed one of the hosts' Berserk Buttons.
  • The crew of Wreckless Eating ordinarily rate the dishes they eat on a scale of one to five (insert reviewer's name) faces, but they've encountered so many awful foods that they've had to extend the scale downward. Anything they would only eat again if they were starving to death gets a Big F.U.; anything they still wouldn't touch if they were starving to death receives 5 out of 5 F.U.'s.
  • Brutalmoose, in his "Brutalfoods" review of Lunchables pizza, assigns "Ian Points" to the various boxes. For the first meal (all-cheese pizzas) he grants it 10 points for the pizzas themselves, 8 for the Capri-Sun drink, and 15 for the Air Head dessert... then takes away 100 for the incredibly terrible comic that came with it, giving it a final score of -67. For the second (pepperoni and cheese) he grants 2 for the pizza, 9 for the Capri-Sun and 10 for the Crunch bar, then takes away 500 for another comic that is not only terrible, but is in fact the exact same one as the first, leaving it at -479. The third (deep-dish) gets 5 for the pizza, 3 for the Cheez-Its, 7 for the fruit roll-up, 1 for the Kool-Aid mix, 20 for the water bottle the Kool-Aid goes into... and then takes away 20,000 because he decided to put at least a bit of all the other ingredients into the Kool-Aid and drink it all at once, to which he jokes "they didn't tell me that I had to do this, but it's still their fault somehow" and leaving it with -19,964 points. By the time of the fourth (a "healthier" organic version) he's crossing over into the Meaningless Value area, giving it no Ian Points whatsoever and, when summing up the scores at the end, labeling it as simply "BAD".
  • JelloApocalypse's "Every [blank] Reviewed in Ten Words or Less" series initially used a positive/negative 1-10 scale (with the positives being based on genuine enjoyment and the negatives being based on So Bad, It's Good factor), but he felt the need to add a 0 after watching Monsters vs. Aliens. Since then, a few other movies have also gotten stuck with one.
  • Rata of Rank 10 YGO uses either a 1-3 scale or a 1-5 scale in various categories to grade archetypes, but gave the Sparrow Family series a 0/5 on every category, with the exception of Versatility (which dictates the kinds of threats the deck can be built to respond to), which got a -1/5. As he put it, "these guys could lose to a deck of Uno cards."
  • Fasion Photo Ruview is a web series in which Raja and Raven, alumni of RuPaul's Drag Race, give their opinions on various fashion outfits, most often the runways from that week's episode of Drag Race but also sometimes actual runways or drag queen's social media posts. The show uses a simple two-point scale for the most part; "Toot" if a look is good, "Boot" if it's bad. However, there have been certain outfits on the show that have caused the two to go beyond the two-point system, in both directions:
    • Chi Chi DeVayne's Book Ball outfit, which she made entirely out of paper by herself, was deemed to go beyond a Toot in terms of quality, and led to Raja inventing the "Shoot" to appreciate its excellence. Several exceptional looks since have received Shoots.
    • ... On the other end of the scale, while Kim Chi and Naomi Smalls were rating several of Raja and Raven's looks, they were confused by an outfit of Raja's that looked like it was pulled out of the closet, and crowned the "Scoot" for looks worse than just a Boot.
    • Upon seeing Peppermint's poorly-done & mismatched makeover of a crew member, Raja called it a "Poot" because of how bad it was. When Raven pointed out that Scoot already exists, Raja claimed "A Poot's worse than a Scoot." Meaning Peppermint's outfit was so bad it broke an already broken rating scale!
    • Raja felt so saddened by Dusty Ray Bottom's martian look that she gave it a "Bless": A rating which encompasses when you see an outfit and say "aw, bless" and can't bring yourself to judge it further.
    • During Season 10's Mermaid runway, Aja served as a stand-in judge for Raven. She believed that Monique Heart's look met the baseline expectations of a mermaid-themed runway, but didn't go above or beyond in any way, leading her to create "Noot" for a look she felt truly neutral about.
    • For Naomi Small's stunning Final Four look on All Stars 4, Raja and Aquaria both give it a Shoot, but Raja further gives it a "Gawdammit", the only emotion she is able to convey over the look.
    • One week, Katya and Violet Chachki are tasked with reviewing Taylor Swift's runway looks, after openly admitting there are not big Taylor Swift fans. After tearing into many of her looks in a row, they decided to break the tradition of giving a "Top Toot of the Week" to the look they most like, and instead reward a "Top Boot of the Week" to the look they hated most.
  • In Scott the Woz's video covering E3 1995, the same video that introduced his five knee-slap scale (a standard for his videos covering the various E3 conferences, keeping this from being a Meaningless Comparison), Sony's "$299" moment caused Scott to slap his knee at such a rapid and continuous rate that he was visibly scarred and bloody, going up to fourteen knee-slaps before the video cut away from Scott slapping his knee.

    Western Animation 
  • Seanbaby gave the Challenge of the Super Friends version of The Riddler a –1. He gave Aquaman a 1. He did explain the logic behind it: Riddler is as useless as an ordinary human being would be against the Superfriends, and then makes it worse by giving away the Legion of Doom’s plans in his puzzles. He’s actually a 2 for the heroes’ side subtracted from his basic 1, making The Riddler, “as useless as an ordinary human being”, a better hero than Aquaman.
    • An earlier version of the page gave Marvin, Wendy, Wonder Dog, and Gleek all a zero, ranking them below Aquaman. Unlike Riddler, there wasn't any special logic besides them just being that useless.
  • In the Gravity Falls short "Mabel's Guide to Dating", Soos somehow scores a twelve out of five on Mabel's dating quiz.
    Soos: My grandma was right all along, I am the world's most perfect man!
  • In one episode of The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, Jimmy and his friends somehow manage to win 8th place in a contest with only 7 entrants.
  • In one episode of Johnny Bravo, Johnny and Suzy entered a competition that (thanks to Johnny) they got 18th place in, when there were only twelve contestants.
  • The Simpsons: In "Strong Arms of Ma", Marge develops agoraphobia after being mugged by a hobo. During an attempt by the family to help Marge overcome her agoraphobia, she is told to describe her anxiety level using a number from one to ten. However, while Homer attempts to get rid of a beehive, Marge says "12," then "15". When the swarm of bees attack the family, Marge screams, "703!"
  • In an episode of The Emperor's New School, Yzma creates a clone of Kuzco to fail all of his classes. At one point he gets a G- on a test.
  • Regular Show has an example when Rigby is trying to make a videogame for Mordecai, and he has to pass physical and intellectual tests, that are graphed. His results in the intellectual test are so low that his result doesn't even appear on the graph; conversely, the physical test results were so high that the graph's upper limit wasn't high enough to correctly gauge his result.

