Follow TV Tropes

Following

"They Wasted A Perfectly Good Character" Cleanup

Go To

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#101: Sep 11th 2020 at 10:41:49 AM

Second bullet doesn't have enough context on how Izzie and Paige were wasted as characters. Are they canonically autistic? Because otherwise that's just a What If? scenario, not a wasted aspect of their canonical characters.

Third bullet point doesn't note any specific character that was wasted.

The fourth bullet point seems to be referring to a character that doesn't exist, which doesn't fit the trope.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
ccorb from A very hot place Since: May, 2020 Relationship Status: It's not my fault I'm not popular!
#102: Sep 11th 2020 at 6:26:53 PM

[up] There is actually a support group in the show, and the bullet point is saying they should develop one of the support group members further.

And a large reason why people like the show from the second season onward is that Casey and Izzie have Belligerent Sexual Tension and fall in love, which is enough to distract away from Sam and Elsa.

Edited by ccorb on Sep 11th 2020 at 9:35:54 AM

Rock'n'roll never dies!
Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#103: Sep 12th 2020 at 10:29:05 AM

Bringing up the following example from Doctor Who S37 E1 "The Woman Who Fell to Earth":

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character: Many were upset at Grace's death, saying that even with the crew understandably not wanting to squeeze five people into the TARDIS, she could have served quite well as the era's equivalent of Jackie Tyler or Wilfred Mott. Instead she'll at worst be a case of Stuffed into the Fridge and at best a case of Mentor Occupational Hazard depending on how her death continues or not to affect Graham and Ryan. That of the four humans it was a black woman who died didn't help the optics. Then again, He's Just Hiding could be in play...

ccorb from A very hot place Since: May, 2020 Relationship Status: It's not my fault I'm not popular!
#104: Sep 12th 2020 at 7:19:13 PM

From YMMV.Inazuma Eleven Ares:

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character:
    • Similar to the original series having half of Raimon's team being Out of Focus, some people wish more had been done with members like Michinari and Hiro.
    • Sakanoue Noboru was liked for being a unique character and having a few genuine moments, but even as a member of Inazuma Japan, he did not receive much screentime barring his contributions to Shining Satans, with many wishing he had done more.
    • A lot of characters not being picked for Inazuma Japan in 'Orion'' had fans wishing certain Ensemble Dark Horses like Nae and Midorikawa would eventually join the team.

Rock'n'roll never dies!
ElBuenCuate Since: Oct, 2010
#105: Sep 12th 2020 at 11:40:00 PM

I'm sorry of just barging here. I just want to check if it is right to just take out various potholes spread on various examples, like this from Talking the Monster to Death.

Stephenie Meyer: Alice tore a page from The Merchant of Venice because the end of Breaking Dawn was going to be somewhat similar: bloodshed appears inevitable, doom approaches, and then the power is reversed and the game is won by some clever verbal strategies; no blood is shed,note  and the romantic pairings all have a happily ever after.

AlleyOop Since: Oct, 2010
#106: Oct 5th 2020 at 7:40:51 PM

I assume They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot cleanup can also go here as well? Anyway, I was making slight changes to an entry on Captain Marvel (2019) and I noticed that the article had very bloated sections for this trope and the above. I removed most of the entries and rewrote one of the two I considered valid, but I'd like to bring it to this thread just in case:

