Follow TV Tropes


Democracy Is Flawed

Go To

"A great deal of democratic enthusiasm descends from people like Rousseau, who believed in democracy because they thought mankind so wise and good that everyone deserved a share in the government. The danger of defending democracy on those grounds is that they are not true...I do not deserve a share in governing a hen-roost much less a nation. Nor do most people...The real reason for democracy is just the reverse. Mankind is so fallen that no man can be trusted with unchecked power over his fellows. Aristotle said that some people were only fit to be slaves. I do not contradict him. But I reject slavery because I see no men fit to be masters."
C. S. Lewis, Equality

Some writers don't believe Democracy Is Bad per se. They see it as the best system we've got. That said they don't think it is perfect, and they've written something to get this viewpoint across.

Writers who are utilizing this trope will lay bare the flaws of democracy but not demonize it. They will point out the safeguard against tyranny it provides while pointing out that the influence of narrow interest groups, an unaware populace and a biased media can still lead to the people being manipulated into voting against their interests or even simply not having a candidate that represents their interests to choose. They will note that it allows the checking of unwise usage of power while at the same time leading to polarization and paralysis. The overall use of this trope is one that is in favour of democratic procedures (in fact, one of their main criticisms may be that the system isn't democratic enough) but that said procedures are still full of holes.


More philosophical works may speak of the human element as reason for why democracy is flawed.

For now, Real Life examples are permitted, as this is a politically motivated trope and they are helpful. Try to keep it to famous opinions on the matter rather than analysis of the actual systems. Failure to be civil will result in the Real Life section being nuked. Real Life examples are a privilege, not a right.



    open/close all folders 

    Anime and Manga 
  • High School Prodigies Have It Easy Even in Another World: The Republic of Elm runs into this trope when it comes to the issue of whether or not to help Yamato, where voting yes could restart hostilities with the Freyjagard Empire while voting no means betraying their nation's ideals. Both choices have their pros and cons, but the voters on both sides aren't thinking as hard about the long-term consequences as Tsukasa. It's also clear that they still have to rely on Tsukasa to find out how to implement their decision and plan for potential consequences. Worse yet, the pro-war side is being manipulated by a smooth-talking but wicked former noble, showing that it's easy for bad actors to manipulate public opinion. While the corrupt noble is arrested and the two political parties come to a compromise, it's clear that the democratic system would have fallen apart without the Luminaries' interference. That said, Tsukasa believes having the citizens vote over the issue is preferable to them killing each other in a civil war.
  • Legend of Galactic Heroes spends a lot of time showing that democracy at is best is nowhere near as good as the best that can be done with an iron fist, but it also is unlikely to sink quite as low. The Free Planets Alliance is corrupt to the core, but people can still complain about it without being sent to The Gulag. The Empire, in the meantime, can go from golden age to decadence all on the basis of who's in charge of it, and the rights of its citizens are tied to The Emperor's whims. Reinhart eventually enshrines said rights with a constitution, but he couldn't have done so without taking supreme power in a coup.

    Comic Books 
  • When Papa Smurf is away, The Smurfs argue who should be the new leader. In the first round of voting, everyone votes for himself. The second round ends with a Smurf elected (by making empty promises) who installs a monarchy with himself as the king.
  • In the IDW Transformers G1 continuity, Optimus Prime eventually renounced Autobot dominance over Cybertron and allowed its citizens to elect a leader. They chose Starscream.
    • Starscream has since found himself somewhat beholden to the people he now rules, and the Council of Worlds that includes representatives from various colony worlds. He's unhappy about having to answer to people who have no idea what kind of stresses he's under to actually be a good leader, but surprisingly enough he actually is trying. If only to spite those who think he can't handle it.
  • In Project Superpowers, Boy King claims that the only time that democracy is preferable to a monarchy is if the throne is occupied by an unwise king, because otherwise, democracy just invites mob rule. Of course, since Boy King is the unelected monarch of a small Eastern-European country, he may be a bit biased.
  • While the democratization of the world in the The Legend of Korra animated series is portrayed as a good thing, the followup comics show that implementing that democracy in practice is hard work. The second series The Legend of Korra: Ruins of the Empire has Korra go to the Earth Kingdom to help them with their fledging democracy. It's estimated that it will take a full year before they can have elections and the Earth Kingdom has never been democratic so it's hard to get others on board. The confusion is also used as a means to an end by Guan, the villain.
  • Democracy is also this, along with Democracy Is Bad. Cleisthenes' reforms improved the life of many citizens and felt strong and ready to protect their city from the Persian attack. Women and slaves would still not have a vote though]…
  • At the end of the Earth X trilogy, Mar-Vell has to warn Reed Richards not to let Steve Rogers turn the Paradise into a democracy, because heaven has to be better than the lowest common denominator of a popular vote.