    Other 
  • In the aftermath of the 2009 Australian bushfires, authorities introduced a new fire danger category above "Extreme", named "Catastrophic—Code Red".
  • In physics, the Mohs scale of hardness is defined as capping out at 10 with diamond, which was at the time the hardest substance known to man. Aggregated diamond nanorod, or "hyperdiamond", is much harder than diamond and thus goes off the top of the scale.
  • Oil prices at Canadian gas stations used to be advertised with large placards that only go up to 99.9 cents/litre. When gas prices finally went through the dollar/litre ceiling in 2009, there was a lot of bitter joking on the streets of Toronto over the "suddenly cheap gas" as gas stations were forced to display the new prices as 4.7 for 104.7 cents/litre.
  • In 2012, Hurricane Sandy was renamed "Superstorm" Sandy by many commentators, as it wasn't technically a hurricane by the time it landed, but the size of the storm and destruction it caused (the second-costliest on record for the United States until 2017) was well beyond that of a "mere" tropical storm.
  • In the United States, the USDA rates meat quality from Canner to Prime on grades 1–5. The Japanese-made Kobe Beef had a reputation for being un-rateable due to being too good.
  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rates the safety of cars on a scale of 1–5 stars. The Tesla Motors Model S electric car got a score of 5.4 stars. Apparently, not having an engine up front gives the Model S a large crumple zone.
  • Jew or Not Jew rates how Jewish people are on a scale of 0–15 based on heritage, appearance/behavior, and how proud they would be to have them as Jews. Adolf Hitler, naturally, got a –1 on the last one, with a total score of 0 (weighed down by a 1 in appearance). Queen Elizabeth II got a total score of 4.5 (a distant ancestor was Jewish).
  • The January 1985 issue of Britain's Car magazine had a comparison test of four "poverty" cars: the Citroen 2CV, the Lada Riva, the Reliant Rialto, and the Skoda Estelle. For the occasion, they made up a rating system called the "Cavalier Rating", where a car got 10 points in a category if it was as good as a Vauxhall Cavalier 1.6 GL and no points if it was as bad as a Fiat 126. The three-wheeled Rialto was given a "handling/stability" rating of -5.
  • The US Armed Forces' service-independent aptitude test, the ASVAB, can work like this. Someone who scores well on, for example, the Air Force's score breakdown will completely annihilate the Army's breakdown.
  • The Dvorak Intensity Scale, used to measure hurricane intensity, maxes out at 8.0. Hurricane Patrica registered an 8.3
  • After Swedish football defender Glenn Hysen pretty much single-handedly kept England from scoring in the away match during the qualifications for the 1990 World Cup, the newspaper Expressen rated his performance as six out of five. To this day, he's the only player to get that rating.
  • Dark Bunny Sauces are rated from 0-10, with empty and filled-in pepper symbols demonstrating the heat rating on the bottle itself (0 depicts all peppers as empty, 10/10 shows them all filled). Bradley's Blood, Nuclear Narwhal, Obscure Octopus, Rabbit's Revenge, and both versions of Terrified Trashpanda (tea-based and coffee-bassed) clock in at 11/10; the tenth pepper is depicted as bursting. Then there's Wailing Werecat which takes this type Up to Eleven by going up to 12.
  • During the May 3, 1999 tornado outbreak, the National Weather Service introduced a new alert above "Tornado Warning", being "Tornado Emergency", indicating a violent tornado that could produce more damage and more fatalities than usual.
  • Clint's Reptiles considered the king cobra to be a 0/5 in Handleability, the category determining how much you can play with a pet. It shouldn't take much explaining as to why, but the fact that he considered other poisonous snakes like the gaboon viper or rattlesnake, or even large predators like the American alligator, to be a 1/5, expresses just how dangerous the cobra is.

Meaningless Comparison ("Final Score: 7 Bananas.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • Zac Bertschy of Anime News Network awarded Silver Spoon with “3 moos out of five” and Free! with "4-pack, halfway to a 6, gotta do more crunches this summer" (probably meaning 4/5).

    Film 
  • The Dread Central review of Birdemic: 5 out of 5 Exploding Eagles (same as the The 13th Alley review).
  • In film critic Leonard Maltin’s movie guide, he gives the movie The Naked Gun 33⅓ a rating of 2⅓ stars, the only time he has given anything a score not in an increment divisible by one-half (or BOMB). In his review of The Naked Gun, he gives it 2½ stars and parenthetically explains, "What else?"

    Live-Action TV 
  • On Saturday Night Live's Weekend Update recurring character Aunt Linda (played by Kristen Wiig) gives such ratings as "seven 'Ghaaas?' and one-and-a-half 'Yougottabe Frigginkiddingme!'" (Note that those were both for one work.)
  • Lampshaded in the The Office (US) episode "Beach Games": Pam is keeping track of the points that Michael gives various competitors in the office games, but Michael keeps changing the method in which he rates them (i.e., a gold star to the winner of event 1, 10 points for event 2, a checkmark in event 3, etc.). The end result is that Pam can’t convert the scores over between events and has no idea who's actually winning.
  • In Red Dwarf, Dave Lister frequently talks about writing Michelin Guides or similar about various settings, resulting in Legion getting a psycho rating of "four and a half chainsaws, maybe five". Rimmer suggests that the G-Tower from The Tank in series 8 probably gets “the full five slop-out buckets” in the guide to Penal Hell-Holes.

    Music 
  • Music critic Anthony Fantano (theneedledrop) gave The Lonely Island's Turtleneck and Chain 5 dicks out of 10.