    TWAPGC 
  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character:
    • In a weird way, Carol herself, even though she's the main character. While the story of her Laser-Guided Amnesia is a potentially fascinating one and something the MCU hasn't seen very much of yet, we don't get to see very much of the past that was erased from her memory, brushing over her military training and childhood in a brief montage and showing us very little of how she was supposedly judged, looked down upon, and mistreated. Compare how well we got to learn about Steve Rogers in his own first movie before he got superpowers, and Carol's story feels curiously slight by comparison. In the other primary MCU origin stories (The First Avenger, Doctor Strange (2016), and Iron Man in particular), those heroes had to suffer through a lot of mistreatment and just plain bad luck before reaching success, which makes Carol's supposed "hardship" come across as an Informed Attribute at best, and what struggles she does go through are barely dwelt upon for more than a few minutes at most. The fact that even after her memories have been recovered, Carol only seems pained about the years she's lost and the life that the Kree have stolen from her for a scene or two before jumping right back into the fray means that her unlocking her true powers and the "I don't have to prove anything to you" moment feels somewhat perfunctory when it should have drawn fist-pumps and cheers. She's the main character and received a lot of screentime. While I think the film could've done a little better on this front, it serves its purpose. This is just complaining.
    • Double-whammy version for Minn-Erva. In the comics, Minn-Erva was a Kree Hot Scientist and Eugenicist whose pet project was using Mar-Vell's genes to improve the Kree, creating an interesting connection between Minn-Erva and both Mar-Vell and Carol. The movie abandons this backstory, with promotional material describing Minn-Erva as the previous star player of Star-Force who feels threatened by Carol's power and competence. Despite either of these backstories providing plenty of depth for the character, the movie itself uses Minn-Erva as little more than another goon for the Kree empire, ignoring any potential character development she could have gotten. The nail in the coffin is that she seemingly gets killed off in the finale, preventing her from getting any future character arc to live up to her potential. Some actual valid criticisms in here, all though the points about the comic are just complaining. I cut down and fused what was left with the below, which you can see on the current page.
    • The rest of Star-Force falls into this as well. We don’t really get to see much of Carol’s relationship with the rest of her teammates during her time as a member of Star-Force. At-Lass was pretty hesitant in trying to fight Carol, and she doesn't kill them despite showing that she could, implying that she had a pretty close relationship with her teammates aside from Minn-Erva. Some fans were also disappointed that none of them aside from Carol have superpowers like in the comics, which could make them much more of a challenge for Carol to fight. Instead, they are simply a group of Badass Normals and are quickly trounced by Carol. See above. The reasons given are weak and complainy, but the idea that Star-Force are underused still holds valid in my opinion.
    • For that matter, even Yon-Rogg falls into this for many people. He has a few brief interactions with Carol in the first act, most of which are spent offering bland mentor platitudes and then barely appears until the third, where he's defeated without a fight, leaving his actual motives, personality and relationship history with Carol barely fleshed out. As a consequence, we don't spend enough time with him in the beginning to really get to like him, and we don't really get enough time with him in the climax to hate him. I somewhat agree, and a Deleted Scene adds credence to the idea that there was more to him that didn't make the final cut, but this entry reads as complainy.
    • Maria Rambeau. Although audiences and critics love her, she doesn't appear until more than an hour into the film. Many wished that she had been introduced earlier in the film since she could've further humanized Carol through their friendship. She's a main character. This is just complaining that she didn't get even more material.
    • Returning characters like Coulson, Korath, and Ronan only appear in a few scenes and don't really do much with the overall plot. Korath and Ronan specifically, which some viewers were expecting to receive some much-needed character development after their first appearance in Guardians of the Galaxy, only for them to turn out to be exactly the same characters that they were as before. This is just complaining. The film never promised to actually do more with them, nobody expected them to be heavily fleshed out, and the fact that they even got to appear at all is a bit of a treat.
    • Dr. Lawson. Though she's two things that the MCU has very little of, (1: non-civilian active female characters played by an actress older than 50, and 2: good-aligned Kree), she doesn't get nearly as much time to shine as earlier MCU "mentor characters" like Dr. Erskine, Odin, or the Ancient One. The story of a brilliant Kree scientist breaking with their genocidal ways to help the Skrulls on Earth is interesting enough to carry an entire movie on its own, but we learn very little about her history with the bad guys or emotional motivations before Yon-Rogg kills her. I agree that she was underused and underexplored so I left this in.

