I'm the last Plantagenet,
Beaten by Henry in the Wars of the Roses
The Tudor dynasty
Didn't care that much for me,
Now I'm painted as a baddie, that's why, one supposes.
Richard, Duke of Gloucester (2 October 1452 22 August 1485), crowned King Richard III in 1483, was the sixth son of Richard, 3rd Duke of York, and brother of King Edward IV of England, who had seized the throne from the reigning Lancastrian king, Henry VI. (The complicated relationships of the various branches of The House of Plantagenet were the principal cause of the "Wars of the Roses", in which Richard distinguished himself.) On Edward's death, he seized the throne from Edward's son (called Edward V, though he was never actually crowned), declaring him and his younger brother Richard of York bastards. (Traditionally, Richard had his nephews murdered in the Tower of London; this has been much disputed since at least late Tudor times.) A rebellion led by Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, arose, and Richard was killed fighting for his kingdom at Bosworth Field, the last English king to die in battle.note
Richard's traditional reputation was largely formed by Sir Thomas More's History of king Richard the thirde, which (possibly based on the reminiscences of John Morton, Bishop of Ely) depicts Gloucester as a hunch-backed, withered-armed Machiavellian villain. More's account formed the basis for William Shakespeare's Richard III, which has probably been the most influential account of Richard's life and character — despite its obvious historical shortcomings — and has indeed tended to color perceptions of the entire Late Mediaeval period.
Nevertheless, Richard's rehabilitation started fairly early. In the reign of James I (i.e., after the death of the last of the Tudors), the antiquarian Sir George Buck discovered the suppressed Titulus Regius that set forth the Parliamentary explanation for Richard's assumption of the throne and claimed he had seen a letter (now lost, if it ever existed at all) from Edward V's sister, Elizabeth of York, which established the friendly relations between them, and wrote his History of King Richard III in an attempt to moderate the king's negative image. Unfortunately, Buck died insane, and his history was published only after his death, by his grandson (1646). The view that Richard had been slandered by Henry Tudor gained a strong following, and has influenced historians, either positively or negatively, ever since.
The fate of the Princes was never certainly established. The last sighting of the boys alive seems to have been around July 1483, shortly before Richard's coronation. Stories of their death varied wildly: some said they had been poisoned, others drowned, others stabbed — but the most accepted version was that attested by Thomas More, that the princes had been smothered and buried secretly under a staircase in the Tower. Bones found there in 1674 under a staircase (as More had said, though he also said he had heard that Richard had had them disinterred and buried elsewhere) were declared to be theirs by the then king, Charles II. The identification is by no means certain; the bones were last examined in 1934, and it was determined at that time that not all of them were even human. Their age, sex, and date of burial have been disputed (though most experts agree they are pre-pubertal); there has even been some speculation that they're the remains of ceremonial sacrifices from Roman times. The dean and chapter of Westminster Abbey, where the bones are inurned, have refused to allow further testing, as has Queen Elizabeth II, who will not allow DNA analysis of the remains or of available remains of any known relatives of the Princes.
As a King, Richard III reigned for a mere two years. Among the legal reforms consolidated in his time was the Court of Requests, a court for poor people to present their grievances if they could not afford the legal fees, he also made it easier to provide bail for lower orders and protected their property seizures. Such reforms had its roots in Richard III's time at the Council of the North. Under his reign, all the laws and statutes were ordered by decree to be translated from Old French into English, and he also banned the restriction on the printing and selling of books. The efforts of greater centralization that would characterize the reign of Henry Tudor more properly began in Richard III's reign.
Popular depictions of Richard since Shakespeare's plays have generally veered back and forth from outright evil (Richard may be considered the patron saint of the Historical Villain Upgrade) to a revisionist version in which Richard, though appearing a somewhat cynical Deadpan Snarker, is nevertheless a fundamentally decent human being — often the only decent human being in what is otherwise a Deadly Decadent Court. He is often portrayed as a creepy old man even though he died aged only 32. He was also a Warrior Prince and the best warrior in England, second only to his brother Edward - indeed, quite unlike the picture of him as a weakened Machiavellian, he died leading a daring cavalry charge in an attempt to kill Henry Tudor (who was ironically said to have just hid among his men during the attack and made no attempt to fight) that was repulsed and ended with Richard fighting to the death while surrounded after falling from his horse.