    Professional Wrestling 
  • When pro wrestling reviewer Scott Keith has to review a particularly horrendous match, and the 5-star to negative 5-star system fails to express how disgusted he is with the product, he breaks out the "Hot Poker up the Ass" rating system. The general idea behind is that he takes one person (usually the main guy responsible for the horrible show, such as Vince Russo) and rates each segment by the number of hot pokers that person deserves to have shoved up their ass for subjecting viewers to it. Kevin Nash and WCW announcer Tony Schiavone have been victims of this as well.
    • Another example he used once was the "Shane McMahon Unconditional ReFund" (SMURF), supposedly based on an incident in which a friend of his was sitting behind Shane at a show and got paid actual cash money to quit complaining about the show. Basically, how bad each match was would be measured by the approximate refund amount to justify not complaining about it.
  • Bryan Alvarez described the nWo Souled Out Pay-Per-View from 1997 as "twenty asses."

    Video Games 
  • X-Play regularly gives its review scores nonsensical values, usually related to the game being reviewed, somehow.
  • Penny Arcade has a comic where Gabe and Tycho briefly review Madden 13, ending with a game review score of 9x and 3/(two footballs).
  • BlazBlue: Cross Tag Battle has official stats for each character measuring their Attack, Speed, Range, Casualnote , and Luck, on a scale of one to eight stars. For some characters, however, the Luck stat is replaced with something else:
    • Rachel Alucard has a Georg score of three frogs, a reference to her using a frog named George XIII extensively in her space control strategies from her home series.
    • Iron Tager has a GETBnote  score of eight stars.
    • Nu-13 has a Ragna score of five hearts.
    • Jubei's luck stat is replaced with paw prints, and this stat has a score of four additional sets of paw prints.
    • Hakumen has a Counter score of five stars.
    • Gordeau has a Grim Reaper score of six stars.
    • Carmine has a Blood score or six stars.
    • Badass Adorable characters such as Es, Platinum, Orie, and Ruby replace their luck stats with "Kawaii" stats, which range ten to twelve stars.

    Web Video 
  • When Bro Team Pill reviews a game, its rating always nonsensical. F.E.A.R. 2 got a "I would rate this game". Garshasp got a "Cool out of yes". Battlefield 3's review concluded with him reviewing the review video, claiming it's better than his FEAR review.
  • Whenever ProJared does a review for an older game, he'll give it something like "a bucket of tears out of ten". This is to be more comprehensive than a simple score so he has good reason (as he'll always use it in a metaphorical way to express how he's feeling about the game, such as giving Chrono Trigger "a clock without hands out of ten", or "timeless"). When he reviews a current game he'll use a regular numerical rating. He also straddles the line with Meaningless Value as, in one video, he awarded Oscar a "f—- you out of 10" because it aggravated him so much (though he still stuck to his nominal metaphor-based assessment as well).
  • The Tourettes Guy tried out a mattress at Sears, and only gave the comment "Triple H would shit his pants."
  • Ram Zaes has a series called Fandoms in a Nutshell which ends with him rating the fandom with a nonsensical, but related value out of 10. For example, he gave the Danganronpa fandom a seesaw out of 10.
  • The Pop Arena grades every Goosebumps book , "[an inanimate object] out of 10."note 

    Web Original 

    Other 

Meaningless Value ("Up Yours out of 10.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • Zac Bertschy from Anime News Network was infamous for these during the annual season previews, especially harem comedies and ecchi shows. Here's a list:
  • Jacob Hope Chapman aka JesuOtaku has become prone to these since he started working with ANN in preview guides, often for the same reasons as Bertschy.
  • The Pop Team Epic anime's pilot achieved the rare and dubious honor of getting this type of score from almost every ANN reviewer. Nick Creamer gave it a "Two middle fingers right the heck up there." Lynzee Loveridge gave it a "I think my brain is bleeding." James Beckett gave it a negative 5 out of 5, and said attempting to score it properly would be "an exercise in futility." Theron Martin gave it a "WTF." Jacob Chapman, true to form, rated it "╭∩╮('・ω・´)╭∩╮". Its only legitimate score was a 1.5/5 from Rebecca Silverman.

    Film 
  • CHUD.com's infamous "Fuck You Out of 10" review of the Halloween (2007) remake.
  • Dread Central reviewer Scott Foy’s now trademark “FUCK THIS MOVIE” rating. Foy doesn’t use profanity often, so when one of his reviews contains the phrase (and now rating) “Fuck this movie” it means that the film in question is really bad.
  • Spill.com (an online movie review site) gives a rating of "Fuck You" for movies they absolutely hated. They've got "Full Price!!", "Matinee!", "Rental", and "Some Bullshit!" as the other ratings instead of a numbered scale, but "Fuck You" is not in their regular rating scale. However, sometimes they find films so bad and offensive that they can't even give it "Some old bullshit", instead resorting to this. Often accompanied with a picture of Korey flipping the bird.
    • Disaster Movie was the first movie they reviewed to earn this dubious honor.
    • Vampires Suck in this review. Spill's video reviews are usually 4–5 minutes long and have the profanity spoken by the reviewers censored. The review is only 44 seconds long, consisting only of a clip from the film, which then cuts to a disgusted Korey staring blankly at the camera for several seconds before issuing his “Fuck You” rating, which this time goes uncensored.
  • Sue at Mutant Reviewers from Hell gave Grave of the Fireflies a rating of “GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!
  • Phelous, a reviewer of bad horror movies from That Guy with the Glasses, described A Serbian Film as the worst thing he’s ever watched. And he’s watched movies like Birdemic and Five Across the Eyes.
    • Notable is the fact that he usually watches a movie for a review twice (once just to watch it, and again to take notes) and he was so disgusted with it he refused to watch it again after the first viewing.

    Live-Action TV 
  • Victoria Jackson’s tenure on Saturday Night Live in the late 1980s shaded into this trope. Her rating scale was “4: Pretty good. 3: Best movie ever. 2: Worst movie ever. 1: Pretty good.”
  • Conan O'Brien does this on occasion with his Clueless Gamer reviews. He usually starts by noting that he’s the worst possible person to review games as the last game he was good at was Pong, and then ends with a completely nonsensical rating—and rating scale.
    Conan: Out of an 88—an 88 being pretty good, a 110 being excellent, a 150 being awful, and a 3 being... not bad—I'd give this... a 26 C.