    TWAPGP 
  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • Captain Marvel is not only the first MCU chapter to star a main character rooted in the Kree culture, but also introduces the Skrulls with all their own baggage, and also features a plot where the two civilizations clash against each other. However, the film barely shows the Kree homeworld at all, as well as just a bit of their creed and space navy (and most it amounts to the familiar Ronan), while the Skrulls themselves are portrayed as having become pauper refugees and receive virtually no focus or expansion outside that characterization. It does not even make a real comparison between the two races due to how little it shows about each. Many people hoping to learn about the MCU space lore were understandably disappointed at this. This film just introduces them, and never promised to explore them in more detail or do a particularly comics-accurate take.
    • While it's generally agreed that Carol getting her powers from an explosion caused by her blowing up the lightspeed engine to prevent the Kree from getting it is an improvement on the comics' version (where she was trying to save Walter Lawson), some feel that this is one area where Marvel could have afforded to alter her backstory more significantly, because the story's themes of female empowerment and choice are somewhat undermined by the fact that she still gets her powers from being lucky enough to survive the explosion, rather than because she was inherently stronger or more devoted. While possibly valid as a criticism, this is wishful thinking and not what the trope is about.
    • Also, while most people already expected the Kree turning out to be the bad guys, they also were already led to believe that the Skrulls wouldn't be much better, since that was the case in the comics, which would create the chance to explore many layers of morality in the setting. Instead, the Skrulls are given some Adaptational Heroism, being portrayed as the real good guys who are wrongly accused of their crimes (even if Talos does admit he's done some awful things in the war regardless of how good his justifications are), rather than making the war a case of Gray-and-Grey Morality on both sides at best. Getting to see any of those things that Talos did offscreen would have made it much easier to get invested in the Kree vs. Skrull conflict, and consequently, made the revelation that the Kree are the bad guys land with much more impact. This would be valid... if this wasn't done deliberately for the purpose of a twist.
    • Carol's vital flashbacks make a big focus on her strong will and determination to rise up after every fall, but some feel this attribute is actually not explored in the film, as most of her conflicts are not rooted on overcoming external challenges like those in her memories, but on building an inner identity (in this case, the human Carol Danvers being re-discovered by the Kree Vers) that is only barely reflected on them. Some would have preferred her decisive flashbacks to show the most definitory moments of her past life, like her bad rapport with her family or her career with Maria and Mar-Vell, instead of being a generic motivating sequence with a single action repeated over and over. Agreed but could rewrite this to be less of a "gotcha". Cut the last sentence for being Fix Fic wank.
    • It's easy to think that the film would have benefitted greatly from having a character who could aspire to be a threat for Carol, instead of being basically Carol steamrolling an entire Kree fleet and effortlessly humiliating her nemesis Yon-Rogg, which is by itself a weird novelty in a MCU solo movie given that no previous main character had lacked a villain capable to go toe to toe with them (the nearest to this in Captain Marvel would be the Supreme Intelligence, who is actually more of a psychological schemer that can get trumped by sheer will). This would have been a way for her flashbacks about rising up from crashes and athletic failures not to feel hard to jive with the rest of the film, if only because, barring two instances of Carol being captured (only to free herself at both), there are no situations in the final movie that can be equated to a "fall" for her to rise up from: she takes the revelation of her old identity remarkably coolly, never finds opponents that can seriously threaten her beyond some hand-to-hand struggle, and later gets a powerup that ensures not even all her enemies's combined space fleet poses a challenge to her. Just complaining.
    • Many feel that The Reveal of how Nick Fury lost his left eye (getting it scratched by Goose the Cat/Flerken) was a hugely wasted opportunity to flesh out his backstory and justify his need to keep secrets, since it was implied back in Winter Soldier that Fury had been betrayed by someone close to him, losing the eye in the process. Especially considering that the film features the Skrulls, who are known for their ability to disguise themselves. Rather than losing it in a Moment of Awesome as most fans thought, the moment is instead Played for Laughs. I actually agree with this but think this is closer to Fan-Disliked Explanation, which already has an entry dealing with this exact thing.

Edited by AlleyOop on Jan 11th 2021 at 2:19:30 PM

Redmess Redmess from Netherlands Since: Feb, 2014
Redmess
#107: Jan 11th 2021 at 6:11:03 PM

I agree Plot should be rolled into this thread as well.