    Fan Works 
  • It's not an uncommon theme for My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fanfics to use this trope, seeing as how Celestia is supposed to be a good queen (well, princess) but viewers tend to associate democracy with the "good" form of government. In some politically focused stories, Princess Celestia and/or Luna exhibits this attitude to explain why Equestria remains under an eternal monarchy/diarchy.
    • In Equestria: A History Revealed, while it started off promising, the Equinus Republic quickly devolved into politicians holding their own private agendas, constant lack of consensus and progress, and pointless bickering in Parliament. This all sets the stage for the rise of Discord.
    • In Sunshine and Fire, Celestia uses this logic to argue against the parallel universe version of Applejack and her plan to overthrow her own world's version of Celestia (a corrupt, insane tyrant) and install democracy in her place. She specifically focuses on how, in addition to democracy's normal flaws (aka susceptibility to inefficiency, corruption, infighting and mob justice), Applejack wants to install it on a world that has known nothing but tyranny and oppression for a thousand years, and in particular where "the majority" will be drawn from a species that was repressed for those thousand years and which would thusly be eager to oppress those who had power beforehand in turn.
  • The Equestrian Civil Service Series splits the difference by making Equestria a constitutional monarchy (or possibly diarchy) that's very similar to the real-life Westminster system, which isn't surprising for a series that owes so much inspiration to Yes, Minister.
  • White Sheep (RWBY): General Ironwood has many problems with the Atlas Council, and Jaune finds it impossible to get them to capitulate to his extremely minor, perfectly reasonable demands. Despite Ironwood's complaints, he is quick to insist that democracy is far better than the alternative. The big problem is that Jaune has basically forced them into the worst possible situation for a democratic council: Making a snap decision, with minimal information, and what information they do have runs counter to everything the people have believed for centuries. Due to the myth of Atlas' invincibility, if the politicians give Jaune what he wants they will all immediately be impeached and the country will be thrown into chaos. Jaune and Ironwood reach a compromise by faking a war, which puts the country under martial law and leaves Ironwood as the sole person with any authority. The plan is to fight for a few weeks and then "force" Jaune to "accept" peace, ignoring the fact that this is what he wanted all along.

  • Star Wars: In the prequel trilogy, then-Senator Palpatine uses the political mire of the Galactic Senate to ignite his scheme of overthrowing the Jedi and Senate to establish a Sith Empire. In the Expanded Universe, it's implied that a large amount of the corruption in the Senate for the millenium was due to the Sith. All Palpatine did was fulfill it.
    • This is a running theme through Star Wars Legends. No one's debating the Republic doesn't have many, many flaws. However, they stood for almost thirty thousand years against many iterations of the Sith Empire. The Empire in all but the most recent form (that is, under the rule of the Fel family) is a brutal, racist, sexist, corrupt and self-destructive trash heap with crumbling or non-existent infrastructure, a house of cards economy built on eternal war and slave labor, wastes the talents of most species (remember: this is a galaxy with at least twenty million sentient species) by making sure anyone who isn't Human (or Sith species, when they were still around) is sent to a slave pit (if they're not Force Sensitive). Force Sensitives are conscripted to the Sith to be trained, target practice, and frequently both. Klingon Promotion is standard operating procedure, as is Chronic Backstabbing Disorder (no one can trust their underlings, as the underlings are just biding their time to stab the boss and take their job and the underlings can't trust the boss not to get them killed just to advance their prospects), and the whole thing is "ruled" by an Ax-Crazy theocratic cabal of Sith who don't give a bantha's arse about anything but their own (inevitably lethal) power games. The Republic looks like Utopia compared to that mess.
    • One of the most overwhelming themes of the Legacy of the Force series. Pretty much every problem is caused by the Galactic Federation, and pretty much every one of those is because it's a democracy.
  • Sunshine. When the Icarus II crew is discussing the option of diverting the mission to intercept the Icarus I so they can retrieve the payload and possibly save their crew if they are still alive, Mace wants to put it up to a vote. Searle points out that they are not a democracy, but a group of astronauts and scientists on a mission to save mankind. Therefore they shouldn't arbitrarily make their decision by popular concensus but to make the most informed decision possible, made by the person best qualified to understand the theory and complexities of the payload delivery, physicist Capa.