    Music 
  • Pitchfork seems prone to this:
    • They gave Jet’s Shine On the rating “video of a chimp drinking its own piss”. (After a site redesign, a 0.0 score is displayed; the video is posted where the review would be.)
    • Their rating of Radiohead’s In Rainbows seemed like this: instead of a score, there was an input box for users to submit scores (a reference to the band’s ‘pay what you feel like’ distribution method for this album). However, upon entering a score, the editor’s score (9.3 out of 10) became visible. However, after a site redesign, only the reviewer’s score remains.
    • They gave Do You Like Rock Music?, the second album by English rockers British Sea Power, the rating of U2.
    • They gave Meow The Jewels, the joke remix album of Run The Jewels 2 a cat emoji with heart-shaped Wingding Eyes, likely meant as a positive rating.
  • Cokemachineglow's alleged review of Starflyer 59's Dial M (which began with the reviewer admitting that they could not objectively review the album, and immediately derailed into a rage-filled rant against Christian Rock) gave the album a score of "†%".
  • Terrorizer magazine gave Sunn O)))’s album Monoliths and Dimensions the rating O))). They actually intended this as a compliment, however, awarding it a glowing review.
  • Anthony Fantano typically rates albums and mixtapes on a 10 point scale — but if he really doesn't like an album, he refuses to assign it a number at all, and simply calls it NOT GOOD (complete with explosion SFX).

    Podcasts 
  • Medium Popcorn has a four-star ratings scale: "Small", "Medium", "Large" and "Extra-Large". For those movies they deem unworthy of even a "Small", they have the rating of "Pile of Dog Shit" And they can (and do) add as many piles on to the rating as they feel, depending on how much the movie in question pissed them off. For example, co-host Justin Brown gave Good Burger (which he despised) thirty-six piles of dog shit ("Twelve bags of dog shit, with each bag containing three piles").

    Video Games 
  • Angry Joe's review of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is both this and still within bounds. He wishes he could give the game Kevin Spacey out of 10 before lamenting that that isn't a score on his scale and just giving it a 6/10
  • Sure, the rating scale of ScrewAttack’s VGR show is pretty idiosyncratic in itself (“Buy It”, “Rent It” and “F It”), but they still do occasionally play with the scale for certain games. For example, Modern Warfare 2 was given a “rent it, just never return it” in protest of Activision’s infamous price hike they demanded for that game.
  • During his stint at Electronic Gaming Monthly reviewing horrible games, Seanbaby once gave a Trolls game a score of "a picture of a Troll riding a Hotdog."
  • The highly divisive Shmup Space Giraffe received what The Other Wiki describes as an "unusual" rating of "Holy crap this is awesome hell yes/10" from a review on Angry Gamer.
  • JonTron's "Game Reviews?" hand out scores that do not make sense at all, such as an A out of 5 for Sonic Colors and 6 Golden Bananas+ out of Shigeru Miyamoto for Donkey Kong Country Returns.
  • A variant in The Grimoire of Marisa, wherein Marisa rates and offers her opinions on some of the many spellcards in the series. Marisa’s rating scale itself is fairly normal, giving the spellcard a certain number of stars based on her perceived difficulty of "Referencing" the spell. However, she sometimes breaks the “difficulty level" boundary and rates some by "Show-Off Level," "Temperature," "Believability," "Volume," and "Whimsicalness."
  • Top Ten FTW's Top 10 Most Difficult Games introduced a Frustration Index Meter that gave mostly nonsensical scores like "Balls deep in that ass" and "Double Obama Teriyaki"
  • TOM from Toonami liked Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag that he reviewed it before finishing it, and noted he doesn't want it to end. So he gave it a score of "ARRRRRRRR!"
  • Paul Tassi of Forbes expressed a mixture of horror and addition when reviewing Flappy Bird, questioning how a game so inherently pointless and low quality could become a major phenomenon. In light of its inexplicable fame and appeal, he rated it "Cthulhu/10".
  • In response to many publishers in the game industry abusing Metacritic and other review aggregate websites as a means of awarding "merit" based bonuses to developers, a lot of websites (Such as Kotaku, Ars Technica, and Joystiq) that review video games no longer give out a quantifiable score as an "Up yours" to the industry.
  • The closest thing Yahtzee, the host of Zero Punctuation, gave to a numerical value was one of these. In his 2019 Games I Haven't Reviewed Roundup, his final score for Terminator Resistance was Fine out of 10.
  • In-Universe in Undertale. Checking Temmie reveals that, instead of having ATK and DEF scores, she's just "RATED TEM OUTTA TEM". The Mad Dummy also breaks the scale by having a DEF score of "YES".
  • Furcadia has a seasonal contest for minigames (called Dreams), and one well-known creator—known as Graphite—experienced a variation of this (as his creations were contest entries, there were no ratings beyond First Place, Second Place, Third Place, etc.).
    Graphite was sure his creation ColdFusion (essentially a game of Atomica built on the Furcadia platform) would win because his creation was so innovative and different. He took patching (adding special graphics) and skinning (altering the appearance of the game interface itself), and DragonSpeak (scripting) to such an extreme that his game didn't resemble Furcadia at all.
    Unfortunately, this meant the judges had no idea how to rank it, and so placed it in a category all its own. To quote Graphite, "This dream was in fact so innovative that the judges decided to create a special category for my dream alone in which I ended up getting first place, last place, and every place in-between."
    The judges did agree that the dream was So Cool, It's Awesome, gave it a glowing review, and awarded Graphite handsomely for essentially taking DragonSpeak and Patching and creating something that didn’t resemble Furcadia at all in either appearance or gameplay. To quote Felorin (Co-Founder of Furcadia), “This dream is going to receive a special Puzzling, Mind-boggling, Patching and DragonSpeak Mastering Trickster award of Triwings for Life and a dozen Purple Roses. (Whew that’s a mouthful!)”
    Sadly, every update made to Furcadia since then makes the dream less and less compatible, and its virtually unplayable now.

