Follow TV Tropes


Would Be Rude to Say "Genocide"

Go To

Who now remembers the Armenians?
— Attributed to Adolf Hitler note 

Some pesky population happened to get in the way and got exterminated as a side effect. For storytelling reasons the operation may not be called genocide or otherwise be made to sound bad. There are three basic ways in which this can play:

Legally speaking, genocide is a category that is fairly recent, dating from the 1920s and entering public consciousness after World War II. The man who coined it, the lawyer Raphael Lemkin, defined it as "a coordinated strategy to destroy a group of people, a process that could be accomplished through total annihilation as well as strategies that eliminate key elements of the group's basic existence, including language, culture, and economic infrastructure." This was eventually enshrined into the 1948 UN Convention of Genocide where it defined genocide as actions, committed with demonstrable intent, to kill off "a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". The key phrase is "co-ordinated" which establishes intent and infrastructure geared to achieving said crime, as well as whether a group of victims can fit categories of identifiable "nation, ethnicity, race or religion".

Since the category was codified, the word is often invoked by many individuals across the political spectrum, to invoke the word to describe any action of mass operations committed by states or organized communities, without regard to whether said example fits the 1948 definition. A large number of historians and scholars when examining allegations of genocide have generally struggled to separate deaths caused by famine, war, disease, expansionism, many of which are consequences of government policies, often incompetently implemented, but lack the evidence of "co-ordination" to display the intent to destroy another people as part of original policy.

The option to be offended is an interesting one.

- How dare you accuse me, my country, or my Lord of genocide?
- But it's true!
- That's not the point. The point is that I get offended when you say such horrible things!

Compare Villain with Good Publicity, Devil in Plain Sight, "Blackmail" Is Such an Ugly Word, Distinction Without a Difference, Deadly Euphemism and Metaphorically True.


    open/close all folders 

    Anime & Manga 
  • In Code Geass Princess Euphemia is accidentally Brainwashed into wanting to kill all Japanese people, and the Brittanian military follows her orders to slaughter them. While the genocide is eventually called off, the Brittanians seem to consider the Japanese "a dangerous, belligerent race" because they dared to fight back when faced with annihilation.
  • After Freeza single-handedly exterminates the Saiyan race in Dragon Ball Z, he comes up with a fake story about their home planet being destroyed by meteors that even his henchmen who were there stuck with, probably to avoid Genocide Backfire from the few surviving Saiyans left. It doesn't work, of course. He is none too secretive about his other genocides, however, which just goes to show how afraid of the Saiyans he is.
  • Bleach: Yhwach has a history of targeting the Quincies whenever he wants to redistribute Quincy power, or simply power himself up. Six years before the story began, he enacted The Purge on all "impure" Quincies, killing entire generations of men, women and children. He doesn't refer to this as "genocide"; he refers to it as Auswahlen, or "Holy Selection". When he uses a minor version on pure Quincies he no longer deems useful just to power up his "useful" Quincy, he tells the victims they should be happy because they're "supporting" their comrades. The only Quincy in history known to be immune to Auswahlen is Uryuu, who has been Kicked Upstairs by Yhwach in an attempt to find out why.
  • One Piece: It's heavily implied that this happened with the "Void Century"; the World Government is dead set on wiping out any information about those missing hundred years, to the point where they completely destroyed an island, and placed a 79,000,000 bounty on a 8 year old girl for just speaking the language that the only surviving records of that century were written in. It is known that there was a civilization that was presumably destroyed during that century, as artifacts from it exist, but beyond that, nothing else is known because of how effective the World Government is at snuffing out any information.
  • Mobile Suit Gundam: Operation British in the series' Back Story provided the trope-naming Colony Drop, which first involved completely annihilating a space colony's population with chemical weapons. The manga series Mobile Suit Gundam: The Origin, which covers the events leading up to the original anime, includes this operation. Admiral Dozle Zabi invokes this trope when, while briefing Lieutenant Ranba Ral on Zeon's plans, Ranba reacts incredulously to the outright murder of an entire colony's citizens. Specifically, Dozle tries to convince Ranba to command the operation by downplaying the genocidal aspect—not only countering that Ranba was already responsible for the deaths of a hundred million colonists but that the colony group was a defeated enemy nation. Using one of their colonies as a weapon, Dozle tried to argue, would make their deaths "count for something." Ranba disagrees, considers this operation the work of the devil, and refuses to take part any further.

  • In the Lucifer volume Mansions of the Silence, Lucifer annihilates billions of souls as a side effect of saving the life of one single person. (That one person was someone he owed a favor, his billions of victims were not.) Of all the people who witness this tragedy, only Bergelmir says anything about this action being immoral, and even he is quite polite about it. Even so, everyone else simply ignores him as they would a person who's being generally rude, impolite and socially inappropriate. Those present know that annoying Lucifer is really not the best course of action if your plans involve seeing another day, so they're probably staying quiet out of simple self-preservation. But in any case, elsewhere in the comic it is mentioned that it's impossible to destroy a soul - it simply unravels and then rewinds itself over millennia. And considering that the Mansions of Silence are in some ways worse than Hell, it could just as well be said that Lucifer granted their inhabitants a break from their usual torment.
  • In the Strontium Dog arc "The Final Solution", The New Church publicly claims that they're moving the mutant population in New Britain to new homes in another dimension where they can live in peace away from normal human beings. What they're really doing, however, is rounding up mutants from their ghettos and dumping them in a dimensional wasteland to be stranded and killed by an Eldritch Abomination, but they know that nobody would make much fuss if they make it sound like a peaceful relocation program.
  • In Runaways, Xavin's attempt to bring an end to the war between their homeworld and Majesdane resulted in both worlds being wiped out. While Xavin's homeworld was just one colony of the larger Skrull Empire, so far as we know, the Majesdanians had only their planet and maybe a colony or two elsewhere, and thus it can assumed that the Majesdanians are nearly extinct (to say nothing of any other lifeforms that lived on their planet...)
  • Nemesis the Warlock: When Torquemada is on trial for his genocide of billions of aliens as Grand Master of Termight, his defence is to proudly proclaim his crusades necessary because the aliens wanted to destroy them as well, bringing Nemesis' Torture Technician uncle to the stand to prove his point. He leaves out that it's actually Torquemada's wars of annihilation that made some aliens call for humanity's extermination.
  • In Paperinik New Adventures Xadhoom refers to her planned genocide of the Evronian race as "debt collection": they destroyed their homeworld and apparently exterminated her race, so she assumed the name "Xadhoom", meaning "Creditor", and started killing. Ultimately Subverted when it turned out there were some survivors of her race, so she simply left the Evronians without a homeworld and in shambles after killing off a large part of their race.