  • This was a key theme of the late Allen Drury's Advise and Consent series (written between the late 1950's and the mid-1970's). He sought to show, sometimes Anviliciously, that American democracy, as inefficient as it often is, is infinitely preferable to the "efficient" tyranny of Communist regimes.
  • Discworld:
    • Lord Vetinari mentions a town voting to make itself democratic, then immediately voting to no longer pay taxes. Given the general Humans Are Bastards and Morons tendencies on the Disc, the only viable forms of government are monarchies and dictatorships.
    • The Ephebians have an elected head of state (elected by a very small minority of rich men, that is) but as it's a parody of Athens' own democracy in ancient times, it's hardly a democracy as we'd understand it: the head of state has the official title of "Tyrant" and doesn't appear to have any checks on his powers other than a fixed term in office.
    • Referenced in The Fifth Elephant:
      Vimes had once discussed the Ephebian idea of ‘democracy’ with Carrot, and had been rather interested in the idea that everyone had a vote until he found out that while he, Vimes, would have a vote, there was no way in the rules that anyone could prevent Nobby Nobbs from having one as well. Vimes could see the flaw there straight away.
    • King Verence II of the Lancre is a well-meaning fellow that attempted to implement a parliament. His subjects however, clearly have no interest in doing what they think is his job for him. Ironically, this (along with other implications) clearly implies the populace already have some sense of self-determination.
    • After the last king of Ankh-Morpork, the ironically nicknamed Lorenzo the Kind, was killed by "Stoneface" Vimes, democracy was established in the city. The people immediately voted against it, as they didn't want to be ruled by idiots like their neighbors.
  • Robert A. Heinlein:
    • Glory Road, a doctor of sociology of a highly advanced civilization mentions to the hero (who is from present day Earth) that democracy is "a good system for beginners", while stating that advanced civilizations have far better ways of government.
    • Time Enough for Love:
      • Lazarus Long makes the following comment regarding democracy:
        "Democracy is based on the assumption that a million men are wiser than one man. How’s that again? I missed something."
      • To his credit, he also shows doubts regarding autocracy:
        "Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. Let’s play that over again, too. Who decides?"
  • Niccolò Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy suggests that unrestrained democracy would lead to anarchic chaos, but it was necessary for liberty in balance with aristocracy and monarchy in a true Republic. In contrast to his more famous work which sidestepped the issue entirely (and was probably meant as satire). It is worth noting that Machiavelli’s ideal form of republic is a notable forerunner of the modern idea of checks and balances in government, and he may be argued to have been Vindicated by History, as many of today’s political systems seem to have taken his ideas to heart. For example, the American Political System can be argued to have elements of monarchy in the presidency, of aristocracy in the court system (originally the Senate), and of democracy in Congress. Meanwhile, the British Political System, at least in theory, has monarchy in the prime minister (and the actual monarch), aristocracy in the House of Lords, and democracy in the House of Commons. Of course, people’s opinions may vary wildly on how truly effective these systems are.
  • in The Book of Mormon, when King Mosiah abdicates in favor of a democracy, he notes that while "the voice of the people" will usually work, there may come a day when majority vote will support wickedness. He also notes that when a king is righteous, a monarchy is preferable; democracy exists to avoid the inevitable wicked kings that lead the people into wickedness.
  • One traditional interpretation of Thucydides' writings has been that democracies need leaders, but that leadership itself can be fundamentally dangerous to democracy. This does not appear to be intended as a condemnation of democracy in and of itself, but a warning to the electorate of the need for vigilance.
  • In So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish, Douglas Adams presents a lengthy parable about first-past-the-post voting systems (see Duverger's Law under the real life section below), in which people are ruled by lizards, whom they universally hate. They all have the vote, so they assume the government they have resembles the one they actually want, but they persist in voting for lizards, because if they didn’t vote for a lizard, “the wrong lizard might get in”.
  • Victoria showcases the full spectrum of democracies and their strengths and weaknesses. In the backstory, the failing representative democracy of the United States had good intentions originally, but became deadlocked and corrupt when the legislators and bureaucratic leviathans of the federal government grew too distant from the people and were bribed by the special interests. The main story line features the titular Victoria, a direct democracy building on the Articles of Confederation; it has less corruption and unelected bureaucracies, but is correspondingly more vulnerable to populist demagogy, racism and the influence of political generals. And then, of course, there is their enemy: the Democratic Republic of Azania, a Lady Land that starts out as a democracy but soon is one in name only, after fascists take over its elected assembly.
  • Caliphate shows democracy giving way to fascist regimes coming into power: after the United States suffers a nuclear attack by Islamic terrorists, the people overwhelmingly vote for a third party demagogue that vows to make them pay and proceeds to nuke the entire Muslim world in retribution. Meanwhile, Western Europe has a high influx of Muslim refugees who overwhelmingly vote to transform the European Union into the titular Caliphate, where non-Muslims and women are second class citizens. Yet, several characters lament how miserable the world has become, but rather than blame democracy for its downfall, they miss its loss instead and wish the world had been freer.
  • City of Light: Palidia is a representative democracy, with a lot of the familiar problems-a huge class divide despite political equality in theory, strongly antagonistic politics and difficulty handling crises which their democratic government can't deal with quickly. This results in them turning into a dictatorship.
  • Comes up multiple times in books by Brandon Sanderson:
    • In Mistborn: The Original Trilogy, after the Final Empire is overthrown, the heroes form a constitutional monarchy to administer the city. Ultimately, the elected parliament promptly votes them out of office and sides with their enemies. In retrospect, Elend shouldn't have written that clause into his constitution. In the end, he is forced to dissolve the government and declare himself emperor in order to save what's left of humanity.
    • However, by The Alloy of Law, set in the same world several hundred years down the line, the Empire has been dissolved and the government is democratically elected and runs seemingly smoothly outside of a fairly normal level of corruption. Elend is even referred to in the histories as "The Last Emperor". Ultimately, it's less the Democracy is Bad, and more that Elend's attempts to set one up were too idealistic and naive for the situation he found himself in.
    • The Stormlight Archive:
      • Dalinar initially tries to work with the Alethi highprinces peacefully to fight the coming Desolation, but eventually gives up and decides to just force them into it. And of course, it doesn't even occur to him to allow the lesser nobles or lowborn to have a more direct say in the matter. In the second book (Words of Radiance), he sadly asks Wit if he's a tyrant. Wit says yes—but unfortunately, a tyrant is what they need right now.
        Wit: Do not sorrow. It is an era for tyrants. I doubt this place is ready for anything more, and a benevolent tyrant is preferable to the disaster of weak rule. Perhaps in another place and time, I'd have denounced you with spit and bile. Here, today, I praise you as what this world needs.
      • Alethkar actually does have an extremely basic form of democracy: All citizens have the right to travel, and landowners have authority based on the number of people who follow them. Bad landlords, in theory, will quickly find themselves without any citizens. Of course, lower-class citizens rarely have money to travel, and soldiers have this right suspended so landlords always have plenty of armed men to enforce their will. It has such a minor effect on politics that it's never even mentioned as something that the nobles have to worry about.
      • In the fourth book (Rhythm of War), Jasnah is working to turn her kingdom into a republic once the war is over, and Wit cheerfully refers to Dalinar as a horrifying dictator again. Dalinar, on the other hand, is befuddled at the idea of any even mildly democratic government. He explicitly sees a nation as basically a very large army, and therefore it needs a single strong authority figure in charge.
  • These Words Are True and Faithful deconstructs a common argument for trusting a democratically elected government, namely, that people cannot be trusted to run their own lives:
    “And if we’re too stupid to make those decisions for ourselves, how are we smart enough to elect the right elected officials to make those same decisions for all of us, including you? Is the voting booth like the Great Teacher from that TV show?”

