Main Tropes Index

Troperville

Editing Help

Tools

Toys

Narrative

Genre

Media

Topical Tropes

Other Categories

Custom Search

Sally Impossible: What could possibly be more important than your son?
Richard Impossible: Sssssssscience?
The Venture Bros, Twenty Years to Midnight

Battle Cry for the Mad Scientist, the Morally Ambiguous Doctorate, and even good aligned Gadgeteer Genius and Science Hero. This is one of the classic motivations for many a Science Is Bad movie, the researcher will seek knowledge for its own sake rather than to better the world; usually this simple curiosity will evolve into "ambition" and "hubris" before long, as caution and restraint are thrown out the steel-barred window. Or used as raw materials.

When a scientist says he does something For Science!, what this usually means is they simply don't care about the answers to several important questions regarding their research, like:
  1. How will I fund my research, and how can I make money off of it? (What? These are legitimate questions!)
  2. Does it have any potential applications — that are not immediately lethal, full of side effects, potentially genocidal or ecocidal?
  3. Is there any way of gaining any replicable data or results?
  4. Where will I get willing test subjects?
  5. Are these experiments ethical?
  6. Will it rise up against humanity and/or eat me?

Usually, this nonchalance leads to Reed Richards Is Useless as they file away their inventions under "Forgotten Phlebotinum" rather than seek to commercialize them or expanding the body of knowledge available to humanity. And that's with normal research. Contrary to Fridge Logic, For Science rarely provides additional insight in its field; after the Nuclear Roboclone is created, most Mad Scientists lose interest in documenting how they actually did it and what else can be done with those methods. Where test subjects are concerned, at their most benign they'll only threaten to do minor experiments on friends; if they get volunteers or luckily capture one, the effects will be quirky and temporary rather than deforming Biological Mashups.

These benign inventors may end up in service of the Corrupt Corporate Executive, and will be so happy to have funding they don't ask where the money comes from — or what their discoveries are being used for. Expect them to go "you promised you would use my discoveries for good!" to his "Oh, but I am!"

It can also lead to Jumping Off The Slippery Slope as an inventor slips into full blown, cackling mad science as sanity and ethics are deemed "irrelevant" or hindrances to their work. Other times, the answers they come up with to the above questions will lead them to a life of supervillainy as they get research funds by robbing banks, get test subjects by kidnapping, and out-and-out make things solely for destructive purposes... or because they can.

There is some truth to this — many scientists and especially mathematicians do what they do for the fun of it rather than more practical concerns — but that's little different from the rest of academia.

There is also some significant falsehood to this in that basic research, research done with no application in mind, is what actually advances science and makes the world a better place. The applied science may as well be done by an engineer. In addition scientists usually have a pretty good idea what will take place and are only seeking to test it.

Remember, Science Is Bad, but... but... Just Think Of The Potential! Contrast For The Liberal Arts!


Examples

    open/close all folders 

    Anime & Manga 

    Comics 

    Fan Works 

    Film 

    Literature 

    Live Action TV 

    Music 

    Tabletop Games 

    Video Games 

    Machinima 

    Web Comics 

    Web Original 

    Western Animation 

    Real Life