Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Nostalgia Critic cleanup

Go To

themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#102: Oct 18th 2020 at 9:10:34 PM

Made a sandbox for the character page. I'm not done with the main page cleanup but the character pages are driving me a bit nuts for their length. Rather than tackle them all at once, I'll copy the contents and work on them here page by page, starting with Critic's first subpage(!).

Sooooo much squicky gushing and reboot wank on that page.

Edited by mightymewtron on Oct 18th 2020 at 12:10:55 PM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
#103: Oct 23rd 2020 at 3:16:19 PM

The Bad Dreams entry was removed for being misuse of the trope name.

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#104: Oct 23rd 2020 at 4:06:38 PM

There's multiple entries under Bad Dreams, most misused but some of them could fit Past Experience Nightmare, I think, and some could also be moved to that "Annoyance Nightmare" TLP.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#106: Oct 29th 2020 at 12:30:10 PM

Coming here from the discussion on the complaining cleanup thread:

  • Became Their Own Antithesis:
    • Bullet 1: Very complain-y
    • Bullet 2: Slight complaining
    • Bullet 3: Complaining
    • Bullet 4: Quite complain-y
    • Bullet 5: Complaining
    • Bullet 6: Seems legit, I think it can stay
    • Bullet 7: Can probably stay, as it is In-Universe

I'll get to Character Check later

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#107: Oct 29th 2020 at 12:33:34 PM

Remember you can add the thoughts to the character page cleanup too. smile

Not quite sure about the last bullet point as there's not enough context on how his values changed since he was a young critic. I added a bit more context but will have to fix it up later.

Edited by mightymewtron on Oct 29th 2020 at 3:36:38 PM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#108: Oct 29th 2020 at 12:39:34 PM

[up] Ah, OK. I will add to the sandbox when I get to the next trope. Will add context to my last bullet point at that time as well.

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#109: Oct 30th 2020 at 2:43:13 PM

Alright, so it seems Character Check has already been gone through. With that in mind, and since I'm relatively new here so I don't quite know how to add my thoughts to the sandbox if others have already added them, I will add my thoughts on the bullet points:

  • Character Check:
    • Bullet 1 is all complaining. Cut.
    • Bullet 2 is a bit confusing. Maybe it can be rewritten so that someone who doesn't know what it is talking about can understand?
    • Bullet 3 is a bit complain-y and confusingly written. Rewrite or cut.
    • Bullet 4 is very complain-y. Cut.
    • I agree with the Sandbox that Bullet 5 is weirdly fetish-y, and needs either a rewrite or a cut.
    • Bullet 6 feels like it doesn't fit Character Check. The trope seems to be about characterization that disappears and is abruptly brought back once to make the character seem more like their older self. With that in mind, "the only reason why he started reviewing was because a long history of abuse made him desperate to be loved" does not seem like it could be construed as characterization. Maybe cut.
    • Bullet 7 doesn't seem true and doesn't fit the trope. I used to watch Critic and I don't recall him "being tired of always failing and wanting to do better." Since that, to my knowledge, isn't consistent characterization, it might be cuttable.
    • Bullet 8 doesn't seem like it fits the trope either. What about Critic's character changed? What was brought back? Not explained.

That's my interpretation. As for the previous trope, it appears it's been edited already, so I will not expand on what I said.

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#110: Oct 30th 2020 at 2:51:27 PM

You have a good point that even the character traits listed here are not consistent. It's very much cherrypicked as specific aspects of Critic's personality tend to change based on Rule of Funny. So probably none of Character Check counts, as the only few actual instances of characterization are aspects that never went away (such as his love for Christmas).

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
#111: Oct 30th 2020 at 3:09:52 PM

This discussion on the Awesome.The Nostalgia Critic discussed whether the moment from the Blues Brothers 2000 entry when the Critic criticized the film for being inferior to the original by showing the statue of The Blues Brothers atop the Hollywood Blvd was valid because he didn't care that Tamara's character died of an overdose. Is this a valid removal, since the skit was Black Comedy, while the inferiority of the sequel and calling it out was Doug's actual opinion?

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#112: Oct 30th 2020 at 3:15:09 PM

Given how he removed his jacket and everything, it was clear that the actual moment discussing the Blues Brothers' importance to Chicago culture was an opinion extending beyond the character. It is Black Comedy that Critic doesn't care that Tamara dying, and there's some ironic subtext that Critic cares more about stupid movies than somebody's death that takes some "awesome" factor away from the scene, but given the nature of the show treats bad movies as Serious Business, I doubt he didn't want that scene to come across as a little bit awesome in context.

Also, the medicine that was killing Tamara was medicine that made her not give a shit about the movie. So the message of that ad was clearly that watching bad sequels blindly not giving a shit about quality isn't a great thing, which seems to suggest we aren't supposed to not care about the movie, and Critic's/Doug's anger is justified.

So...it could be valid? It's YMMV, some people might not consider the moment effective due to the background, but in context it seems to be Doug trying to get a passionate point across. It's usually clear when he's exaggerating Critic's passion to stupid amounts and we shouldn't agree with his point; this doesn't seem to be one of those instances.