    Fan Fiction 
  • In Weaver Nine The PRT has a blanket kill order on every and all members of the Society. Given that very few of them have committed crimes worthy of a death sentence, and the fact quite a few of them are innocents who joined the Society in gratitude after the Society rescued them from slavery, unjust imprisonment, torture, or other terrible fates... it reeks of Genocide.
    • In addition: Weaver's Society is all but legally a nation unto itself, with infrastructure, territory and such. Most obvious in when she offers forty citizens to the defense of Brockton Bay, more than half the number of capes the Protectorate could gather.
  • The Conversion Bureau has ponykind forcing mankind to "convert" en masse into ponies. If they don't, they're killed. That this is genocide is ignored by both the ponies and the authors, who see it as the best possible thing that can be done. The fact that the authors gleefully ignore this and in fact treat it as a good thing (sometimes going so far as to vehemently defend it) is actually frightening, and was in fact a factor for the very first TCB fic never being finished. However, most deconstruction stories often subvert this trope where humans and ponies alike realize the true meaning behind the bureaus and often rebel against Celestia.
  • Lines And Webs non-equine races can't be magically mind controlled by Celestia to stop them from being violent, so she plans to drive their species to extinction in order to enact her vision of a peaceful harmonious world. Interestingly downplayed, Celestia doesn't want to actively commit genocide, just cause their civilizations to shrink until they die off naturally. Of course, its still resulting in mass starvation, so it really isn't any different.
  • Implied to be in the planning stages in Event Horizon: Storm of Magic, where an After-Action Report written on the rescue of Daenerys from the Dothraki for The Company™ describes them as "savage barbarians", and that when they eventually initiate their colonization program in Essos, they'll have to come up with a "Final Solution to the Dothraki Problem". And The Company™ is supposed to be the good guy, relatively speaking.

    Films — Animated 

    Films — Live-Action 
  • Star Wars
    • A New Hope: The Evil Empire regime removes the galactic senate just before they destroy the populated planet Alderaan. Thus, there is no Senate that can protest against this atrocity. While they don't say outright that the upcoming demonstration of the Death Star's firepower is the reason why they removed the senate, it sure is convenient timing.
    • And Order 66, aka the Great Jedi Purge, in Revenge of the Sith.
    • The Expanded Universe explains events a bit more. The Emperor wanted to disband the Senate for quite some time before the events of A New Hope. He used the outing of Princess Leia, a member of the Imperial Senate, as a Rebel agent as a pretext to finally disband it. It was one of the last symbols of the Old Republic (something he wanted to be rid of entirely) and potentially filled with Rebel sympathizers. Considering that three of the Alliance cofounders were Senators, he may have had a point. Thing is, with no Legislature, there was no scapegoat for his own crimes, and once they no longer had to maintain public appearances, some Senators went to openly work for the Rebellion.
  • Never Let Me Go: People "are completed" on an industrial scale. And "completed" actually equals harvested for their organs. The main characters are clones who have been created specifically for this task.
  • In X-Men: The Last Stand, Magneto interrupts a mutant committee meeting over the development of a cure for mutation to deliver a scathing appraisal of what he considers to be avoidance of this issue, drawing from his own experiences with mass extermination:
    Speaker: This cure is voluntary. Nobody's talking about extermination.
    Magneto: No one ever talks about it; they just do it. And you go on with your lives, ignoring the signs all around you. And then one day, when the air is still and the night is fallen, they come for you.
    Speaker: [interrupts] Excuse me-
    Magneto: Only then do you realize that while you're talking about organizing and committees, the extermination has already begun.
    • Magneto is exploiting this trope, however: he is using fear of genocide to widen the divide between mutants and humans and perpetuate his war against humanity, ostensibly to protect the mutants from just such an extermination.
    • Anything involving Magneto and his views on genocide is always rather uncomfortably ironic since his whole motivation is to wipe out the entire human population (and he nearly succeeds in X2). Naturally he never applies the apt description of genocide when it's him. Surprisingly, even after the number of movies made, no-one has yet called him out on this hypocrisy.
  • Played straight to the very end of the Critters quadrilogy. Even in the last movie, where they hint at this trope being in place, when the crites have almost completely been annihilated but cannot be completely made extinct because galactic law prevents doing this, those trying to protect the last of the critters assume the role of the 'bad' guys, even though one of them, the shapeshifter 'Ug', was a returning 'good guy' from all the previous movies. In the end, the 'bad guys' are defeated and the last of the crites are destroyed and that evil bastard Ug who was trying to save them from extinction is killed as well, and there is much rejoicing. Ug had the upper hand in the situation, but the 'good guys' took him down by pointing their guns at the last of the crite eggs, and he had to make a fatal mistake trying to protect them. Isn't it nice when the 'good guys' use sleazy bad guy tactics to kill the virtuous bad guy?
  • In the Holocaust drama Conspiracy, the words "extermination" are almost never used, and are not written down as such by the secretary. Instead, everything is couched in euphemisms. Interestingly this was before the specific word "genocide" to denote such mass slaughters was coined. Coupled with the Translation Convention, Kritzinger and Lange struggle to come up with something that would encapsulate it as "war" is thoroughly insufficient and settle on "chaos".
  • Denial is about "historian" David Irving's Real Life Holocaust denial and his attempt to silence real historian Deborah Lipstadt from calling him a Holocaust denier via a frivolous libel lawsuit.

