Follow TV Tropes

Following

Duplicate Trope: Bat Family Crossover

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Aug 12th 2020 at 11:59:00 PM
GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#1: Jun 10th 2020 at 8:03:18 AM

At closer inspection, I’ve come to the conclusion that nearly all examples of this Trope fall under either Crisis Crossover or Intra-Franchise Crossover

Bat Family Crossover‘s laconic: A crossover that only affects characters living in their own part of The 'Verse.

This laconic is so specific that The DCU and the Marvel Universe are the only franchises that can do this trope “properly”.

Now for it’s sister tropes.

Crisis Crossover’s laconic: A crossover that involves all the characters and locations in The 'Verse in a single storyline.

First paragraph of Intra-Franchise Crossover: Sometimes when a series is rebooted or adapted to another medium, the different iterations of the franchise will crossover with each other. This is much more likely to happen in series that are fantasy or sci-fi bent or if the successor doesn't have the same cast.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#2: Jun 10th 2020 at 8:28:48 AM

Opening, but also clocking.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#3: Jun 10th 2020 at 8:30:22 AM

OP, please do a wick check next time. I am very wary of Duplicate Trope threads that are opened but there's no proof that the tropes are being conflated, if at all.

Now looking at the concepts, they seem different in scale to me (but I am an avowed Batfamily fan).

So I'm not really seeing the dupe issue right now.

Edited by Synchronicity on Jun 10th 2020 at 10:34:43 AM

jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4: Jun 10th 2020 at 8:35:07 AM

Adding on to what Synchronicity said, unless it’s definitely clear that two tropes are duplicates of each other from their descriptions, you can’t just tell that tropes are duplicates of each other from their laconics alone.

Edited by jandn2014 on Jun 10th 2020 at 11:35:58 AM

back lol
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#5: Jun 10th 2020 at 8:38:56 AM

[up]Yup. Laconics are in general very unindicative of the trope's actual meaning — see the Laconic improvement project. So I'm going to argue against any action to be taken if the laconic is the only proof.

GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#6: Jun 10th 2020 at 9:20:33 AM

I’ve never done a wick check before and they seem quite lengthy and complicated, but here are the non-Comic OP Es

    Anime and Manga 

    Fan Works 

    Live-Action Films 

    Live-Action TV 

    Professional Wrestling 
  • While there are plenty of cross promotional events in pro wrestling that do not qualify, sometimes promotions will establish widespread, long term alliances that create a lasting continuity between them. NWA Showtime All-Star Wrestling and NWA Smokey Mountain doing a joint event, for instance, as the NWA members acknowledge the same champions and have a say in the NWA's general direction. Similar cases include the World Wrestling Network (EVOLVE, Full Impact Pro, etc), Global Pro Wrestling Alliance (Pro Wrestling ZERO1, Pro Wrestling Noah, etc) and World Wrestling League (CMLL, TNA, etc). -Crisis Crossover
  • Promotions overseen by the Box y Lucha Libre Comision tend to keep luchadors, luchadoras and mini estrellas seperate from one another in competition. The most common place wrestlers from all three designations match up against each other under such circumstances is "lightweight" division, which predates the comision's acceptance of luchadoras and the mini estrella concept entirely. -Crisis Crossover
  • Sometimes a promotion will have multiple branches, each with their own champions and angles. The International Wrestling Association was Puerto Rican but also had a popular Japanese branch and would bounce wrestlers between the two. Último Dragón's Toryumon was largely Mexican based but had a Japanese branch, which eventually became Dragon Gate and went on to set up branches in the USA and UK, who it would rotate talent through. -Crisis Crossover
  • With the collapse of the territory system, many professional wrestling promotions have opened up or contracted smaller promotions to act as "farm leagues" to train new talent for their rosters. Since this often results in "developmental" losing its biggest money makers, the larger and often more popular promotion will loan some members of its own roster to help the smaller one keep crowds interested. WCW had the Heartland Wrestling Association for instance and gave national exposure to some of its stars, such as Shark Boy. Chikara meanwhile has its "Wrestling IS" affiliates, one of which (RESPECT) used to be a showcase for Ring of Honor and SHIMMER trainees. -Crisis Crossover
  • Some wrestling promotions are considered "sisters", either due to an overwhelmingly shared roster, mutual involvement or ownership from the same behind the scenes figures, reliance on the same distributors and various other reasons, such as CZW and the Maven Bentley Association, where the owner of the latter acts as an authority figure in the former. -Crossover
  • During its "brand extension era", WWE was divided into two different brands, one being Monday Night Raw and its B Show, Sunday Heat, the other being Thursday Night Smackdown and its B Show, Velocity. It was rare to see a wrestler affiliated with one brand have any interaction whatsoever with a wrestler from the other outside of The Royal Rumble and WrestleMania, making those two events bat family crossovers.
  • Some promotions act as "parents" to others, such as when Dramatic Dream Team experimented with two "child" Joshi promotions, TJP and Union Pro, in the 2010s. A few wrestlers being used in minor DDT roles would be more important on the "child" shows and also interact with wrestlers otherwise not being booked by DDT. -Crisis Crossover

    Video Games 

    Western Animation 

[down] Did I do enough to prove it?