Edited by mightymewtron on Oct 30th 2020 at 6:16:19 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#113: Oct 30th 2020 at 10:55:33 PM

Just took a chainsaw to The Nostalgia Critic: The Critic: Tropes A-E, but it's still not fully resolved. Can anybody help me figure out some of the other questionable tropes listed there?

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#114: Oct 31st 2020 at 11:20:26 PM

I'll crosspost in the complaining thread if this doesn't get attention, but are any of these Hypocrite examples from Characters.The Nostalgia Critic The Critic Tropes F To M not just sheer complaining? Not a lot of them have enough context to clarify if the hypocrisy is intentional in-universe.

  • Hypocrite:
    • Demanding pure logic in the silliest of cartoons, but running on emotion himself.
    • Even though he has a ton of guilty pleasures, he never fully gets that people can like movies that he can't stand.
    • He's so unwilling to accept Ma-Ti's death that he'll try and find (or make Chester find) a supernatural book that would raise the dead, but even in the movie where the aforementioned dying happened, he never fought back when he thought he was about to be killed.
    • In The Odd Life of Timothy Green and the Twilight editorial, he makes rants about learning from your mistakes and growing up. The irony that this comes after To Boldly Flee but he's back to screaming and having psychotic breaks like he did years ago has not been lost on people.
    • He also jokes that the mother in The Odd Life of Timothy Green is “as unfruitful as her garden.” Remember when he called a similar joke in North “the worst thing uttered by humanity”?
    • Five minutes after a giant getting-up-on-his-high-horse rant about Bay showing the soldiers in a shitty light, he accuses Bay of "editing history" to make the soldiers look better. It's confusing.
    • When Real!Critic and the others give Ma-Ti a funeral in Suburban Knights, he calls them awful people for cremating him. Says the guy who screamed for Brain Bleach every single time one of the male reviewers had a fanservice moment.
    • He acts pretty high and mighty with the TMZ crew considering that he's bashed actors for sexuality and weight just because his creator told him not to.
      • In Eight Crazy Nights he even uses a TMZ-like picture of Adam Sandler being overweight on a beach because for whatever reason film!Sandler being trim pisses him off.
      • He's also disgusted by the head of TMZ slapping the crying Rachel character, but that's an awful lot like something he did a few episodes previously.
    • Doug put "Is It Right To Nitpick?" up on facebook noting the irony of Critic preaching about the subject.
    • Sage calls him right out on this new trait in The Guyver, telling him he has no right to bitch at other people (which he did) for enjoying something stupid and not letting anything go considering he does both things all the time.
    • Wanting to go back to his "nostalgic roots" in Dawn Of The Commercials after how proud he was of making Doug remove the cut-off date in The Review Must Go On.
    • Intentionally done at the end of "When Is A Movie Just A Movie", where after condescending that it's your own problem if you get hurt by a movie and playing the invoked MST3K Mantra song, saying that if he gets upset then that's allowed.
    • Sympathetic example at the end of Alice in Wonderland (2010), as he tells Burton that nothing good can come out of living in someone else's shadow, and when everyone finds out that he had a Burton shrine, Carrot Juice points out that Critic was living in Burton's shadow.
    • The guy who openly admitted on several occasions that's he's invoked Pandering to the Base and is Only in It for the Money with his own work preaches like mad to the focus group guys in The Lorax about how both of those things are wrong. This gets acknowledged at the end where the analysts are gone and he's with Black Willy Wonka being disappointed that he's not getting the secrets to money and happiness.
    • After years of pulverizing painfully pushed puns, he makes a really bad one in the Doom review.
    • For all his mocking of Linkara's clichés, he can't take it when Linkara trashes his screaming, invoked Fountain of Memes reputation and disrespect for his audience.note 
    • In the American Beauty editorial, he musters up disgust for the film making pedophilia “quirky”, but ends it thanking a sixteen year old Thora Birch for showing her breasts (who because she was a minor at the time, had to get her parents to approve).
    • In “Why Do We Holiday Too Early”, he gets that he's the last person who should be lecturing other people regarding getting fixated on holidays and associating them with happiness.
    • He absolutely hates children getting getting hurt or mistreated, but makes a child abuse joke in Cop and a Half, hits and insults Evillina when he's supposed to be babysitting her in The Cat in the Hat, and murders several kids during TMNT'14.
    • He apparently hates Pokémon for being a Cash-Cow Franchise, but is a huge fanboy of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, the original hugest Cash-Cow Franchise claiming he collecting all he could get, even some actually rather disgusting cookies. He even lampshades it once even so slightly.

Edited by mightymewtron on Oct 31st 2020 at 2:20:41 PM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#115: Nov 1st 2020 at 4:33:13 AM

[up] Yeah that's all complaining. All of it can go.

EDIT: Except the one that says it was done intentionally. Thats In-Universe.

Edited by themayorofsimpleton on Nov 1st 2020 at 7:40:02 AM

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#116: Nov 1st 2020 at 10:17:02 AM

I left three examples up that appeared to be deliberate (though one of them was about Word of God calling it ironic).

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#117: Nov 13th 2020 at 7:57:39 PM

Just took a chainsaw to Characters.The Nostalgia Critic The Critic Tropes F To M. There's so many examples that amount to "Doug got skinny and unattractive in the reboot which makes it worse" and speculation of stuff like incest that isn't in the text at all. It's so fucking creepy.

