Follow TV Tropes

Following

Badass tropes - now on: Action Girl

Go To

Alright, so in TRS Badass Gay came up for discussion and it was agreed that there appears to big problem with the Badass X tropes in general, which needs to be sorted out until something can be ruled on for Badass Gay.

Here's a courtesy link: TRS page. And Badass page with its subtropes. You can also visit the sandbox page here.

Noted Problems include:

  • Tropes are just listings of characters people thing are badass who happen to have a certain trait. (The Badass + Trait Problem)
  • Badass X as a naming scheme is actually very vague and doesn't give a lot of insight into what the character trope actually is, assuming it is a trope.
  • Badass X as a naming scheme proliferates the use of Badass + Trait 'tropes'.

Suggested things to do include:

  • Make it a requirement that a badass character trope means a character is "badass because of a trait", or "badass in spite of a trait".
  • Renaming away from the Badass X naming scheme as much as possible.
  • Cut, redefine or re-purpose things that are just Badass + trait.

There are also a lot of tropes that seem to be valid character-types, but have the naming scheme 'Badass X', when there's more to the trope than that. There are also a lot of prop or event or whatever tropes that need to be gone through as well.

Edited by Berrenta on May 15th 2020 at 7:39:14 AM

ChaoticNovelist Since: Jun, 2010
#1351: Oct 14th 2015 at 12:29:37 PM

In the meantime, we should finish creating the fan speak page. I like the second version of the introduction paragraph in the fanspeak page. I also don't have a problem with putting "Badass as fighter" at the top of the definition list.

Does anyone else have anything to add or change?

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1352: Oct 14th 2015 at 1:12:57 PM

[up]For the record, I'm okay with putting "Badass as fighter" first, I'm merely disagreeing with mentioning it as "the most common use on this wiki" since I think my wick checks show it to not exactly be the case. And I like both versions of the description.

I'd suggest to add "Badass as an adjective that means "cool, awesome"" which from what I've seen is the most common use in the vernacular outside this wiki. Maybe it should also be mentioned in the definition itself, since it's a bit different from what's currently described in the definition.

edited 14th Oct '15 1:15:15 PM by Rjinswand

ChaoticNovelist Since: Jun, 2010
#1353: Oct 15th 2015 at 9:19:42 AM

The Badass Fan Speak draft has been updated. This is Version 3: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Sandbox/BadassFanSpeak.

Anything else or should I move it into Main?

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1354: Oct 15th 2015 at 11:24:54 AM

I think "Badass = cool, awesome" should be distinct from "Badass = Rule of Cool", because Rule of Cool =/= "cool, awesome". It's a different meaning.

Here, I split it into its own entry, see what you think.

I also took the liberty to remove the "a Badass doesn't need to be macho" paragraph, since it was taken from one of my posts anyway. Thing is, that post related to an attempt at finding the "one true definition" of Badass, while now we're trying to list all possible uses of the word, and there definitely are people who associate "badass" with "stereotypically macho".


Besides these minor points, I think the writeup looks pretty splendid

edited 15th Oct '15 11:26:22 AM by Rjinswand

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1355: Oct 15th 2015 at 11:30:45 AM

I still think the definitions should be bullet points, since this is about quick definitions, not sections.

edited 15th Oct '15 11:31:52 AM by DragonQuestZ

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1356: Oct 15th 2015 at 11:32:01 AM

UPD: [nja]


By the way, I've started cleaning up ZCE in the wicks. Currently, I'm only removing total ZCE (like this: )

Do you guys think I should also remove ZCE potholes like

This was a pretty badass fight, and Mr. Jones punched Mr. Smith in the face.
or
But Mr. Jones should've known better than to mess with Mr. Smith.
? I feel that I should, but I'd like to hear your opinions.

edited 15th Oct '15 11:37:30 AM by Rjinswand

ObsidianFire Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: Not caught up in your love affair
#1357: Oct 15th 2015 at 12:33:58 PM

I think "Badass as "Cool, Awesome"" should be the first or second point on the fanspeak page as that's how it's used in common speech. People shouldn't have to go hunting on the page for the most common definition of the word.

ChaoticNovelist Since: Jun, 2010
#1358: Oct 15th 2015 at 1:29:41 PM

Since the underlying logic behind "Badass as fighter" is about being "cool/awesome etc. (as we've established, Glass Joe is not a badass), I put "Badass as 'cool, awesome'" first and "Badass as Fighter" second.

I think the sections make for better organization than bullet points and it better resembles the template for Mary Sue which is what the crowner said.

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1359: Oct 15th 2015 at 2:18:31 PM

[up]Cool! I think the writeup is good to go [tup]

UPD: You know, maybe also mention in the description that "badass" can be used as a noun or as an adjective?


Does anyone have any input on the question I asked in @1356?

edited 15th Oct '15 2:20:30 PM by Rjinswand

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#1360: Oct 15th 2015 at 6:48:10 PM

Yes — that is a Sink Hole. Please remove them.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
lakingsif Since: Dec, 2012 Relationship Status: Wanna dance with somebody
#1362: Oct 16th 2015 at 4:30:35 AM

and don't forget badass as an adjective when describing an action in relation to the person's expected capabilities. i.e. "that was pretty badass to say you're x"

OH MY GOD; MY PARENTS ARE GARDENIIIIINNNNGGGGG!!!!!
Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#1363: Oct 16th 2015 at 4:34:38 AM

^^^ Agreed, remove extraneous potholes.