  • In Date A Live Sir Isaac Ray Peram Westcott uses a manner of speaking very different from what he really wants. He uses the word "rewrite" when he really meant "cataclysm", "destruction", "death", "annihilation", "genocide", "war" and other depraved things that humanity can invoke on the world. He often says that in order to make a mind game with people who are listening to this.
  • R. A. Salvatore's novels about Drizzt feature the massacre of entire groups as a social institution for the dark elves of Menzoberranzan, although usually conducted on a smaller scale then genocidal: Killing a group of people is a crime, but only members of that group can make the official complaint. Thus: If you successfully kill everyone, so no one is left to protest, no crime can be said to have been committed. Ironically, this institution is also a part of how they maintain social order: If one of the royal houses falls out of favor with their evil Goddess, then other houses will use this system to gang up on them.
  • The Illuminatus! Trilogy: In one of the many versions of the backstory, Gruad has just destroyed Atlantis, wiping out its entire population: "But deep inside, he knows that what he has done isn't nice".
  • In the Animorphs series
    • The Andalite military's plan to "quarantine" planet Earth to keep the Yeerks from using the resources (especially the Human Resources) of Earth to conquer the galaxy. But it's not actually militarily possible to enforce this quarantine—so everyone treats this as an euphemism for genocide.
    • Alloran had previously attempted something extremely similar with the Hork-Bajir, by releasing a virus, resulting in a huge death toll (and, if anything, ensuring that all of the surviving Hork-Bajir would be the Yeerk-Controlled ones. And also leading to him losing his rank and reputation.)
  • Ender's Game. Throughout the book Child Soldiers are being trained to fight in case an alien race known as the Buggers invade like they'd done twice before, the last time being 70 years prior. It turns out in the end that the Child Soldiers were actually being trained to launch an invasion against the Buggers, resulting in the extermination of their species via Earth-Shattering Kaboom while tricking the children into thinking they were only playing a game. The Buggers themselves, thought to be Always Chaotic Evil by most Earthlings and portrayed as such in propaganda, were actually peaceful, having ended their hostilities against mankind generations ago. And the initial hostilities were an honest misunderstanding. They didn't mean to start a war, they were just saying "hello" by introducing their drone-soldiers to our territory and having them fight a bit. Drone-soldiers killing each other is roughly analogous to a hand-shake because each individual drone has no mind of its own. They had no idea that ALL of our drone-soldiers were actually individual Queens. How insane is that, an entire race of Queens and nothing but Queens? Who could possibly have predicted such a form of intelligent life existed? They became passive when they realized this, in the sense of only now fighting a defensive war. They made no further attacks and merely tried their best to not be wiped out by the vengeful hand of humans, who they were trying desperately to communicate their apology to. (It nearly worked.)
  • In the children's book The Inventors, the two main characters Nate and Cat have won a scholarship with the world's greatest inventor Ebenezer Saint, who they discover is planning to destroy humanity and start rebuilding society from scratch. At one point, Saint begins rolling out a list of euphemisms for what he's about to do, before asking for suggestions for more. He accepts Nate's suggestion of "Begin the genocide", but calls him a drama queen for it.
  • In Harry Harrison's Deathworld, their world has gotten really too deathy, so they decide to emigrate. There is a nice planet with a nice plateau BUT the plateau is inhabited. The Deathworlders suggest simply eliminating this population. 'Oh no' says the hero, 'that would be wrong'. Instead they lead this war-like race off the plateau to rich farmlands where they can cut a swathe through the native population, enjoy their luxuries, get seduced by the lifestyle and never return to the plateau. This wholesale slaughter is 'oh well you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs'.
  • Likely the largest genocide ever imagined is at the conclusion of the Skylark Series. The protagonists have previously tangled with the "ameboid" Chlorans, who attack, enslave and exploit humans (but do not exterminate them). In the earlier encounter there was just one Chloran planet; the option of genocide (called explicitly by that name) was considered, but due to pleadings of "soft-hearted" women the milder option of sending the planet far away was taken. But when discovering a faraway galaxy with millions of Chloran planets, the protagonist Seaton decides that the Chlorans are "a cancer" and a danger to the entire universe, and that nothing would do but to kill every single one of them — emphatically rejecting any other option. He and his arch-enemy turned ally DuQuesne proceed to do just that, causing all the Chloran suns to go nova. "The Chlorans died in their uncounted trillions. The greeny-yellow soup that served them for air boiled away. Their halogenous flesh was charred, baked and desiccated in the split-second of the passing of the front wave from each exploding double star, moments before their planets themselves started to seethe and boil. Many died unaware. Most died fighting. Most died in terrible, frantic effort to escape... But they all died." Immediately afterwards, DuQuesne, feeling not the slightest remorse at having just killed uncounted trillions of sentient beings and destroyed an entire galaxy, proposes to his long-cherished lady love and is thrilled to hear that she truly loves him. (DuQuesne, however, is a self-admitted villain.)
  • The Hunger Games: During the assault on a Peacekeeper mountain fortress in District 2, Gale comes up with the idea of causing a landslide to trap them inside; he even wanted to bomb the railway leading out of it to ensure there are no survivors (they decide to leave the railway open). When told that there were District 2 civilians inside, he said that he felt they deserved to die as well. The rebels go through with the plan, and hundreds (if not thousands) die as a result of Gale's actions.
  • Victoria has the far-right, misogynist regime of the Confederation carrying out a "soft" genocide on the Lady Land Azania. While not physically exterminating the Amazons after conquering their country, they systematically destroy their culture and re-educate or enslave the survivors, and they also deprive them of the advanced technology they need to reproduce in the absence of men, thereby ensuring their extinction as a people. This is presented as freeing them from a horrible oppression, as they are returned from their wayward, Godless way of life to woman's proper place in the world as wife and mother.
  • The Chronicles of Narnia: when the Pevensies become rulers of Narnia at the end of The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe, it's casually mentioned that in establishing their golden age, they "stamped out" the apparently Always Chaotic Evil species that had followed the White Witch. According to the author, the original inhabitants of Telmar were so evil that Aslan turned them all into non-sapient animals, effectively ending their lives as people. The narrative voice of the Narnia series always makes his opinions clear, and here they seem entirely in line with the opinions of his heroes.

    Live-Action TV 
  • If you consider allowing a race you could have effortlessly saved to die because of a non-interference policy to count as genocide Janeway and and Archer from Star Trek both committed genocide, in this case calling it principle (they justify it as not interfering with evolution). Notably Averted by Picard in "Pen Pals" who was initially unwilling to interfere but after hearing the plea of the species in question agreed to "bend" the rules and classify it as a request for help.
  • In the Star Trek: Voyager episode "Living Witness", an alien civilization called the Kyrians remembers an encounter with Voyager centuries ago very differently from what really happened. Because Voyager traded with the Vaskans, one of their enemies, they revised the events to make Voyager a bunch of bloodthirsty villains who slaughtered their people. Evil Janeway doesn't share the Vaskan ambassador's concerns about annihilating the Kyrian population.
    Ambassador: I want them defeated, but this is genocide!
    Janeway: Defeat... genocide... why quibble with semantics?
  • While people are getting slaughtered by the thousand in Equatorial Kundu on The West Wing, C.J. Cregg is not allowed by the White House legal counsel to say the word "genocide" in front of the press. This was in reference to the Clinton Administration standing by with the Rwandan Genocide going on, which they referred to as "genocide-type acts" because acknowledging it was genocide would mean under the Genocide Convention they were required to intervene. Unlike the fictional administration here, they never did.
  • In The Event, when the only possible refuge left for the aliens is Earth and its resources clearly won't suffice for both them and the humans, Sophia concludes that "we need to make room". One of her henchmen, who had until recently acted as The Mole inside U.S. government and gradually grew to sympathize with the humans, immediately calls her out on it: "You mean GENOCIDE!"
  • When the human fleet of Battlestar Galactica discover a disease that could wipe out the entire Cylon race, Helo seems to be the only one willing to publicly describe using it as genocide. Adama does admit in private that he views it as genocide, however. It eventually becomes clear that pretty much everyone realizes it is genocide, they just don't care.
  • Uther Pendragon in Merlin (2008) views his slaughter of magic users and all dragons except one as completely justified. His son, Arthur, goes along with it to please him, but it's repeatedly shown that he will not kill harmless magic users if he isn't forced into it.
  • In Black Adder The Second, Edmund briefly becomes Lord High Executioner, or as he calls it: "The Minister of Religious Genocide". It's his responsibility to execute "traitors" and closeted Catholics by command of Elizabeth the First. Notably the episode never moralises on genocide, and Edmund regards it as nothing but a tedious and very deadly chore he has to do.
  • In The Vampire Diaries, Elena causes the slaughter of tens of thousands of vampires without blinking, justifying it because it brings her closer to a cure.