My main issues are figuring out whether some entries are reading too much into things (like the stuff about his love life) or whether they're more plot tropes than character tropes.

Edited by mightymewtron on Nov 13th 2020 at 11:47:34 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#118: Dec 6th 2020 at 12:53:25 PM

Crossposting from the Critical Research Failure thread cleanup for extra visibility:

This huge section (and I mean huge, open the folder at your own peril) just got added to the YMMV section. It's trope-slashed which is already a problem, but we need to go through each example to see if it's valid for either item. Much of this isn't even from a NC episode but from spinoffs like Disneycember.

    It's so long y'all 
  • Critical Research Failure / Cowboy Be Bop At His Computer: The Critic and his real life counterpart Doug Walker have been known for getting important movie facts incorrect. In general, Doug doesn't seem to be that concerned in doing much research about the stuff he reviews, certainly when comparing him to The Nostalgia Chick or Brows Held High, since he believes a film should be enjoyed and completely understood on its own without All There in the Manual. Unfortunately he has officially announced that he will no longer do fuck up vids because Douchey annoys even him. '"Lindsay and Kyle good, Doug bad" gushing/complaining. Also I don't see what's wrong with an opinion that a film should be understandable on its own merits.
    • The Michael Bay rant in Pearl Harbor. A lot of people in the comment sections told him that soldiers really didn't have to learn to swim before WW 2 because they would have been screwed anyway (some even deliberately avoided it so they would die less painfully). ZCE
      • Though honestly it was one of the few things that could have been accurate, as Pearl Harbor has plenty of inaccurate stuff in it. Natter
    • In a sketch ironically complaining about Disney film animation errors of history, he calls The Little Mermaid British. Two things, Hans Christian Andersen doesn't even sound like a British name, and Doug knew all about the fairy-tale in his Disneycember review.
    • He does this a number of times in his Disneycember and Dreamworks-uary videos. None of these are even Nostalgia Critic videos; this is Doug's other series.
      • In the Dinosaur review, he claims that the film didn't do well at the box office. Dinosaur actually was a great financial success, the problem being that its generic plot (which Critic also criticizes) caused the film to be forgotten in pop culture. Not common knowledge. This might even be Common Knowledge.
      • In the Atlantis: The Lost Empire review, he claims that critics ripped it to shreds. It's more accurate to say that 'some'' critics ripped it to shreds as the movie had a mixed reception. Not common knowledge.
      • In his Treasure Planet review, the reason he's so critical of it is because he's so unfamiliar with the concept of Steampunk (a huge design influence on the movie). He also erroneously refers to the film's setting as The Future when it's actually an Alternate Universe. Not everybody is super familiar with steampunk.
      • During his review of The Road to El Dorado, he claims that the point of the movie is to have animated characters act like live-action characters. The real point of the movie is that according to the producers, after seeing so many animated features whose heroes were upstaged by more memorable sidekicks, they decided to just cut out the typical "hero" characters and center the film on Those Two Guys in the first place.
      • In his Dream Works-uary review of Madagascar, he refers to the lemurs as rodents. Lemurs are primates. This could be valid CRF.
      • In his Disneycember review of The Hunchback of Notre Dame II, he claims that it was animated by TMS Entertainment and goes into detail about how their style doesn't fit Disney movies, when it was actually animated by Walt Disney Animation Japan. However, many of the founding members of Disney Animation Japan were former TMS animators, as Doug pointed out on Facebook.
      • In his review of Mulan II, he claims that the plot is driven by Huns about to attack, when it is actually the Mongols; the Huns are the villains of the first movie. Humorously, Disney Channel made a similar but opposite mistake in a TV spot for the first film (referring to the Huns as the Mongols).
      • Among many criticisms of The Phantom Menace he explicitly states Queen Amidala makes no sense as "you don't elect queens". Yes, such a thing exists: it's called an Elective Monarchy. There aren't any out there that are near as functional as the one in the film seems to be, mind, but the film is also a work of fiction that gets to make it's own rules in the first place.
    • He also criticizes that the Clone Army would become the Stormtroopers, implying this makes no sense as all the Stormtroopers had "different voices" (Why would clones have different voices?). The Stormtroopers weren't clones (except for Darth Vader's 501st Legion) but recruited troops.
    • Ironically does this about one of his own videos in "Top 11 F*ckups Part 3". During one of the entries, he states he made a mistake in his Gordy review by calling a pan a pot. However, in said Gordy review, he actually referred to a pot as a pan, making it a rare occasion of not doing research on his own content.
    • He has complained that some elements in the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movies are not consistent with the TV animated cartoon series, despite the fact that the films were actually meant to be closer to the original comic series.