Optimism is a duty.
AlleyOop Since: Oct, 2010
#108: Jan 11th 2021 at 6:32:24 PM

So do I have the go-ahead to clean house?

Redmess Redmess from Netherlands Since: Feb, 2014
Redmess
#109: Jan 11th 2021 at 6:51:56 PM

These two tropes seem to be catchalls for "This episode gave me a cool plot/character idea that it did not go for, and I want to let you know!" edits.

Optimism is a duty.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#110: Jan 13th 2021 at 8:50:12 PM

Plot might warrant its own separate thread in case the type of misuse is slightly different, but either way, it definitely needs one.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Tomodachi Now a lurker. See you at the forums. Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
Now a lurker. See you at the forums.
#111: Feb 8th 2021 at 2:22:12 PM

I updated the entry of The Scrappy from Eggman Nega, and changed it to They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character.

Does this entry sound fair?

To win, you need to adapt, and to adapt, you need to be able to laugh away all the restraints. Everything holding you back.
HarpieSiren Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: I've been dreaming of True Love's Kiss
#112: Feb 22nd 2021 at 1:37:41 PM

From Persona 5 Strikers:

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • Detractors of the game's story often bring up that the original vision for the game, a Crisis Crossover with other games in the Persona series, had a lot of potential in terms of character interaction and potentially giving characters from the original Persona and the second game's duology some spotlight. Most note that even sticking to the Hashino-era Persona games had interesting opportunities to visit previous locales like Inaba and Tatsumi Port Island and interact with older party members.
      • If nothing else, the fact that Naoto and Chie don't appear at all despite being police officers seems weird in a game that's trying to show the police in a better light than Persona 5. Even just having Naoto alone would have been a massive Wham Shot for fans of 4.

While there is something to be said about people being disappointed that this wasn't a Persona Musou like the initial plan was. The second indent just seems like someone was upset they didn't shoehorn a cameo from P4 into a P5 sequel.

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#113: Feb 22nd 2021 at 1:57:55 PM

If we're checking plot examples in here now, here's some South Park stuff. I'm assuming that concepts that were never in the plot to begin with and are just listed as "missed opportunities" are misuse here (though I still think there's a place for fan opinions like that somewhere. Fanfic Fuel, maybe?)