    Live-Action TV 
  • Luka Kovac expresses a belief similar to this to John Carter in the first episode of the "Doctors Without Borders" arc of ER. It probably helps that he's lived through a time in his native Croatia when there was no democracy.
  • It's not clear if this was an intentional Aesop, but a great many of the Rag-Tag Fleet's problems in Battlestar Galactica could have been avoided if President Roslin would favour expert advice over public opinion. Roslin becoming president is even a potential example of this trope: before the Cylon attack she was a mid-ranking member of the Department of Education. She became president simply because she was the highest ranking (read only) member of the civilian government left alive, so the line of succession fell to her despite her obvious lack of qualification.
  • Doom Patrol: Crazy Jane has sixty four different personas living inside her head, in a mental construct called The Underground. They tend to hold votes to decide things like what they should do in various situations. Unfortunately, the reason Jane has so many personas is because she developed Dissociative Personality Disorder as a result of sexual abuse she suffered as a child. Consequently, her personas range from "quirky" to "absolutely dysfunctional" in personality and on top of that most of them besides Jane stay in the Underground either full-time or most of the time and have little if any idea of how to interact with the real world. As a result, any time they vote to override Jane (who's one of the saner personas and who spends most of her time fronting and therefore does understand the real world), they tend to mess things up badly. Examples include putting Karen (a telepath who's obsessed with 90s sitcoms and tries to Mind Rape every handsome man she meets into falling in love with her), The Hangman's Daughter (who doesn't want to do anything but paint and doesn't even understand things like eating or sleeping), or Baby Doll (a telekinetic with the emotional maturity of a young child) in charge.
  • Game of Thrones: This applies to House Greyjoy, although the show made it even more obvious than in the books that the power will stay in the hand of the Feudal Overlord family (one of the perk of being an overlord, power and influence are hard to lose) as no one proposed themselves once Theon backed up Yara's claim but another Greyjoy. And of course, there is the fact that the common people of the Iron Islands, and the thralls and salt wives, don't get a vote. In the books they make it more explicit that any ship captain can put themselves forward as a candidate — it's just that the main families like the Greyjoys tend to be the most famous and successful, so they usually win. In turn, this means they will probably continue to have opportunities to be successful, so power does tend to be concentrated in a few families (they only tend to get voted out of power if they really screw up). In the book version, three other minor fringe candidates try to run against Yara and Euron but they don't even make it through the first round of voting and quickly give up. Democracy is Flawed also applies in the sense that the ship captains voting at the Kingsmoot tend to be easily swayed by grandstanding and empty promises — in the books, it was considered unusual that a few of the smarter lords actually support Yara, based on her appeal to reason and logic ("What the hell do you think will happen if we keep harassing the mainlanders?")
  • Yes, Minister played with this one, as neither idealistic front-bench rookie Jim Hacker nor his much more experienced and rather jaded Permanent Under-Secretary Sir Humphrey were ever consistently in the wrong.
  • Adam Ruins Everything: "Adams Ruins Voting". Adam explains the problems with the American electoral process, from the racism and elitism of the Founding Fathers, to the irregularities of the electoral college, to disenfranchisement of minorities and felons, to gerrymandering. But then Adam talks about how the system and the franchise has improved greatly over the years, and how voting can solve these problems.
  • Black Sails: Pirate Captains are democratically elected, and the crew can call votes for a change of leadership if they so desire. This causes all sorts of problems for the captains, particularly Flint, who's grand vision for Nassau and the future of piracy is frequently threatened by his greedy and short-sighted crewmates. But on the flip side, many of the captains -especially Flint- will abuse their position when they can get away with it. This rule exists to ensure that the Captain is always acting in the best interests of the crew.
  • Black Mirror: "The Waldo Moment" is a story about a blue cartoon bear running in a British by-election. Despite Waldo and the comedian who plays him standing for no policies and his increasingly pissed off voice actor openly admitting to such, he plays on cynicism and apathy of the electorate towards the political system and attracts a lot of votes. End result: Waldo comes second (with Conservatives first and Labour and Lib Dems behind) and goes on to become the mascot for a global populist right-wing movement. If you notice the similarities between Waldo and Pepe the frog, congrats.
  • The Orville: "Majority Rule" satirizes a direct e-democracy (by way of upvotes and downvotes on social media) via a planet with such a form of government which is very similar to a modern day Earth. LaMarr is filmed doing something unbelievably stupid and rude but not actually damaging, and is sentenced to a lobotomy unless he can manage to throw himself on the public's mercy such that he doesn't score 10 million downvotes. It's also later revealed that everything on the planet runs on this kind of system, including things that should be instead based on concrete facts for everyone's benefit, such as what medicines cure what diseases and what kinds of foods are good for you.