      • In his crossover with AVGN to review Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014), they question the 90's film's depiction of the foot clan. Most of their arguments hold (Shredder wants to send teenagers with a few weeks ninja training to fight armed police, they all instantly believe his stories about giant rats and turtles, he claims to want to take over the city but never orders them to do more than petty theft), but their main question is why any rational teenager would risk their life in the Foot Clan in the first place when Shredder can't offer them much more than video games, junk food, and sex, even though that was the whole point of the film's subplot involving Foot-Clan new recruits that served as commentary on real life street gangs. These kids would, irrationally, rather enjoy whatever hollow cammraderie and vice a dangerous gang would give them than submit themselves to the authority of their parents or the foster system, who they view as corrupt and evil. Strangely, Doug commented on this believable irrationality of teenagers in his original review.
    • An egregious case, since he says he is a big fan, is in the editorial about Tom and Jerry, where he outright states that Tom always starts the fight, which is wrong. While Tom does start the fight often, sometimes it's Jerry who starts it. Jerry almost always receives comeuppance in these episodes to soften the blow, however.
    • Not that it helps make the movie better, but the budget of Foodfight! was actually 45 million, not 65 like he keeps pointing out. To his and everyone else's credit: It was more to blame on imdb due to that site listing the false budget number.
      • Another moment in the review is when he expresses surprise that Lieutenant X is voiced by Tim Curry. He's actually voiced by Jeff Bennett doing a Tim Curry impersonation.
    • In his editorial about The Looney Tunes Show, he stated that in the episode To Bowl Or Not To Bowl, Daffy was the only player on the team who couldn't bowl. However, while Daffy was a mediocre player, the only member on the team who was shown to be better than him was Bugs, while the rest of the members (with the possible exception of Porky, whose skills as a bowler were never shown in the episode) were even worse at bowling than Daffy was.
    • His Jurassic Park III review has a curious complaint from him about the film's early classification of Isla Sorna as being 'restricted'. While he does more criticize the presentation, he also treats it as obvious fact; this is not information viewers of the previous films would be privy to, however. When The Lost World: Jurassic Park ends, we have no idea what the political and legal status of the island is. By presenting us with a caption telling us the island is 'restricted', it shows us that the action about to occur, with the Dino-Soar company performing their para-sailing tours, is in fact pretty illegal.
      • He also then goes on to query exactly why the Velociraptors insist in just intimidating their prey rather than just outright killing them and then taking their eggs, which ignores the point that the Raptors are generally depicted as being intelligent enough that they could be concerned about damaging their eggs during a confrontation, and also ignores the point that in the modern, contemporary animal kingdom, there are a number of animals that use similar tactics.
    • In his review of The Purge, he repeatedly refers to the gang leader as 'Henry'. But, Henry was the name of the daughter's boyfriend, not the gang leader; he was unnamed and instead given the title 'Polite Leader' by the credits. And Henry is repeatedly named in the clips used in the review. He did point this out in his commentary of the review, though.
    • In his review of Pound Puppies and the Legend of Big Paw, he was justified in complaining about Mc Nasty being a Devil in Plain Sight, but he seems to be unaware that Cooler didn't believe Whopper because the latter is Crying Wolf personified.
    • In his look at Sonic Sat AM, he painted Sally Acorn as a case of Princesses Rule while ignoring that she could not become a Queen because her kingdom was gone and was already taking great responsibility as the Freedom Fighter's field commander and strategist.
    • Matrix Month:
      • In his The Matrix review, he states that Trinity is played by Kate Moss, even though she's actually played by Carrie-Anne Moss.
      • In the next review about The Matrix Reloaded, he treats Neo in What the Hell, Hero? fashion for the rest of the review series for choosing saving Trinity over Zion after the Architect scene. Problem is, it was more a case of Take a Third Option. Zion was going to be destroyed anyway. What the Architect was offering Neo was to choose people to be unplugged from the Matrix to rebuild it and start the whole process again, with humanity still enslaved by the machines. To be fair, Critic implies that he was having a tough time understanding what the Architect was saying, not without good reason.
      • In the review of The Matrix Revolutions, he thinks it's ridiculous for Neo to have such issues with a single Smith when before he walked over a whole army of them. He seems to have overseen the fact that Smith has gotten a hell of a lot more powerful after taking over the Matrix, especially after absorbing the Oracle.
    • In his review of Dunston Checks In, he opens up with "MONKEYS AREN'T FUNNY!", despite the fact that this movie and every other example he brings up use apes, not monkeys. He later brings this up in "Top 11 F*ckups part 3".
    • In his Labyrinth review, he refers to Jareth the Goblin King as "Jared".
    • In the Titanic: The Legend Goes On review, he repeats the common myth that the third class passengers on the Titanic were trapped below deck by the crew, and not allowed to come up on the deck. note
    • Critic makes a rather notable mistake in his Warriors of Virtue review, where he assumes that the movie erroneously uses the term Tao (from Taoism) and mocks how they get it wrong. However, the director of the movie is the established Hong Kong filmmaker Ronnie Yu who knew both languages and clearly simply named the magic land in the film Tao.
    • In his review of The Haunting remake, he repeatedly refers to the doctor as "Dr. Moreau," even though this isn't his name in either version (it's Markway in the original, Marrow in the remake). The second mistake is forgivable, since "Marrow" and "Moreau" sound fairly similar, but you'd expect him to know the character's name in the original, given that he holds it in such high esteem.