    Foldered cuz it's long 
  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • Played deliberately in the "You're Getting Old"/"Ass Burgers", after an enormous number of life changes occur as a result of him maturing (including his parents divorcing and Kyle and Cartman becoming friends and business partners), Stan is just coming to appreciate the new directions in his life and new possibilities there are. Cue a stack of Reset Buttons reverting everything back to normal, much to his despair. The one change that is hinted to stick at the end of the episode, Stan becoming an alcoholic, never comes up again (though some other episodes hint at Stan's addictive tendencies), even though it would serve as a good comparison point given Randy is consistently an alcoholic. I think this counts, even as an Intended Audience Reaction.
    • "Cartman Finds Love" ends with the entire school believing that Cartman and Kyle are a couple. This is never brought up again despite the vast amount of comedic potential. Probably counts, though this was before the show started changing the status quo significantly.
    • No one ever mentions the Wii U in the "Black Friday" three-part saga. Not once, is it ever referred to as being a third choice. Same applies to PC gaming. "Missed opportunity" misuse.
    • After "The Cissy" a lot of people were disappointed to find out that Wendy's trans persona "Wendyl" was an act, and she returned to being a girl in subsequent episodes with no mention of actual gender issues. Similarly, Stan is implied to be experiencing real gender issues by having a "Which Restroom?" Dilemma. This is never brought up again. This stands out given that Season 18 was one of the first seasons with an ongoing storyline, but the only references to the events of "The Cissy" were the continuation of the Lorde plotline or puns on "transgender." Keep - I even expanded upon this because I know a lot of people who thought this point was underdeveloped.
    • Cartman replaces Wendy as the student body president in "Dances With Smurfs". Like most changes to the status quo in the show, it's never mentioned again. Probably valid.
    • Some were disappointed that Professor Chaos or the boys' Ninja alter egos from "Good Times With Weapons" didn't appear in "Imaginationland". Probably "missed opportunity" misuse. I also rarely see anybody bring this up.
    • "Cash for Gold" could've been the first South Park episode to have Cartman primarily come into conflict with Stan, rather than Kyle or Wendy. Given how vehement Stan was in his opposition of gemstone networks, and how Cartman was trying to set up his own gemstone network, the two could've easily come to blows. But this does not come to be, as Stan does not really confront Cartman about his gemstone network. Unsure.
    • The ending of "The Hobbit" is considered this for some, as the effects of all the girls (including Wendy) giving into the Photoshop craze is never brought up again and completely discarded next season. Could use more context on why it was wasted.
    • This scene from Season 21's "Moss Piglets" seemed to be setting up a Distaff Counterpart of the four boys as a group, which would have provided interesting story opportunities in light of the gender segregation that has been ongoing since Season 20. By the end of the season, however, Heidi's new characterization as a female Cartman has been dropped after only a few episodes, and with the lack of any real female stand-ins for Cartman, this leaves the scene in question as nothing more than a simple throwback to the bus stop scenes that used to be prominent in the show. This was probably one of the most well-liked scenes in the episode, yet this dynamic was never really brought up again, so I think it's valid.
    • Heidi finally makes her Season 22 appearance in "The Problem With a Poo". In this episode Kyle suffers a similar ordeal she did last season so it would be interesting for the two to swap roles with Heidi trying to get Kyle out of his toxic relationship with Mr. Hankey, right? Instead Heidi is relegated back to being a background character. "Missed opportunity" misuse. Also she was way in the background with other characters, so it's not like there was ever any setup in the episode of her being a major character again.
    • Many thought Tweek should have played a larger role in "Buddha Box," as some sort of Straight Man to call out Cartman and the rest of the town's ingenuine anxiety disorders, considering he suffers from constant anxiety and he's been depicted as a Buddhist in the show before. A lot of shippers wished Craig and Tweek had more to do in the episode in general (especially given the preview using a Craig scene where he talks about Tweek, leading many to assume they would be the focus of the B-plot), with Tweek having to deal with Craig's issues as a role reversal of "Put It Down." Since Tweek and Craig do appear in the episode but only have a small role, I think it counts, but I'm not sure if this entry is too biased towards shipping wish fulfillment.
    • The Tegridy Farms plot line of Seasons 22 and 23 began with Randy starting a marijuana farm as a personal protest against the rising popularity of vaping. Despite this, the show never discussed the major controversies surrounding vaping devices that emerged shortly before Season 23 aired. Probably counts, as the episode set up the vaping thing but forgot about it even as the rest of the Tegridy Farms storyline continued.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#114: Mar 12th 2021 at 7:41:18 PM

Double post, but here's more South Park entries from South ParQ Vaccination Special that just seem like "here's what I would have done" misuse (or at least not episode-specific). Also some Big-Lipped Alligator Moment misuse for extra measure.

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • Considering that Donald Trump was infected with COVID-19 and Mr. Garrison was a stand-in for him in South Park, it would have been amusing subplot for Mr. Garrison to have to cope with having COVID-19 (not to mention cathartic after the previous episode had him kill the pangolin that could provide a vaccine sooner just so more Mexicans would die)
    • The reason why Garrison became President in the first place was because of the influence of the Member Berries and the build up of those little bastards might have a huge part of the plot throughout season 20. By the time of this special they were never seen and mentioned at all. The build up went nowhere and if the Member Berries don’t show up in the next season then their appearances will end up becoming a Big-Lipped Alligator Moment.
      • Member Berries could have tied in very well with the QAnon subplot, as the Mr. Harrison loving group could be still supporting him due to their consumption of Member Berries.

