Creators are allowed to be inaccurate if the inaccuracy serves the story better than accuracy would.
In a nutshell, the writer is aware that some parts of the show are inaccurate. The history is wrong, or the science is off, or something else. It's easy to assume that the writer didn't bother with research. But they may well have. Often they know that what they are writing is off, and wrote it anyway. Sometimes, it's because it's the way it's always been done in show business, and, even if they themselves know the truth, the audience still wouldn't believe it otherwise. In some cases, the research couldn't be done because information was lacking, so the artist made an educated guess.
Telling a good story is what is most important in fictionnote . Plus, whoever first said "truth is stranger than fiction" didn't know what they were talking about.note If some things have to be fudged for the sake of a good story, then they will be fudged. If things have to be sped up to stay interesting, they will be. These are changes to ensure Emotional Torque.
However, this is a double-edged sword. For the license to work, the story has to be good. A bad story will often look worse for its inaccuracies. There isn't a complete consensus, of course, about which stories are on the right or wrong side of Sturgeon's Law. Another major downside is that this trope often used negatively in an Author Tract, usually to construct a Straw Character or deliver a straw argument in favor of, or against, something.
The license also doesn't allow every kind of inaccuracy. People still expect characters to be consistent. This cannot be used to excuse Character Derailment or Contrived Stupidity Tropes. It also doesn't excuse false claims of accuracy. It will allow violations of External Consistency, and sometimes Genre Consistency, but usually not Internal Consistency.
When reading about artistic license on a page, keep in mind that Tropes Are Not Bad. Someone listing an event of artistic license does not mean the work or use of this trope was bad. Pointing out artistic license is not bad-mouthing a work. If an entry seems especially snarky about it, You Could Always Edit It Yourself, making it a little less snarky.
Writers, be warned: Using too many of these or taking one to illogical extremes can tug at the audience's Willing Suspension of Disbelief.
See also Hollywood Style (various forms of artistic license), Garnishing the Story (in that adding to the story is the primary reason for inclusion), The Power of Index (an element is much stronger than it would realistically be), and Rule of Index (where the license is from how cool/funny/scary/etc. something is).
- Acoustic License
- Art Major Biology
- Artistic License Animal Care
- Artistic License Awards
- Artistic License Economics
- Artistic License Engineering
- Artistic License Film Production
- Artistic License Geography
- Artistic License Geology
- Artistic License Gun Safety
- Artistic License History
- Artistic License Martial Arts
- Artistic License Military
- Artistic License Music
- Artistic License Nuclear Physics
- Artistic License Paleontology
- Artistic License Religion
- Artistic License Ships
- Artistic License Sports
- Artistic License Statistics
- Artistic License Traditional Christianity
- Artistic License University Admissions
- The Coconut Effect
- Common Hollywood Sex Traits
- Font Anachronism
- Just Plane Wrong
- Just Train Wrong
- Reality Is Unrealistic
- Sadly Mythcharacterized
- Sadly Mythtaken
- Science Marches On
- Sci-Fi Writers Have No Sense of Scale
- Society Marches On
- Technology Marches On
- Things Are More Effective in Hollywood
- Writers Cannot Do Math