    • In the Cool World review Critic asks "When will people learn that the vision of the artist is all you need to make something brilliant?" which immediately leads into Ralph Bakshi and similarly kooky directors talking about their more insane visions that didn't exactly work. The joke however falls flat when the first example used is the Saruman/Aruman fiasco from Bakshi's The Lord of the Rings...which happened because of executives, not Bakshi.
    • In the A Kid in King Arthur's Court review he stated that Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes was ten years old; that is incorrect, as Calvin is six.
    • He opens up his editorial on dubbing bad singing performances from actors by claiming Emma Watson's voice was auto tuned for her singing numbers in Beauty and the Beast... except that her voice was not auto tuned and she actually took singing lessons to prepare for the role.note While his opinion on her voice is valid, saying she's auto-tuned is just incorrect.
    • Uh, that's not Kal Penn in The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas, that's John Cho. What's even worse is that the immediate following joke is one about a future movie called "Harold and Sulu" in which the mock-up poster has two John Chos on it. However, at least he seems to have caught on to the mistake rather quickly, as the You Tube version at least actually refers to him as John Cho.
    • In his Pokémon: The First Movie review, he chides the movie's producers for their arrogance in subtitling it "The First Movie", as if it was inevitable that it would be successful enough to warrant at least one sequel. The movie actually got that title because it had already gotten a sequel by the time it was released in the United States, though the sequel had only been released in Japan at that point. And its original Japanese title (which was chosen before said sequel was released) wasn't "Pokémon: The First Movie", it was "Pokémon the Movie: Mewtwo Strikes Back". He corrected this mistake in his review of Doug's 1st Movie later, though. Based on the beginning, he also doesn't realize that "Pokémon: The First Movie" and "Mewtwo Strikes Back" are two different names for the same movie. In his defense, at least, he does admit he's unfamiliar with the franchise and that he had a very difficult time figuring out which movie is the one he's supposed to be looking at.
    • In his review of Freddy vs. Jason, he goes on a long diatribe about movie studios pandering to their audiences by making television series adaptations of popular horror movie franchises. As an example, he cites Freddy's Nightmares and Friday the 13th: The Series. Except... those series are most definitely not straight adaptations of A Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th. Freddy's Nightmares is a horror anthology series that just has Freddy Krueger as the host (and occasionally making cameos), and Friday the 13th: The Series is a show about an antique shop full of magical artifacts that's related to the movie series In-Name-Only. note To be fair, that kind of reenforces his point, as slapping the name of a popular franchise on something just for the brand recognition could be seen as the highest form of pandering imaginable.
    • In his Super Mario Bros. (and later on Thomas and the Magic Railroad), he claims the movie versions of Mario and Luigi are father and son. However, Luigi says Mario is like a father to him because of Mario's Promotion to Parent after their parents died. It's been more than ten years since the review and the Critic appears to still believe they are father and son.
    • He also gets a lot of details about the infamous age consent laws in Japan wrong in his (out of nowhere) diatribe in his Sailor Moon review. In fairness, while he does point that that the age of consent being infamously thirteen is only between minors (contrary to what some people both inside and outside the anime community might believe), it only applies on the federal level and most prefectures raise it to sixteen and the age of consent between adults is twenty (the age of adulthood in Japan overall). He doesn't even bring up Tuxedo Mask being a college student in the anime to justify it! On top of that, along with coming right the hell out of nowhere, he seems to imply that the series was male-geared hence the Fanservice when in reality, it's the quintessential Shoujo for a reason and how it's not exactly helping the Unfortunate Implications of the review already having for calling the girls slutty.
    • In his Top 11 Dumbasses In Distress, he claims that Princess Peach's ability to fly was only shown in Super Mario Bros. 2 which was All Just a Dream and in her own game, Super Princess Peach, she only had weak abilities like crying. Super Princess Peach did show her flying. Said game also showed that she could control fire. He makes this error again in his editorial on Mario comics.
    • In his X-Men review, he claims that Morph is a Canon Foreigner. In reality, Morph is actually based on the obscure X-Men character Changeling (the name was changed to avoid confusion with Changeling from the Teen Titans). He also said that Morph is only in the first two episodes before being Killed Off for Real, but it was revealed in season 2 that Morph survived, and appears in multiple episodes afterwards.
    • Alien vs. Predator. Critic wonders why the Predators — who want to use Humans as living incubators for more Aliens to hunt — don't just unleash Facehuggers all over the planet instead of bothering with the trouble of posing as gods to attract Human Sacrifice volunteers. Said suggestion requires that you ignore the Predators' long-established Never Hurt an Innocent and Noble Demon beliefs.
    • In his editorial "Was The Killing Joke That Bad?", he praises the Joker's Villain Song as one of the few additions to the comic outside of the reviled prologue, when it was in fact in the comic.
    • In his list of favorite characters, he rather inexplicably refers to Ed Wood as "Edwood D. Wood."
    • Both the tagline for the review of The Sorcerer's Apprentice and the episode itself mock the idea of Nicolas Cage playing Mickey Mouse. Cage's character is more the closest equivalent to the wizard Yensid, with Jay Baruchel playing the Mickey equivalent.