Edited by mightymewtron on Mar 12th 2021 at 10:41:56 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Adept (Holding A Herring) Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#115: Mar 16th 2021 at 2:26:47 AM

The following examples from Criminal Case seems to boil down to "these characters don't get as much Character Development as I want them to":

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character:
    • Many fans were disappointed that Roxie never got her own character arc in Pacific Bay, especially when every other member of the PBPD are given individual character arcs. Paradise City was a very good opportunity for her to finally get into the limelight, especially since she seemed very familiar with the district and her affair with the heist leader, Louis de Rico, could potentially add her character depth, but no such thing ever happened.
    • Lily Karam, Jonah's half-sister, was introduced as a suspect in Chapter 41. And though she wasn't the murderer, she was certainly behaving suspiciously, even after being cleared of the charges. Her remark that she's planning to leave for Brazil seem to indicate that she's going to play a major role in future events. But when the player did finally arrive in Brazil, not only was Lily nowhere to be seen, she was never even mentioned again since. She did end up appearing in Season 7, but she doesn't recognize the player at all.
    • Jack is the only Bureau member whose past profession is unknown, but other than a few small mentions, nothing is ever revealed about his past, and he only has pure intentions throughout the series, which disappointed some fans. Not helping matters is the Ship Tease between him and Lars after Angela's arrest, which didn't have much of a resolution by the end of the season and isn't expanded on during Travel In Time.
    • Elliot had a lot of potential as a main character, since he was shown slowly warming up to the rest of the team and implied that he came from a rich, neglectful family. But other than some character development and being held hostage in Case 32, he only gets some small cameos outside of analyses, and some of his fans are disappointed that his past wasn't explored more. Even the aforementioned hostage situation was forgotten about shortly after it happened.
    • A few fans feel that Marina becomes this in Travel In Time, having less analyses in comparison to World Edition and only really having a prominent role in The '60s. And unlike most of the team-mates, she hasn't been featured in any of the Additional Investigation arcs.
    • Quite a few characters got this reaction from fans in the finale of Supernatural Investigations, including George Mathison, Chief Arrow, Arthur Darkwood and The Demon Queen. Many agreed that their last appearances could've been handled better.
    • Some fans feel this way about Luke, who has a rough family history and issues with Fabien de la Mort as well as being the youngest and most inexperienced of the Supernatural Hunters. While any of those things could've provided him with some Character Development like the rest of the team, they aren't expanded on, and while he's still enjoyable, he remains underdeveloped compared to characters like Gwen, Priya, and Hope.


Cut?

Oshawott337 Since: Jul, 2020 Relationship Status: Longing for my OTP
#116: Mar 30th 2021 at 2:50:21 PM

[up][up]Yeah, it doesn't sound like there were many implications that could happen in the episodes to count as the plot being wasted. I would say cut them.

Anyways bringing these up from YMMV.Yu Gi Oh VRAINS:

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character:
    • Aoi's Blue Girl persona is heavily underutilized, only appearing in a couple of episodes before the transformation to Blue Maiden and only dueled once against Soulburner, which ended in her loss. But people wouldn't really know that with the huge amount of focus she has on the opening and endings. And it is not helped at all by the Off-Model problems with Blue Maiden that her previous appearances didn't have. I think most of this entry can count, but the last sentence confuses me. How does her next persona being Off-Model tie into Blue Girl being wasted?
    • Believe it or not in Season 3, Yusaku and Revolver of all characters. They don't get a proper duel until fifteen episodes into the season, having only each had an offscreen duel with one of the Ai clones, and each only get one onscreen duel. Soulburner fares better than them, receiving two lengthy duels against Roboppi and Revolver. It's true that they only get one onscreen duel, but I'd hardly call them wasted? They're still important to the story, with Yusaku being the one to defeat the final villain, and Revolver being the one to build Pandor and working actively in other ways to take down Ai. Feels like this is more focused on number of duels than their actual importance. And Yusaku is literally the main character, I don't think he's allowed to count for this?
    • Pandor is introduced with a ton of red flags surrounding her, particularly Revolver's claim that any thoughts of opposing humanity would be erased from her, which just screams to be bypassed. In the end, other than telling Ai to flee rather than taking him in, she never displays any signs of rebellion, and is dismissed until the end of the series after Ai takes over SOL Tech, serving little purpose in the scheme of things. I do think she can count, but I'm pretty sure her telling Ai to flee as going by a technicality in her programming since she was expected to kill him was supposed to be her rebellion. That specific part sounds more like people just didn't like how it was handled.