  • The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy has the Lintillas, hundreds of billions of clones of one particularly attractive and talented lady created by a faulty cloning machine at a Brantisvogan escort agency. As halting the cloning process would kill the current incomplete clone (and thus be murder), various legal experts tried to get the definition of murder changed in order to make it legal. As it turns out, they managed to get murder renamed (to 'revoked') but failed to achieve anything else (such as legally changing the spelling; 'revoked' is still spelt M-U-R-D-E-R-E-D).
    • One tactic involved mass cloning another individual, Allitnil, who is irresistable to the Lintillas. Each Allitnil and Lintilla pair would be tricked into signing a death warrant under the guise of a marriage license, and the two of them would be vapourised. If later series are to be believed, the plan was quite unsuccessful.

  • The band members of System of a Down are Armenian-American, and they are all very active in spreading the word about the Armenian Genocide. However, their music is almost never specifically about genocide: the only song from them that specifically mentions the word "genocide" is the song "P.L.U.C.K." (which stands for "Politically Lying, Unholy Corrupt Killers") from their self-titled debut album in 1997. "Holy Mountains" from their album Mezmerize/Hypnotize is also about the Armenian Genocide, but doesn't even mention that word.
    • It's somewhat justified in the fact that their lyrics are primarily concerned with specific issues. They tend to tackle topics such as drug decriminalization and environmentalism in order to curb complacency in general, and Serj Tankian (the lead singer) even said that he would rather not preach about the genocide.
  • Sirusho is an Armenian pop star that releases her music internationally, and while she is not as well-known as System of a Down, her more recent work thematically concerns the Armenian Genocide. However, despite most of her 2016 album Armat being about the Armenian Genocide and releasing two singles on its centennial anniversary regarding the very same subject matter, she never outright says the word "genocide" in any of her songs.

  • In the Mass Effect series, the extermination of the vast majority of the quarian species during the Geth War (which admittedly was initiated by the quarian government under the same logic humanity used in regards to Skynet, with a Skynet-esque response by the geth) is successively downplayed from one title to the next. With dialogue in the first game stating directly that "the geth killed billions and drove [them] from [their] homeworld," the tie-in novels written by the lead writer of the the first game and part of the second having the third person narrator directly describe the geth's actions as "genocide in which less than a single percent of the [quarian] population survived", the second game limiting its description to "the Geth drove [them] from [their] homeworld," and the third presenting it as the conflict in which the Geth "won their freedom." It goes the other way, too; in the first game Shepard can directly point out that the first strike against the Geth was an attempt at genocide, in the second there's a major Quarian faction who think it should be acknowledged as such, but by the third the comparison is avoided even though we see recordings of Quarian kill teams massacring surrendering unarmed Geth. The Quarians actively trying to wipe out the Geth race during the game is also never called out.
    • Another example from the series is the krogan genophage. With only 1 of 1000 infants surviving birth, the species is slowly, but surely dying out. While some people like Maelon regret it and see it as what it really was, most people, especially salarians and turians, try to downplay and justify it. This is a (potential) major point of conflict with Mordin, who goes out of his way to beat about it. As of the third game, he too realizes it was a mistake.
    • Mass Effect: Andromeda gives us the kett, a race of Scary Dogmatic Aliens that invaded the Heleus Cluster and almost immediately started a war of extinction against the native angara roughly eighty years before the Andromeda Initiative arrived. It takes about a third of the game to uncover that the kett are actually perpetrating an Assimilation Plot that can be summed up as "convert any compatible specimen of every species we can get our paws on into more kett, kill the rest, then move on". It's literally the only way they can procreate because they purposely removed their reproductive organs via genetic engineering, which means they willingly chose to become a virus-like plague on the galaxy that has genocide of everything non-kett hard-coded into their life cycle. They call this insanity "exaltation", have built their entire society around it, treat it with religious zeal, and honestly think they're doing their victims a great favor.
  • In StarCraft, Mengsk crosses a Moral Event Horizon by having the entire civilian population of the planet Tarsonis slaughtered by the alien Zerg so that he can crown himself emperor. In Star Craft II, he starts out as a Villain with Good Publicity who have managed to erase all traces of his crime. His loyal lackeys all shut up about it (or did he have them all assassinated?), and in the public social life of the empire it's out of line to point out that the Zerg invasion of Tarsonis was convenient for Mengsk's powergrab. To imply that the emperor was actually behind the attack is surely out of the question. Of course, there is one single exception to this dreadfully polite silence: Our hero, the main character, the "Traitor & Terrorist" Jim Raynor. Oh, and the genocide really backfires on Mengsk once the hero's forces have taken over the television network so the truth can no longer be suppressed.
  • In Halo 2, after the changing of the guard, the remaining Prophets initiate an Order 66-style genocide of the Elites, disguised as a Brute uprising.
  • A Very Long Rope to the Top of the Sky:
    • The ancient Lydian president takes the second option ("I Did What I Had to Do") regarding the near-extinction of Somnians perpetrated by his orders. However, Solomon does explicitly refer to it as genocide.
  • Yggdra Union has lots of genocide as "justice" when you get to the part where Yggdra has finally forced the Empire out of her country, then decides to invade Bronquia and destroy it. Even after Kylier tries to get her to realize that she's going to become the new 'evil invader', Yggdra tells her "This is Justice." Then the game forces you to mow through the 'Bronquian Militia', which is a basically a bunch of level 1 units trying to defend their homeland, and makes you feel very bad about it. "What is Justice?" is a question that a lot of people are asking throughout the game.
  • A gameplay mechanic in Age of Wonders. When you take over a town, you have the option to "migrate" the race currently inhabiting the town, replacing it with a race that's friendly to you. It's a very useful option - say you're a good-aligned race but just took over an undead town and want to replace it with another good-aligned race - but you're still basically committing mass deportation and resettlement...
  • World of Warcraft:
    • The Black Dragons are a genocidal breed of dragons that have been corrupted by the Old Gods, and now serve their insane master on his quest to kill everything. In the face of this threat, the Red Dragons, after many years of conflict, decide the only thing to do is to declare every single Black Dragon corrupted and beyond redemption, and to exterminate every last one of them. That's every Black Dragon, Drake, Whelp, and Egg. And the player helps them do this, even personally dispatching the last fertile Black Dragon female and smashing her eggs. The irony of the Red Dragons, the Protectors of Life, being forced to declare indiscriminate oblivion on an entire species is not lost. However in a far distant and unrelated quest, there are signs that the Red Dragons have taken steps to purify a Black Dragon egg and to restart the flight anew. With one member: Wrathion who ended up killing off the entirety of the Black Dragon species, barring himself.
    • Also played straight with the war against the now homeless Zandalar Tribe and the remnants of troll species(barring the Darkspear who are playable).
  • A codex in Dragon Age: Origins talks about a long series of wars between the Qunari and all the other nations of Thedas. The Qunari were eventually driven back when they withdrew to avoid civilian casualties. In the lands they had occupied, there had been many converts to their strange, totalitarian and occasionally brutal religion. When the Chantry could not convert them back, they simply purged the civilians and then denied that it ever happened.
  • Stellaris allows you to "purge" anything from individual pops (each of which represents roughly one billion people) to entire species including your own, but no matter what the game calls it, it's genocide on a mind-boggling scale, the other empires in the galaxy are very aware of it and tend to react suitably appalled if you indulge in it. Methods range from comparatively merciful mass neutering to execution squads systematically going from house to house. The tool tip for the latter option even includes another cynically trivializing term: "dissolution of a people". Early versions of the game allowed absolutely everyone to purge anyone they didn't like, but later updates restricted the ability to purge pops to the morally darkest grey and black empires, which usually means some combination of militaristic and xenophobic mindsets. The most extreme Absolute Xenophobe factions have this hard-coded into their foreign policy - every alien species they conquer gets purged automatically, resulting in their total extinction in as little as two years.