After his death, his body was hurriedly buried at a monastery in Leicester. The monastery (including his tomb) was torn down during the reign of Henry VIII. By the 19th century there was no marker of where the grave had been and it was rumoured that the remains had been thrown into the nearby river. A few historians attempted to trace the site of the grave and concluded its location now lay under a car park in central Leicester. In 2009, Richard III Society eventually launched a project to find the grave. In 2012, Richard's remains were unearthed from the carpark and, using DNA from two descendants of his sister, identified as his in 2013. He was reburied at Leicester Cathedral in 2015; a visitor centre now exists on the site of the original grave.
The remains showed signs of scoliosis (a curved spine) — which could have given him uneven shoulders but certainly not a hunchback — but there were no signs of the other deformities claimed by Tudor propagandists. Further studies on his body and contextual reconstruction with scoliosis patient Dominic Smee also suggests that medieval armory and cavalry weaponry does not hinder a scoliosis sufferer from being an effective cavalry fighter — although it would definitely tire them out in on-foot combat. (The entire sequence of Richard's actions in Bosworth suggest this is how it went down, and why he became vulnerable in the end.) It was also found that he did indeed go down fighting — his body showing that he suffered over a dozen injuries, three of which would have been fatal fairly quickly. Of those three injuries, one could have only been inflicted after death. This was the blow to his pelvis, which would have been armored at the time of his death. The other two, a blow from a sword and a halberd-type weapon, both to the skull, were more likely the fatal wounds. In brief, whatever your opinion on the man might be, he is actually a Real Life Handicapped Badass.
Not to be confused with the current Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, Queen Elizabeth II's first cousin, who is (so far as we know) not planning to usurp the throne. He is, however, a patron of the Richard III Society UK.
Works associated with Richard III:
- In the DC Comics miniseries Knight and Squire, Ricardian researchers create a clone of Richard, which somehow has all the original's memories. But Richard really is a villainnote and is soon joined by other wicked kings. Together, they attempt to take over England through the power of... Twitter.
- Tower of London, a 1939 Universal horror film starring Basil Rathbone as Richard, and its 1962 remake, directed by Roger Corman and starring Vincent Price.
- Notable in that Price played Clarence in the Rathbone version.
- In the Anno Dracula series, Richard is the villain of "Vampire Romance", and more of a monster than in Shakespeare.
- Alexander Tagere from the Arcia Chronicles is a Fantasy Counterpart of Richard, portrayed in a very sympathetic light. His life up to the battle of the not-Bosworth Field is pretty much a word-for-word retelling of Richard's biography, transplanted into the High Fantasy setting of the series. That the author is an active Ricardian probably explains it.
- Richard of Gloucester is an ambivalent figure in Robert Louis Stevenson's novel The Black Arrow (1888), which has been adapted for televison and film several times, notably in 1911, 1948, and 1985.
- Josephine Tey's The Daughter of Time is probably the 20th century work that re-started the revisionist view of Richard. It involves her long-time detective hero Alan Grant bored in the hospital and piecing through the evidence in search of the "historical" Richard.
- John M. Ford's The Dragon Waiting has a pretty sympathetic Richard III...in an Alternate History setting with Werewolves and vampires.