  • Dice Funk:
    Jess: The problem is—
    Austin: Democracy!
    Jess: Well, that's part of the problem....

    Professional Wrestling 
  • TNA had pulled out all the wrestlers it had under contract, so at ROH Generation Next a poll of the fans was proposed to decide who was the top up and coming wrestler in the company, since that was who was mostly on the card only for Austin Aries, Roderick Strong and Jack Evans and be declared the best things in Ring of Honor by Alex Shelley, who claimed he had talent on loan from God before trashing the ballots and proceeding to highjack the show to prove it. The fans who were denied their voting, approved.
  • The Shield's motive was to destroy fan favorite wrestlers because they realized their company had become a popularity contest whose direction was determined by audience popularity. However, they turned face when they saw what The Authority felt was "best for business".
  • WWE has held events where fans can vote on future matches (opponents, stipulations,etc.). Typically, the choices will be such that one choice will obviously get the most votes in order to maintain their planned storylines.

    Tabletop Games 
  • A variant occurs in the Vampire: The Masquerade Brujah clanbook, in which the narrator admits that, while the Camarilla is flawed and there are many things that the Brujah don't like about it, its still the best idea that vampires have come up with so far and should be maintained until something better is created.
  • In BattleTech, the Free Worlds League is the closest thing to a democracy in the Feudal Future. Nobility does not necessarily imply planetary lordship, and there is a strong planetary democratic tradition. However, prevalent sectionalism ensures that the FWL is the most unstable state, having succumbed to repeated civil wars that its neighbors are keen to exploit. Initially, the Captain-General was a temporarily military posting, but during 300 years of total war it became an executive hereditary position occupied by House Marik, and slowly became more powerful than the elected parliament.

  • And, as always, Shakespeare did it ages ago in his famous To Be or Not to Be speech in Hamlet:
    For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
    The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
    The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
    The insolence of office...
  • This trope is also significantly part of Coriolanus' motivation, as he believes the people are too stupid and petty to be allowed to vote.
  • The musical Knickerbocker Holiday has as its primary moral that a government run inefficiently by a council of fat and stupid men is better than one run efficiently by a dictator.
  • Referenced in 1776, the musical about the founding of America, when Franklin quotes Plato:
    "What do you think, Doctor? Democracy. What Plato called 'A charming form of government, full of variety and disorder.' I never knew Plato had been to Philadelphia."