    Visual Novels 
  • In Code:Realize, the Vampire War that occurred two years prior to the beginning of the story turns out to have been a mostly successful human effort to wipe out the vampire race. The public has been told that the vampires were planning to exterminate humanity and that the war was one of self-defense. In actuality, it was a show of force on Queen Victoria's part to discourage other nations from declaring war on Britain.

    Web Original 
  • Zinnia Jones: Debated in the episode A challenge to Christians: Stop defending genocide
  • One political meme riffs on the tendency for authoritarian extremists to deny crimes against humanity perpetrated by dictators they agree with:
    Authoritarian left: "Never happened. Besides, they were kulaks anyway"
    Authoritarian right: "Never happened. Besides, they were jews anyway"
    Libertarian left: "Never happened. Besides, they were fascists anyway"
    Libertarian right: "Never happened. Besides, 14 is the legal age of consent in some countries anyway"

    Real Life 
  • The UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide compels all nations that have signed it to act with full force to stop and prevent any acts of genocide in the world. Most modern versions of this trope are usually countries trying to cop out of this agreement since they have neither the resources nor the desire to get involved in a long, drawn-out conflict with little apparent gain to the intervening countries ("It's a civil war, not a genocide!"):
    • The massacres in East Pakistan (later Bangladesh) by the Pakistani government in 1971 provide a particularly grisly example. Richard Nixon viewed Pakistan as a Cold War ally and used its leader, Yahya Khan, to negotiate America's "opening" with Maoist China. Therefore the US not only refused to condemn Pakistan but actually supported them. The Bangladeshis did resist Pakistani military action, and India ultimately intervened in the conflict, so the violence wasn't entirely one-sided. But the mass killings of Bengalis predated any concerted resistance, let alone India's involvement.
    • During the genocide in Rwanda and the slaughter of a large chunk of the population for being the Tutsi and not Hutu, the UN and major nations insisted on calling the events genocide-like acts as a way of loopholing out of doing anything. The USA was a particular abuser of this – since the Somalian intervention in 1993 blew up in their face, they didn't want to risk another failure. Probably the best account of this is Michael Barnett's Eyewitness to a Genocide, which documents it from the perspective of someone who actually worked at the UN at the time (it isn't pretty).
    • During the genocide in Darfur, European authorities were very reluctant to call it a genocide, instead repeating the cop-out from Rwanda and calling it "Genocide-like acts". In this particular case, intervening would make them look bad, as intervention has become a very dirty word in light of the War on Terror. Thus it was not a genocide. This didn't prevent the International Criminal Court from issuing a warrant for the arrest of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir specifically indicting him for three counts of genocide (as well as five counts of crimes against humanity and three counts of war crimes). The arrest warrant has not been served, as al-Bashir has made a point of not visiting any country that might arrest him.
  • Imperial Japanese Army Chinese Expeditionary force policies on the treatment of POW, subjugation of partisans, and establishment and maintenance of 'Comfort Houses' during the eight-year China Incident don't make for pleasant or socially-acceptable smalltalk.
  • During World War II, most Germans and a lot of people in the allied nations as well refused to acknowledge that the concentration camps were really death camps – even if they knew the truth for certain, it was so much easier to pretend it wasn't happening. To this day, there are still people who cling to the fantasy that the Holocaust didn't happen at all, or that it "only" happened to the Jews – thus retconning away the other victims: the Slavs, the gays, the intellectuals, the Romani, the mentally disabled, and so onnote 
    • For some Jews, it's a case of "Would be rude to say 'Holocaust'". They prefer the word Shoah (Hebrew for "catastrophe"). Jews often see their mass destruction as something unique in scale. The "uniqueness" of the Holocaust is also advocated by German historians such as Hans Mommsen and Hans Ulrich-Wehler, citing the high-level of pre-meditation and infrastructure dedicated to killing programs, and the fact that it was achieved by an advanced European nation that had undergone modernisation. These subtle critiques get lost when used in political footballs however, where mass famines (the Irish potato famine, the Holodomor, the Great Bengal Famine of 1943) and population displacement (the Partition of India, the Nakbanote ) are promoted by activists and advocates to be on the same scale as the Holocaust, which leads to a messy and bitter feud among victims groups.
    • There is also the fact that the term 'holocaust' is a Greek term meaning sacrifice (as in a sacrifice to God, normally burnt), thus the usage of that particular word so as to imply they were being sacrificed as opposed to brutally murdered may have something to do with it.
  • The Armenian Genocide was a Trope Maker for 20th century genocides to come, and indeed Raphael Lemkin coined the word to describe Turkey's actions against Armenia after attending the trial in Berlin of the Assassin of Talaat Pasha note . The Republic of Turkey passionately denies it was a genocide to this day, mainly to protect their reputation and avoid paying reparations. There are citizens in Turkey who want the government to acknowledge the genocide, though they may not be the majority since the country is very nationalistic, and in fact people have been prosecuted saying genocide occurred under a law criminalizing "insulting Turkishness". This gets tied into international politics because Azerbaijan, an avowed enemy of Armenia and close ally of Turkey, demands that Turkey refuse to acknowledge the genocide. Not that Turkey's government is in a particular rush to do so anyway, Azerbaijan just gives them another excuse.
    • This particular one has repercussions elsewhere. A major controversy ensued when Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, urged the U.S. Congress not to recognize the Armenian Genocide; unsurprisingly this was not considered becoming of one of America's most respected civil rights organizations. The internal conflict proved to be too much and the ADL has since downplayed the issue, though they're still against recognition.
    • This also extends to many of Turkey's allies. The US President for example must avoid using the "G" word when addressing Armenian-Americans on the Day of Remembrance for the genocide, using instead the Armenian term Medz Yeghern (The Great Calamity), which predates the creation of the word 'genocide' and has since gained Unfortunate Implications due to its use as a way to dance around having to say it was a genocide. For the record, although both George W. Bush and Barack Obama stated that if they became President they would issue a formal recognition of the genocide, Ronald Reagan is currently the last U.S. President to do so. [1]