    • In the Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory he notes Slugworth being German as a change (which he calls redundant considering Augustus Gloop) for this particular version even though he was in the original, even being played by German actor Günter Meisner.
    • In Spawn, he mistakes Malebolgia for Satan. In reality, Malebolgia is a high ranked demon working for Satan.
    • The episode for Superman: The Animated Series has the Critic point out that they never explained why Krypton was destroyed. Meanwhile, at the three minute and four second mark of the video, Jor-El is explaining why the planet is blowing up.
    • His review of Halloween (2007) has him stating that Rob Zombie decided to remake the original because he thought the story was in need of a re-telling. In fact, almost the complete opposite is true. Zombie initially rejected the film because he didn't think he could do the original justice, and it was only after being encouraged by John Carpenter himself that he hesitantly agreed to do it.
    • Dragonball Evolution:
      • He claims Piccolo looks like a piccolo...and then shows an image of a clarinet instead note . This one's just funny because they just copied the text of the page outright so they left in the damn "note" without expanding the note.
      • A mistake made not by Critic but by guest starring Masako X. At one point he claims that Goku hates fighting and only fights when he has to. Goku hates killing, but is otherwise a Spirited Competitor who loves fighting strong opponents. Made egregious by the fact that Masako X was in the review specifically for his knowledge about Dragon Ball. Though he later clarified that he tried to be sarcastic, but the inflection was off.
    • An interesting one is his ripping on Jupiter Ascending for using a Maxi Pad as a bandage. Not only is this actually a good idea, but the Maxi Pad originally was intended to treat battlefield injuries before a better use was found for it. In his defense, he was probably dumbfounded by all the other ludicrous things in the movie (including Jupiter using the pad backward for some reason).
    • In his editorial "Are Video Games Art?", he claims that Metroid fans were outraged at Metroid: Other M for reasons entirely related to the story and that the gameplay wasn't disliked or commented on much at all. While there are some fans who claim that Other M's gameplay is good to great, this is far from a universal or even majority opinion; just look at the section on Scrappy Mechanics on the game's YMMV page.
    • While it is true that he says it's his own opinion, his review of It (2017) does have some glaring flaws in their critiques:
      • The first is It itself, the Critic portrays the new It as if it is a gritty remake that has no interest in anything funny, mainly due to It's new design, however throughout the movie it is made very clear that It is doing this partially because it needs to eat, and partially because it finds the misery and fear of the children hilarious, ultimately the difference between the Curry version from the Skarsgard version is that the Skarsgard version of Pennywise is seeking to entertain, just not other people, it seeks to enterteain itself through a morbid and depraved "show" and it chooses that apperance to make children uncomfortable.
      • Another point is the fact that the Critic complains that the apathy of the adults towards the alarming situation is not made very clear, this is false, not only are the adults in the town shown to be awful people, there is an entire scene dedicated to show just how apathetic the adults of Derry are, the scene in which the Losers Club discover just how many missing children posters actually are and how they are hidden.
    • In his Editorial, "Can Hype Kill a Good Film?", he seems to think that that Hype Backlash (though not stated directly, it is what he was talking about) is where people liked something already, but they turned away from it because it got so insanely popular in the marketing and people talking about it. That's actually the definition of It's Popular, Now It Sucks. Hype Backlash is actually defined as when people hear all the praises of something so much, that when they finally sit down to watch, read, or try whatever it is, they don't see what the big deal is about.
    • In his review of Water World he's confused as to why the villains are called The Smokers and assumes it's because they smoke a lot of cigarettes. It's very clearly established in the film that The Smokers have access to fuel, as their headquarters is the Exxon Valdez oil tanker, and thus have gas-powered smoke-spewing vehicles (including aircraft) as opposed to the man and wind-powered skiffs and rafts used by everyone else. It's even a plot point as part of The Smoker's motivation for finding Dryland is that their finite oil supply is almost depleted.
    • He calls Tom Cruise's character in The Mummy (2017) Rick Morton instead of Nick Morton. Though, the fact that both Critic and the Nerd refers to Cruise by his real name make it clear that neither of them care either way.
    • In his "Top 11 Worst Sequels" video, his entry on X-Men Origins: Wolverine claims that Fred J. Dukes ("The Blob") isn't a Mutant in the movie, but just a morbidly obese human. Except he is a Mutant, just like in the comics; the movie clearly shows that he had invulnerability and super-strength during his time with Team X, even before he gained all that weight. And though it's never spelled out, it's pretty strongly implied that his obesity is a side-effect of his powers. note
    • In his review of Cool World, his version of Ralph Bakshi, despite getting almost everything else correct about the movie's original pitch (a half-cartoon, half-human child wanting to kill their dad), uses masculine pronouns to talk about the child despite how the character was intended to be a girl.
    • In the Dark Age of Films video, he says Toy Story was one of the reasons that help improve movies after the 1996-2001 bad summer flicks era, that movie however came out in 1995.