I also added Determinator and Made of Iron as tropes we have for the Badass as Tough or Resilient section.

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
ChaoticNovelist Since: Jun, 2010
#1364: Oct 16th 2015 at 12:14:55 PM

I added the "noun or adjective part" and then made the swap. Also, I updated the laconic to reflect this change.

Now I have other concerns. Should we do anything about the quote or the page image?

Also, what about that long list of subtropes? Should we prune it to remove shoehorning, or, should we let them stay given the wide variety of possiblity defintions of the word? Should we move all of them into to another page and call it Common Badass Traits?

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#1365: Oct 16th 2015 at 12:26:59 PM

Wait we already swapped it? I didn't think we were done yet. We certainly hadn't finished discussing what we'd be doing from there, which would be reflected in the page write up.

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1366: Oct 17th 2015 at 7:57:57 AM

Wait, I'd suggest we keep the new writeup (Badass 2.0) in the sandbox, until we finish a lot of other stuff. Right now it might be confusing to tropers unfamiliar with this thread!

I'd suggest to revert to Badass 1.0 for the time being.

Should we do anything about the quote or the page image?
That'd be a question for Image Pickin', once we supplant Badass 1.0 with Badass 2.0

Also, what about that long list of subtropes? Should we prune it to remove shoehorning, or, should we let them stay given the wide variety of possiblity defintions of the word? Should we move all of them into to another page and call it Common Badass Traits?
That's what this thread is for. We should review each and every one of them individually, and determine what they are.

I'd argue that Badass 2.0 shouldn't have any subtropes, since it's a fanspeak word with no clear definition.

edited 17th Oct '15 7:58:48 AM by Rjinswand

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#1367: Oct 17th 2015 at 12:04:36 PM

It already has subtropes though. I don't think saying that they don't exist or aren't related is really going to work.

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#1368: Oct 17th 2015 at 3:00:47 PM

It has been redefined. It's a new definition.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#1369: Oct 18th 2015 at 12:28:57 AM

I agree that it shouldn't have any subtropes as a multi-varied Fan Speak term. The list of tropes (which has Example Indentation In Trope Lists problems anyway) has examples from any concept that Badass has been used for. It's not a Super-Trope because there is nothing concrete uniting all of these tropes. The list reflects that, being a mashup of things tropers consider awesome, tropes about fighters or fighting, tropes about willpower and never giving up, tropes about being intimidating or scary, tropes about people with authority, and tropes that rely on Rule of Cool to work. Others are shoehorned in with hyperbole.

Sub-Super Tropes:

Sub-Tropes:

Singular:

Plural forms:

Playing with a Trope:

edited 18th Oct '15 12:35:38 AM by Morgenthaler

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1370: Oct 18th 2015 at 1:07:31 AM

I agree there isn't one true common element. Yet I think that there are plenty of common elements that fit at least some of the tropes.

I also think that characters who constantly do things that work because of Rule of Cool can work as a trope, just with a) a clear, distinct name, and b) example context would require explaining multiple actions and why they each fit in rule of cool. This could even fit World of Badass as a Sub-Trope, since it could be about how even though most characters pull off rule of cool actions all the time, these actions still cannot work without rule of cool.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#1371: Oct 18th 2015 at 1:23:41 AM

Why the hell is Almighty Janitor listed there?!? It's only kind of related.

I'm also pretty sure the info blurb for Took a Level in Badass needs to be changed, because it's a Character Development trope that gets a hell of a lot of shoehorning. That blurb does not help at all as written.

edited 18th Oct '15 1:27:48 AM by Karxrida

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1372: Oct 18th 2015 at 1:35:40 AM

[up]Plus that's yet another trope that needs renaming (and not just to swap out "badass").

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#1373: Oct 18th 2015 at 1:09:04 PM

@1369: Great points! I completely agree with you. I think we should try arranging these tropes into groups, by their meaning — that'd help to find which supertropes they belong to. E.g. I think a lot of those are subtropes of Hidden Badass, which is already an index in itself.

I might give it a try myself later.

By the way, if we decide to keep Badass 2.0 on the main Badass page, maybe we should remove the "subtropes" lists from the main page and put them into the Sandbox?

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#1374: Oct 18th 2015 at 1:19:40 PM

At the very least, I don't think we can eliminate Badass as a supertrope without replacing it with the supertrope to everything like Badass Normal.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1375: Oct 18th 2015 at 2:34:03 PM

Can we propose different tropes now to be evaluated?

Cause well Badass Princess and its Redirect Warrior Princess is a problem, a Warrior Princess usually has things like leading an army into battle, kicking butt, directing troops, Royals Who Do Something and so on, the spear to Warrior Prince.

The Badass Princess is just a trope about a princess who seemingly isn't an standard Damsel in Distress princess, it might be trope but it certainly is not a Warrior Princess.

Look at say Zelda, Hyrule Warriors Zelda is a real Warrior Princess complete with armor and physically leading the army into battle, other incarnations of Zelda no so much but still have some badass moments.

edited 18th Oct '15 2:47:33 PM by Memers


Total posts: 2,807
Top