    Web Original 

Impossible to Rate ("What.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • Zac Bertschy of Anime News Network gave the first episode of Upotte!!!! a rating of “WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT”.
  • Hope Chapman rated Prison School "???".
  • Apparently the first episode of Pop Team Epic broke everybody on ANN, with the majority of the scores being this.

    Fan Works 
  • Rage Reviews (a review group on Fimfiction.Net) normally grades fanfics on a scale of 0% to 100% Rage. For stories that exist on a completely different axis, they have a few other scores: "??%" for stories that are too confusing to inspire rage, "MEH" for stories that are too boring to get angry over, and "SAD" for stories that just make the reviewer feel sorry for the author.

    Comic Books 
  • Paul O’Brien of The X-Axis picked up Quantum and Woody #32, on the assumption that a relaunch of a title, which had as its gimmick that stuff had happened in all the unpublished issues since the cancellation, would be a great out-of-context jumping-on point. He was wrong, and rated it n/a, on the basis that he simply couldn’t judge what someone who knew what the hell was going on might get out of it.

    Film 
  • Animal House features this, when Dean Wormer dresses down the group for their terrible grades. Though most of them get C's at most, and D's and F's more frequently, D-Day's grade isn't applicable - he hasn't done enough work to be counted as having completed a single course.

    Live-Action TV 
  • MythBusters (see above) once had a myth fail to yield useful results—the Supersize JATO Rocket Car, because the rocket car blew up before it could launch off the ramp. Adam decided to call this myth “Appropriately Supersized”.

    Music 
  • Mixed with Meaningless Comparison in Jon Savage's review of Nurse With Wound’s 1979 LP Chance Meeting on a Dissecting Table of a Sewing Machine and an Umbrella for Sounds magazine, in which he gave the album "????? out of five" instead of the usual five stars (he couldn't decide whether it was "pure genius" or "sheer nonsense").
  • Similarly, Pitchfork’s review of Robert Pollard’s Relaxation of the Asshole gave it both a 0.0 and a 10.0 (the current version of the site just displays the 0.0 though).
  • This review of Toby Keith's "American Ride", in which he is so baffled by the song (he can't seem to pinpoint whether it's an Indecisive Parody, So Bad, It's Good, or a Mind Screw), ending his review in "I'm afraid the 'Ride' has just left me stranded too deeply in WTF-limbo to render a verdict." He eschews the site's A-to-F rating scale to give the song a rating of "AMERICA!… I mean, N/A."
  • Pascal Wyse's review of William Shatner's 2004 spoken-word album Has Been in The Guardian, in which he eschewed the paper's normal 1- to 5-star scale, instead calling it "beyond the star system".
    This CD is beyond good or bad. It is from a world where concepts such as "unique" and "indispensible" [sic] live happily alongside "hilariously, brain-tearingly wrong".

    Professional Wrestling 
  • 411Mania reviewer Larry Csonka admitted he had no idea what rating to give the 2020 Money In The Bank ladder match(es)note , although he said he enjoyed it overall.
  • On a recap of WWE Raw on Bleacher Report, the segment of Lana and Bobby Lashley's marriage puzzled the writer so much that he gave it a "Grade: WTF".

    Video Games 
  • NGamer gave ??% to Bakushow (aka LOL), on the grounds that its score depends entirely on what the player makes of it.
    • WarioWare: DIY got 100%, as the game itself is one of making games. The thinking was that NGamer made all the games, and NGamer is infallible. Therefore, NGamer’s games must be perfect.
    • On separate occasions under its previous names (NGC Magazine and N64 Magazine), it awarded scores of ??% to two Japan-only games that they found completely unable to comprehend- GiFTPiA on the Gamecube (which they suspected was probably really good) and Get A Love: Panda Love Unit on the Nintendo 64 (with the mini-review reading “Impenetrable Japanese girlfriend simulator. No, hang on, That Came Out Wrong.”)
    • It also gave a DS entry in the Cabela hunting series ":(" and Mizuiro Blood "???".
    • Similarly, the UK Nintendo Official Magazine gave a blank space where the percentage score traditionally was for Phantasy Star Online Episode III: C.A.R.D. Revolution. The review essentially degenerated into a series of screenshots of humorous quotes sent to random online opponents.
  • PC Gamer UK once gave a terrible University management game XX% and the review was written as a multiple choice exam so the reader could choose the final score. The highest possible was no more that 10% and the lowest was a flat 0.
  • When TOM from Toonami reviewed Dropship: United Peace Force for the PlayStation 2 the game received a “?” rating. Tom had no idea how to rate the game since he could never get past the sixth level. This was accompanied by repeated footage of TOM losing on that level. (And per the guy in charge of Toonami, to this day, they still haven't beaten it.)
  • Equestria Gaming has handed out “Ungradeable—??/10” ratings on occasion.
  • In a case of it being this trope or Readings Are Off the Scale, Symposium of Post-mysticism’s author Akyuu gives ratings for friendliness and power. Unlike Perfect Memento in Strict Sense, which had definite ratings, she actually gives out “Unknown” ratings for when she cannot define the character. Reiuji Utsuho is a unique case: both areas are rated as “Unknown”.
  • Video game magazine Zzap64! already did this in 1987 when they reviewed the Shoot 'Em Up Construction Kit. This is mainly due to the fact that they thought that the game's quality depends on the things that you make with it. They said however that the game is a great tool to make shoot 'em ups with which is why they awarded it a gold medal. This has probably made this trope Older Than They Think.
  • When it came to the Pokémon Metagame on Smogon, during the fifth Generation, Zen Mode Darmanitan ended up the only Pokémon never to leave the Limbo tier due to the fact that it doesn't enter its Zen Mode unless its HP was at half or less, thus they couldn't figure out its usability. In the sixth Generation, however, they now list Zen Mode Darmanitan in UU (the same as normal Darmanitan) because it's effectively an ability of Darmanitan (one which almost never sees play) rather than a separate Pokémon.