     Video Games 
  • The New California Republic in Fallout: New Vegas is a democracy styled after pre-War America (as it was perceived by most survivors. That the actual America in the days before the War was not so much "flawed" as it was almost as much an authoritarian, nigh-totalitarian regime as the Communists it decried is a recurring plot element in the series), and most characters in the game say it's flawed but a hell of a lot better than suffering under a military dictatorship like some other areas. The other choices in the Mojave Wasteland are under the usually-benevolent rule of autocratic Mr. House, or totalitarian slavery under Caesar's Legion. In-universe characters non-aligned with either faction will generally see flaws and strengths of all factions, but while both NCR and Mr. House are regarded as morally gray, the Legion is near universally condemned by those outside of it.
  • In Transistor, people in Cloudbank can constantly vote on different things in the city. This gives the citizens the power to change everything in the city on a whim, whether it be the weather, the architecture, or the color of the sky. Reacting to this is the main motivation of the antagonists; their motto is "When everything changes, nothing changes."
  • In Civilization, democracy has the highest output for productivity, population growth, trade, and science. However, it is incredibly hard to keep your citizens from rioting and even more difficult to wage war due to the high cost of maintaining an army and the unhappiness of your citizens.
  • The Komi Republic in The New Order Last Days Of Europe is a young Disaster Democracy established in former Soviet Russia after the nation's defeat at the hands of Nazi Germany in World War II. Syktyvkar boasts a constitution and multi-party democracy but the true nature of the democratic scene is a nightmarishly chaotic Pandora's Box of extremist ideologies as the country welcomes exiles who were kicked out of everywhere else. Komi can result in some of the best unifying forces for Russia (like Bukharina's left-communist nation or a liberal democracy) and one of the absolute worst (Taboritsky's deranged Esoteric Nazi Imperial cult that collapses with his death, causing a second, worse Russian Anarchy).
  • In Far Cry 6, Anton Castillo, the dictator of Yara, is actually the democratically elected President of the country. There's no indication it was a flawed election or he cheated either. It's just as soon as he was elected, he turned around and instituted a draconian military dictatorship before suspending elections. Clara Garcia, the Big Good, further states that free elections won't magically make this legacy go away either.
  • Rise Of The Third Power: One of the Resistance members in Republic of Tariq notes that the country's democratic system means it takes longer for the government to get anything done. This is shown in Nadim, where the commoners riot because the government fails to address their poverty. While part of this is due to the losses the country suffered in the Great War, some NPC dialogue indicates that the senators and other authority figures are beholden to the aristocrats rather than the masses as a whole. When the party arrives in Ishtala, they find that it'll take weeks for the senate to decide on whether or not to help Princess Arielle. However, Rashim believes that if it weren't for the democratic process, it would be easier for tyrants like Noraskov to take power. In Peren Desh, Gage acknowledges that Arkadya's theocratic system is even more flawed and it already allowed several despots to rise to power before Noraskov.


    Web Original 
  • In Twitch Plays Pokémon, Democracy Mode was originally met with contempt and scorn. The Mob learned to live with it after a week, decrying it as slow but having formed a common enemy in the form of The PC. On the 16th day, with the end so close at hand and the nearest checkpoint a full three hours away, the Anarchists begrudgingly agreed to let Democracy go off during the boulder-pushing puzzles.