Edited by GeneralGigan817 on Jun 10th 2020 at 12:27:40 PM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#7: Jun 10th 2020 at 9:26:17 AM

That does look really bad and misuse filled.

But the thing is, if the description and usage are otherwise fine, and we can find enough legitimate examples through the wicks, then there is no need for the trope to be cut. Works like Spider-Geddon and Night of the Owls are two legit examples off the top of my head.

Of course wick checks are lengthy and complicated. But they are necessary in understanding how the trope is used on the wiki. Anyone can screw up a trope's main page, but the wick check shows the bigger picture. If you are confused, How to Do a Wick Check can point you in the right direction, but the burden of proving the trope is in such horrible condition we need to get rid of it is on you.

GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#8: Jun 10th 2020 at 9:43:24 AM

I personally believe this Trope should be limited to Marvel and DC examples only, as no other universes are vast enough to use this trope properly.

Edited by GeneralGigan817 on Jun 10th 2020 at 3:47:18 PM

Tomodachi Now a lurker. See you at the forums. Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
Now a lurker. See you at the forums.
#9: Jun 11th 2020 at 7:16:00 AM

Agree, is a very specific trope for Marvel and DC, I don't think there is any other shared universe that works like it.

To win, you need to adapt, and to adapt, you need to be able to laugh away all the restraints. Everything holding you back.
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#10: Jun 11th 2020 at 7:23:40 AM

I don't see the point of limiting a trope to two works (or series) only. Cut it.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#11: Jun 11th 2020 at 7:28:18 AM

Crower ideas.

[down] Yes, but are they using the Trope correctly?

Edited by GeneralGigan817 on Jun 11th 2020 at 11:34:31 AM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#12: Jun 11th 2020 at 9:35:32 AM

This is not the same thing as Intra-Franchise Crossover. That requires different adaptations crossing over with each other, not different characters in the same group.

Looking at the wicks (sigh), Jojos Bizarre Adventure, Big Finish Doctor Who Specials The Light At The End, and Professor Layton and the Last Specter, and Darkwing Duck list the trope with some context. These are not Marvel and DC properties.

earzo700 Since: Jul, 2013
#13: Jun 13th 2020 at 7:15:47 AM

It's not useful to limit a trope to only certain franchises just because it doesn't crop up with the same frequency elsewhere. Even assuming that all of the wicks up there[up] are invalid examples (which I find unlikely), another franchise that does eventually manage to utilize this trope should have a place for it on the page.

In my opinion, breaking the page into 'DC Examples', 'Marvel Examples', and 'Other Examples' would have the same benefits as restricting the page to DC/Marvel examples only, but with none of the downsides. So if something like that is the best solution (and I'm not sure that it is), then I'd rather see the change made to the organization of the page than the definition of the trope itself.

EDIT: Looking at the trope, it seems the description is 'mini Crisis Crossover, but limited to only characters from one location', but the page image is Spider-Verse, which is 'mini Crisis Crossover, but only characters who are Spider-man'.

Maybe the actual reality of this trope is a crossover based on a location at all, but an Intra-Franchise Crossover or Crisis Crossover intentionally limited to a set of characters with something (such as location) in common?

EDIT 2: I'm now certain that there's something to 'mini Crisis Crossover, but limited to characters with attribute X'. If that's a trope, then this is just that but more specific.

EDIT 3: Yeah, I say the whole trope should be reworked to not focus specifically on location, but instead on some key idea that goes beyond fitting all the most popular characters in a franchise into one story as CrisisCrossovers are want to do. 'Every hero in one city', 'Every affiliate of a specific team', 'Every main character from the franchise', 'Every version or expy of a specific character'.

Edited by earzo700 on Jun 13th 2020 at 8:16:17 AM

GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#14: Jun 13th 2020 at 1:59:56 PM

Regardless of whether this is a duplicate or not, I don't like the idea of limiting tropes to specific companies. That's something that can lead to The Same, but More Specific.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Jun 13th 2020 at 4:01:21 AM

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#15: Jun 13th 2020 at 6:41:21 PM

Right. Just because a trope shows up predominantly in a specific company's works doesn't mean it's exclusive to those. Either it exists outside of those works as well, hasn't actually caught on yet as a trope, or just plain isn't a trope. But there's no such thing as a company-specific trope.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#16: Jun 13th 2020 at 6:43:48 PM

[up]In addition, a "company-specific trope" that isn't a duplicate might simply be Too Rare to Trope.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Jun 13th 2020 at 8:44:19 AM

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#17: Jun 13th 2020 at 6:44:03 PM

Redefining is the best way to handle this Trope, and we’ve only got a couple of hours to make a decision.

