Should Gorr be moved from the MCU: Cosmic page to the MCU: Other Supervillains page? The Black Berserkers could stay or be moved with him, goven the precedent set by Hela with Fenris and her Berserkers.
For posterity's sake, I was the one who unmarked all the Infintiy War and Endgame spoilers on the MCU pages (besides Tony and Steve's pages). I figured since every MCU work since Endgame has spoiled the end of that movie and the fact that it's one of the most openly discussed movies ever, marking out stuff like the Snap and the death at the end of Endgame were kind of silly. I mentioned I was going to do so on this clean-up thread and no one objected.
Should the characters from the time heist be listed under a variant folder? For example, the 2012 cap who 2024 cap fought with, the Peter quill who rhodey knocked out, or the Howard stark Tony talked to?
I was scrolling through the r/marvelmemes subreddit and saw this post:
That made me wonder if we should add the characters from Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse as part of the Variant folders seen throughout many of the indexes and character pages.
I was thinking maybe the What if episodes should have their own character pages in stead of just sticking them onto the regular character folders Orr pages. Things could get messy
Edited by FurygildemanIs it time to allow for spoilers for Phase 3 on all recurring character pages (as in, not dead and featured in any Phase 4 project)? I think enough time has passed and having spoilers for Infinity War and Engame marked on, say, MCU: Scarlet Witch is more of a nuisance than something helpful at the moment.
I can get behind leaving the spoilers marked on MCU: Iron Man, MCU: Captain America etc (dead or retired).
Edited by AsherinkaI have a question: Since the MCU: Mysterio page contains the members of his team (plus the Elementals), wouldn't it be more appropriate to rename it "Mysterio's Team" and place it under "Criminal & Terrorist Organization"?
To a lesser extent, the same question applies to MCU: Hela's page as well.
So... what happened to the Eternals character pages? All the other upcoming characters have pages and exist even before we know anything about them, seems like a pretty big oversight
Hide / Show RepliesThey’ve been re-added now that the first trailer of “Eternals” is out.
So why do we have Sharon Carter (Under CIA) and The Power Broker as separate entries? Let's combine these into one and reference that one from the other. Since Sharon's still CIA or actually (nvm - spoiler alert). I suggest we put all tropes for her into that entry, then add a link under the Madrapoor entry for her.
Edited by MasterSonWhy is Pepper's Rescue Armor in Tony Stark's character page? You can make the argument that Pepper didn't event the armor. But Rhodey didn't invent his suits either, but they're all on his page. Can we put the Rescue Armor in Pepper's page?
Hide / Show RepliesPersonally, I don't have a problem with that, but Pepper doesn't have her own page.
We make separate pages when the character section gets is too long, this is not true for Pepper yet. But we can still move the Rescue Armor section to this page: MCU: Companies – Stark Industries
With only 4 left not having their own pages between MCU: Avengers and Allies (Danvers, Selvig and Cho) and MCU: New Avengers (Quicksilver), there is no sense in having both pages - perhaps combine them under MCU Avengers Inititive? The separation still make sense for a list. Carol Danvers is close enough to own-page as it is but discretion should be used before making that move. The other 3 do not have enough content or support to (such as armors, weapons, sidekicks) to warrant own pages.
Edited by MasterSon Hide / Show RepliesDone, we've actually had a parallel discussion about that on the old "New Avengers" page that has now been turned into a redirect.
I gave Vision his own page because I thought it made no sense to have three different Vision pages with character tropes. I didn’t see the rules about splitting pages until I came to this page to index him. I’m sorry, but for future reference, so this mistake isn’t made again, it should probably be put at the top of every mcu page. If you want to undo what I did I understand. I just ask that you that I didn’t know.
FYI, Image Pickin disapproves of character images with black borders: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1572971479002376000&page=1
I started a discussion on ATT asking if the "Species" identifier on most character bios could be removed, since I thought they were unnecessary. Thoughts?
Hide / Show RepliesConsidering the fact that the MCU has plenty of characters of various species, I think we should keep it.
Would anyone else like to make a dedicated page for Mysterio? By that, not the individual character (unless his page grows that long), but the Collective Identity. These include:
- Quentin Beck / Mysterio
- William Ginter Riva
- Dimitri Smerdyakov
- Guterman
- Janice
We could also put the Elementals here.
Thoughts?
Hide / Show RepliesConsidering the page isn't only about Myserio himself, but also about his team, shouldn't it be named "Mysterio's team" or something like that, instead of simply "Mysterio"?
It seems like you guys are rolling with this now, but I really don't like this whole new trend of sorting by "Heroes" and "Villains". Sorting by location worked far better. I mean, now we have Ego next to Erik Killmonger. Not to talk about the fact that there are still villains listed under cooperations. or Government etc I'd vote to reverse it all.
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% ScandinavianI was thinking about making a page or section dedicated to the Human Species as a whole. This is what I got so far:
- Humans Are Special
- Able to becomes Half-Human Hybrids (by breeding with Clesialtials, as Peter Quill was conceived), or
- Only species to survive the experiments of the Kree (Inhumans, especially Hive)
- Only species (that we know of) who has been infused with the power of an infinite stone (Wanda, Quicksilver, Carol)
- Able to build Technology that matches species who have been around longer than us. (Hank, Tony, the people of Wakanda, etc.)
I think you can add all that in the Nine Realms page, since there is already a section about Midgard (in other words, Earth) and its inhabitants (in other words, humans).
Now that Endgame is released, what do you guys think we should do with the Avengers page?
I believe we could make a new page of Avengers. Consisting of:
- Bruce Banner / The Hulk (redirect to the dedicated Hulk page)
- James Rhodes / War Machine
- Sam Wilson / Falcon / Captain America II
- Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch
- Peter Parker / Spider-Man (redirected to the dedicated Spider-Man page)
- Carol Danvers / Captain Marvel
- Scott Lang / Ant-Man II
What could it be called? Maybe just Avengers - Current Members would suffice.
I'd like to do this, but I feel like it's important to at least see what others think first.
Edited by ThoughtComplex Hide / Show RepliesI don't see any problem with the current page, it's not like Stark and Cap stopped being the Avengers. Also before P4 announcements it is unclear who is indeed retired. Thor is getting his 4th movie so does he count?
Edited by AsherinkaActually, we don't know if Thor is getting a 4th movie, just that Waititi pitched one. Based on the ending of Endgame, I find it more likely he'll be in Vol. 3.
Do we really call it "The Dark Dimension"? I mean, in the MCU, they're actually called "Zealots". Yes, including Kaecilius and Dormammu. So, the "Zealots" aren't just their mooks.
This index needs to be fixed a bit. I mean there are those in "Other Individuals and Organizations" who are Obviously Evil.
What if we make it like this:
(under "Villainous Organizations")
- Cosmic Villains: The Grandmaster, Topaz, Kyln Prison, The Sovereign, Abilisk, The Vrellnexians, Taserface's Ravager Clan
- Ego the Living Planet
- Nine Realms Villains: Svartalfheim, Muspelheim, Marauders
- Hela Odinsdottir
- Evil Incs: Hammer Advanced Weapons Systems, Roxxon Oil Corporation, Cybertek, IGH, Isodyne Energy, Midland Circle Financials, Testament Industries. (so many of them, wtf lol)
- Advanced Idea Mechanics
What's especially jarring for me is that you put The Lighthouse under "Villainous Organizations" despite only the Kree Watch, few of the collaborators, and few of the True Believers can be considered evil among them. Yet you put more Obviously Evil characters like those I mentioned above from Cosmic Villains and Evil Incs under "Other Individuals and Organizations". Like, seriously, guys?
Can Ant-Man, Rocket, Nebula and Captain Marvel be considered Avengers now? I feel like, especially in Ant-Man and Captain Marvel's case, they could be moved to an Avengers section (not sure about Rocket and Nebula, given their former Got G status). What do you think?
Hide / Show RepliesI think we should wait until Avengers: Endgame is released.
Edited by PhoenixionWould anyone be open to making a page for "New S.H.I.E.L.D."? The organization is fully running again in Far From Home, yet the current layout doesn't quite fit that status. Not sure if it's too early, but I figured I'd ask. New S.H.I.E.L.D. currently consists of Nick Fury, Maria Hill, Mysterio, Spider-Man, and I suspect the characters played by J.B. Smoove, Remy Hii and Oli Hill (though that's speculation to be confirmed later).
This came about when I tried adding Mysterio to S.H.I.E.L.D., but couldn't fit it anywhere that felt right. So let's see what you guys think, and if not now, then it's at least something to consider by the time of FFH.
Hide / Show RepliesI would say no since we have gotten no confirmation that Fury and Hill are specifically working for S.H.I.E.L.D. in Far From Home yet. I would wait until either the film or Agents of Shield season 6 makes it clear if they are working independently or not.
Edited by LowCal_Calzone_ZoneDo we really need the 'heroic' and 'villainous' organization headers? I think it is way too simplfying, and honestly, Thanos doesn't fit in alongside street criminals like the Fisk Crime Ring. Just make a section about the Earth and one about the cosmos.
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% Scandinavian Hide / Show RepliesI'd keep them. There are exceptions when some characters are Affably Evil or make a Heel–Face Turn, but in most cases the division is straightforward. Thanos is definitely a villain and leads a villainous organization (see the page about his forces).
Also, the MCU wiki divides all characters into heroes and villains, check:
- https://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Heroes
- https://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Villains
Then I think we should at least seperate by place, meaning villains from Earth, from the cosmos etc. It's quite inconsistent as of now, with Hela being listed under Nine Realms etc
Also, the headerson the respective pages need to be updated too whenever one moves characters
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% ScandinavianWell, Hela is not a part of a Villainous Organization, so "Other Individuals and Organizations" fits her. I see your point but I don't think that dividing characters into "Those from Earth" and "Cosmic one" instead of the current three major groups would be that beneficial (i.e. I'd rather see the Guardians grouped with the Avengers than the Guardians grouped with Thanos and Co). Not to mention that it would require extensive editing to change all the indexes.
I agree that some characters from the "Other Individuals and Organizations" section could be moved up to either of the first two sections though, but it is better to discuss on a case-by-case basis.
Does Gamora need a new page? Her section is less than 21k symbols long, and overall Guardians page is not that long either.
PS MCU films and characters page length as of 15 Jul in symbols without spaces: https://imgur.com/a/X500DI3, https://imgur.com/a/GN8k2d2
I merged the page back and redirected it to the Guardians page for now.
Hide / Show RepliesPS All characters with more than 25k characters of text written about them currently have a page.
Characters with pages or sections between 18k and 25k symbols in descending order:
23686 | Johann Schmidt/Red Skull | No separate page | |
22033 | Yondu | Separate page | |
21296 | Scarlet Witch | No separate page | |
20824 | Gamora | No page (discussed) | |
20605 | Drax | Separate page | |
20171 | Ronan | No separate page | |
19671 | Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow | Separate page (merge back?) | |
18440 | Scott Lang/Ant-Man | No separate page | |
18153 | Two Groots | No separate page | |
18086 | Odin | No separate page |
There really need to be some sort of guideline about the limit for page length before splitting.
I'm really unsure here. Gamora is definitely a more major character than Yondu, but she has quite fewer characters of text... and with that argument we'd also have to make a separate page for Red Skull because he's got more characters than Yondu and that isn't necessarily imo.. yeah guidelines would be great here :D I tend towards making a separate page here but if it comes to depend on one vote I wouldn't really choose a side.
I don't see a need for it. If it is not comparable in size to character's who have their own pages, it wouldn't make sense to give her a separate page. It is unlikely to get bigger any time soon.
Would it be okay with others if I made pages for Ultron, Hela and Killmonger? They have more symbols than other characters who already have separate pages and I think they shouldn't be lumped in with the others (especially in Ultron's case, where he's lumped in with Criminals & Terrorists).
Just wanted to get an opinion before I do these.
Hide / Show RepliesI'm on the fence about it. They won't be making more appearances, but their sections are indeed quite long.
Neither is Ego, yet he's got his own page. Does the amount of appearances matter versus how many tropes they embody and how long they are? I feel like they should have their own pages, especially since it would save space on the pages they're currently on.
I'm kinda unsure as well, especially about Hela and Killmonger, since Ultron was an Avengers-villain, but since they are really quite long and Ego has his own I think it's alright for all of them to get their own as well!
I think there could be a page for supervillains in general that have a large presence in spite of limited screenitme. Should fit for all three you listed.
I think [1] suggested creating a single page for all three of them, something like MCU Supervillains. I'd rather either keep them where they are or create a page for each of them to keep it consistent, tbh.
Yeah, I'd rather not make a page called "MCU Supervillains" where unrelated villains are grouped together. If Ego can get his own page, I don't see why the other three can't.
Ultron I could see getting a page simply because he doesn't fit in the grouping and was significant enough of a character.
Hela for now I'd say no. As awesome as she is, she just hasn't been prevalent enough, as Ragnarok wasnt even entirely focused on her. Same goes for Killmomger. They'd only get pushed if the page they are currently on gets too long
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is covered in Theres No Such Thing As Notability. Basically, if they embody enough tropes than they deserve a page if someone thinks so. It doesn't matter how "notable" or "significant" they actually are. This isn't Wikipedia. Given how long their pages are, I feel they should have a page.
That applies to a work in general. Wikipedia loves doing a lot of "this work has to have had a cultural significance" stuff, which is not the issue here.
There are priorities on which one gets a page first. They won't get a page just for the sake of getting a page, there has to be enough reason to split character pages into individual pages. If all of them fit on one page then they go in one page.
But it's not for the sake of giving them a page. It's because their entries are so large that they should get one. The way I see it is if that Ego can his own page, I see no reason why the others can't. It makes no sense to give Ego a page but then not give the others their own when they should ideally be judged by the same standard.
But not all of them need a page, or alternatively split the page into separate sections rather than one character per page. Well idk why Ego specifically got a page but for these one movie villains they don't really feel warranted to have one.
Splitting the character folder into separate sections still takes up space on the page they're on. Again, I feel like "they don't really warrant a page because they only appear in one movie" specifically goes against Theres No Such Thing As Notability where anything can be tropable and warrant a page if they have enough tropes to support it. I'll see what others think, because if Ego can get his page, there's absolutely no reason for why the others can't.
Then by that logic why don't we make one page per character from the beginning? Because it floods the site with unneeded pages.
No. We make pages for characters with enough tropes and space to justify occupying it. Ultron, Hela and Killmonger fit that criteria.
Do we have a word count limit for pages? If yes, what is it. Are the pages Ulton, Hela and Killmonger on over the limit? Would moving them elsewhere be the best fix for that?
I'm not sure the exact number is needed, but apparently 25k symbols is a good minimum. They each exceed that and even have more symbols than characters who do have their own pages.
If the page notifies that it's too big then of course we remove sections and split into new pages. But you keep bringing up the reason "because Ego has his own page", making it sound as though they are given pages just got the sake of it.
We might not be Wikipedia, but we're also not a wikia. Splitting up characters into individual pages is done as a last step.
I'm also for not splitting pages unless they are tagged as too long. There are already many pages for this franchise, it's daunting for the casual visitors to even find the one character they want to see. I would be, in fact, more for merging back one-character pages if they were split too early.
Because I have to keep pointing it out that saying "this character shouldn't get their own page, they're not significant enough" doesn't really hold up when Ego, a one-off character, does in fact have his own page. It's not because "I want it for the sake of it", but because they have a lot of tropes and symbols (as mentioned, more than others who do have their own page) that warrant it. I don't see the problem in giving people with large amount of tropes their page when they need it, it helps me find them easier if anything. It's clear as day navigating through the character page and besides, we also have an index.
Having all these pages was a natural result of the series its based on, nothing we can do there. We can't really cut down on pages when we its bursting at the seams with characters and more just keep getting added.
Well you can't use something that was done wrong as an example to justify more things being done wrong. I don't know why Ego's page got split, but that is not a good enough reason to warrant every Big Bad being split too.