    Web Video 
  • The Hardcore Kid gives works a rating of "Hardcore Hit" if he likes them, and "Hardcore Headache" if he doesn't. Marvin Marvin got a "Hardcore Tumor" because of how reprehensible he found it, and Bagi, the Monster of Mighty Nature a "Hardcore Catflap" because it was such a Mind Screw to him.
  • In his review of Lunchables pizzas, Brutalmoose awards each product made-up Ian Points ranging from -67 to BAD.
  • On The Music Video Show had this in one episode. Near the end of each episode, the host sums up his feelings towards the video with Final Thoughts. In this episode, it is part of a Robot Chicken sketch involving a man throwing himself out a window, followed by a black screen with the words, "AND THAT'S HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER" with Are You Afraid of the Dark music.
  • TierZoo couldn't rank the players of the very, very weird Abyssal Server because nobody has any real knowledge of it aside from a few screenshots and twitch clips—just enough to make it clear that the server is completely different from any other. (In other words, he couldn't rank the animals of the ocean floor because scientists have very little information about it and the conditions are incomparable to anything on land.)
  • Rank 10 YGO had this response to Ojamas, apparently grading it on every scale to be an Ojama King/3. He acknowledged that if the deck were to be graded conventionally as a single archetype, it would probably be named average at best at every grade - but as the deck is more of an unusual engine of highly variable synergy and quality rather than a conventional archetype, this wouldn't really work.
    "You can't grade Ojamas. They're like an engine, if the engine was a double-A battery powering up the entire USS Enterprise... Ojamas are actually decently consistent, but it's like having a lifetime supply of bootleg game consoles. No matter how many of them there are and no matter how much they try to convince you, that's not a Playstation and there is no such game as Super Mario Bros 16."
    • Similarly, Kaijus got a Minilla/5 on every scale, for about the same reason - dedicated "pure" kaiju builds are almost impossible and the deck is far more useful as a removal engine in something else, making traditional grades much less applicable.
    • Frogs also got no rating, again, because the deck is almost never played "pure" and works mainly as an engine in other Water-based decks.
  • In the 2020 Quarter Three FIMI video, Crash Thompson (Formerly The Rock Critic) reacted to Will Wood's The Normal Album with a bewildered look, a tilted head, and a very confused "Huh?" And "Huh?/5" was the rating it got.

    Web Original 

    Other 
  • The aforementioned Dark Bunny sauces also has Bunny's Garden 2016 and Bunny's Cupboard, each with a heat rating of ?/10; while Rabbit's Rub and Heffalump are listed as variable.

Refusal to Rate ("Scores don't apply here.")

    Anime and Manga 
  • Zac Bertschy refused to rate the anime adaptation of Bunny Drop (the space where the rating would go reads "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ENDING", somewhat crossing over with an Up Yours rating), as Zac couldn't get over the creepiness of the original source material's ending where the adoptive father/daughter duo marry each other, but still held out hope that the anime would end differently, as he thought the story was enjoyable up until that point.

    Comic Books 
  • The X-Axis again: Paul didn’t give a rating to the 2004 relaunch of X-Force, holding that judging its quality by any normal standard was beside the point—it was exactly what you’d expect a relaunch of X-Force by Rob Liefeld to be like and therefore, presumably, the people who bought it did so because that’s what they wanted (whether to make fun of it or because they were genuinely fans of the Rob Liefeld style).
  • On Atop the Fourth Wall, Linkara has a video of "Top 15 Comics I'll Never Review." He has various reasons—some viewer suggestions he actually likes, he won't review porn, etc.—but some, like One More Day, fall into the category of rage-inducingly bad. He eventually did it anyway.

    Film 
  • Roger Ebert did this occasionally:
    Ebert: Note: I am not giving a star rating to Pink Flamingos, because stars simply seem not to apply. It should be considered not as a film but as a fact, or perhaps as an object.
    • In his review of The Human Centipede, which he disclaimed as not being "so much a review as a public service announcement," he was more explicit in his refusal, as put by the page quote.
    • He refused to give a star rating to Beyond the Valley of the Dolls not for quality or content reasons, but because Ebert wrote the screenplay and could not be objective.
  • There was a review of one of The Toxic Avenger movies that rated it "Stars? Who needs stars?"
  • A fairly positive example: the website 1000 Misspent Hours and Counting will not give star reviews to movies that either predate the concept of filmmaking (Georges Méliès’ ‘stunt films’) or are not in any state to be objectively reviewed (the stills-based ‘reconstruction’ of the legendarily-lost London After Midnight). These films are still reviewed, but their rating is “Not Applicable”.
    • A more straightforward example: The film Roar (Tippi Hedren, her family, and several dozen untrained lions) got a "?!?!?!".
      El Santo: What makes Roar such astonishing viewing — and what ultimately forced me to invent a brand new rating just for it — is the stark divergence between the movie that Marshall and Hedren set out to shoot and the one that actually emerged from their efforts. What was supposed to be a treacly, Disneyish family adventure flick, with an uplifting moral about humans living in harmony with nature, came out instead as the most authentically terrifying animal attack picture I’ve ever seen. They thought they were making Grizzly Adams, but they came within an ace of making Grizzly Man.
  • The only film currently without a star rating in The Editing Room is Gooby; and that particular script needs to be read to be believed. This might be more a case of Impossible to Rate, however.
  • Unshaved Mouse's review of Saving Mr. Banks ends with him withholding a score to the "piece of corporate propaganda".
  • James Rolfe attracted some minor backlash from fans of Ghostbusters (2016) when he, an avid and vocal fan of the Ghostbusters franchise, issued his "no review" and simply refused to watch or support it, and by extension and in the interest of fairity, refused to give it a rating. His "review" of it instead consists of him matter-of-factly explaining how people should "rate" it by voting with their wallets, admitting he's too biased and attached to the original films to give it a fair rating as he felt it would taint his memories of the original films, and simply criticising the trailers for their jokes and special effects and the title itself for simply using the name of the original film instead of having a subtitle as if it's trying to replace the original.
    James Rolfe: Instead of a review, for once, I'm doing something a little different: a non-review. Because I refuse to watch it. Judging from the trailers, it looks awful. So, instead of doing what everybody else is gonna do — go see the movie and then talk about how bad it is — I'm going to do something different. Something unheard of. I'm not gonna see it! Wow, what a novel concept, right? If you already know you're gonna hate it, why give them your money? If this is the Ghostbusters movie no one wanted, then the box office results should reflect that.
  • DVD Talk gave the Fox Cinema Archive's Pan and Scan DVDs zero stars in all categories, and automatic "Skip It" advice, with the reviewer insisting that no good reason exists in The New '10s for a widescreen movie to have its picture cropped to 4:3.
  • A review of Brazilian movie Motorrad had the critics refusing to give it a grade, because while they didn't like it, they couldn't make any sense out of the movie - it still later made their list of the worst movies of the year.