    • Turkey's denial wouldn't quite be such a problem to Armenians if not for its constant foreign meddling whenever the subject comes up in other countries. Not only has it been successful in getting recognition of the genocide blocked in the US, but whenever the subject of making a movie about it comes up in Hollywood, Turkey does its best to find some way to get the project shut down or being it down after its releae. i.e, when the movie The Promise was released, there was an all-out internet war between Armenians and Turks, with many Turkish trolls bombarding the film's IMDB page with one star reviews long before the film premiered in theaters and they could possibly have seen it, and purchasing advance tickets to theater screenings only to ask for a refund at the last minute.
    • The topic received a significant bump in publicity in June 2016 when the German parliament, the Bundestag, passed a pro-Armenian resolution that explicitly included the term "genocide" in its very name. To say that Turkey was upset would be the understatement of the year. The German motion led to major political turmoil between the two countries that still hasn't been fully settled as of January 2018. German politicians were forbidden from visiting Bundeswehr soldiers stationed at the Turkish air force base Incirlik, and both sides pulled no rhetorical punches for over a year until the situation finally began to relax a bit.
  • The situation is similar with what happened to the Pontic Greeks, considered a Genocide in Greece and of course not in Turkey. The Assyrians suffered a similar fate as well at around the same time. Unsurprisingly, many Assyrians and Greeks on the net supported Armenians in regards to The Promise.
  • Older Than They Think: The Roman destruction of Carthage and its entire population, and the enslavement of its survivors, was widely lauded by Romans of its time as both just and necessary, with the worst aspects of Punic culture used as added justification for their annihilation. For years before it actually happened, Cato the Elder, a famous Senator, ended each speech he made with the demand "Carthago delenda est," Latin for "Carthage must be destroyed."
    • Of course in the case of the Ancient World, boasting of destruction of whole tribes and places was common in records and while it is true that the Romans destroyed the Carthaginian Empire in the Third Punic War, that did not necessarily mean extermination of all Carthaginians. The Romans also converted Carthage into a new colony and encouraged settlement there and made it into a Roman province. Carthage was a merchant oligarchical state and most of its clients simply traded one conqueror for another.
    • For Raphael Lemkin, the Albigensian Crusade was an outstanding example of a pre-modern genocide. It targeted a religion, Catharism (seen by the Catholic Church as a heresy) and involved mass murder of some 200,000 people who were denied quarter and involved the specific intent for targeting and eradicating an entire belief system and all its practitioners.
  • According to Azerbaijan's propaganda, Armenia is an evil nation at least in part because the Armenian army deliberately killed civilians during the Nagorno-Karabakh War.note  In particular, the Khojaly Massacre was the most infamous one, which was seen as completely uncalled for in the international community. The Armenian government continues to deny responsibility for the massacres committed by the Armenian army on Azerbaijan's citizens, contending that they gave the citizens advance warning and an escape corridor before invading the town, but the Azeri army prevented anyone from evacuating. There were pogroms on both sides of the conflict too, such as the massacres of Armenians in Baku and Sumgait which Azerbaijan denies took place, though Khojaly was still worse in terms of casualties. So it's more like two countries doing this to each other. Hence the Azeris demand for Turkey not to recognize the Armenian genocide, in retaliation.
  • The other Trope Codifier of things to come from the C20th: the German treatment of the Herero and Nama peoples of what is now Namibia. Read of it, and you can't help seeing the template for the Holocaust. Although, they had taken notes from the Boer Wars of the previous century, they took them to new extremes.
  • The disappearance of Muslims from Greece (and, later, the rest of the Balkans excluding Bosnia, Bulgaria, and Albania) is sometimes incorrectly identified as this. In 1923, after the long and bloody affair that was the Turkish War of Independence (in which the Turks soundly defeated the British, French, Italians, and Greeks put together), the Greeks and the Turks jointly negotiated a treaty providing for the exchange of populations: Greek Orthodox Christians in Turkey for Muslims in Greece. As a result, approximately 1.5 million (surviving; the Turks had already perpetrated the Pontic Greek genocide, which claimed between 750 and 900,000) Christians for about 500,000 (surviving; there had been reprisals, pogroms and other atrocities perpetrated against Turks and Jews in Greek Macedonia since the Ottomans had ceded it) Muslims. The incredible, full-circle irony of this is that the population transfers were based on religion, not ethnic or cultural identity. The result was that many Greek (and Greek-speaking) Muslims were deported to Turkey and Orthodox Turks were expelled to Greece. The whole affair remains a source of much bad blood between Greece and Turkey (though they've both grown closer recently), and many people from both countries feel they were more the victim, and it's one reason why the Armenian genocide is a Berserk Button issue in Turkey, being seen by many as a Double Standard. Still, as it stands today, Turkey is about 99.8% Muslim (some sources put the Christian population of the country at about 1,000), while there remain large Muslim populations in the Balkans (majority populations in Albania and Kosovo, minority in Bulgaria, and plurality in Bosnia).
  • The systematic extermination and/or relocation of indigenous people in the United States was generally depicted by contemporary writers (even L. Frank Baum of all people) as justifiable, necessary, and inevitable, with few exceptions, and they were mythologized as a Dying Race to more or less cover up the fact that it was largely being done on purpose. This kind of myth was also used in Argentina and Australia, countries where European settler-immigrants also wanted the locals to make space for them (but not New Zealand or South Africa, where it was pretty clear that the locals were there to stay). Also used in The Raj (of 1848-1947), wherein the British consistently favoured static/agricultural nations and peoples over nomadic tribes - most famously in Burma, where they managed to piss off the mountain tribes enough that they sided with the Japanese.
  • The famine in the Soviet Union during the 30s, especially in Ukraine described as Holodomor, is sometimes considered a genocide. Even Raphael Lemkin supported recognizing it as such in the early 50s.