- Richard, the Princes in the Tower, and his reputation are the focus of The Hellequin Chronicles prequel novella Infamous Reign, which features Nate Garrett a.k.a. Hellequin being sent to deal with the matter of the missing Princes (Nate had backed Richard's accession and his superiors therefore felt that it was his mess to clean up). Richard is depicted as a decent man who had the spine to stand up to an angry Nate despite being plainly terrified of him, and wasn't to blame for the Princes going missing. As it turns out, the Princes were descended from King Arthur through their mother, and Nate's Arch-Enemy Mordred, who had a fixation on preventing Arthur's descendants from ever taking the throne, kidnapped them. Nate rescued them and smuggled them into exile, but shortly after, the Battle of Bosworth happened, Henry Tudor took the throne, and Richard's reputation was thoroughly smeared - something that even Henry concedes he didn't deserve (but which he also considers politically useful).
- Richard III in the 21st Century, a sci-fi duology in which a research team rescues Richard at his moment of death and brings him to the year 2004, where he must learn to adapt to a very different world than the one he left behind.
- George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire is an Epic Fantasy that is loosely based on the Wars of the Roses and is filled with echoes of "The Princes in the Tower" and several characters - Stannis Baratheon, Ned Stark, Theon Greyjoy - are loosely patterned or direct expies of the historical Richard, with the fan favorite Tyrion Lannister, a deformed Deadpan Snarker dwarf, matching the rhetorical splendor of Shakespeare's Richard III, though all four of these characters are among the most popular. Arnolf Karstark seems to be a straight Expy of the theatrical Richard, but without his rhetorical splendor, ironically it looks like he's headed to being executed by Stannis.
- Sharon Kay Penman's The Sunne in Splendour is a Door Stopper epic detailing the Wars of the Roses, which focuses on a very sympathetic Richard.
- Ripped off in Anne Easter Smith's A Rose For The Crown, which is by no means bad but is definitely inferior to the above in every way that counts.
- Rosemary Hawley Jarman's We Speak No Treason is a long romance novel about Richard of Gloucester and the woman who loves him for all time.
- A short story by C. J. Cherryh has a young woman who's been sentenced to the Tower of London meet several of the ghosts haunting it — including the two little princes. Edward V tells her that Richard was believed to have murdered them, but adds, "But he didn't, you know."
- In the first Blackadder series, Richard III (played by Peter Cook) was actually a pretty good ruler who reigned for a long time (long enough for his nephew and heir, Richard, Duke of York to grow up and have fully grown children of his own) and was accidentally beheaded by his great-nephew Edmund during the Battle of Bosworth Field when he was mistaken for a horse thief. Most of his reign (and all of Richard IV's) were later Retconned by Henry Tudor to have never happened.
- The Doctor Who audio play "The Kingmaker" featured a ruthless, but fundamentally decent Richard III who sounded suspiciously like Christopher Eccleston.
- Horrible Histories gives Richard a song about how he's a nice guy who was unfairly vilified by Thomas More and William Shakespeare.
- In the miniseries The White Queen, which is based on Philippa Gregory's The Cousins' War Series novels, Richard is played by Aneurin Barnard, who is presented as a loyal supporter of his brother Edward IV, plus a romantic and (mostly) good husband to Anne Neville, the tritagonist of the story. It's notable for being the most sympathetic note and the most attractive note live-action portrayal of Richard. It's also very controversial for including an affair between him and his niece Elizabeth of York in the final episode.
- "The Ballad of Richard III" by Gwydion Penderwenn which takes a pro-Richard stance.
- William Shakespeare's Henry VI (Parts II and III) and Richard III. That last one is such a negative portrayal of the King that his name has basically become synonymous with villainy.
- The noted American playwright Maxwell Anderson wrote a little-known play called Richard and Anne. In it, the ghost of Richard III interrupts a production of Richard III in order to angst about his everlasting love for his wife Anne. And Henry of Richmond shows up as a vulgar music tutor.
- In Yu-Gi-Oh! The Duelists of the Roses, a game loosely based on the War of the Roses, King Richard III goes under the name Richard Slysheen as his appearance is based on Heishen, the Big Bad of Yu-Gi-Oh! Forbidden Memories.
- This crossover parody of Horrible Histories' Richard III song with footage from The White Queen is entertaining because the lyrics fit perfectly with the selected clips.