    Literature 
  • Smart Bitches, Trashy Books has a grade of "DNF", for books they Did Not Finish.
  • ARamone, who reviews on The Arched Doorwaynote , once refused to rate a book she hadn't finished; the closest she got was saying she wouldn't recommend it.

    Live-Action TV 
  • Chuck Sonnenburg of SF Debris has done this with a couple of his Star Trek reviews.
    • The TNG episode "Family" was a good natured case. While Chuck liked the episode, he refused to rate it because, as he put it, the episode consisted entirely of plot threads which in other episodes would've been B plots.
    • He also did this for Doctor Who's"Vincent and the Doctor", for the same reason — he could not compare it to other episodes for rating, when it is so different to them.
    • He also skipped out on ranting the Voyager episode, "11:59", for a similar reason, saying that he found it to be too much unlike Trek for him to make a qualified judgement on it.
    • Another Voyager episode, "Mortal Coil", also went unrated, though for a somewhat less good natured reason. Chuck felt that the episode relied heavily on the viewer, if not outright liking, then at least having some sympathy for Neelix's character. In the summary, he admitted up front that he simply despises Neelix too much for that to ever happen, so he recused himself from rating the episode, explaining that he simply felt incapable of giving it a fair shake.

    Music 
  • James Wolcott’s review of Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music.
    "What's most distressing is the possibility that Metal Machine Music isn’t so much a knife slash at his detractors as perhaps a blade turned inward. At its very worst this album suggests masochism. He may be, to shift weaponry images, moving to the center of fire so that we critics-as-assassins can make a clean kill. Fine, Lou, go ahead. Just stand there. Don't move, But [sic] damned if I'll squeeze the trigger."
  • This review of the Massive Multiplayer Crossover single "Forever Country" by the blog Saving Country Music gives an N/A out of N/A rating because he simply felt that it was more of a product than a song, and not worth his time.
  • Deconstructed and Played for Drama for Drowned In Sound's review of Mount Eerie's "A Crow Looked At Me". The justification is that it's such a personal album, about the death of Phil Elverum's wife, that even giving a score feels rude and disingenuous.
    • Spectrum Pulse couldn't bring himself to give it any kind of rating for the much the same reason.

    Professional Wrestling 

    Tabletop Games 
  • The writer of the tier system for Dungeons & Dragons 3.5e refused to give the truenamer class a rating—due to poorly-written formulas, after the first few levels it can’t use its powers at all without extremely heavy Min-Maxing, and even then it’s a Squishy Wizard with worse spells than some Magic Knight classes. He would later note that an optimized truenamer is in Tier 4 (about as good as a warlock or rogue), while an unoptimized one is Tier 6 (the same as Joke Characters like the commoner and infamous trainwrecks like the samurai and divine mind).
  • In Dungeon Dudes' ranking of spells for Dungeons & Dragons 5e book Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, they refused to give "Dream of the Blue Veil" a ranking as it was entirely a plot device.
  • rpg.net writer Shannon Appelcline made a list of "The Top 10 Infamous RPGs", which did not include the games referred to as "The Vile Trio":
    Three games nowadays tend to placed at the top of lists of infamous RP Gs: Racial Holy War (2001), FATAL (2002), and HYBRID (2006). None of them were professionally published, and none them seem to have been created in good faith as actual RP Gs, so they aren't included in this list. (They're also not deserving of any attention.)