    • Academic historians who regarded reports after the opening of the Soviet Archives note the difficulty of seeing the famine, or any famine, as legally falling under the 1948 definition of genocide since if the famine was deliberately engineered to starve Ukrainians, it did not explain how it affected regions outside Soviet Ukraine, in Russia, Kazakhstan and the Caucasus where millions starved in conditions and situations similar to the Ukraine. The causes of the famine and its links to Stalin's policies of collectivization are also contentious, since famine had been common in Russia since the Russian Empire, and the harvest at the start of 1933 was lower than projected and there was a drought that led to the start of the crisis, which at the very least seems to question intent and co-ordination. Supporters note that unlike Lenin who allowed foreign aid and backed off war communism in favour of NEP in response to a similar famine in the early 20s (caused largely by the Russian Civil War deprivations), Stalin's USSR did no such thing and intensified persecution of the kulaks during collectivization and refused to allow international observers to visit the famine stricken Kuban area in Ukraine where the majority of people died in the famine.
    • Nicolas Werth, an anti-communist demographer had initially opposed seeing the famine of 1933-1934 as genocide in the wake of the publication of the "Black Book of Communism". Recently, he has lent some support noting that one could possibly regard the actions of the Soviet bureaucracy to Ukraine as an institutional response to the peasant rebellion that broke out at the beginning of collectivization. Ukrainian peasants resisted forced collectivization and requisitions by acts of sabotage, destroying crops and burning cattle and this led the local soviets under general orders to stop providing new seeds for planting and likewise provided the internal passport which made it difficult for them to move to gain food in new areas, which aggravated the crisis causing mass starvation, which would fit the legal rubric of genocide if one sees the peasants of the Kuban as a "national/ethnic/religious/racial" group distinct from Ukraine's urban centers and the peasants in the Caucasus/Kazakhstan and Russia. This was Rafael Lemkin's contention since he regarded the Ukrainians as a distinct ethnic entity.
    • Timothy Snyder, in his book Bloodlands also regards the Ukraine famine as a genocide, though he uses different parameters than Lemkin. He noted that if one included political groups under the 1948 contention, then one could identify the actions of the Soviet government as genocidal. He notes that the 1948 UN Genocide Convention was compromised because the Soviet Union deliberately argued against including political groups as categories falling under the criteria for victims of genocide. William Schabas, one of the foremost authorities on genocide, disagrees. He noted that the Soviet Union's refusal to include "political categories" was backed by many countries some of whom such as Sweden/Iran/Egypt/Belgium hardly qualified as Soviet puppets, as well as the World Jewish Congress and that it was determined by the vagueness of defining political groups.
  • Whether the Manifest Destiny period of the US counted as one towards the Native-Americans varies hugely on who you ask, with generational gaps accounting for a large portion of it. Aside from the numerous broken treaties with tribes, there were also boarding schools whose primary purpose was to "properly" educate native children, barring them from speaking their native tongue and otherwise ensuring they would be assimilated into the European-dominant culture in the US. The now-infamous American professor Ward Churchill invoked this in his book A Little Matter of Genocide. He naturally argues that it was.
  • Peru had a similar story with Alberto Fujimori's "ligation days", but it's not Peru that denies it. Like Iran and a few of Israel's other neighbors with the Holocaust, this one involves countries unrelated to the actual perpetrator: The United States (mostly because of some American companies who supported Fujimori) and Japan (because the Japanese-Peruvian Fujimori resided there for years and it took a LONG effort to be brought back to face justice).
  • In East and South-East Asia the Japanese are considered notoriously cavalier about their Army's war crimes during the 1930s and 40s. Part of this comes from genuine ignorance, as Japan's right-wing has been partially successful in preventing this from being covered in schools and school textbooks; they fear that acknowledging the 6-20 million deadnote , as well as the specifics of the various war crimes and crimes against humanity (biological weapons testing on hundreds of thousands, human medical experimentation on tens of thousands, mass-rape of hundreds of thousands, torture of hundreds of thousands, forced prostitution of tens of thousands, POW deaths from preventable causesnote  and heavy-handednessnote  in the hundreds of thousands, POW-beheading contests, etc, etc) would harm the patriotism and national pride of Japan's youth. Interestingly enough, some surveys of national pride would appear to indicate that the advent of the internet has resulted in a dramatic decrease in Japanese patriotism, as the i-net savvy younger generations have started to become aware of their country's horrible war deeds.
  • Matthew White, a self-described "atrocitologist", has taken it upon himself to be a scholar of the absolute nadirs of evil human beings have committed. He coined the term hemoclysm ("blood flood") to describe the worst atrocities of history. While World War II tops the list in raw numbers with at least 55M deaths, when the ranks are adjusted for the world's population at the time, it drops to ninth. The Mongol conquests may have killed 40M in the 13th century (#3 in raw numbers, #2 in adjusted rank), and the An Lushan Revolt in the 8th century supposedly claimed 36M (#4 in raw numbers, #1 adjusted). None of these meet the definition of "genocide" since they constitute 'attempted extermination of a people'. Stephen Pinker, who used Matthew White's work as a tiny fraction of his research for The Better Angels of Our Nature, makes the case that hemoclysms and genocides of history have been relatively frequent, and even advances the rather bold claim that they were 'ordinary' in the minds of the people of those eras.
    • Of course, this also conflates various types of killing; while the Mongols really did execute a couple of genocides, this only accounted for a small part of their body-count. Also, the idea that it was "normal" at the time is modern-day revisionism and propaganda: it wasn't at all. Indeed, one of the major reasons that the Mongols were so harsh to some of their enemies was precisely to terrorize everyone else into surrendering, so that they didn't HAVE to fight as much. If their enemies just gave up, it was much easier for the Mongols to rule over them. Additionally, some of it was done to end endless inter-tribal violence; by simply killing all the older men (gendercide), they effectively deprived the losing tribe of the ability to take revenge. People like Vlad the Impaler and the Mongols are remembered precisely because they were unusually harsh, and they were well aware of the psychological impact on the enemy and took full advantage of it.