    Western Animation 

    Real Life 
  • A common joke when someone is moving slowly is to say he's moving at the speed of government. In Fascist Italy, Mussolini is said to have made the trains run on time. He didn't, note  but the belief reflects this trope, and the perception at the time (i.e. 20s-30s) that choosing democracy over fascism was choosing Liberty Over Prosperity, summed up by Harry Truman who argued, "Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship." As well as Winston Churchill:
    "Many forms of Government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."
    • A lot of this has become Dated History. Fascism and Nazism appeared to be successful because both came to power in developed nations with republican, democratic, and constitutional monarchical institutions that had done a lot of the heavy lifting trains. Hitler took credit for the Autobahn, but the first was built one year before Hitler's reign, which Hitler downgraded to a highway, so that he then could "officially" build the first one. The first Autobahn (or, Autostrada in the native language) in the world was proposed in 1921 and completed in 1924-1925 in Italy, Mussolini having gained power in 1922.note 
  • After World War II, the new German state simply kept most of the existing laws but made significant changes in regard to elections and the power of major offices in the new constitution, to prevent the rise of populists in the future. While many aspects of national and state election and lawmaking are now frequently described as undemocratic, it was regarded as a necessary move. In late 2011, the Pirate Party unexpectedly came in fifth in the Berlin state election and fourth in the Saarland, winning seats in both states and are expected to get similar results in North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein. While rightfully described as a populist movement, the Pirate Party of Germany differs from other such parties in Europe by having the increase of democratic participation in Germany as their primary (and some even say only) aim, instead of handing all power to strong leaders who know "what's best" for the country.
  • The French Revolution did much to popularize this image and it gave an image of "democracy" as amounting to mob rule orchestrating several large amounts of deaths. Researchers who know the actual history see the Revolution's failures as stemming not from mob rule but poor leadership made by the "leaders" who made things worse by declaring war on the rest of Europe. The third view these days is the democracy of the First French Republic was bad, self-destructive and transient but given the circumstances it operated under, achieved a lot more than it had any right to expect or hope for and that, despite reversals, it codified modern democracy (anti-racism, abolition of slavery, people's right to protest, universal suffrage) and through its military successes, it proved that democracy could rule a large nation and lead it to war and it generated massive shock waves that forced nations across Europe to reform or go the way of Louis XVI.
  • From John F. Kennedy's "Ich bin ein Berliner" speech:
    "Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect. But we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in, to prevent them from leaving us."
    • And then there's good old first-past-the-post, which operates roughly thus: if there are three large and a multitude of small parties and Party A gets 34% of the vote, Party B gets 33% and the remaining 33% goes to Parties C through K, Party A gets to make all the decisions by itself until the next election, unless Party B or C can herd together enough allies in the smaller parties to form 34% or more of the vote between them. Constitutional monarchies usually give the sovereign the casting vote in this eventuality; the decision-making process elsewhere varies. Either way, the 66% of the population who didn't vote for the people now running the show are kind of screwed.
    • Which is why, by Duverger's law, democracies whose elections are determined by first-past-the-post tend towards two-party systems (the United States being the prime example): groups of like-minded voters tend to congregate together into broad coalitions in order to reach that 50%+1 threshold that would guarantee victory. Note that this is not a hard-and-fast rule - countries with parties having strong regionalist platforms tend to break this rule (e.g., the US in the 1860 presidential election, Canada and the UK today).note 
    • Canada and the UK have what is sometimes called a two-and-a-half party system. That is, there are two dominant parties that regularly win most or all of the elections, but one or more smaller parties also regularly win a significant number of seats. These parties sometimes hold the balance of power when neither of the two largest parties has a majority.
    • To avoid this, some countries opt for a proportional representation system, but this has flaws of its own. Chiefly, small parties are given disproportionate power, since as it's very difficult for any party to get a majority they need their support to form coalitions. This means that small parties that don't represent most citizens' opinions can have a major hand in government decisions, and even control over certain ministries as inducement to support the ruling coalition.
  • When there are only two physical choices for a given vote (i.e., "yes" or "no"), simple majority vote generally works fine. But by Arrow's impossibility theorem, when there are three or more possible options which each voter personally ranks in order, it's impossible to have a voting system that can convey the sum of each voter's ranking of choices into a "fair" community-wide ranking. Any voting system you design will violate at least one of the following aspects of fairness:
    • No one voter gets to pick the whole electorate's preferences without input from others ("Non-dictatorship").
    • If every voter individually prefers option A over option B, then the election will always pick A over B ("Monotonicity").
    • If every voter previously preferred option X over option Y, then the election will always put X over Y whether or not Z is a pickable choice. ("Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives").
  • George W. Bush once commented—jokingly, one sincerely hopes!—that his job would be easier if he were a dictator. Cue the Conspiracy Theories. LBJ also made a statement on what he would do if he were a dictator, and Harry Truman also made a comment about dictatorships being more efficient than democracy, as noted above. Even Barack Obama said, "I've got a pen and I've got a phone - and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward." and Donald Trump celebrated Chinese President Xi Jinping abolishing term limits, adding "Maybe we'll give that a shot". In fact, most democratically elected leaders have most likely fantasized that they were dictators at one point or another, if only to cut through all of the red tape.
  • The Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth was an Elective Monarchy that represented a "nation of nobles" where each noble was equal, and had voting powers and deliberative powers in the quasi-parliament, the General Sejm, with each noble having Liberum Veto to unilaterally cancel any policy it dislikes so any decision passed must have a total consensus. This was supposed to act as a check on the power of the King/Grand Duke: if he wanted a law passed, he needed the consent of the Sejm, who would grant or withhold approval through simple majority vote. However, this handicapped the King from having any executive power. If the King wanted to make reforms for the general benefit of the entire realm, he would face backlash from those nobles who perceived that said development would take away influence and importance away from it. This effectively paralyzed the realm. Moreover this system allowed neighboring powers to easily bribe one or two of the nobles. This allowed Russia, Austria and Prussia to start messing in the nation's internal affairs. Likewise, while the Commonwealth and its Sejm had a bigger franchise than UK's Parliament and had 300 members, but on the other hand it was a system coterminous with serfdom, which comprised 80% of the population who had zero rights and no representation. Enlightenment thinkers such as Rousseau and in America, Franklin and Madison, cited the Commonwealth circa 1700s as a system that was both feudal ''and'' republican possessing none of the advantages of either system and the flaws of both, citing the Liberum Veto and foreign influence as part of the justification for a strong executive in America as well as the Emoluments Cause.