    Video Games 
  • X-Play required any game they reviewed to receive a rating of 1 to 5 stars. Any other rating was not allowed, so games that the hosts felt didn’t deserve even 1 star were never given a review.
    • The hosts refused to rate Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing because giving it 1 star would imply that it was actually a game. Other games featured in the ‘games you should never buy’ segment, such as Barbie Horse Adventure or Flags (a ‘flag waving in the wind’ simulator), also were not rated.
    • X-Play gave Pokémon Channel a 1 out of 5, but they later said it should’ve been left unscored since it too wasn’t technically a game.
  • Played for Laughs by Jim Sterling’s100% objective review” of Final Fantasy XIII. The "review" consists of Sterling rattling off things about the game that are technically true, but give no opinion on the actual content, such as "Final Fantasy XIII is a video game." It was made as a Take That! to people who attacked negative reviews for not being "objective." Sterling would later say that a review is, by its nature, the reviewer's opinion, declaring the complaints meaningless.
    • Played straight in Sterling’s review of Velvet Assassin, where the game is so horrible he couldn’t finish it and gave it an ‘N/A’ score.
    • Was also played straight in Sterling’s review of Knight's Contract, where he stated that while he couldn’t give it a score because he did not finish it, he assured readers that “it would not get a ten out of ten”.
  • Although The Video Game Critic typically grades on a standard A to F scale, he will occasionally give a game an ‘NA’ (ostensibly for ‘Not Applicable’.) This is typically for one of two reasons: Either the game is simply an enhanced remake of another one, or it’s meant for preschoolers and thus it would be slightly unfair for him to give it a grade.
  • When NGamer reviewed the infamous witch-touching game Doki Doki Majo Shinpan!, the rating for each category simply said “NO”. It was even awarded the “Superman 64 Award For Worst Game (of 2007)”. In a similar vein, they gave a game based around hunting wild animals a :( score, saying that 'We haven't felt this depressed in a long time'.
  • Tomcat Alley, an FMV flight simulator on the Sega CD, was given no score on a scale from 0–100 by a magazine called Interface (“TA claims to be an ‘interactive movie’ and not something as lowly as a mere videogame. And since our business is games it gets no score. No arms, no cookies!”).
  • Again from The Grimoire of Marisa: Marisa outright refuses to rate the spellcards of Suika and Medicine. Suika because all but one of her moves aren’t even danmaku (her being a fighting game boss who uses brute force), and Medicine because her body can't handle using poison.
  • Kill Screen's review of Duke Nukem Forever probably stands as the most extreme example of this; not only did the reviewer refuse to give a score, the entire site decided not to give out scores ever again.
    "We didn't think it would be possible for a single terrible game to change our entire scoring system. Congratulations, Duke, you've broken us."
  • In place of verbally receiving its 1, or any verbal review at all, Alex Navarro’s video review of Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing ends with him turning his back on his desk, walking out to the street, lying down on it, and shaking his head.
  • In response to the technical issues involving the Always-On DRM and the disastrous launch, Jonathan Cresswell's "review" of the 2013 SimCity is nothing more than a fake loading screen and "Estimated load time: <random number> minutes."
    • YouTube game reviewer Pro Jared did something similar in his One-Minute Review of the game. He just showed himself struggling to get into the game, gave up 10 seconds into the review, and just ended it with the line, "F*** it, I'm going to bed," cutting to a black screen for the rest of the one-minute video.
  • In Some Call Me Johnny, Johnny chose not to give Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing a score.
    Johnny: We're not going to give it a score, it doesn't deserve one.
  • Polygon's "review" for Star Fox Zero has their reviewer being so aggravated with the game that he not only refused to complete it (thus not giving it a score), but also insisted that he hadn't actually made a review of the game.
    This isn't a review of Star Fox Zero. Save for very rare, extreme circumstances, Polygon reviews require that a game be completed, or at least a good-faith effort be made to complete it. I am not playing any more Star Fox Zero.
  • Jonathan Wojcik's Pokémon reviews are generally given some sort of rating (see elsewhere on this page for when he gave some Pokemon a 'six out of five' or a 'moldy, festering Lucario skull out of five') but when he reached Goodra, he found that his feelings were too split (by his love of what the Pokémon represents but also his desire for what Goomy and Sliggoo seemed to be leading up tonote ) to give it a good or a bad rating, but also too strong to give it a neutral one.
    For the first time, I'm not going to rate a Pokémon at all. I don't want to give Goodra a "bad" rating, because at the end of the day it's still a dragon type slug with green slime dribbling off it, but neither can I bring myself to give it a good one. Not after a betrayal this unspeakable.
    • In Wojcik's Digimon reviews, the coverage for Nanimon ends as follows:
      It's just ... it's godless. I'm not religious, that's just the only thing that this is. Godless.
      RATING: NO GOD
    • The Wind Spirit line got ratings of "Ew", "Nah", and "??!!?!??!???!????????", as they were generally decent (or at least interesting) designs, but they were incredibly skeevy as the Henshin Hero forms of a character meant to be eleven.
  • When Kevvl, mentioned above, perfect-ran Duff McWhalen's stage in Mega Man X5, he refused to give Duff McWhalen a difficulty rating because, after an entire stage consisting of a very long, multi-phase fight with a miniboss, Duff McWhalen himself is incredibly easy. Instead, the U-555 (the stage's miniboss) gets the rating, and it's a 10/10.
  • Giant Bomb refused to publish a review score for Fallout 76 because none of their staff could stand to play the game enough to finish it properly in order to review it.

    Web Original 
  • Something Awful's "WTF, D&D!?" column reviews bad or otherwise bizarre Tabletop Games. However, their page for FATAL wasn't so much a review as it was a top-ten list of reasons why they refused to review it.
  • Blogger Beware's retrospective on the original Goosebumps books lists the ten best and worst books. In the latter category, Chicken Chicken (a book he found to be absolutely horrible) ranks #0, with this paragraph accompanying it:
    "This book doesn't deserve a number. It doesn't even deserve to be listed. To list it implies some value, even as a marker for the lows of the series. But this book doesn't deserve the attention it will garner just by virtue of its position. This isn't a case of 'So bad it's good,' this is 'So bad I want to vomit[...]'. Chicken Chicken very nearly ended the blog two years ago, but I ultimately decided to push forward. I don't know what else to say except it really is that bad'."
  • The Rap Critic refused to give a grade to "Loyal" by Chris Brown because "it would validate him as a rapper".
  • Much like the Drowned In Sound example above, Mark Grondin from Spectrum Pulse refused to give Mount Eerie's "A Crow Looked At Me" a rating because it was a too raw and personal record for him to give it a score.
  • In Anthony Fantano's review of Yung Lean's Unknown Death 2002 mixtape... Anthony doesn't review the mixtape at all, instead chanting "my hands are bread" repeatedly.
  • As mentioned above in Out of Bounds, Fasion Photo Ruview is a web series in which RuPaul's Drag Race alumni Raja and Raven give their opinions on various fashion outfits, usually looks from Drag Race but also sometimes actual runways or drag queen's social media posts. The only time they have outright refused to rate a look was Joy Villa's "Make America Great Again" dress from the 2017 Grammys, deciding that even giving it hate with a rating would only give the look more publicity and infamy that she was looking for by wearing it. It did cause Raja to retroactively give a Toot (a good rating) to a look she had previously Booted, deciding "anything is better than this dress"
  • Crash Thompson refused to review or rate Goodness, Gracious by Back Up Kid on grounds that this was basically a basement recording by a hobbyist rather than a professional recording by a professional artist or musician. He then demanded his viewers consider how they'd feel if such meagre efforts of their own were held up to scrutiny. But he did enjoy the recording, and encouraged Back Up Kid to keep going.
  • As noted above, Poparena rates Goosebumps books with a random object out of 10. However, he gave both Night of the Living Dummy III and Say Cheese and Die-Again! nothing. The former is said in his usual way and was due to being so dissapointed by it and the latter is said in rushed anger because of how much it offended him.

    Western Animation 

 
Feedback

Video Example(s):

Top

ProJared

Jared shows how much he loves "Monster Hunter" by giving the third game a 12/10.

How well does it match the trope?

4 (5 votes)

Example of:

Main / BrokeTheRatingScale

Media sources:

Main / BrokeTheRatingScale

Report