And we're allowed to bring up plot here as well, right?

Edited by Oshawott337 on Mar 30th 2021 at 3:50:59 AM

"Let’s see who’s stronger: someone that has something to protect, or someone that has nothing to lose."
Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#117: Apr 11th 2021 at 11:44:35 AM

Does this thread deal with They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot as well?

Bringing these two up from YMMV.RWBY (there are several on the page, but I think these are the only three questionable ones):

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character:
    • Despite being the main protagonist, Ruby receives far less character development or back story exploration than the other main characters, and even some minor characters. For example, her complicated family situation is only discussed whenever Yang's character is being explored and her goals and drives in life usually only get mentioned by proxy when other characters are discussing their own life goals. With only a few exceptions, her feelings and thoughts about even traumatic events tend to only be hinted at, or speculated about by other characters. As a result, Ruby's role in the story is passive, acting as a lens for the characters around her to be explored and as a pivot around which the plot occurs, rather than contributing to, or driving, the plot in more a active fashion. It took until Volume 6 for her to finally become more assertive.
      • The complaint is valid. Although the main character, Ruby had no real exploration. Everything happened around her, everyone else discussed her bar her. Volume 5 was the show's Seasonal Rot, which resulted in the creators taking on a lot of critical feedback from the fandom. They made a lot of changes, one of which was transforming Ruby into a much more dynamic, assertive character. She's listed as an Author's Saving Throw entry as a result. So... does she count as this for Volumes 1-5? Or is she just an Author's Saving Throw example that should basically say she would have been this but for the creators taking the criticism on board?
    • While Adam's death was certainly welcome, some felt that it occurring immediately after the revelation of his Facial Horror, the implications, and how the show basically brushed it off, was a poor decision because it could have been used to add depth to a character many felt was too one-dimensional, and ends up unexplained. In particular, that Adam had no conflict with Weiss despite the built-up war between the SDC and White Fang was seen as a particular disappointment.
      • I'm not sure this is an example. There's consensus in the fandom that he's been badly handled, and it's part of the criticism of how the Fantastic Racism storyline as a whole has been badly handled. However, I'm not sure if he's a case of being under-utilised for his role so much as not being used the way people wanted him to be used. He feels borderline. I don't know which way this should go.
    • Penny's development in Volume 8 had a great deal of potential that was never realized thanks to "The Final Word". Using the Staff of Creation to remove Penny's artificial body and the life-threatening virus inside, Penny is made a pure human. The series could have explored Penny's feelings with the transformation and how she had to learn to adapt to being biological with needs like eating or sleeping. Instead, Penny is fatally wounded by Cinder in less than an hour and has to convince Jaune to kill her so she could pass the Winter Maiden powers to Winter Shnee and keep them from Cinder.
      • This has only just been added. I don't think it's an example. She had such a significant role in the Atlas Arc she was practically a main character. People didn't like the way her storyline ended. I've spoiler tagged the rest in case there's anyone here does watch the show and hasn't seen how Volume 8 ends. Robot Girl based on Pinocchio finally becomes a real girl, the nature of which was emphasised in the show as being mysterious. Shortly after becoming a real girl, she sacrifices that life for the greater good. The fandom had been hoping to explore exactly what kind of living being Penny had become, so wasn't expecting her to be killed off.

Edited by Wyldchyld on Apr 11th 2021 at 7:48:30 PM

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
Silverblade2 Since: Jan, 2013
#118: Apr 27th 2021 at 1:05:08 PM

Mortal Kombat (2021) appears to have the unreasonable complains about a single 110 minutes minutes long movie not giving every single characters as much focus and development than in a long running video game franchise...