[down] I think the reason it's a Wall of Text is because it's the exact same contents as the CowboyBeBopAtHisComputer.The Nostalgia Critic page that was cut over a year ago for complaining. I know because I recognize the entries I had originally added to the page.

Edited by mightymewtron on Dec 6th 2020 at 4:05:44 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#119: Dec 6th 2020 at 12:57:52 PM

You weren't kidding, that's a wall of text if I've ever seen one O_o

Where to start?

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#120: Dec 6th 2020 at 1:01:48 PM

I did a bit of markup on the examples, some seem to be limited to fan knowledge (not CRF) but since I don't know a lot of these works he's discussing I can't really tell for sure what counts, and it's just....so much.

Does a legit error on his part regarding media even count as Cowboy Be Bop At His Computer or is it Dan Browned or something else? I know we had a sandbox for this somewhere, IDK what happened to it.

Edited by mightymewtron on Dec 6th 2020 at 4:02:41 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
#121: Dec 6th 2020 at 7:48:38 PM

Thoughts on the Wham Episode page, since the show doesn't really have an ongoing narrative?

Edited by costanton11 on Dec 6th 2020 at 9:48:53 AM

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#122: Dec 6th 2020 at 8:13:24 PM

I feel like we went over it before at some point but I'll look it over again now.

    Wham Episode 

  • More personal than most but the ending of My Pet Monster has his low self-esteem and job insecurity (which have been building up from at least the review of Full House) hit him right in the face. The depression carries on to the next episode. It does carry over to the next episode and establish some of Critic's insecurities for probably the first serious time, so maybe it counts? Or would the Commercials special be better for that, as it not only focuses more strongly on the Heroic BSoD but also establishes a Once a Season trend?
  • A Simple Wish has Mara Wilson existing! As a demonic badass who schools the Critic and gives him a Humiliation Conga for bashing child stars! Is this a significant plot thing or just a cool guest star appearance?
  • Review of Scooby-Doo. Critic reviewing the movie with his younger and older self, all three dying to save the world (Critic gets better though), returning characters coming back (most notably Roger as the angel from "You're A Dirty Rotten Bastard"), is a prequel for To Boldly Flee, and his self-hate running deeper than anyone realized. It was set up as the original Grand Finale, so I guess it counts if those are allowed to count.
  • "The Review Must Go On" starts off as a Demo Reel episode with Donnie, Tacoma and Rebecca happy with life, but then switches to Critic pushing Doug into killing that show off and bringing him back into existence. Given that it brings the whole show back, I guess it counts.
  • Son of the Mask introduces a hell right under Critic's home with the devil and Evilina as recurring characters, Santa Christ comes back a lot nastier, and Critic really regrets coming down from the Plot Hole. Is introducing recurring characters enough of a Wham Episode? Also I usually skip the Santa Christ bit cuz it's depressing/boring to me but it could function for important character development, though I don't know if it recontextualizes the show.
  • The Cat in the Hat is the first big episode showing how Critic in the reboot Came Back Wrong, from his going against his earlier morals and hitting a child, to being gleeful when even the Devil thinks he's sick, to just selling his soul for a worthless joke. All of these are just jokes, and Critic hitting Evilina is the result of Never Live It Down that's spread all over this wiki. The only possible narrative significance might be Critic and Satan having a positive relationship?
  • The Master of Disguise is the starting point for a lot of plot threads that ended up getting darker; Rachel reveals herself to be a bit of a Broken Bird and tries to kill Critic (and ends up beaten down on the ground), Critic himself has such a breakdown that he says he has to go to the asylum or prison after the review, and he destroys a Happy Madison's building full of people. None of this has any impact on the narrative. Rachel trying to kill Critic is just a gag.
  • The Last Airbender. Not just that it's a big movie with big demand and build-up, but Doug's vlogs get welded into Critic canon, Doug himself becomes another life, Shyam-Amon becomes the first reboot Big Bad who talent-bends Critic, Critic and Doug (as a platypus bunny) meet up again, and there's more meta and Lampshade Hanging than we care to name. Critic and Doug meeting might have some narrative ramifications given To Boldly Flee but I'm not sure, my memory of the skits from this review is too foggy.
  • The Shining. Critic loses his mind even more, domestically abuses Rachel, tries to kill Malcolm, does these two things because “someone has to pay” for what's been happening, hallucinates a bar in which he complains he wants a drink from the Plot Hole, and doesn't even get better, hiding in catatonia at the end. All of this is just a parody of The Shining, not a legitimate statement on the character's arcs. Critic's Sanity Slippage is played as a joke and he never actually threatens Rachel - they exaggerate their screaming fit and she easily overpowers him without showing legit fear, it's just somebody with a Single-Issue Wonk calling it "abuse" just like the shit with Evilina mentioned above.
  • "The Guyver" is an episode update by Sage, but it serves as wham for Critic. Doug used a vlog to send him over there, it's the first video in the reboot where he's explicitly called out by an equal (not someone who works for him like IC!Rachel) for being an asshole, it's established that his memory of the anniversary specials are fading, and a Redemption Rejection is involved. Pretty sure an episode of another show cannot be a Wham Episode for NC.
  • The Wicker Man (2006) introduces Tamara, has Critic tortured both mentally by her and physically in a Mistreatment-Induced Betrayal by Malcolm, and Karl and Quinn show up to retcon the “The Review Must Go On” retcon. Introduction of Tamara can count, but the whole thing about TRMGO retcon might be debatable. This is the only time Demo Reel characters have shown up in the series.