  • Indonesia puts a high emphasis on how much they love democracy. When it was revealed that Suharto's reign was in fact a facade of dictatorship, and a few incidents proved this, they were pissed, removed Suharto from power, and strove to be as democratic as possible. Happy ending? Nope. Turns out that even the democratic parties were also flawed, Indonesia's advancement has been kind of stagnant and it allows several annoying factions like the Islamic Defenders Front to be very open in how much they think Indonesia should just take the method of Taliban Islam and causing general ruckus everywhere "in the name of God". It says something that despite Suharto's dictatorship and fake propaganda, some people agreed that he did a lot more for Indonesia's advances, to the point of wanting a new Suharto-like leader to rise, just without his questionable traits.
  • The Electoral College system in the United States was designed to serve as a check against Democracy. The founders did not want one region to dominate by virtue of most people live there, so they didn't want to use a pure popular vote. The TL;DR version is that the President is determined by winning more smaller, regional popular votes, than the other candidate. Usually, this falls in line with the popular vote, but in 5 occasions, there was a difference between the two numbers. There are theoretical situations where one can become president while winning only 23% of the popular vote. This requires some numbers that are so precise (not to mention a political alliance of several states that traditionally would be laughable) that it's safe to say it could never happen. That said, Richard Nixon was elected by carrying 49 out of 50 states. Nixon himself was the president who got the closest to abolishing the Electoral College. His administration worked with Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that passed the House with an overwhelming bipartisan majority (339-70) in 1969 but died in the senate. They were about a dozen votes short of getting to the 67 they needed and most of the holdouts were southern segregationist Democrats.
    • To scare you even more, that 23% assumes only two candidates. You only need to win the 11 most populous states by 1 vote each, and win by a plurality, not a majority. If you have three or more serious candidates (think 1992 with Clinton, Bush Sr, and Perot), you can do it with even less than 23% in theory.
    • It's also worth pointing out that the system originally did not have any popular vote requirement. Instead the members of the Electoral were selected in a manner chosen by the State Legislature and as such were only indirectly elected.
    • While the Electoral College was designed to prevent a few small regions with the highest populations from dominating the vote on a federal scale, the idea of one small region eclipsing a lot of less densely populated regions is still an issue on a state-wide scale, as most states determine their votes for the Electoral College on a winner-takes-all basis. This means that any city or region that holds most of the state's population (one example being Chicago for Illinois) can effectively dominate their state's vote even if the rest of the state voted differently than that city, and the less populated parts of the state can be effectively ignored from campaign groups.
    • The Electoral College was also designed partially under the idea of there being two candidates, but did not anticipate only two broad political parties. The modern Democrat and Republican parties were founded long after the Constitution was written, and efforts to get a third party (or more) has met with limited success, with only Libertarians getting ANY foothold. In contrast, other countries may have multiple parties but they still tend to whittle it down to a couple of candidates for the deciding vote. If there are five parties candidates may squeak by with 21 percent of an initial voting period to become one of the final two, but the deciding vote is being made by a country that just doesn't like any of the options because their preferred candidate was knocked out of the race.
    • A feature of the electoral college that comes from its nature is that it partially obscures or makes irrelevant local differences in turnout or voting eligible population. The number of electors is (indirectly) based on population via being based on each state's congressional delegation (with minimum number of electors per state being 3, thus slightly distorting the weight of small states upward), however, it is not based on voting eligible or actually voting population. So during slavery three fifths of slaves were counted, during Jim Crowe blacks who could not hope to ever get to vote were counted and during the whole era of no female suffrage, women were counted. It is certain that had slaves not been counted in 1800 and had the election gone exactly the same, Jefferson (the Southern candidate) would have lost and Adams (the Northern candidate) would have won. The repercussions down the ages can only be guessed at, but in a system where the national popular vote counts, a state has an advantage in enfranchising more of its people (e.g. giving women full suffrage) in an electoral college system it will not benefit from that. There is however an - arguably - positive aspect to this feature, as local events that depress or increase turnout have no outsize effect. If a blizzard immobilizes large parts of Alaska and only a few hundred Alaskans vote, Alaska still gets three electoral votes, if the presidential candidate is from Wyoming and thus every Wyomingite goes voting, the state will still only get three electoral votes. In a national popular vote events like these can (and do) influence national electoral results, to the point that a sunny day in parts of the country that traditionally vote for one party can swing the election in a close race.
    • There is a loophole which would effectively render the Electoral College completely pointless without having to get rid of it. Currently, most states give all their votes to the candidate who won a plurality in the state, with Nebraska and Maine choosing their electors semi-proportionally. However, this does not have to be the case. The Constitution provides that each state can appoint its electors "in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct", meaning that the state legislatures can choose any method they want to select their electors. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is a growing movement which could take advantage of this technicality to effectively bypass the Electoral College. Once enough states join to control a majority of the electoral votes (270/538), they would all give their votes to the candidate who won the national popular vote, forcing a victory for that candidate regardless of population distribution.
  • The United States Senate has also become increasingly undemocratic in a different way than it was originally. Back in the day, the senate was undemocratic because it was not elected by popular vote but appointed by governors because it was seen as a more highbrow chamber than the House which was elected by the commoners. This function was done away with starting in the 1918 elections. It is now undemocratic because while more people live in the roughly dozen most populated states, there are more sparsely populated states. Back when the constitution was first written the biggest state had 12x the population of the smallest state while today it's 68x. The 50 Democratic senators represent 40 million more people than the 50 Republican senators as of 2021. The Republican caucus in the senate hasn’t represent the majority of Americans since 1996. The problem is only getting worse too. A study by the University of Virginia estimated that by 2040 70% of Americans will live in the fifteen biggest states meaning that 30% of Americans will have 70% of the senators while 70% has 30% of the senators. At the current moment, the make up of the Senate hurts the Democrats but prior to about 2000, it hurt Republicans. This is largely due to the very heavily democratic GI generation having mostly died off and being replaced in the electorate by their more conservative children, the baby boomer generation. Millennials who are Democrats like the GIs are/were cluster into bigger states in the Sunbelt like California, Georgia, and Texas which dilutes their votes in the senate.
  • More generally, the framers of the United States Constitution consciously sought to avoid tyranny of the majority. The very idea of constitutional constraints on the power of the voters or their elected representatives presupposes that democracy is flawed.


Video Example(s):



Matthias tries to enlist the help of the quasi-socialist Guerilla Union Of Shrews In Mossflower (GUOSIM) in his epic quest to save the woodlanders from a rat invasion, a monstrous snake and a carnivorous owl. But first, the GUOSIM will need to put that sort of thing to the vote.

How well does it match the trope?

5 (7 votes)

Example of:

Main / ObstructiveBureaucrat

Media sources: