Dueling Works / Film
aka: Dueling Movies

    open/close all folders 

    Action-Adventure (non-Sci-Fi) 
Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Treasure Island (1934) The Count of Monte Cristo (1934) 1934 released swashbuckling adventure films based on classic pieces of literature that helped revitalize interest in the genre.   Both were successful with critics and at the box office. But Treasure Island won out in both categories.
The Prince and the Pauper (1937) The Prisoner of Zenda (1937) Both were swashbuckling adventure films released in 1937 based on classic stories that center around a to-be-crowned king meeting his physical double which spirals into political strife for control of the country.   Both were success and generally well regarded. However whilst The Prince and the Pauper made more money The Prisoner of Zenda received stronger reviews.
Gunga Din (1939) The Four Feathers (1939) 1939 released adventure films that center around British military men venturing into colonial land where they must contend with a dangerous group of "natives" looming over.   The Four Feathers does marginally edge out its competitor in terms of reviews, but Gunga Din managed to win at the box office. Each is considered a classic adventure film, and are well remembered enough to where many would consider it a tie.
The Sea Hawk (1940) The Mark of Zorro (1940) 1940 released swashbuckler adventure films. Each in some ways seem to be trying to channel Errol Flynn's own The Adventures of Robin Hood. Near impossible to tell. Each has a 100% on Rotten Tomatoes and made at least 2 million at the box office.
The Three Musketeers (1948) Adventures of Don Juan (1948) 1948 swashbuckling adventure films based upon classic pieces of literature/lore that center about heroes who fight to stop a high-ranking official from finishing some nefarious plot that would include going to war with England. The two films came out within less than two months of each other.   On the whole The Three Musketeers seems to be the more well remembered of the two. And whilst both made it into the Top 10 grossing films of the year, 2nd and 9th respectively, The Three Musketeers wins it out in how it made almost a full million more a the box office... and back then, $1m wasn't the chump change it is today. Don Juan has still has its devoted fans, though.
You Only Live Twice (1967) Casino Royale (1967) James Bond films. The former is an official Bond film, while the latter is a parody made by the man who held the rights to that particular novel. Bond's production company eventually got the rights to Casino Royale, both novel (which was adapted as the first Daniel Craig Bond) and movie. You Only Live Twice, which had better reviews and box office. Casino Royale is widely considered a train wreck whose only lasting appeal is the Burt Bacharach score and its psychedelia value. It wrecked several careers, derailed the stardom of star Peter Sellers (who was McLeaned in the movie when he realized what he had gotten into), and was a literal Creator Killer for Charles Feldman; he died the next year. This duel enraged Bond production company EON because they got caught up in Casino Royale's negative publicity, and they became dead-set against another unauthorized Bond movie, which set up the bitter rivalry with Thunderball producer Kevin McClory that wasn't fully resolved until after McClory died.
Octopussy (1983) Never Say Never Again (1983) Again, James Bond films. Much like the above, the former is official, and the latter is a remake of Thunderball, done by the guy who had the rights to said novel, Keven McClory, who was entangled in an ugly cinematic and legal feud with the Broccoli clan, the people behind the official Bond movies. The latter has the return of Sean Connery as 007, who prior to making it said he would never play Bond again — hence the title. Bond's production company eventually got the rights to said movie (its Blu-Ray release is even listed among the official ones!), and halted the production of another remake in the 90's. Both were box office successes, something that didn't please Broccoli or McClory (who were clearly hoping for the rival movie to tank), but Octopussy grossed more. However, Never Say Never Again did better critically, thanks in large part to Sean Connery. The feud went on when McClory tried to make another remake, but the legal entanglements ended those hopes and led to him being barely visible on the Hollywood spectrum for the rest of his life when he refused to back down; his children began caving in after his death and sold the Thunderball rights back to EON in 2013 following Skyfall's success.
Iron Eagle (1986) Top Gun (1986) Two 1986 films about cocky young pilots proving their mettle. The former is about a guy on a secret, unauthorized mission to rescue an Air Force pilot dad trapped behind enemy lines. The latter has its protagonist going through Navy training, encountering love, rivalry, and loss along the way to becoming a hero. Top Gun was a Summer Blockbuster, the biggest hit of its year, and coronated Tom Cruise as a true-blue movie star. It is still fondly remembered today. By comparison Iron Eagle, which came out first, only grossed a few million more than its budget in theaters. That said, perhaps because of the popularity of its dueling movie, it did well enough on video ($11 million in rentals according to the Other Wiki) that it had three B-Movie sequels through 1995. Top Gun wins, but Iron Eagle gets points for making its own small success story.
The Lethal Weapon Series (1987) The Die Hard Series (1988) Popular cop action film franchises that started with a first installment released in the later 1980's that is considered a seminal film in the genre. Ironically enough, both films were also set around Christmas time, though their releases were about a year apart. It is also notable that both films, at least for their first couple of installments, were scored by Michael Kamen. A real ironic note is that Bruce Willis, the actor of John McClane the star of the Die Hard films, was actually considered for the role of Martin Riggs before it subsequently went to Mel Gibson.

Another fun note is that in an early scene of Die Hard 2 one can see an ad for Lethal Weapon 2 on a magazine.

It is also interesting to note that the script for Die Hard with a Vengeance had started out written to be an original standalone piece called Simon Says. However, that film was ultimately not made but they continued trying to find a way to use the script. At one point before being rewritted into a Die Hard movie it was at one stage reworked to be an installment of the Lethal Weapon series.
Most of the films in question got either mixed if not outright positive reviews. The highest rated of them is the original Die Hard, followed pretty closely by the first Lethal Weapon with that film's first sequel being the highest reviewed of all the follow-ups in question. Die Hard 2-4 each while not without their detractors are generally well liked whilst Lethal Weapon 3 and 4 are more divisive. However A Good Day to Die Hard is by a significant margin the least well reviewed. Financially it is close, but each installment of the Die Hard franchise managed to outdo its Lethal Weapon counterpart. With all that in mind at the end of the day it would appear that the Die Hard franchise is the ultimate victor.
Robin Hood (1991) Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991) 1991 films retelling the famous thief of British folklore. Prince of Thieves was a Hollywood project with then-bankable Kevin Costner leading the cast. The other was a low-profile British film with Uma Thurman as Maid Marian and a low-profile cast (Patrick Bergin was Robin). Fox's version was released first, but went straight to TV in the States, allegedly to avoid competition with Costner's. Prince of Thieves was a monster hit and the one most remember; Robin Hood was a failure even in Britain.
Under Siege (1992) Passenger 57 (1992) 1992 released "Die Hard on an X" films, the former on a battleship and the latter on a plane, that star at the time popular martial artist action stars and came out within a month of each other.   Under Siege takes it. Though it had a higher production budget, it still made more than three times the profit at the box office. It also had a far more positive critical reception, getting mostly positive reviews in contrast to the mixed-to-negative reception Passenger 57 got. And the reception from the general audience does not look much different. Notably, Under Siege actually also managed to get a sequel.
Speed (1994) Blown Away (1994) 1994 released action thrillers that see a good cop go up against a mad bomber in a race against time, with a major plot device of needing to sustain an action (keeping a bus above 50 MPH, typing continuously into a computer) to keep a bomb from going off. They came out within less than a month off each other. Speed was deemed as "Die Hard on a Bus" (aside from the opening in an elevator and the closer in a subway). Blown Away has a deeper plot featuring The Troubles. Speed blew past its opponent, making more than ten times as much at the box office, receiving significantly better reviews, and remaining in the public consciousness to this day. It notably also wound up getting a sequel. Though that's... another story.
Terminal Velocity !994) Drop Zone (1994) Films based around Special Forces skydivers, both released in late 1994. Drop Zone was supposed to be released first, but reshoots ended up delaying it until after Terminal Velocity was released. Both films also starred actors who have experienced personal trouble in later years: Charlie Sheen was the star of Terminal Velocity, while Wesley Snipes was the lead for Drop Zone. Neither of them did particularly well in terms of reviews, but Drop Zone at least broke even on its worldwide box-office and VHS rentals. Terminal Velocity only grossed around two-thirds of what Drop Zone made, while costing even more to produce, making it indisputably the loser.
Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995) Sudden Death (1995) 1995 released "Die Hard on an X" films. (On a train and at a sports arena respectively) that star popular martial arts action stars of the time. Playing men caught at the wrong place at the wrong time, and have the added issue of child family members of theirs being caught up in the situation as well (Casey Ryack's niece and Darren McCord's own children).   With both critics and audiences Sudden Death has higher ratings, but Under Siege 2 won at the box office by approximately $40 million. Hollywood being what it is, that probably gives it the win.
Executive Decision (1996) The Rock (1996) 1996 released action films whose stories are of the "Die Hard on an X" mold (noticing a pattern here yet?) — on a plane for the former and a prison (Alcatraz Island in fact) for the latter. Both films' central characters are not traditional action-hero types but desk/office type of guys thrust into an extremely dangerous field situation, that isn't helped when a tragedy hits their military team at the start. Also notable is that the big threat in both films is a deadly gas/nerve agent. One pairs two tough guys, Kurt Russell and Steven Seagal (though the latter dies early). Another gets an Odd Couple, Nicolas Cage in his first actioner and an already 66 Sean Connery. Even though it had a bigger budget, The Rock still won out at the box office with more than twice the gross of Executive Decision. Neither was considered a masterpiece by critics, and whilst both got mixed-to-positive reviews The Rock was still a bit higher. And on places like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB it however seems to be ahead by a good margin.
Con Air (1997) Air Force One (1997) 1997 released action films that play out as a "Die Hard on a plane" scenario that were released only about a month apart. One reunites Nicolas Cage and The Rock producer Jerry Bruckheimer. The other has Harrison Ford as the POTUS and director Wolfgang Petersen. Air Force One had an only marginally higher budget, and even with that in account it still won at the box office by almost an extra $100 million; it also scored higher with critics. Con Air does have better viewer ratings, though, according to sites like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb.
XXX (2002) Die Another Day (2002) 2002 released spy action thrillers. One is, naturally, a Bond film while the other is an attempt to channel the Bond formula for a new series. Ironically enough the director of Die Another Day Lee Tamahori would go on to direct the sequel xXx: State of the Union. Both received mixed reviews across the board from critics and the general audience, but Die Another Day made about twice as much at the box office, becoming the highest grossing film of its franchise at the time. However, notably, it does face more vitriol in certain circles than XXX from a more hardcore online Bond fanbase for more than a handful of scenes with Willing Suspension of Disbelief. It was Pierce Brosnan's final Bond movie, and the mixed reaction plus the influence of Mike Myers's Austin Powers spy spoof trilogy convinced EON to reboot the film series in 2006 with Daniel Craig, which took a very Darker and Edgier tone. xXx earned a sequel in 2005, but Vin Diesel didn't return for it and it bombed, ending the film series prematurely until Diesel revived it in the 2010s, returning to the lead role. The real loser was Lee Tamahori, whose career was torpedo'd by two critically-drubbed action movies in a row.
Resident Evil series (2002) Underworld series (2003) Both series revolve around an Empowered Badass Normal Action Girl protagonist and her struggles against various supernatural foes. They are both known for their highly stylized cinematography. Both franchises moved to 3-D with their respective fourth entries. Oh, and the lead actresses of each franchise (Kate Beckinsale and Milla Jovovich) later married the respective directors of each series' first film (Len Wiseman and Paul W. S. Anderson). Underworld is an Urban Fantasy story about the war between vampires and werewolves, while Resident Evil is a Zombie Apocalypse story adapted from the video game series. Critically, both series tend to be regarded as cinematic junk food, though Underworld wins by a small margin given that the RE films also have a hatedom from fans of the games in addition to critics (plus the first two movies in that series both made Roger Ebert's most hated list). Commercially, on the other hand, RE wins hands-down, having grossed over twice as much money as the Underworld films.

The real winner is Screen Gems, which produces both series and makes lots of money from both of them. They never had to compete with one another at the box office, with each franchise's films usually coming out in alternating years — excepting 2012 (when they were still released nine months apart). This inexplicably changed in 2016 when each franchise released a film within a month of the other, marking the first time this trope has applied as an actual "duel."
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003) Van Helsing (2004) Characters from multiple stories team up to save or destroy the world. Jekyll and Hyde feature in both. "LXG"'s team comes from classic, mostly public-domain stories while "Van Helsing"'s monsters are all from Universal Studios. (Fun fact: the original plan for Van Helsing was a direct sequel/prequel to "Bram Stoker's Dracula", but Anthony Hopkins was too old). Both did all right at the box office, but were ravaged by critics, and a sequel to either is highly unlikely. League is a bigger failure though, as the experience filming it convinced Sean Connery to retire from Hollywood, and not many of the other players in that film came out not in pieces.
Underworld: Evolution (2006) Ultraviolet (2006) Comic book movie sans an actual comic (Ultraviolet even starts with fake comics that the film's based on). A vampire war/rebellion led by a shapely Action Girl. It seems that most of Ultraviolet's vampire references (the heroine and her pals are infected with a virus that mimics vampirism; the MacGuffin is a possible cure) were cut out so as to distance itself from Underworld, which led to some audience confusion. Underworld: Evolution did well enough to continue the franchise with at least two more sequels. Ultraviolet, while visually striking, didn't do well enough to start its franchise.
Ninja Assassin (2009) Ninja (2009) Movies about badass ninjas. Ninja Assassin was produced by the creators of The Matrix and starts Korean pop star Rain, while Ninja was directed by director Isaac Florentine and was a Direct-to-Video release. While Ninja Assassin did beat Ninja, the latter is considered a decent action movie on its own merits. It even got a sequel in 2014. The sequel, Ninja II: Shadow of a Tear is called either, a Surprisingly Improved Sequel or Even Better Sequel to its predecessor. Ninja Assassin hasn't gotten a sequel yet, because it barely got back its budget (A budget of $40 million with a box office of $60 million).
The A-Team (2010) The Losers (2010)

The Expendables (2010)
Capital-"A" action movies adapted from other mediums about rag tag groups of government agents who come together to clear their name: The former is The Film of the Series. The latter: An adaptation of Andy Diggle and Jock's re-imagining of a classic WWII DC comic as a group of Special Forces operatives during the War on Terror. The Losers basically is The A-Team, there's never been any doubt or denial that it played a major role in its re-imagining, the timing of the film releases are just unfortunate. The A-Team soundly trounced The Losers at the box office, grossing more in its opening weekend than The Losers in its full run; however, The A-Team had an underwhelming run of its own, which illustrates how badly The Losers flopped. If The Expendables is counted, however, then it's a clean win by knockout.
Machete (2010) The Expendables (2010) Both films feature outrageous special effects and stunts to tell a barely-there story and feature numerous oldschool actors returning to type of roles that made them famous, gleefully employing the Nostalgia Filter all the while. Machete is a loving homage to over-the-top '70s exploitation films directed by Robert Rodriguez and featuring a star-studded cast; Expendables has the participation of a laundry list of '80s action stars led by Sylvester Stallone (who directed, wrote and plays the lead). The Expendables. Though Machete enjoyed a slight critical edge, the The Expendables had a significantly higher box office gross and made a significantly greater impact on pop culture.
Tomorrow: When the War Began (2010) Red Dawn (2012) Foreign armies invade small-town America/Australia, and a group of teenagers take to the hills to fight back guerrilla-style. Red Dawn is a remake of the classic 1984 Cold War action movie, updating the villains from the Soviet Union to the People's Republic of China (or North Korea) and moving the action from Colorado to Washington state. Tomorrow when the War Began is an adaptation of the first book of an Australian Young Adult series published in the '90s that, while hugely popular in Australia (to the point of being compared to Harry Potter in cultural influence), never caught on overseas. Tomorrow got better reviews, but Red Dawn (2012) made more money. Neither turned a profit.
The Raid: Redemption (2011) Dredd (2012) Badass super-cops raid high-rise apartment blocks controlled by drug lords in order to bring them to justice. The Raid is an Indonesian martial arts film, while Dredd is a Hollywood action film that marks the second theatrical adaptation of the 2000 AD comic book Judge Dredd after the 1995 film starring Sylvester Stallone tanked. While The Raid came first,note  rumor has it that the makers of the film borrowed its plot from an early, leaked version of the Dredd script. Both films were acclaimed by both critics and action buffs as capital-A action movies with little in the way of pretension. Box office-wise, while Dredd made more money than The Raid, it was a Box Office Bomb due to its substantially higher budget, with many observers viewing it as an indictment of the idea that Internet and Comic-Con buzz alone could power a film to success. Meanwhile, The Raid's meager (£1.1 million) budget gave it a very low bar to clear.
Olympus Has Fallen (2013) White House Down (2013) 2013 "Die Hard in the White House" movies about a Secret Service agent (Gerard Butler or Channing Tatum) fighting to save the President (Aaron Eckhart or Jamie Foxx) from (mostly) terrorists. Tonally the two films are rather different: OFH goes for drama while WHD has a greater focus on comedic moments. Eckhart remains a hostage through most of his film, whereas Foxx and Tatum work together in a Wunza Plot. Another key difference is The Plan for taking the White House: OHF does it from outside-in, while WHD does it from inside-out. OHF and WHD got similar reviews (48% for OHF, 50% for WHD on Rotten Tomatoes) and opening weekends ($30M vs $25M). WHD won out in worldwide box office gross, while OHF won in the domestic US box office. Since OHF made a profit (due to a much lighter budget than WHD) and resulted in sequel London Has Fallen, it would be considered the winner here.
Bullet to the Head (2012) The Last Stand (2013),

Parker (2013)
Genre Throwbacks to '80s Rated M for Manly action vehicles, released within a month of one another in winter 2012/2013. The Last Stand stars Arnold Schwarzenegger, was marketed as his big return to leading man status, and is directed by rising Korean filmmaker Kim Ji-woon, while Bullet to the Head stars Sylvester Stallone fresh off the success of The Expendables. Finally, Parker stars Jason Statham and is based on Donald E. Westlake's book series. The Last Stand received somewhat more positive (if still mixed) reviews than Bullet to the Head and Parker, but all three films bombed at the box office - The Last Stand and Parker grossed about the same, $48 million, and recouped their budgets (though Statham's movie was meager $35 million, $10M less than the other), while Bullet to the Head tanked hard with $21 m on a $55 m budget. Between the failures of these films and that of Dredd the prior year, many observers concluded that, The Expendables aside, "macho" action movies had lost their allure with moviegoers.
Jack Reacher (2012) Parker (2013) Adaptations of a book series featuring Anti-Hero badass protagonists with a Sherlock Scan and a vendetta against someone who quite recently wronged them. Right out the gate both studios signed on big name actors in the title roles (Tom Cruise and Jason Statham, respectively). Also each hero teams up with an ordinary, hardworking single woman who serves as The Watson. And funnily enough, both movies had their release dates pushed back for innocent (and unrelated) reasons. Critics gave both movies middle-of-the-road reviews, with high forties on Metacritic. But in terms of box office, Reacher had five times the take of Parker. It also got a sequel in late 2016.
The November Man (2014) The Equalizer (2014),

Three Days To Kill (2014)
2014 films that feature a middle aged(ish) actor from the looks of things trying to pull a "Liam Neeson" so to speak. (An actor who similarly went for a similar action role at such an age and found something of a major career boost as an action star after the film Taken) Each playing a successful/veteran government operative. The first two are also adaptions of a preceding series (a book series for the former and a television series for the latter) that center around a former government agent who has gone into retirement but finds himself put back into action. Major components involving him facing off against corrupt Russians and defending a young woman.   The Equalizer had better reviews and a significantly better gross at the box-office than The November Man.

If we were to count 3 Days to Kill it also lost out to The Equalizer but about ties with November Man. As it won on the financial front, but was beaten in terms of reviews.
Wyrmwood: Road of the Dead (2014) Turbo Kid (2015) Two genre-blending homages to late 70's-early 80's cinema, both of which have been described as "Mad Max meets X", with X being a Zombie Apocalypse for Wyrmwood and BMX Bandits for Turbo Kid. Both films have been noted for their significant levels of violence, as well as deliberate use of implausible elements under enforced Rule of Cool. Interestingly, these films both received their U.S. debut in 2015, the same year that the real Mad Max returned with Mad Max: Fury Road. Hard to know for certain, as both went direct-to-digital in most countries. Which film has been purchased or viewed the most is unknown. On Rotten Tomatoes, Turbo Kid received slightly better reviews than Wyrmwood, though both films received strong praise. IMDb reviewers have also favored Turbo Kid over Wyrmwood. So while Turbo Kid has the edge, it would seem that these two Mad Max homages were both largely overshadowed by Fury Road.
Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) The Transporter Refueled (2015) 2015 action films centering around a "road warrior" of sorts that will be the fourth film of their respective franchises. Both franchises had lain dormant for a while. Both films feature returning screenwriters but have recast their lead roles (Tom Hardy replacing Mel Gibson as Max Rockatansky, and Ed Skrein replacing Jason Statham as Frank Martin).   Mad Max by a complete landslide. Fury Road grossed a bit more than twice its budget (it's not quite a profit, but the critical reception should help second-run and home sales), and brought down the house critically: it was the highest-rated movie of 2015 on Rotten Tomatoes, and in fact is the site's 4th-highest-rated movie of all time. It was also nominated for an Academy Award For Best Picture, an unprecedented nomination for a summer blockbuster. Refueled, in comparison, sputtered out early; it lacked critical applause, and while it made about half again its budget, in raw numbers it grossed less than 10% of what Fury Road did.
Kingsman: The Secret Service (2015) The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (2015) Two films aiming to recapture the charm and success of the classic James Bond films. Kingsman is based on a comic book, U.N.C.L.E. on the classic 1960s television series. Kingsman hands down - it was a surprise box office hit making $415 million on an $80 million budget to mostly positive reviews (the same weekend Fifty Shades of Grey came out, no less!). The reviews for U.N.C.L.E. were also mostly favourable, if a bit less so than Kingsman but it's box office was a dismal $110 million on a $75 million budget. Kingsman already has a sequel announced but the attempt to relaunch the U.N.C.L.E. franchise is probably dead in the water.
Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation (2015) The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (2015) Big-budget action movies based on Cold War era spy TV shows. Rogue Nation is set in the "present" while U.N.C.L.E. is set in The '60s. Tom Cruise was originally slated to star in the latter, before leaving the project during its Development Hell and going on to film the former. Rogue Nation is also the fifth in its franchise, while U.N.C.L.E is the first. Mission wins both critically and commercially. It received unanimously positive reviews and has gone on to make over $300 million worldwide. U.N.C.L.E. meanwhile received mixed reviews and peaked at $100 million.
Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation (2015) Spectre (2015) Big budget spy action movies from iconic franchises. Rogue Nation is the fifth Mission Impossible film, Spectre is the twenty-fourth James Bond one. Rogue Nation wins this one - it has a better critical reception and while Spectre has a higher box office its budget was one and half to two times Rogue Nation's making that film much more profitable.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
The French Connection (1971) Dirty Harry (1971) 1971 crime thrillers about a hard-boiled inner city cop who has little regard for the rules, but always gets results. Along the way, he gets into fistfights, gun battles, and car chases, pushing him to the brink of his endurance, amidst his increasingly-strained relationship with his superiors. These two films more-or-less codified the Cowboy Cop genre. The French Connection stars Gene Hackman tracking down a French drug smuggler, while Dirty Harry stars Clint Eastwood hunting a depraved serial killer. The French Connection won at the time due to massive success at the Oscars including Best Picture and a Best Actor win for Hackman, but Dirty Harry has endured more in popular culture thanks to Memetic Mutation.
Goodfellas (1990) The Godfather Part III 1990) 1990 released mafia crime films that came out two months apart. Ironically the film The Godfather is facing here has an alum from a previous Godfather film in a leading role as a crime boss. And that is, of course, Robert De Niro. Both films on the whole were successes, and big contenders at the Oscars. However, on the financial front The Godfather takes it, making about three times as much at the box office. However in terms of reviews whilst Godfather III has generally positive ratings, the ratings of Goodfellas are still noticeably higher. Goodfellas has, however, held up much, much better than Godfather III and is now considered a classic of the genre, often ranked up amongst the best films of all time alongside first two Godfather films ironically enough. Whilst Godfather III is more debated, in large part it would seem because it is often compared unfavorably to its predecessors which leads to it receiving more heat. And thus at the end of the day, Goodfellas would probably be considered the winner.
Casino (1995) Heat (1995) Acclaimed crime films that were released within a month of each other in the year 1995. Notably both films feature Robert De Niro in a leading role. Both are very popular with both critics and audiences. As shown on sites like Rotten Tomatoes where critically they received a close ratings from both groups with similar results on IMDB, with Heat beating it by a minute margin in eac however. That along with its higher box office gross edges out Heat to victory in this one.
Mulholland Falls (1996) L.A. Confidential (1997) Two neo-noir crime dramas set in 1950s L.A. with an All-Star Cast.   L.A. Confidential wins out. Mulholland Falls had caricatured acting, was too fixated on costumes and production design and overall wasn't well received by the audience. L.A. Confidential had denser characters, a complex but cogent screenplay, better action and was a commercial success.
Ocean's Eleven (2001) The Italian Job (2003) Remakes of movies about a crew of thieves pulling off a complicated heist against dangerous enemies. Both films were remakes of classic 1960s films. While both had good reviews, Ocean's Eleven was much more successful and spawned two sequels. The Italian Job's sequel is still in development hell.
The Black Dahlia (2006) Hollywoodland (2006) Highly stylized period crime pieces, set in Los Angeles and (loosely) based on real-life, high-profile deaths. Released within a week of one another.  The Black Dahlia received more attention before release and had a budget nearly quadruple Hollywoodland's; however, it received largely negative reviews and bombed at the box office, prompting director Brian De Palma to take a leave of absence from filmmaking. Hollywoodland was well-reviewed and turned a small profit.
The Girl Next Door (2007) An American Crime (2007) 2007 crime dramas with a slash of horror based on the real 1965 torture and murder of Sylvia Likens Girl, based on a 1989 novel, fictionalizes the story and moves the setting to the 1950s; Crime stays closer to the facts. Neither really. Despite its more high-profile cast (Ellen Page as Sylvia and Catherine Keener as her torturer), Crime failed to find a theatre distributor and was eventually aired in Showtime in 2008; it received three nominations to TV awards but was generally trashed by critics. If only for that, and because the critics are more divided in its case, Girl wins.
Death Sentence (2007) The Brave One (2007) 2007 vigilante movies about previously wimpy people on the hunt for criminals after they kill people close to them. (In Death Sentence Kevin Bacon's son dies. In The Brave One Jodie Foster's husband dies. Fittingly, the latter can be defined as Death Wish but with a woman, while the former is based off a novel written by the writer of Death Wish. Death Sentence was directed by James Wan while The Brave One was directed by Neil Jordan. The former leans more towards Gorn while the latter has the deaths spread out. The Brave One made more money and got better reviews than Death Sentence, but still fell short of it's $70 million budget.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Lambada (1990) The Forbidden Dance (1990) Projects from the former heads of Cannon Films focused on the lambada dance craze. Lambada was greenlit first in late 1989 for a May 1990 release. Then, The Forbidden Dance was greenlit for a release a month earlier. Eventually, both films ended up moving up and were released on the same day (Lambada had finished filming eleven days before release, The Forbidden Dance was finished a few weeks before). Neither won as both films flopped at the box office. Lambada made a little more money though.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
The Day After (1983) Threads (1984) Made For TV Movies produced in the mid 1980s about the consequences of nuclear war on normal citizens. Day is set in the continental US state of Kansas and Missouri, while Threads takes place in the United Kingdom. Threads was made as a direct response to the American film. Also, while both movies depict a nuclear exchange, Threads was even more realistic than Day in just how horrifying such a scenario would be. Day was aware of this though, ending with a screen text amounting to "What you've just seen was horrible. However, this is only a toned-down depiction. The real consequences would be even worse." They both win. Both films received high critical acclaim, were popular with home audiences, and taught a significant part of the public the realities of nuclear warfare. Day even had an impact on Ronald Reagan to pursue nuclear disarmament; he reportedly broke down in tears after a private showing.
Twister (1996) Tornado! (1996)

Night of the Twisters (1996)
Yes, three films all dealing with tornadoes — Twister being a major Hollywood production, while the other two were made for TV movies. Twister was directed by Jan DeBont (of Speed fame) and co-written by Michael Crichton, while Tornado! was written by John Logan. Night of the Twisters was based on a novel which was Based on a True Story. Hollywood won with Twister grossing over $200 million. The other two faded into footnotes; however, Night of the Twisters was able to outlast Tornado! thanks to more repeats on television. Twister still gets more showings on TV while the others do not.
Dante's Peak (1997) Volcano (1997) Movies about volcanoes! The former is set in a small town, and is very loosely based on the Mt. St. Helens explosion. The latter is set in Los Angeles and is therefore much crazier in scale. As above, not exactly imitations, but these were both released around the same time and dueled each other with very similar plots. The former, incidentally, is considered notable for being one of the few popcorn disaster movies that actually tries for scientific accuracy. Surprisingly, Dante's Peak won, with $6 million more in box office receipts. Volcano gets the consolation prize of being shown on cable much more often. Heck, it's probably on right now somewhere! (Volcano does lose the duel as far as scientific accuracy goes, however.)
Deep Impact (1998) Armageddon (1998) Meteor-strike disaster movies. Neither films were imitations of each other per se, but they revolved around different reactions to the same idea, one more dramatic, the other more action-based. Amusingly, in an early screening of Deep Impact, Morgan Freeman is giving a speech in which he reassures his audience that life will go on after the meteor-hit, declaring, "There will be no armageddon." Too many viewers at the screening got the in-joke, however, and the uproarious laughter at what was meant as a dramatic scene induced the director to cut the line from the final print. This actually was an example of the height of the Disney/DreamWorks feud (DreamWorks distributed Deep Impact with Paramount while Disney/Touchstone distributed Armageddon) Although Deep Impact is regarded as the better film including by Disney's critics Siskel & Ebert (Disney's movie was derided for scientific inaccuracy and being loud), Armageddon wins with better box office and the fact that more people are aware of it 10 years after the fact. While Armageddon has a lower RT/Roger Ebert rating and is one of the movies on his most hated list (he called it the worst film of the year on the show), that RT rating is still within range of Deep Impact (which still got a Thumbs Down from Ebert), plus Disney's film has a much higher audience rating on the site than Deep Impact.
2012 (2009) Knowing (2009) "The End of the World as We Know It" stories, both released in 2009. Knowing starts out as more of a sci-fi thriller before evolving into a disaster movie during the course of the story, while 2012 is a full-on disaster flick from the word go. Both got middling receptions, with 2012 getting better scores from the critics on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, but Knowing getting better audience ratings. When it comes to the box-office however, 2012 is easily the victor, with a massive $770m worldwide. That said, Knowing was no slouch in that department either, earning $180m worldwide on a $50m budget.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) Michael Moore Hates America (2004)
Fahrenhype 9/11 (2004)
Celsius 41.11 (2004)
Documentaries released in mid-2004, relating to the George W. Bush administration, the War on Terror and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Fahrenheit 9/11 was very critical of the Bush administration's handling of... well, just about everything. The other three were all, to varying degrees, much more in favor of Bush and the right-wing in general. Leaving aside the result of the 2004 election, Fahrenheit 9/11 was by far the best-reviewed and most financially successful of the four, though the controversy surrounding its political views and the studios who had to distribute it contributed to the end of the Disney/Miramax relationship (Miramax produced it, and Disney was forced to distribute it against CEO Michael Eisner's wishes); Miramax was replaced by the live-action side of DreamWorks for the first half of The New 10's. None of the remaining three were very well-received, though Michael Moore Hates America is generally regarded as the best of the trio, thanks to the involvement of Penn Jillette and at least making an attempt to criticize the behavior of both the left and right-wings (it currently has a 75% on Rotten Tomatoes including Two Thumbs Up from Ebert & Roeper), instead of being just outright propaganda for one or the other. Celsius 41.11 is essentially the big loser because it was a bad Box Office Bomb and crushed the career of its director, Lionel Chetwynd.
The God Who Wasn't There (2005)Religulous (2008) Documentaries about atheism and the problems with organized religion. The former gave a comedic, more light-hearted portrayal of its subject, the latter was much more serious. Religulous wins easily, as it had a successful theatrical release and got Bill Maher a spot presenting the Best Documentary Oscar in 2009. The latter meanwhile was self-distributed and its constant online ads years after release turned its director into a joke and a Shameless Self-Promoter.
Inside Job (2010) I Want Your Money (2010) Competing documentaries about the ongoing economics crisis, released one week apart in October 2010. While the former places the blame on both capitalism and politics, the latter places all of the blame on Barack Obama (who wasn't even President when it happened). Inside Job was critically acclaimed, became an arthouse hit and won an Oscar, I Want Your Money was critically savaged and only lasted a week in most theatres, only barely making its budget back.
Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory (2011) West of Memphis (2012) Documentaries about the West Memphis 3 and the near two decade-long battle to prove their innocence. Purgatory is the final chapter of the Paradise Lost series and is directed by Joe Berlinger, West of Memphis was directed by Amy Berg, produced by Peter Jackson and actually has Damien Echols (one of the West Memphis 3) as a producer, making that film more or less a first-person account of the events. Purgatory has been amassing near-unanimous acclaim and received an Oscar nomination for Best Documentary Feature. West of Memphis has also received near-unanimous acclaim, but has failed to make in on the 2012 Oscar shortlist.
Kurt Cobain: Montage of Heck (2015) Soaked in Bleach (2015) 2015 documentaries about Kurt Cobain that use previously unseen materials tell their stories. Montage of Heck is an estate-approved biography that explores Cobain's life and fame, using home movie footage to show his personality outside of his persona. Soaked in Bleach uses recordings made by private investigator Tom Grant as the basis for a series of recreations arguing that Cobain's death was not a suicide but a murder perpetrated by Courtney Love. Montage of Heck was universally acclaimed as a warts and all look at an icon, with a 98% rating on Rottentomatoes. Soaked in Bleach has a 29% Tomatometer rating, with many critics writing it off due to sloppy filmmaking and logical fallacies in its argument. Plus the dramatization of Cobain's last days, which implied that his death was not suicide, got a Cease and Desist threat from his wife, Courtney Love; she never followed through on that threat.


Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968) The Love Bug (1968) Family films about magical vehicles. Both films seem to have the Disney touch. Chitty Chitty Bang Bang even had then-Disney regular Dick Van Dyke and Sherman Brothers songs. But only the latter was made in house at the legendary studio. The former was produced by Albert Broccoli of James Bond fame and was based on a novel by Ian Fleming (also of Bond fame). Chitty Chitty Bang Bang had mixed reviews and modest financial success. The Love Bug was released a few months later and eclipsed the other film and spawned a number of sequels starring the car Herbie. It was assumed that The Love Bug did better than Chitty because it was set in contemporary times but the other was not (unlike Fleming's novel).
Conan the Barbarian (1982) The Beastmaster (1982) 1982 released barbarian swords and sorcery films that center around a hero whose village winds up decimated by a band of raiders, leading to the death of his parents. The lead hero vows revenge, and thus goes up against the powerful and corrupt theocrat behind it.   The Beastmaster continues to have a strong cult following to this day, but Conan the Barbarian remains the more well known, has garnered greater acclaim from critics, and made about ten times as much money at the box office.
The Dark Crystal (1982) Krull (1983) Fantasy films from the '80s, each was set in an exotic world ruled by an evil force. A fortress must be penetrated. The Dark Crystal was done by Jim Henson (which meant, of course, animatronic puppets), while Krull was live action. Each have their fans and maintain devoted followings today, but The Dark Crystal has better critical reception. Krull was also a box office bomb while Dark Crystal was a modest box office success
Legend (1985) Labyrinth (1986) Big-budget, lavish, special effects-heavy fantasies with a youthful hero/heroine and newfound fantastical companions on a quest to face off with a Big Bad and right a terrible wrong. A seductive, Large Ham villain attempts to woo the leading lady. Both films share a cinematographer (Alex Thomson), and their settings might have had more in commonnote  had the makers of the latter not been made aware of the former. While in the U.K. they were Christmas releases for 1985 and '86, respectively, the North American releases were two months apart in the spring/summer of '86. The two movies take The Hero's Journey in different directions. Ridley Scott's Legend is a straightforward Fairy Tale with a Nature Hero saving a Princess Classic and unicorns from a villain who's effectively Satan, with the fate of the world at stake. Jim Henson's Labyrinth is an often-humorous musical take on the Down the Rabbit Hole plot, with the Present Day heroine seeking to rescue the baby brother she wished away into the land of the Goblin King, and the major characters have more complex personalities/development. The former film uses prosthetic makeup for its non-human characters, while the latter uses animatronic puppets instead. Both films were box-office flops in the U.S., the latter only doing a little better than the former with critics, but gained cult followings on the video market. Labyrinth was a critical blow to director Jim Henson, who fell into depression and did not get another chance to direct before his death (taking a potential sale to Disney with him). It was also one of two major 1986 bombs for George Lucas (Howard the Duck was the other), and derailed the writing careers of Monty Python vet Terry Jones and co-writer Dennis Lee. In later years, Legend's reputation has gone up a bit thanks to a Director's Cut (the U.S. release was significantly shorter and had a completely different score), but Labyrinth has proven popular enough to spawn several memes and an Expanded Universe in graphic novel form. Both have become major cult classics, with Labyrinth having developed its slightly faster and that film's villain being the inspiration for the villain character of The Emperor (Mateus) in Final Fantasy II and the Dissidia: Final Fantasy spinoff series.
Photographing Fairies (1997) Fairy Tale: A True Story (1997) 1997 movies somewhat based on the real-life story of the Cottingley Fairies, about two young cousins who allegedly capture real fairies on film and attract the attention of prominent figures of the time such as Arthur Conan Doyle and Harry Houdini. Photographing Fairies is more of a mystery with elements of romance and intrigue, while FairyTale is a family fantasy-drama that focuses on the two young cousins at the centre of the real-life incident. Both films In addition to being released not very far apart, both films have almost the same score on IMDb, a 6.3 for FairyTale and a 6.7 for Photographing Fairies.
Dungeons & Dragons (2000) The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) High Fantasy in a magical land of elves, goblins and other fantastical creatures based off legendary and sacred nerd franchises. (Both distributed by New Line Cinema.) Lord of the Rings is an extraordinarily realized version of one of the most important and influential books of the twentieth century. On the other hand, Dungeons & Dragons has Tom Baker as the King of the Elves. LOTR by a landslide, in case you couldn't guess. It's one of the most revered film trilogies in movie history, and inspired The Hobbit to be adapted as well a decade later. DnD became instant Snark Bait for its plot and acting and tanked, sentencing ITS sequels to Direct-to-Video.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) Harry Potter and the Philosopher's/Sorcerer's Stone (2001) First installments of high-budget film adaptations of popular and beloved fantasy series, with an overlapping viewer demographic, released within a month's difference of each other.   A tie, or, better said, both films win. Both LOTR and HP were incredible box-office hits, grossing about $900 million each, successfully launching their respective film franchises, revolutionizing the use of CGI in movies and greatly raising the prestige of the fantasy genre.
Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones (2002) Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)
The Lord of the Rings The Two Towers (2002)
2002 released fantasy adventure films that served as the second chapter in a contemporary string of competing franchises. Granted some would argue whether or not Star Wars should count as a fantasy or sci-fi franchise, many agree on it essentially being both. As it still has the major mystical element of the Force, and in terms of character plays more with fantasy archetypes than sci-fi ones. Overall the winner is The Two Towers, followed by Chamber of Secrets and then Attack of the Clones in terms of both financial and critical reception. However, none of them was a complete failure in any of those regards. However, like the rest of the Star Wars prequels, Attack of the Clones remains starkly divisive within the core fanbase.
Inkheart (2008) Bedtime Stories (2008) Some kid brings stories to life. Only superficially similar. Inkheart is a modern-fantasy adventure tale centered around a young teen, while Bedtime Stories is a more lighthearted Adam Sandler vehicle involving much younger children. The "stories come to life" is played for tension and action in the former while it is played for laughs and poignancy in the latter. Neither film was well-liked by critics, but Inkheart's reviews were still significantly higher than Bedtime Stories's. However, Bedtime Stories pulled in over $100 million in the US alone (and $200 million worldwide), while Inkheart was a flop, earning only $17 million domestically (its worldwide gross of $70 million was barely enough to recoup its budget).
Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) Oz: The Great and Powerful (2013) 2013 movies based on classic stories with heavy doses of special effects. Jack the Giant Slayer is based on Jack and the Beanstalk, while Oz the Great and Powerful is based on The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Both are directed by superhero movie pioneers, Sam Raimi of the Spider-Man Trilogy for Oz and Bryan Singer of X-Men and X-2 for Jack the Giant Slayer. Both of those series could be seen as Dueling Movies on their own rights. Jack the Giant Slayer was a box office bomb and received mixed reviews from critics, and had the potential of crippling the Darker and Edgier fairy tale films until Into the Woods saved the genre. Oz the Great and Powerful has mixed reviews as well but was much more successful at the box office.
The Jungle Book (2016) (Disney) Jungle Book: Origins (Warner Bros., 2018) New adaptations of Rudyard Kipling's classic novel, both done in a hybrid of live action and CGI, featuring an All-Star Cast of actors for the animal parts, and with a Gender Flip for Kaa. Disney's version (their third take on the material) will be directed by Jon Favreau and star Bill Murray, Lupita Nyong'o, Christopher Walken, Ben Kingsley, Scarlett Johansson, and Idris Elba. Jungle Book: Origins will be directed by Andy Serkis and will star Serkis, Christian Bale, Naomi Harris, Cate Blanchett, and Benedict Cumberbatch. It remains to be seen, but Disney's version has actually managed to get a higher Rotten Tomatoes rating from both critics and audiences than the original film that was Walt Disney's Grand Finale due to his death. It's also a mammoth success and part of what is so far a stellar year for Disney. Warner has pushed their version back twice; first to avoid a direct head-to-head duel and then to give it breathing room from the Disney version's publicity.
The Jungle Book (2016) (Disney) The Legend of Tarzan (Warner Bros., 2016) Two new adaptations of classic jungle literature. Jungle Book is Jon Favreau's take on the Disney classic and features a bit of a different story. Tarzan sees the titular lord of the jungle be "asked" to return to Africa after 10 years of being in England, unaware of a conspiracy in play.   Disney and Jungle Book win out; it actually scored better reviews than the original film from Walt Disney and is one of the highest-grossing films of the year. The Legend of Tarzan got bad reviews from critics and was released in the 2016 "summer bomb buster" that sunk a multitude of other tentpole films. Tarzan became one of those victims despite a good audience reception.

    Martial Arts 
Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Street Fighter (1994) Mortal Kombat (1995) Two movies based off two of the most popular fighting game franchises of the 90's. Of the two Mortal Kombat was more faithful to the source material. Both did respectably well at the box office, though did not perform as well against critics. Nowadays Street Fighter has fans who claim the movie is So Bad, It's Good. Mortal Kombat was the less cheesy of the two and many hold it up as a one of the most faithful adaptations of a video game into a movie, though it doesn't exactly have stiff competition.
Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997) Rush Hour (1998) Two movies with a serious Chinese martial arts angle, released a year apart by New Line Cinema towards the end of the 90's. MKA is the sequel to 1995's Mortal Kombat, but only brought back the actors who played Liu Kang and Kitana; the entire crew was otherwise replaced. It continued the story of the first film with Shao Kahn taking Shang Tsung's place as the Big Bad and launching his own invasion of Earth through Mortal Kombat. Rush Hour is a light-hearted buddy-comedy martial arts film starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, as they work to save a girl from the clutches of crime boss Juntao.   Mortal Kombat: Annihilation succeeded where the first film failed in accomplishing the requirements to make the Video-Game Movies Suck trope complete (that trope had started earlier in the decade with Disney/Hollywood Picture's Super Mario Bros., which was already a Creator Killer for its producers and directors, and the Street Fighter movie; MKA's failure ensured the trope would be here to stay). It also infected itself with Sequelitis as well (one of at least three 1997 movies that fell victim, with Batman & Robin and Speed 2: Cruise Control being two more) and took in less than half of the first movie's box office returns plus earned the hatred of both movie critics and the video game community, which included MK creator Ed Boon. Virtually everybody involved with MKA got their careers sent to the Netherworld alongside the intended film series, especially director John Leonetti, who didn't direct again for nine years and only directed two movies since, and producer Lawrence Kasanoff, who went on to get hung up on the infamous Foodfight! for the next decade. Rush Hour became an American Star-Making Role for both Chan and Tucker and led to a series of Rush Hour movies and eventually a TV show.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
The Hollywood Revue of 1929 (MGM) The Show Of Shows (1929, Warner Bros.)
Paramount On Parade (1930, Paramount)
All three films are plotless revues (musical numbers interspersed with sketches), designed to showcase the studios contracted stars and demonstrate how far they had come in talkie technology (and how much Technicolor they could afford). By 1929, audiences showed every sign of preferring sound films to silents. Each of these films was its producing studios declaration of intent, stating their claim to the future of film. The Hollywood Revue of 1929 has the highest score on IMDB, but modern viewers should remember that none of these movies survive in the format that audiences originally saw (missing soundtracks, missing color footage, completely lost segments).
Grease (1978) Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1978) From record and film producer Robert Stigwood, via different studios (Paramount and Universal): Two Summer Blockbuster musicals aiming at the teenybopper market with name performers from both the film and music spheres. Both were adapted from stage productions, and both involve key alumni of Saturday Night Fever — lead actor John Travolta in the former, and band The Bee Gees in the latter (getting to act as well as provide tunes). The latter's director, Michael Schultz, turned the former down when it was initially offered to him. The former is a cheery, Camp take on The '50s; the latter is a fantasy Jukebox Musical based on songs of The Beatles. Stigwood focused on the latter film, as he was sole producer on it (as opposed to co-producer, with Allan Carr, on the former) and it had a budget three times as big, but Grease proved to be the biggest movie of 1978. While it didn't receive glowing reviews, they were much better than what Sgt. Pepper received when it opened the following month. The box office receipts barely covered the budget and many of the performers in the film suffered career setbacks for their association with it.
Can't Stop the Music (1980) Xanadu (1980) 1980 disco musicals, each with a $20 million budget, that double as non-actor vehicles. Both involve alumni of the 1978 blockbuster Grease: producer Allan Carr and screenwriter Bronte Woodard with the former, and lead actress Olivia Newton-John with the latter. (Carr wanted Newton-John for the female lead in Can't Stop, but it didn't work out.) The former fictionalizes the creation and rise to stardom of the Village People and intertwines it with a romance between an uptight lawyer (Bruce Jenner) and a feisty ex-model (Valerie Perrine). The latter is a fantasy about a Greek Muse (Newton-John) who inspires a struggling artist (Michael Beck) to open a lavish roller disco; complications ensue when she falls in love with him. Can't Stop opened in June, Xanadu in August — either way, they were victims of the "Disco Sucks" backlash. Both received wretched reviews and derailed the film careers of several of their leads, one of whom was Gene Kelly, who never played another fictional role. They inspired the very first Golden Raspberry Awards when they ran as a double feature; the former "won" Worst Picture and Screenplay, and the latter Worst Director. But Xanadu barely made back its budget, had a hit soundtrack, became a camp classic via cable, and received an intentionally tongue-in-cheek Screen-to-Stage Adaptation in 2007. Can't Stop the Music only grossed $2 million and sounded the death knell for the Village People's popularity and director Nancy Walker, and Carr never had a serious career after it (the notorious Snow White opening number from the Oscars at the end of the 1980's, which put him in Disney's crosshairs, drove the final nail into his coffin).
The Pirate Movie (1982) The Pirates of Penzance (1983) Both are adaptations of the famous Gilbert and Sullivan operetta The Pirates of Penzance released around 1982-1983. The former is a very-loose rendition of the story with a few of the same songs (and some extras) and a generally 80s feel. The latter is a filmed rendition of the then-running Broadway revival with much of the same cast. The Pirate Movie got to theaters first, in the midst of Penzance's Broadway run, and quickly faded away. Although a box-office bomb itself, the failure of Penzance was caused by Executive Meddling, not lack of interest. The Pirates of Penzance actually enjoyed a long run in one of the 92 theaters that showed it. The Pirates of Penzance, with a higher Rotten Tomatoes score and a Golden Globe nom for Best Actress. The Pirate Movie bombed critically and earned a few Razzie nominations.
U2 3D (2007) Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert (2008) 3-D concert films. The U2 concert was shown at IMAX, while the Hannah Montana concert was shown in digital 3-D only. And one year later came the cheaper Jonas Brothers 3-D concert, which was also shown at IMAX. Hannah Montana had a much bigger box office, but U2 3D was better received by critics.
Rags (2012) Let It Shine (2012) TV movie about a teen boy who wants to be a singing star but has a disapproving father. Elsewhere, successful African-American female pop star wishes to sing her own music her own way. The two meet up and (presumably) achieve their respective goals. Both are also based off of classic stories. (Cinderella for Rags and Cyrano de Bergerac for Let It Shine. Rags is Nickelodeon and Let It Shine is Disney Channel. Let It Shine, although Rags did pretty decently as well, especially on iTunes.

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Dick Tracy (1990) The Rocketeer (1991)
The Shadow (1994)
The Phantom (1996)
Superhero films following up on the success of Tim Burton's Batman. Each similarly using a 1930's/40's retro/noir aesthetic and pulp feel. All based on a classic/established hero. All being released within only a few years of each other. However it is notable that Dick Tracy is an exception in how it was in development before Batman came out even though it was released later. However it is notable that they did try to copy the success of Burton's film's marketing campaign. Three of the characters were based upon actual pulp fiction from the era they are set it, the exception being The Rocketeer which was created in the 1980s as a throwback to such stories. Dick Tracy and The Rocketeer both did general well with critics, the former doing marginally better in that category. The Shadow and The Phantom both received mixed-to-negative reviews from that group. Whilst Dick Tracy made the most money at the box office it still wasn't considered a groundbreaking success but ultimately was the only one that didn't lose out. Largely due to how much they spent on the aggressive advertising campaign for the film. The other three films either flopped or bombed financially. All four being quickly forgotten by the mass audience. However each film has managed to gain and sustain a strong cult following, with The Rocketeer getting a sequel announced in 2016.
Spawn (1997) Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997) Two dark fantasy hero action films from New Line Cinema that involve gods and Hell. Spawn is adapted from Todd McFarlane's comic book and follows the man, played by Michael Jai White, as he is killed, turned into Hellspawn, and sent back to Earth with the obese Violater, played by John Leguizamo. MKA is the sequel to the original 1995 movie and continues Earthrealm's struggle against Outworld, with Shao Kahn now leading the charge himself in the wake of Shang Tsung's death. A major connection in this duel is Michael Jai White was offered a chance to play Jackson "Jax" Briggs in MKA, which replaced virtually its entire crew, but turned it down for Spawn; he would go on to play Jax in several web videos in The New 10's. Both films were disemboweled by critics and did severe damage to the movie business; for MKA, it was K.O.ed by both Video-Game Movies Suck and Sequelitis in addition to only performing less than half as well financially compared to the original and being practically disowned by series creator Ed Boon, spelling "Game Over" for the intended film series and virtually the entire cast and crew outside of a few survivors. Spawn also wrecked several careers such as the director's (who didn't direct any kind of movie again for 7 years and his movies since are family-friendly TV movies), made it clear that Michael Jai White would have suffered a setback to his career regardless of which film he picked to star in, and was one of three comic book films in 1997 (DC's Batman & Robin and Steel are the others) that nearly shut the cover on the comic book movie until Marvel began making their own movies in the genre; it would take until 2016's Deadpool for any ideas of super-bloody/R-rated superhero movies to come back from the NetherRealm. Spawn does win, however, on being a financial success, plus Roger Ebert gave it a high rating in his review.
Mystery Men (1999) The Specials (2000) Semi-deconstructive parodies about loser/inept/oddly-abled underdog superheroes.   Probably Mystery Men because it seems better-known and had that whole Smash Mouth tie-in; both movies have their moments, though.
Daredevil (2003) Hulk (2003) 2003 superhero films. The main contenders here are both origin stories for Marvel superheroes making their theatrical debut. While both films had started production by the time Sam Raimi's Spider-Man came out, its success and popularity is often attributed to having influenced how these films were perceived. Both were intended to be darker and more psychological films, though Daredevil wound up getting cut down and edited on the mandate of Avi Arad in order to try and make it feel more like Spider-Man which most will agree was to its detriment. Hulk was not altered in such a way, but many theorize that the general audience had a hard time gravitating to its darker tone and psychological approach because of it. Both films opened up well, but by the second weekend each of their box office intakes dropped staggeringly, and on the whole received mixed reviews. Both films, fairly or not, have often been given derision, sometimes showing up on "Worst Superhero Movies" lists, but they each do have staunch defenders. Daredevil especially got a better reputation after receiving a widely-considered-superior Director's Cut on home video. Financially speaking, Hulk made more at the box office, though it had a larger budget to begin with. Both were intended to start a franchise; however, their sequels were put into limbo and never really happened. The Incredible Hulk was originally intended to be a sequel of some kind, but was eventually rewritten by Edward Norton to disregard Ang Lee's film. Whilst Daredevil never got a true sequel, one of the film's major characters, Elektra, got a loose spin-off film, which was even less successful than Daredevil, bombing at the box office; this skewered the film series after just two films and eventually led to Fox failing to keep the Daredevil film rights from falling back into Disney and Marvel's clutches. Marvel then rebooted it without outside help. Ultimately, both films lost to X2: X-Men United, which made far more at the box office and was well-received across the board.
Spider-Man 2 (2004) Catwoman (2004) One of the chapters in the Marvel vs DC rivalry, and the first serious one in cinema outside of the little-known Captain America (1990) movie. Spider-Man 2 is the sequel to the 2002 big-screen debut, and Peter Parker/Spider-Man now finds himself face to face with Doc Ock, who gets victimized in an explosion and becomes a mad scientist. Catwoman is even more crucial because it is DC Comics' first movie in 7 years after a double-whammy with Batman & Robin and Steel put them in time-out during the period in which Marvel moved into movie-making. This incarnation of Catwoman has nothing to do with the version seen in Batman Returns; the character is now named Patience instead of Selina Kyle, is played by Halle Berry, and is in a different setting; the only thing in common is the character does die temporarily, after which she goes up against her old boss as played by Sharon Stone, whose new cosmetic is turning people's faces to stone. Halle Berry backed out of the X-Men series by Fox/Marvel to go to DC and play Catwoman; she was also coming off of Monster's Ball and Die Another Day. Spider-Man 2 sucked the life out of Catwoman; it was a financial success and kept Marvel's streak going; a third film in the original Sam Raimi trilogy was created 3 years later. Catwoman joined Batman & Robin and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace as one of the most notorious comic book implosions in cinema history (it's also the only comic book movie that Roger Ebert put on his most hated list), which derailed an intended film franchise right away and sent Berry scurrying back to Fox/Marvel to rejoin the X-Men, but with a smaller paycheck and a host of Razzie Awards in hand, one of which made Catwoman the first of two comic book films to get the Worst Picture Razzie (Fant4stic would be the second). It also put down James Bond maker EON Productions' plans to make a spinoff of Die Another Day featuring her character from that movie (the Bond series was rebooted anyway thanks to that film getting some hard knocks and coming after the Austin Powers trilogy), and sent the career of director "Pitof" out the window (just FYI, the tie-in game was also derided, with X-Play's Adam Sessler calling it Prince of Persia if that game sucked). DC remained in the No. 2 position, but Batman Begins, which was their second film back, did save them from having to abandon the cinema business completely.
Sky High (2005) Zoom: Academy for Superheroes (2006) Kid superheroes learn to use their powers. Very different, if you give Zoom a chance. There's very little substance hung on Zooms plot scaffold. Notably, Zoom is one former superhero employed by the military training youngsters, instead of the full-fledged institution implied by the title. Sky High made back over double its budget and earned favorable reviews, while Zoom flopped and earned Tim Allen a Razzie nom as well as being the final bomb that sent the career of director Peter Hewitt down in flames.
The Dark Knight Saga (2005-2012) Iron Man film series (2008-2013) To summarize a few of the above entries, both are superhero franchises by Marvel and DC starring a gadget-using billionaire (Iron Man and Batman, respectively). Both franchises consist of a trilogy with a final installment where the hero ditches all his gadgets and decides to retire, to enjoy a peaceful life with his significant other. Also, although Batman was possibly DC's most famous hero to begin with, Iron Man was mostly a B-lister until his movies elevated him to near-Spider-Man status. The Dark Knight Saga wins as it is widely considered by many to be the greatest superhero series of all time, with all three films (particularly the second one) receiving critical acclaim. While the first and third Iron Man films also received acclaim, the second one was significantly less praised.
X-Men: The Last Stand (2006) Superman Returns (2006) 2006 released superhero movies from a popular string of films. Ironically enough the director of Superman Returns Bryan Singer was the director of the first two X-Men films but jumped ship when he saw the chance to do a Superman film, as that was a character he had a fondness for long prior. Both films have had extremely mixed reviews from audiences, though many fans online claim them to be some of the worst, or at least most disappointing, comic book films. The Last Stand got mixed marginally skewed towards positive reviews from critics whilst Superman Returns interestingly enough had a generally positive response from critics. Financially speaking neither was a failure, but the gross for Returns was less than hoped for by the studio and The Last Stand wound up making twice as much at the box office. Superman Returns also failed to revive the franchise after a 19 year hiatus following the disastrous Superman IV: The Quest For Peace, and Warner/DC would have to reboot the series with The Man Of Steel 7 years later.
Iron Man (2008) The Dark Knight (2008)
The Green Hornet (2011)
Two movies that came out the same summer (and one that would have) in which, after traumatic events, wealthy sons become masked super heroes with pimped-out mechanical aids; they also have butlers and/or a leggy Sassy Secretary (well, two out of three) and a really Cool/Weaponized Car. The heroes pose as apathetic playboys who own their own corporations and have a close friend/business partner who is also a minority. Not only were Iron Man and The Dark Knight dueling movies, but they were also dueling between Marvel and DC respectively during their release in 2008. Green Hornet, on the other hand, was pushed back to January 2011 due to the studio converting to 3-D. Both Iron Man and Dark Knight received huge critical acclaim and did great at the box office, but The Dark Knight wins on a slight edge. Iron Man got a sequel sooner, but The Dark Knight did better critically and financially. And that's not to mention The Dark Knight winning the first ever acting Oscar for a Comic Book movie with Heath Ledger winning posthumously for his portrayal of The Joker. However, Iron Man launched the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has made over $10 billion. With a "B." Green Hornet, when it finally was released, received mixed reviews and modest box office, which, in all fairness, is probably better than it would have done if it was released on time to compete with the other two.
Defendor (2009) Kick-Ass (2010)
Super (2010)
Three indie superhero movies about average people trying to become gadget-based, low-budget vigilantes and end up having brushes with local organized crime. The major difference definitely falls in the personalities of the superheroes. Kick-Ass is an average nerdy teen, while Defendor is a mentally-disturbed homeless man that has delusions of certain supervillains. Supers Crimson Bolt suffers similar deranged illusions, but is slightly more stable. Kick-Ass becomes more stylized as it goes along, while the other two have a more realistic look to them. This could be chalked up to budget differences, as Kick-Ass (while low budget by Hollywood standards) cost over ten times as much as either of the other two. Super received mixed reviews and was released only on select arthouse theater screens, limiting its mainstream marketability, but it was a success on VOD. Defendor had a limited release and will likely have a cult status. Kick-Ass was the big winner, a commercial success that received mostly positive reviews (Roger Ebert didn't like it at all, but most others were kinder) and made stars out of Aaron Johnson and Chloe Moretz.
The Green Hornet (2011) Green Lantern (2011) Green-themed superheroes.

There would have been a third contender, Green Arrow: Escape From Super Max, but it got stuck in Development Hell.
One is based on a long-running second-tier (perhaps) DC icon, one is based on a cult TV show. Both had to correct for silly weaknesses (yellow and reliance on Bruce Lee, respectively). Cracked made a chart pointing out how similar the two movies were. In the end, Lantern got thrashed by critics and proved to be a total disaster at the box office for Warner Bros., who had banked on it being their big movie for the summer of 2011. It became an Old Shame for lead Ryan Reynolds, who, despite meeting his wife on-set, otherwise hated the production and made a pair of Take Thats to it in his next superhero adventure, Deadpool. It also subsequently zapped director Martin Campbell's career for 5 years before getting tapped for a Jackie Chan film that will reunite him with fellow Goldeneye alumni Pierce Brosnan. By contrast, Hornet got mixed reviews but made back its budget nearly twice over, so it looks to be the winner.
Thor (2011) Green Lantern (2011) Superhero movies with the involvement of forces from beyond our world, whether alien or divine. Another Marvel vs. DC duel. Thor got much better reviews, and performed better at the box office. Green Lantern became a stillborn attempt to launch the DC Cinematic Universe when it flopped critically and commercially. The star of that film, Ryan Reynolds, had already been a part of Marvel in a cameo as Deadpool, and when he returned to that role 5 years after this, he made an in-film Take That! to Green Lantern as part of his character's shtick (on the plus side, he did meet his future wife while filming Green Lantern, which he otherwise does not particularly care for). Martin Campbell of Goldeneye and Casino Royale (2006) didn't direct another cinematic film until working on another Pierce Brosnan film with Jackie Chan.
The Avengers (2012) The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
Superhero films released in 2012 and showcasing some of the biggest characters in Comic Books. The Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises are the culmination of their respective franchises spanning over several years. The Avengers is the climax of phase one of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (phase two launched with Iron Man 3, with more films to come), while The Dark Knight Rises is the definite end of Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight Saga. The Amazing Spider-Man, meanwhile, is a reboot of the Spider-Man film series, and is part of a separate continuity from the MCU, what with it still being owned by Sony. The Avengers made $1.5 billion at the box office (it's the fifth-highest-grossing movie of all time) and a higher rating on Rotten Tomatoes, giving it the win. Rises is a close second, with $1.1B (17th-highest by gross), a higher rating on Metacritic, and a higher IMDB score. The Amazing Spider-Man was a clear third-place finisher, though it still did well with both critics and audiences, but its first sequel prematurely short-circuited the series and led to Spider-Man getting absorbed into the MCU.
The Dark Knight Rises (2012) Skyfall (2012)
Iron Man 3 (2013)
All of three of them are the third installments in their line of films, that center around a popular hero that is known for not having superpowers but using his skills, wits and technology in order to get by and combat his foes. All three of these stories have the hero torn down to his lowest and have to rise again from the ashes in order to combat a foe deeply rooted in his past.   All of them were huge successes. Each breaking a billion at the box office and getting glowing reviews from critics, as well as attaining popularity with audiences. Financially the order goes Iron Man 3 > Skyfall > The Dark Knight Rises. Critically however it would go Skyfall > The Dark Knight Rises > Iron Man 3. Dark Knight Rises and Iron Man 3 though have to varying degrees gotten more flack from fans than Skyfall online, particularly the latter for its treatment of a major character from the classic mythos.
Iron Man 3 (2013) Man of Steel (2013) Battle of the ferrous metal themed superhero franchises in 2013. Also, DC vs. Marvel, again. Iron Man 3 is the third in its series and features a new director at the helm. Man of Steel is a reboot of the Superman franchise, 27 years after Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, Directed by Zack Snyder and starring Henry Cavil in the title role. While both movies managed to split the fanbase in two Iron Man 3 was much more well-received by critics and grossed $1.2 billion in the box office, becoming the tenth highest grossing movie of all time. Man Of Steel grossed over $600 million at the box office, so they were both successful. However, Iron Man 3 wins.
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
It's 2012 all over again as Marvel Comics movies by three different studios (Disney, Sony and Fox respectively) compete for the 2014 summer box-office crown. Winter Soldier is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and follows Captain America and his allies after the events of 2012's The Avengers. ASM2, meanwhile, is a direct sequel to 2012's The Amazing Spider-Man. DOFP follows from 2011's X-Men: First Class, which was praised for putting the franchise back on track, and follows characters from the original trilogy (including main character Wolverine) in a time-travel plot. Notably, the character Quicksilver appears both in DOFP and in The Stinger of Winter Soldier, in two separate incarnations. Both Winter Soldier and DOFP have received excellent reviews, while ASM2 got mixed reviews. In terms of box office, while it's a close race for all three, DOFP ranks first and Winter Soldier is a close second, with ASM2 as a slightly more distant third. Sony dropped out of the Marvel race after ASM2, instead joining Disney in the MCU.
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) (2014) 2014, Round Two. Also, both movies revolve around some rather weird concepts (one has a trigger-happy talking space raccoon and a sort-of-talking tree; the other is about ninja mutant turtle teenagers). Turtles is the big-screen reboot of a franchise that's been around for thirty years, while Guardians is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe but otherwise relative newcomers, with their comic book barely older than the MCU itself.note  Both took turns being the highest-grossing movie and both immediately on release got green-lit for sequels in a few years. However, Guardians got much better reviews and a larger gross overall, becoming the third-biggest movie of the year, even beating out the bigger names from earlier in the summer.
Ant-Man (2015) Fantastic Four (2015) 2015 Marvel Comics-based superhero movies with Troubled Productions Both movies had a lot riding on them. For Ant-Man, it was another untested Marvel franchise like Guardians of the Galaxy, and if it failed it would be the first major stumbling point for the Marvel Cinematic Universe. For Fantastic Four, it was more or less an attempt to keep the rights away from Marvel; failure could lead to Fox losing one of their two remaining comic franchises. Ant-Man by a long shot. While Ant-Man didn't have the same underdog power that Guardians did, it was still a money-maker for Marvel and it won over audiences that they hadn't expected — it actually did better than both Captain America's and Thor's first outings. Fantastic Four, however, crashed and burned at the box office in its opening weekend, losing to holdover Mission: Impossible: Rogue Nation and Ant-Man, and even more disconcertingly, the reviews for the movie placed its popularity in the same low category as earlier films Batman & Robin, Catwoman, Howard The Duck, and Superman IV: The Quest For Peace. As a result, Josh Trank, who had earned abysmal press with his Jerkass behavior during a very-badly done production schedule, may never direct another major film (the multiple Razzies Fant4stic "won" included Worst Picture, the second for a comic-book superhero film after Catwoman, and Worst Director for Trank). Ant-Man soon had a sequel announced, while the FF sequel plans were crushed when the original movie mutated Fox's quarterly results into a nightmare.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) Captain America: Civil War (2016) Installments to popular superhero franchises that feature a pair of their company's most well known characters, one who is a patriotic tried and true Boy Scout type and the other a wealthy man without superpowers but has his wits and technology, who are going head to head against each other. Both released in 2016. Each also introduced a prominent minority hero onto the big screen for the first time, who acted as a third party to the two established heroes (Wonder Woman for Dawn of Justice and Black Panther for Civil War). Once more, a lot of things are riding on these films. Dawn of Justice is Warner Bros.' first superheroes crossover and a huge step to further cement the DC Extended Universe after launching it in Man of Steel, and Civil War is the first Marvel Cinematic Universe installment to include Loads and Loads of Characters of the magnitude it's going for. Civil War emerged as a clear winner. While Dawn of Justice had a one month lead on Civil War, the movie was thrashed by critics and proved divisive with audiences, and while it ultimately grossed a little more than $850 million dollars, it was seen as a disappointment due to the fact that Warner Brothers was expecting it to pass $1 billion with ease (this failure can be attributed to the film losing audience very quickly and taking several severe box office revenue drops in the weeks after it opened; the Chinese box office and their filmgoers were particularly nasty to the film, which took an 80% drop in receipts from its first to second week there). This led to a major management shakeup at DC Films that gave producer Ben Affleck more control over the series and could potentially bury Zack Snyder's relationship with the DC Extended Universe after two movies. On the flip side, Civil War is very popular with both critics and audiences, and outgrossed Batman v Superman in less than three weeks, making over $1 billion in less than a month.
Captain America: Civil War (2016) X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) Two Marvel Comics adaptations made by different studios (Disney and Fox respectively) and being released around the same time (May 2016). Civil War is the third Captain America film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and follows the titular conflict between Captain America and Iron Man over their opposing views on the regulation of superhero activity, while Apocalypse continues from Days of Future Past and involves the battle of the mutants against the titular villain. Several new characters are introduced for these films (Black Panther and Spider-Man for Civil War and the alternate timeline versions of Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Angel and several other mutants for Apocalypse). Civil War is the clear winner, being released a few weeks ahead of Apocalypse and achieving critical and commercial success (having a 90% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and making around $1 billion in less than a month). Apocalypse has received mixed reviews from critics so far, with a 47% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and it has earned $403 million so far since its release on May 27th.
Deadpool (2016) Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) Winter 2016 released superhero movies in direct competition with not only each other, but also with Marvel Studios. While both films are in competition with Marvel Studios, both films show vastly different sides to the superhero genre. Deadpool, like Iron Man before it, has once again shown that superheroes can be bright, colorful, fun and, as an extra bonus, vulgar and bloody. Dawn of Justice, however, clings to the grim and gritty, dull-colored action that's been well-known in Warner Bros. stable since Tim Burton's first Batman film. Deadpool. While both movies proved to be record breakers, records do not make a good movie. Deadpool proved to be a critical and financial success as it was beloved by critics and fans with a Certified Fresh Rotten Tomatoes rating of 83%, made $260 million on a $58 million budget when it was released and ultimately making just over $750 million, making back its budget nearly 13 times over. Batman v Superman, however, was thrashed by critics and given a mixed reception by fans. While the film ultimately made just under $850 million, it was seen as a disappointment as it did not reach the $1 billion Warner Brothers thought would just be a formality and causing them to rethink their release plans, including doing a rearranging of the executive and creative hierarchy behind the DC Extended Universe, potentially minimizing Dawn of Justice director Zack Snyder's control over the verse and possibly eliminating him from the picture (it was ultimately outgrossed by not only Captain America: Civil War, but also the Disney Animated Canon's Zootopia, which had a much smaller budget).
X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows (2016) Another action team v. action team matchup, and the second one in a brutal slate for 2016. Apocalypse brings the cast of First Class and Days of Future Past back for a third outing and pits them against the titular Apocalypse. TMNT: Out of the Shadows is the sequel to the reboot from 2014, and has The Shredder escape jail and return. Casey Jones makes his debut in this Turtle continuity with this film. For Fox, this X-Men movie is coming off the heels of both Fant4stic and Deadpool; the latter takes place in their cinematic X-Men universe and gave them a boost, but Fant4stic became one of the most notorious cinematic creations in history; if this film fails, it could put their entire separate Marvel universe in jeopardy. So far, Apocalypse is winning the critical game, with a higher rating on Rotten Tomatoes (48%) than TMNT (36%) and had a good opening weekend, but neither film has really been all that well received by movie critics up to this point. As for box office, TMNT could not pull off any tricks thanks to being in the midst of one of the most competitive summer seasons in movie history, and it got overshadowed by X-Men and at least 3 other major blockbusters, including Legendary's Warcraft and Disney/Pixar's Finding Dory. The odds of it making a profit are not good going into Finding Dory's release, and it could end the rebooted film series after two movies (the violent executive shakeup at maker Viacom, which has a good chance of ending CEO Phillipe Dauman's career with the firm on acrimonious terms, isn't helping.)
Wonder Woman (2017) Captain Marvel (2019) DC and Marvel are each putting their biggest-name superheroine in a female-led comic book-based superhero movie; hoping to break the long string of failures such films have had (Supergirl, Catwoman, Elektra, etc).note  The Amazing Spider-Man Series beat both to the punch in announcing a female-led spinoff (even if which female characters was never decided on), but those plans fell through when Sony cancelled the series in order to bring Spider-Man to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Of the women actually competing, Wonder Woman is the iconic superheroine for the entire industry but often suffers from the Girl Show Ghetto, while Captain Marvel spent decades as a C-lister under the name Ms. Marvel (among others) before a well-received 2012 retool promoted her to Captain and helped her make Marvel's A-list. TBA, though Captain Marvel has already been pushed back twice (a total of eight months) to accommodate other movies, Spider-Man: Homecoming and Ant-Man and the Wasp, being added to the MCU schedule. The latter film also stole some of Captain Marvel's thunder as the MCU's first movie with a woman (The Wasp) in a title role.
Power Rangers (2017) Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) 2017 superhero films that feature teen heroes and channel the spirit of other teen flicks like The Breakfast Club. Also, this isn't the first film adaptation for either. The Power Rangers trailer showed off a severe Adaptational Angst Upgrade, which not everybody is certain fits a franchise that often relies on cheesy Camp. In contrast, Spider-Man's previous films already had their Angst Upgrade, and the character's appearance in Captain America: Civil War indicates that Sony and Marvel intend to pull back from that and focus more on Spidey being comedically Adorkable. TBD
Captain Marvel (2018) Shazam! (2019) Two films released in 2018-9 featuring costumed superheroes originally bearing the same alias. Also, Marvel vs. DC, yet again The Marvel Comics version looks to be releasing first, when the D.C. Version came out in comics first. To Be Decided
Avengers: Infinity War: Part II (2018) Justice League Part Two (2019) Both are the conclusion of a two-part, superhero Crisis Crossover. Both are the result of a decade-spanning cinematic universe and will continue the Marvel/DC rivalry. The two will be released within a month of each other. While Avengers is aiming to be the Grand Finale of the original Avengers line-up, Justice League will finish up the team's first feature-length outing. TBA

    Sword and Sandal 

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Helen of Troy (1956) Alexander the Great (1956) Both were battle epics released in 1956 set during the time of Ancient Greece about famous figures/events of the era. Ironically enough there would be a rematch of sorts decades later in 2004 when Wolfgang Petersen's Troy and Oliver Stone's Alexander would be released close to each other in 2004. That match-up naturally even has its own slot on this list. Neither is particularly popular or well-known, and seem to largely have been forgotten by this point. However Helen of Troy did manage to make about a million more at the box office and got mixed-to-positive reviews from critics in comparison to the mostly negative one received by Alexander the Great. Whilst not glowing, it also has higher audience ratings, which are generally mixed but lean towards positive.
The Conqueror (1956) Alexander the Great (1956) Both were battle epics released in 1956, their wide releases both falling exactly upon March 28 ironically enough, that center around one of history's most famous conquerors and military leaders. (Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great)   Well, the winner of this match depends on what fate one considers to be a worse one. An eternity of infamy or virtual oblivion as it is for each film respectively; The Conqueror earned a lot of derision for casting Western ultrastar John Wayne as Khan, and its failure signaled the end of RKO Radio Picture's relevance in Hollywood for quite a while (this is after Samuel Goldwyn and Walt Disney had already bolted from the studio, with Disney setting up Buena Vista and then Walt Disney Pictures/Touchstone as an alternative distributor). Both films did very poorly with critics, however with the general audience whilst The Conqueror has a generally negative reaction Alexander has a more divided response. Counter-balancing that though is the fact that The Conqueror did better at the box office.
Ben-Hur (1959) Spartacus (1960) Both are Golden Age Hollywood era epics that center around a great hero who stands up to and faces the might of the Roman Empire. Kirk Douglas desperately desired the role of Judah Ben-Hur that ultimately went to Charlton Heston, and though offered the role as the film's chief antagonist Messala he declined. Shortly after, Edward Lewis, a vice president in Douglas's film company, Bryna Productions, had Douglas read Howard Fast's novel, Spartacus, which had a related theme—an individual who challenges the might of the Roman Empire—and Douglas was impressed enough to purchase an option on the book from Fast with his own financing. Universal Studios eventually agreed to finance the film after Douglas persuaded Olivier, Laughton, and Ustinov to act in it. At the end of the day both films came out within a year of each other, and given all that backstory were in essence born to be rivals. This one looks close enough that some may consider it be a draw, but if one had to choose it would probably lean more towards Ben-Hur. But regardless, both films are nowadays considered classics. Being adored by critics and audiences alike. And both making AFI's Top 10 Film Epics list at the #2 and #4 spots respectively. Ben-Hur at the time had a higher box office gross and did bigger at the Oscars. Though Spartacus won 4 at the awards in the ceremony the year after, Ben-Hur holds the record with Titanic and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King for the most awards won at 11 including Best Picture. Though Spartacus started out with a more mixed reception, very likely due to the political climate of the time, it has gone on to have its reputation become much greater than stature, coming to have a slightly higher critical reception that its counterpart, at least if Rotten Tomatoes is to be taken into account.
Troy (2004) Alexander (2004) 2004 released historical battle epics set during the era of Ancient Greece and deal with themes concerning legacy and immortality. Ironically enough there is reference to Achilles and Patroclus in Alexander. Alexander's close-friend and lover Hephaestion compares him to Achilles, followed-up with Alexander stating that if he is Achilles, than Hephaestion must be his Patroclus. Ironically enough both got some controversy in certain circles with regards to their characters' sexuality. Some criticized Troy for apparently going out of its way to establish that Achilles and Patroclus' relationship was purely platonic and he a heterosexual. In contrast Alexander would get criticized by some for so much as suggesting that Alexander the great was not heterosexual. Troy wins this one. While Alexander received generally negative reviews from critics and mixed from audiences, Troy by comparison got generally mixed reviews from critics and mostly positive from audiences. Financially speaking Troy made more than twice as much at the box office, and had only started with a slightly higher budget to begin with. Both films have received Director's Cuts on home video. Troy received a director's that most agree improved on the film, whilst Alexander has received three different cuts itself. The latter two in particular have garnered more praise, but has not elevated the film too drastically in such a way that something like, say, the Kingdom of Heaven Director's Cut did.
King Arthur (2004) The Last Legion (2007) Both are Post-Gladiator Roman Era epics that came out within a few years of each other take place during the decline of the Roman Empire, with them either having abandoned Britannia or are in the process of doing so. Both center around a band of heroes, led by a veteran Roman commander, who are set on a mission to escort a boy of important status to safety. They have to face a powerful "barbarian" force, culminating in a final battle at Hadrian's Wall. Both films also firmly link the King Arthur mythology to Rome. The author of the original novel The Last Legion Valerio Massimo Manfredi himself is aware of the similarities between the two stories and has pointed them out before. Both films have their fans among general audiences, but neither did particularly well with critics. However King Arthur still did better on that front and made eight times as much at the box office (though it still helped kill Michael Eisner's career at Disney), ultimately doing modestly well, whilst The Last Legion did not manage to recoup its budget.
Troy (2004)

King Arthur (2004)

Alexander (2004)
Kingdom of Heaven (2005)

300 (2006)

Robin Hood (2010)

Centurion (2010)
Demythtified Sword & Sandal (would be) epics inspired by success of Gladiator using cinematography from LOTR and stuttercam from SPR to capture massive battle scenes, seasoned lightly with a single tasteful love scene. The hero employs the ancient sword technique of ramping. Troy and 300 seem doomed to comparison, despite having little in common besides being about Greeks. Same with King Arthur and The Last Legion as both are films set during the The Siege in the 2004 flicks fell victim to Seinfeld Fatigue in the wake of a certain '03 film and those Capital One ads. Kingdom was heavily cut up for the theatrical release. Robin Hood (2010) is Gladiator with Robin Hood! 300 wins due to popularity. Troy places thanks to that one fight scene everyone wants to see. Centurion gets a leg up for being deliberately cheesy. Kingdom draws, due to the stellar Director's Cut. King Arthur loses, and it was one of at least 5 major flops that helped lead to Disney CEO Michael Eisner getting dethroned from his position at the company. Alexander loses out as well, even though some of its director's cut versions on home video have received marginally better feedback.
Kingdom of Heaven (2005) Arn: The Knight Templar (2007) Both are Medieval battle epics released during the grand revival of the genre Post-Gladiator that centers around a young man who is disgraced in some way and subsequently goes on a journey to the Holy Land where he becomes a knight and participates in the Crusades. The famous and popular Muslim leader Saladin plays a prominent role in both. The historical figures Balian of Ibelin, Guy of Lusignan, and Raynald of Châtillon who are major players in Kingdom of Heaven were actually featured in the Arn novels by Jan Guillou. This is a tough one given the differences in their releases. Kingdom of Heaven is probably the more well known of the two, but Arn seemed to receive a more positive initial reception on first run. However, after the release of its Director's Cut, Kingdom of Heaven has received a massive boost in popularity.
Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief (2010) Clash of the Titans (2010) Two action-adventure movies with very different target audiences (Percy Jackson is based on a YA book series; Clash is a remake of the 1981 movie). Both are very loosely based on Classical Mythology, up to having an overlapping character roster. Which Zeus do you prefer, Sean Bean or Liam Neeson? The sequel for the Percy Jackson movie was announced before the release... and yet languished in Development Hell for a while (and came out one year after the sequel to the other one, Wrath of the Titans). Both films received lukewarm reviews, but Clash did much better financially.
Black Death (2010) Season of the Witch (2011) Two films released within a year of each other, the former in late 2010 and the latter in early 2011. Both are action/adventure/horror films take place during the Dark Ages as the Black Plague is in full force. Both films are about how a company led by a knight is tasked by the Church to go to a far off village in order to essentially to tackle/investigate potential witchcraft. Director Christopher Smith himself rewrote the latter half of the script to Black Death in order to present the supernatural forces at play in a more ambiguous fashion. On the other hand Season of the Witch lays it all out in the open so to speak. Critically speaking, Black Death Wins Season of the Witch received near unanimous negative reviews from critics and also a generally bad reception with audiences. On the other hand Black Death received generally positive marks from critics though a divided reception with audiences. Commercially speaking, Season of the Witch is the clear winner. While Season of the Witch wasn't a huge commercial success (91 million on a 40 million budget), Black Death only got a limited release and gross only a bit over 270000 thousand.
Centurion (2010) The Eagle (2011) Adventure movies set in 2nd Century Roman Britain with the "mysterious disappearance" of the Ninth Legion as their inspiration. Centurion is an original, Gornasmic chase movie reminiscent of Apocalypto that follows a group of legionaries stranded in enemy territory after their legion is massacred by the Picts. The Eagle is a Darker and Edgier Pragmatic Adaptation of the 1954 classic children historical novel The Eagle of the Ninth, that follows the son of the disgraced general of the Ninth and his Brittonic slave in a mission to recover the Legion's eagle and restore the honor of his family years after the Legion disappeared. Both films received mixed reviews. Centurion, directed by Neil Marshall and starring Michael Fassbender, Dominic West and Olga Kurylenko, was most criticized because of its script, while The Eagle's critics targetted Kevin MacDonald's direction and Channing Tatum's uninspired performance as the lead. Nonetheless, only The Eagle made its budget back, despite costing twice as much as Centurion.
Robin Hood (2010) Ironclad (2011) Medieval era battle epics released within a year of each other that center around a disillusioned warrior that fought in the crusades who returns home to England where he must fight for his nation's freedom and security. Both even having a love interest in a woman of nobility. The famous English monarch King John plays a prominent role in both. Interestingly enough the lead character of Ironclad Thomas Marshall has been said to have based on one of the William Marshals of the time. The father and son who were the 1st and 2nd Earl of Pembroke respectively. William Marshal the 1st is featured prominently in Robin Hood and portrayed by William Hurt. Neither film was a huge success, with both receiving mixed reviews from both critics and audiences. Though Robin Hood still did a bit better on at least the front of the latter. Robin Hood also wound up grossing more at the box office, but was also a bit more than six times as expensive as Ironclad. Robin Hood was intended to be the start of a series, but ultimately the box office numbers did not justify it for the studio, whilst Ironclad wound up actually getting a sequel in Ironclad: Battle for Blood in spite of all that preceding data.
The Legend of Hercules (2014) Hercules (2014) Adaptations of the Hercules myth made for the modern audience. The Legend of Hercules has an original story and stars Kellan Lutz. The other Hercules is based on a comic miniseries and stars Dwayne Johnson aka The Rock. The Legend of Hercules was a critical and commercial failure. In its first weekend, Hercules already earned more at the box office than The Legend of Hercules and although reviews were mixed, it still did noticeably better with critics.
Noah (2014) Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014) Big budget - and controversial - epics based on stories from The Bible by highly respected filmmakers (The former has Darren Aronofsky while the latter is by Ridley Scott). Noah has gone for more of a fantasy angle while Exodus is much more grounded. Funnily enough, the latter's lead was suppose to be in the former but dropped out. Regarding the controversies, Noah was criticized for the Biblical accuracy while Exodus received more complaints on the race casting on the main cast. Both films got banned in several Islamic countries because Noah and Moses were considered prophets of Allah and any portrayal of them is forbidden. Noah wins. It got more positive reviews than Exodus, which got mixed to negative reviews. Regardless that both films got banned in several Islamic countries, Noah was considered to be a hit while Exodus is said to be a flop.
Outcast (2014) Dragon Blade (2015) Both are films set in the past where characters from Ancient China have to team up with Europeans, with Crusaders in the former and Romans in the latter.   Outcast was only released in China and did not receive a theatrical release in America. Neither were a hit with the critics but Dragon Blade fared better.
Risen (2016) Ben-Hur (2016) 2016 Biblical epics that is each in of itself extra-Biblical but serves as a side story for a man whose life becomes entwined with that of Jesus Christ.   Ben Hur gross more but was a huge financially failure (94 million gross on a 100 million budget). It was also critically panned. Risen on the other hand only cost 10 million and made 36 million. It also got generally positive reviews. Thus Risen is likely the winner.
Ridley Scott King David Movie Warner Bros. King David Movie As one would expect, they are both planned large scale historical epics centering around the Biblical figure King David. Though, of course, that is if one of them does not wind up getting cancelled first as was the case with Steven Spielberg's Gods & Kings which was originally set to go head-to-head with Ridley Scott's Exodus that, ironically enough, is now known as Exodus: Gods and Kings.   TBA