Edited by GeneralGigan817 on Jun 13th 2020 at 9:44:07 AM

mimitchi33 Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: I've been dreaming of True Love's Kiss
#18: Jun 13th 2020 at 7:53:09 PM

The second Pretty Cure example of Bat Family Crossover is actually confirmed via the anime to be this. Beginning with Maho Girls Pretty Cure!, the series are shown to take place in the same universe by having the next series' lead Cure show up in the final episode. However, one post-Maho Girls series, HuGtto! Pretty Cure, also had crossover episodes with previous Cures, but at least one instance was explained by Hugtan warping the characters with her magic, meaning that everything pre-Go! Princess Pretty Cure took place in different universes. In one of the aformentioned episodes of Hugtto, Hana specifically mentions the final episode of Kira Kira Pretty Cure A La Mode, where she made a cameo.

Edited by mimitchi33 on Jun 13th 2020 at 7:57:30 AM

FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
#19: Jun 14th 2020 at 8:54:47 AM

I think we can ask for the clock to be reset, right?

Start the crowner, those options look good.

I'd like to apologize for all this.
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#20: Jun 14th 2020 at 9:09:12 AM

[up]The crowner options discount my stance, which is that this seems like a valid concept that is being misused.

OP, I gotta say, if you had done a wick check to begin with and shown results to this end, I would have an easier time agreeing with you that this is a cut candidate. The burden of proof should not be on me to see if all non-Marvel/DC works are using this trope properly. And even if a trope is predominantly used by Marvel and DC, that doesn't mean it's not a trope.

  • Franchise.Jojos Bizarre Adventure: ZCE
  • Recap.Big Finish Doctor Who Specials The Light At The End: " involving Tom Baker, Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester Mc Coy and Paul Mc Gann as their respective Doctors alongside the Master and the first three Doctors in a Batfamily Crossover." For context, the work runs on The Nth Doctor. These are actors who played some of the Doctors, crossing over with each other but not involving the greater Doctor Who universe. Reads as correct to me.
  • VideoGame.Professor Layton And The Last Specter" This is the only format in which it's possible to see characters from all of the PL games which existed at the time, and watch them interact with each other too. For instance, the museum curator (from Last Specter) becomes friends with Katia Anderson (from Diabolical Box), and Ingrid (from Curious Village) rents a room to Dr. Stahngun (from Unwound Future). This reads as incorrect use to me; what's that trope about characters who appear in multiple use of The 'Verse?
  • WesternAnimation.Darkwing Duck: "a Bat Family Crisis Crossover with the Duck Tales comic where Scrooge Mc Duck and Darkwing Duck..." I think this is using 'Bat Family' in that Scrooge and Darkwing are both ducks within the greater Disney comics 'verse, while 'Crisis Crossover' in that they are battling a crisis. I read this as correct.

Maybe the actual reality of this trope is a crossover based on a location at all, but an Intra-Franchise Crossover or Crisis Crossover intentionally limited to a set of characters with something (such as location) in common?

Honestly, this reads like a trope to me. If that's not what BFC is currently, it at least reads like a valid retool option (but without Intra-Franchise Crossover, for reasons I have pointed out). But we need a freaking wick check.

GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#21: Jun 15th 2020 at 6:24:01 AM

[up] Weren’t the OP Es good enough?

[down] The clocks up. It might be too late.

Edited by GeneralGigan817 on Jun 15th 2020 at 1:03:19 PM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#22: Jun 15th 2020 at 6:29:36 AM

[up]For duplicate trope threads, I usually don't think so. Anyone can mess up the on-page examples. The wick check provides a truer picture of how the trope is used in the wiki.

For context, this thread has honestly made me very touchy about 'dupe tropes' that try to produce action with no wick checks. The OP claimed that all three tropes were redundant, but when three tropers including me actually did the legwork, we found that two of the tropes were fine and only one was having problems. See the issue?

Edited by Synchronicity on Jun 15th 2020 at 8:29:47 AM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#23: Jun 15th 2020 at 11:05:35 AM

Yeah, this is the third "duplicate trope" thread I've seen that didn't back up the claims made. I'm also still completely convinced that the proposed options make no sense and are either too restrictive or won't fix any of the "problems" as you cite them.

Laconics, on page examples, titles even, none of those are a good measure for determining how a trope is actually being used.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GeneralGigan817 Since: Mar, 2020 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#24: Jun 15th 2020 at 11:39:33 AM

It finally happened, please remember that this is my first proper Wick Check before you comment on how barebones it is.

jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#25: Jun 15th 2020 at 11:48:28 AM

[up] Not to be harsh, but that's very barebones. I understand that it's your first wick check, but we'll be unable to determine anything from six wicks.

back lol

Total posts: 33
Top