  • The Uncanny Valley is beginning to end Lampshade Hanging, with also an Ironic Echo to his dad hurting him but this time about creeping into a woman's bedroom, admitting that he's sexually repressed, and ending it with a two-in-one Redemption Rejection. I'm pretty sure a review buried on a DVD isn't a Wham Episode just because it had a few dark stalking jokes that were very clearly not meant to be taken seriously.
  • “The Top 11 Best Avatar Episodes”. Dante Basco chasing Critic with firebending, confirmation that in-universe!Rachel and Malcolm were Katara and Sokka in The Last Airbender, in-universe!Doug giving "The Reason You Suck" Speech in a Freeze-Frame Bonus, and Critic's only way to keep himself safe is through meta. I feel like a lot of this is just a more-plot-heavy-than-usual editorial, not anything important for the narrative or characters.
  • Princess Diaries 2. Hyper Fangirl kidnaps Critic to her Big Fancy House that she got from another stalking victim, proves much more desperate and disturbing than even first appeared by trying to manipulate him into loving her. And it almost works via Stockholm Syndrome, but he gets back to himself, tells her that he will never give her what she wants, but she has a breakdown because of this and vanishes. I'd allow this, if only because it's a Wham Episode in the context of one of the rare recurring arcs on this show, changing the relationship between Critic and Hyper as he becomes more fearful of her and it solidifies that they aren't going to be a ship.
  • Matrix Month as a whole. Tamara and Malcolm are Brainwashed and Crazy, it's only the 'month' with a Story Arc both in itself and continuing the overall plot, Critic's meta powers are explained with Self-Deprecation, To Boldly Flee homages are common, and he reality warps to get things back to normal World Gone Mad. I guess explaining the basis for Critic's ability to change the continuity could count as changing the narrative, though it's not called back to much.
  • Mad Max: Fury Road is done with entirely built sets and green screen, Devil Boner gets Character Development, Hyper Fangirl gets over Critic (though nobody thinks it will stick) which he is more than fine with, and meninists are sent by Obama to fight in women's place as Laser-Guided Karma. Only significant development is the beginning of the Hyper Fangirl and Devil Boner ship. And even then, it's played as a gag so it's not really a wham moment.
  • Subverted with We Wish You A Turtles Christmas, as Critic's Christmas obsession blows up the world, gravely injures Tamara and turns Malcolm into a zombie, but he declares it non canon. Is it really a subversion if the show always had Negative Continuity? We'd expect it not to stick.
  • Christmas With The Kranks. As well as Continuity Porn (there are nods to review moments from 2007 to 2015), Critic swaps with his 2007 self because he wants the Glory Days back, his I Just Want to Be Loved characteristic comes back when he says he just started reviewing so people would like him, and the speech at the end is a melancholy You Are Better Than You Think You Are. Not a narrative thing, just a heavy episode.
  • The Phantom of the Opera (2004). A clipless musical with Loads And Loads Of Characters, Chester gets killed (although Beth confirmed he's okay), Beth is kidnapped by the Fandumb Of The Opera in a parallel to Hyper>Critic, and speaking of Hyper, she's still chasing Critic but she gets more insight into her fucked up brain. Technically contributes to the narrative by resolving the Hyper Fangirl arc but otherwise is just a standard clipless episode that also happens to have some good Continuity Porn. And Chester didn't permanently die, obviously.
  • "I'll Be Home For Christmas". Satan has a nephew, Chester has a girlfriend and not subtly in light of 2016 politics, Critic gets To Boldly Flee feelings back and wants desperately to be good. I'm pretty sure D-bag has never shown up again after this episode, and him being related to the Devil is just a gag. The introduction of Doe is pretty significant for Chester's arc as it explains why Bum Reviews is gone but it's not really something that changes the structure of Nostalgia Critic? Plus the whole "To Boldly Flee feelings" as synonymous for "Critic isn't a total asshole" is such an annoyingly gushy pattern on these pages.
  • Green Lantern is mostly a light comedic episode until the last five minutes, where Devil Boner swoops in to punish a Deadpool cosplayer for trying to touch Hyper, and then proposes marriage to Hyper, which she eagerly accepts. I think I added this because it does result in a significant change for some of the most popular recurring characters. I'll defend it.
  • The Chipwrecked review is the Wedding Episode between Hyper Fangirl and Devil Boner, effectively wrapping up the Hyper Fangirl arc, featuring cameos from several other sketch characters. Same as above, though maybe only Green Lantern would count for coming out of nowhere, as that episode set up this one.
  • The Most HATED Nutcracker Movie Ever Made has Critic and company move studios (motivation later trying to run from Aunt Despair and Uncle Lies), Rachel comes back very… Donnie-like, trying to remake Home Alone and Critic essentially apologizes, saying they were a good person even if making something shitty, Critic himself reveals he hadn’t said the F word all year, and the review ends with all of them watching the late Mrs Walker talk from “The Christmas Tree”. This entry is very weirdly written, but it does reveal a really significant Rewatch Bonus (Critic didn't use the F-bomb all year) and bring back an actress who hadn't been physically on the show in five years. It's at the very least a big deal.

Edited by mightymewtron on Dec 6th 2020 at 11:15:12 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#123: Dec 6th 2020 at 8:15:11 PM

I think we did talk about it at least once before and determined that some episodes do mark a shift in the Critic's character development and the tone of the series.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#124: Dec 6th 2020 at 8:16:17 PM

Yeah, when we discussed the Breather Episode page. The problem is some people take certain episodes way too seriously so it becomes difficult to tell if these episodes are really that important.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
#125: Dec 7th 2020 at 8:21:02 AM

I’d say delete the examples that clearly don’t count.


Total posts: 216
Top