I don't now what's worth saving.

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character: Unfortunately to be expected of a franchise with Loads And Loads Of Characters that need to be violently killed off.
    • Many of the villains, barring Sub-Zero, Kano, and to a lesser extent Mileena and Kabal, get significantly less screentime than the heroes, usually only getting one or two lines. Most of them are all introduced at once just past the half-way point. In particular:
      • Goro, champion of Mortal Kombat and Prince of the Shokan, serves as a glorified assassin, only appearing fully for one fight scene. Thankfully, it's a memorable one.
      • Reptile (if that even is him), an Ensemble Dark Horse and The Chew Toy of the franchise, is killed off fairly early (less than thirty minutes into the film) in his first fight against the heroes, leaving out much of his extensive background and sympathetic qualities in exchange for simply being a mindless Starter Villain.
      • Reiko, a general among Shang Tsung's forces, has little characterization beyond The Brute.
      • Nitara seems favored by Shang amongst his henchmen, but is killed by the heroes shortly after being introduced.
    • Liu Kang, often the protagonist of the franchise, is demoted to The Lancer for Cole, who essentially takes his role as Chosen One.
    • Kung Lao, who in the games serves as The Lancer to Liu Kang, gets killed by Shang Tsung and ends up being the only casualty among the heroes. This didn't sit well with fans of the character who have waited 26 years to see him finally appear in a Mortal Kombat movie after having been absent from every Mortal Kombat movie prior to this.
    • Sonya Blade's arc is arguably more fitting for a protagonist's than Cole's. She and Jax spent years trying to learn about Mortal Kombat, meaning she has a lot more personal investment in getting involved in the tournament. She is also seen as a liability by Raiden and the other heroes for not having an arcana despite being a better fighter, and being far more loyal, than Kano and is dismissed by the villains as Not Worth Killing so she has a lot more to prove.
    • Scorpion's daughter was set up to be an important character, but she doesn't have any appearances, let alone a name. Her only scenes is her being comforted by her brother and mother, being hidden from Bi-Han, and taken by Raiden to be raised by monks. Raiden only tells Cole of her importance and his lineage from her, but we never see her reach adulthood or whether or not she wants to avenge her family and clan. Especially jarring, since her own father was already set up as an important character in a Big Damn Heroes way.

fragglelover Since: Jun, 2012
#119: May 24th 2021 at 6:28:53 PM

This is on Hotel Transylvania: Transformania:

They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character: This is how many fans feel about the human versions of monsters, especially Griffin fans, who were hoping for him to be a Mr. Fanservice.

Edited by fragglelover on May 24th 2021 at 8:30:03 AM

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#120: May 24th 2021 at 6:51:01 PM

[up] Given that we only have a trailer, we can't really say that the characters were wasted just because their designs aren't very well liked. Tainted by the Preview is the closest call for now.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
RustBeard Since: Sep, 2016
#121: May 25th 2021 at 11:18:29 AM

[up] Also, isn't the trope supposed to be an interesting character who is underutilized, not fans complaining about how a character is portrayed.

Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#122: May 31st 2021 at 9:36:05 AM

Bringing up the following example from Infinity Wars (2018)

Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#123: Jun 11th 2021 at 10:17:59 AM

Bringing up the following example from Skyfall:

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Character: Séverine is presented as a prostitute who has been trapped in the trade since she was a child and Bond rescues her and even develops a slight relationship with her. Sadly she gets killed off the following morning, and in the second act no less. As such we never got to see their relationship and her character as a whole fully developed.

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#124: Jun 11th 2021 at 10:28:46 AM

[up] I don't see much wrong with that entry. It could use more elaboration on her worth as a character but her backstory seems to imply the interesting aspects of her.

Edited by mightymewtron on Jun 11th 2021 at 1:29:22 PM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
AlleyOop Since: Oct, 2010
#125: Jun 11th 2021 at 2:33:25 PM

It's legitimately been a fairly common complaint about the movie whenever I've talked to people about it, so I think it's justified.


Total posts: 228
Top