      • Finally, just as you'd expect of someone whose entire claim to fame rests on massive kill figures, White's numbers are extremely dubious and much-disputed. The supposed topper (the An Lushan Revolt) is a case in point. For a start, in Chinese history, there have nominally been armies or massacres of exactly 800,000 people no less than three hundred times. This is because '800,000' was actually shorthand for 'well, nobody knows for sure, but trust us it sure was a hell of a lot'. Chinese sources on non-800,000 numbers tend to be somewhat wonky at the best of times, especially regarding warfare. On top of this, a great many of the things used to gauge the overall population figures in the area concerned are wonky, like using census and tax returns listing numbers of household (which don't just reflect the population loss but also the breakdown of the ability to count the people still alive).
  • Countless tribes were exterminated in tribal warfare, their names never recorded and the crimes lost to history.
    • The standard outcome of a defeated city was to be subject to massacre for much of history. For example, the 1258 Siege of Baghdad ended with roughly two million exterminated. This would be called genocide by most modern scholars.
    • The Bible chronicles the extermination of many peoples, in some case directly commanded by God. In one of the more famous examples, Numbers 31 states all male Midianites were killed by Israel, down to newborn infants, as were all women who were not virgins. The virgins were taken as slaves. The tone of the book does not indicate that this act should be condemned as genocide. The theological implications are not a good topic for discussion, but the tone does hint at how societies of the era viewed such horrors.
  • Paul Mojzes in his book Balkan Genocides argues that the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 were actually a series of genocides - ones that the world has mostly forgotten, partially because they happened in a rather remote area, and partially because the term "Genocide" had not yet been coined back then. He also argues that some of the events called "ethnic cleansing" (such as the war in Bosnia 1992-95) or "repatriation" (the expulsion of the Germans after World War 2) actually constituted genocide.
  • From 1976-1983 the National Reorganization Process in Argentina carried out an extensive campaign of what could best be called "politicide", exterminating 30,000 members of various leftist political groups. Right-wing supporters of the junta went into denial, with Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and various other Cold War leaders all trying to paint the situation as a civil war - at least up until the Argentines attacked British territory during The Falklands War in 1982, and it backfired so badly that the Junta ended up falling to pieces in few months.
  • Following the rift between Israel and Turkey due to the Mavi Marmara incident, an argument arose in the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, regarding the question of acknowledging the Armenian Genocide as such, mostly due to political reasons.
  • What the Belgians did to the Congolese is still up for debate as to whether it actually was a genocide; mostly because the Belgians did not try to exterminate the Congolese. However, if it does count as a genocide, then it would have caused far more casualties than the Holocaust. It does not help that Belgium has made Holocaust denial illegal, but denying this doesn't look like a problem; they still have a Monument of Leopold II where it is written "I have undertaken the work in Congo in the interest of civilization and for the good of Belgium."
    • This Reddit comment explains the mindset of the common Belgian about this very well. Stating that Belgians deny the atrocities committed by Leopold II is quite an exaggeration. If anything, Belgians tend to show a healthy amount of debate and nuance when discussing their colonial past, learning about all those severed Congolese hands in history class is sure to leave an impression.
  • A minority of French historians want the War in the Vendée (during The French Revolution) being recognized as a genocide, calling the events "Franco-French genocide". This view is generally considered fringe by most scholars (pro and anti-revolutionary) who noted that the uprising there is more precisely a Civil War with considerable violence and casualties on both sides. It was the Vendeean Royalists, who first opened fire on the Republic (out of protest at the French government's anti-Catholic policies and Conscription), when they massacred 200 people at Machecoul, likewise the Committee of Public Safety had considerable local support from Republican Vendeeans, which meant that it wasn't directed against the whole region but specifically those parts of it that were counter-revolutionary and actively rebelling against the state.
  • There are many groups, both with and without the urging of Irish nationalists, who have come to view the Irish Potato Famine as an act of genocide, with others arguing that it was merely an incredibly callous but depressingly typical response from a government and society which feared 'big government' and 'promoting laziness' far more than it did people dying, and to this day it is an area of debate with people on both sides making valid points. Those who view the act as the latter argue that, with the exception of the pre-famine Corn Laws (preventing the 'importation' of wheat to England) pushed by English landlords who wanted to avoid 'competition' with 'foreigners' including The Irish, Westminster's response would have been pretty much the same regardless of where it happened and how bad it was: it would have held off on acting for a while due to a cautious 'wait and see' approach, it would have let private charity work attempt to solve the problem until it became very obvious that it was totally inadequate, it would have defended the 'right' of landlords to exact pay from starving tenants, it would have organised back-breaking labor for low pay to distinguish between 'deserving' and 'undeserving' starving people, and it would not have accounted for the rise in food prices that would make said low pay totally insufficient to buy enough food to survive. Those who view the act as an outright genocide argue that Britain purposely made the famine worse than it was out of a desire to reduce the number of Irishmen, in line with the Malthusian belief current at the time that Ireland's poverty was a result of overpopulation and thus reducing its population would solve the problem. They point to Britain blocking foreign aid to Ireland, making it illegal for Irish Catholics to purchase hunting and fishing licenses, the fact that Ireland remained a net exporter of food throughout the famine, and to the overall attitude that the Protestant Anglo-Saxon British had towards the Catholic Irish. Charles Trevelyan saying of the famine that "The real evil with which we have to contend is not the physical evil of the Famine, but the moral evil of the selfish, perverse and turbulent character of the people" certainly makes Britian's response to the famine appear genocidal to some. Whether or not it actually was a genocide varies depending on who you ask.

Alternative Title(s): Dont Say Genocide