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Lost Command (1966) The Battle of Algiers (1966) Films about the Algerian War for Independence. Both movies were produced in 1966, though Command beat Algiers to American theaters by over a year. Two films about the same subject could hardly be more different. Lost Command draws on Jean Larteguy's novel The Centurions, about French paratroopers fighting in Vietnam and Algeria. It's unreservedly pro-French, albeit with a token War Is Hell message added. Battle of Algiers is a docudrama produced by Italian director Gillo Pontecorvo and sponsored by the Algerian government. Though intended as Algerian propaganda, it provides a relatively even-handed treatment of the conflict. Lost Command was a modest box office success but earned terrible reviews and is largely forgotten. Battle of Algiers received almost universal acclaim, and today is considered an all-time classic.
Catch-22 (1970) M*A*S*H (1970) Deconstructive black comedy war movies released in 1970, with not much combat but a surprising amount of blood, starring ensemble casts of screwballs, and most certainly not using earlier wars as stand-ins for Vietnam. If suicide is painless, perhaps that is the answer to the Catch-22. Catch-22, despite an all-star cast, got tepid reviews and flopped. M*A*S*H was a huge success, made Robert Altman famous, inspired an even more successful TV series, and helped usher in the '70s auteur era in general.
Saving Private Ryan (1998) The Thin Red Line (1998) Both films were released in 1998 to rave reviews. Both featured an all-star cast of actors clambering over each other to appear in bit parts; both featured a 30-minute extended bloody assault on a bunker in the first half of the film followed by a long tramp across the countryside punctuated by violence. Both had HBO Spiritual Successor miniseries. SPR was set in Europe, TTRL was set in the Pacific. SPR came out several months ahead and had the natural crowd appeal of Spielberg, while reclusive director Terence Malick spent extra time on TTRL. Veterans groups complained TTRL was insufficiently sympathetic to the Allied cause, while critics complained that the second half of SPR was too mawkish. Saving Private Ryan by far among the general public, while The Thin Red Line is still in heated contention with SPR among critics and film buffs.

Of related series, The Pacific is more often compared to Band of Brothers than TTRL.
Seal Team Six: The Raid on Osama Bin Laden (2012) Zero Dark Thirty (2012) Films released in 2012 about the hunt for Osama bin Laden. Seal Team Six was produced by Harvey Weinstein for the National Geographic Channel, directed by the guy who made Turistas, and features a mostly small-name cast. Zero Dark Thirty was directed by Kathryn Bigelow, stars Jessica Chastain, Joel Edgerton, James Gandolfini, and Mark Strong, and is being given a limited release in December 2012 for qualification for the Academy Awards. Seal Team Six got fairly good ratings, but the reviews were mixed. Zero Dark Thirty, while incredibly controversial, still received unanimously good reviews and was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture.
Hangmen Also Die (1943) Hitler's Madman (1943) Two movies about the plot to assassinate Nazi leader Reinhard Heydrich, released within five months of each other and one year after Heydrich was killed, both by anti-Nazi German film directors who'd escaped to Hollywood (Fritz Lang and Douglas Sirk respectively) Hitler's Madman was originally called Hitler's Hangman but had its title changed to avoid confusion with the previously-released Lang film. Actually both did pretty well. Hitler's Madman was a super-cheap B-Movie that turned out so well it was picked up by MGM and given a wide release.
Behind Enemy Lines (2001) Black Hawk Down (2001) 2001 war/actions films released a little less than a month. Each set within the backdrop of a war during the 1990's and centered around American troops who after a mission into hostile territory goes awry must survive the onslaught of the surrounding enemy and try to make it out alive. Behind Enemy Lines is set in the December of '95 during the final stages of the Bosnian War and centers around the ordeal of a lone soldier. Black Hawk Down tells of the Battle of Magdishu that occurred in the October of '93 involving the U.S. Army Rangers, Delta Force, and the 160th SOAR. Whilst Behind Enemy Lines was a box office success and wound up getting three sequels, albeit direct-to-video ones, critics were not impressed. It didn't help Owen Wilson break out into becoming a dramatic actor either. Black Hawk Down is the clear winner here. It hasn't avoided criticism for historical inaccuracies, but by and large was well received by critics, made more money at the box office than its competitor even if on a bigger budget to start with, and took home two Academy Awards.
The Birth of a Nation (2016) (2016) Free State of Jones (2016) 2016 released historical war dramas set in the American 1800's about a revolutionary who starts a revolution against the oppressive southern government.   

Initiators Followers Description Misc Winner?
Major Dundee The Glory Guys 1965 Westerns about arrogant cavalry officers leading their command in disastrous campaigns against the Apache Indians. This is an especially odd pairing, with considerable overlap between the two movies. The Glory Guys started life as a Sam Peckinpah script, with Peckinpah himself slated to direct, but the project spent years in Development Hell and eventually Peckinpah abandoned it. By the time The Glory Guys finally went into production, Peckinpah was directing Major Dundee...which didn't stop the two productions from sharing several actors (Michael Anderson Jr., Senta Berger, Slim Pickens), besides the similar plots. In the short-term, neither. Both movies flopped upon release, though Dundee had its share of sympathetic reviewers whereas Glory Guys was universally panned. While Dundee's rarely listed among the all-time great Westerns, it does have a significant cult following, especially among Peckinpah fans, while The Glory Guys remains extremely obscure.
The Wild Bunch (1969) Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) 1969 released westerns set around the turn of the 20th Century that center around aging outlaws who seek to make a last big score and then flee to a country south of the border to retire. Both parties are pursued by a posse, and ultimately in the end get gunned down. Butch Cassidy was originally titled The Wild Bunch, which was one of several names (along with the Hole-in-the-Wall Gang) that Cassidy's gang was known as historically, but Peckinpah's film went into production first. Today each is considered a classic of the genre, but at the time Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid won. Getting very favorable reviews from critics, won 4 Oscars, and made almost ten times as much money at the box office. That being said The Wild Bunch has grown in stature over the years and became very influential on westerns if not action films at large that followed. Making this a very close call.
A Man Called Horse (1970) Little Big Man (1970) 1970 released westerns that both center around a white man who lives, or had grown up living, among a tribe of Native Americans.   In terms of both reviews and the box office Little Big Man takes it. Though for what it's worth, A Man Called Horse was still successful enough to merit getting sequels.
Hannie Caulder (1971) The Legend of Frenchie King (1971) 1971 released westerns that have women as gunslinging protagonists and are heavy on the fanservice. Hannie Caulder is a revenge drama, while Frenchie King is a farce. Hard to say. Both movies were considered trashy at release and are still considered so today. Though reviews may be kinder to Hannie Caulder.
Tombstone (1993) Wyatt Earp (1994) Historical westerns about... Wyatt Earp. Tombstone starred Kurt Russell and was distributed by Hollywood Pictures, while Wyatt Earp starred Kevin Costner and was distributed by Disney's longtime Arch-Enemy Warner Bros.. Costner was originally involved with Tombstone but left over disagreements regarding the script, deciding to make his own Earp pic. He even put pressure on studios to refuse distribution of Tombstone, but guess which one made more money in the end... Tombstone proved to be a hit and earned the better reviews, while Wyatt Earp flopped at the box office and got nominated for five Razzies. Wyatt was also one of three films in the 90's that crippled Costner's A-list status, followed by Waterworld and The Postman.
The Revenant (2015) The Hateful 8 (2015) 2015 released westerns set in the 19th century in the harsh cold with long running times, lots of violence, production troubles and highly notable directors at the helm of both of them (Alejandro González Iñárritu for the former, Quentin Tarantino for the latter). The Revenant is set during the 1820's and is Very Loosely Based on a True Story on frontiersman Hugh Glass while The Hateful Eight is an original idea by Tarantino and set sometime after the The American Civil War. On top of that, the scale of both films are the exact opposite; The former is large scale with massive battle scenes and sprawling set pieces while the latter is mostly set in a cabin somewhere in the middle of nowhere. Both received positive reviews, but The Revenant proved to be the winner with better reviews and box office (The former made well over 500 million worldwide while the latter earned 155 million worldwide). In addition to that, The Revenant achieved significantly more attention from the Golden Globes and Oscars (3 major wins at the Golden Globes including Best Picture, and 3 Oscar wins including Best Director and Best Actor versus Hateful Eight's 1 win at the Golden Globes and the Oscars for Ennio Morricone's score).

Alternative Title(s): Dueling Movies