If the size has become an issue then split the largest ones off until the page is within limits again. For now I'd say we're in agreement that Ultron can safely get his own page. If the page is still too large after that then Killmonger or whatever can be moved too.
This isn't a case of every Big Bad getting split, just the ones that embody enough tropes in their appearance to justify it. It's no different than the heroes getting their own pages, it just happens that way due to how Trope Overdosed the MCU is. And whoever said it was done wrong? Now I'm curious.
Well if common sense dictates the page is over or about to be over the limit then the largest ones get split into individual pages. I can't really give any other input aside from this.
Some statistics (I'm still on the fence myself):
- MCU: Asgard: 117 106 symbols without spaces, including Hela's section - 30 161
- MCU: Criminals & Terrorists: 159 148 symbols without spaces, including Ultron's secion - 31 662, Killmonger's secion - 34 632 (I'd argue this page needs a split).
- Size of four pages Avengers: Infinity War got split into: 57 162, 50 415, 26 859, 42 138.
- Mass Effect and Star Wars have quite a few individual character pages as well, we could use those for reference.
Some Star Wars character statistics: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Characters.StarWars#comment-113230
Ok, I've done some homework :) There are currently 84 MCU character pages: 47 of them are at least partially related to movies, 37 deal exclusively with other content. I checked those related to the movies only. Here is the list of pages in symbols as of today: https://imgur.com/a/GN8k2d2. I also checked all MCU movie pages, here is another list: https://imgur.com/a/X500DI3. It appears that 4 character pages potentially need a split (highlighted in red), and the 3 villains in question would solve the problem with two of those pages nicely, so I'm now in favor of creating 3 new pages - 1 for each of them. I would also propose to merge back two pages highlighted in green.
Alright sounds good. So I got the green light to make the pages for them then?
As soon as the majority agrees with the idea. I asked here as well: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=12911386090A37310100&page=66#comment-1646 and got the reply "100,000 text characters is likely too long".
I get a "404 not found" for those two Imgur link, I would have liked to see them.
But count me in the camp for "split if needed to reduce size", "merge back when still possible".
Try to copy these: https://imgur.com/a/X500DI3, https://imgur.com/a/GN8k2d2.
The following pages were created: MCU: Ultron, MCU: Hela, MCU: Erik Killmonger.
Now that we've gotten that villain pages out of the way, I wanted to ask something else:
Would it be okay with others if I added a Citizenship stat to go with the Species stat? I feel like with the MCU encompassing characters from all over (quite literally) that we could include it. Examples:
Captain America — American Black Panther — Wakandan Thor — Asgardian Black Widow — American (formerly Soviet-Russian) Scarlet Witch — Sokovian Peggy Carter — British Armin Zola — Swiss etc.
Since the MCU has such a diverse amount of characters, I figured a stat for their Citizenship would be a nice compliment to their Species stat. Since this means I'd go through all the characters (don't worry, I got nothing better to do) and that all future characters would have it, I just wanted to see if you guys were cool with that.
Hide / Show RepliesWeird, I can't get this thing to look well. Anyways, you get the gist I'm sure.
I think it wouldn't hurt, and MCU wikia has citizenship listed for most characters, so information can be copied from it.
And a new question. Currently the Avengers page structure looks like this:
Main Character Index > Heroic Organizations > Avengers & Their Allies > Avengers Initiative (+6 subpages) | New Avengers (+1 subpage) | Allies (+1 subpage)
- Avengers & Their Allies is not a page at all.
- MCU: Avengers Initiative is 11 822 symbols long (which is very short) and contains only common tropes for 6 original Avengers + has 6 character pages attached to it
- MCU New Avengers is 73 462 symbols long (which is ok, i.e. current length of individual MCU: Iron Man and MCU: Thanos pages is 71 769 and 67 879 symbols, respectively), contains tropes for 5 characters (5k to 20k symbols each), all of whom are AoU recruits + has 1 character page attached to it (Spider-Man)
- MCU: Avengers – Allies page is 23 295 symbols long (which is again rather short) and contains tropes for Ant-Man - 13 312 s, tropes for 3 minor characters (2-3,5k s each, 9 501 combined), references to other pages + has 1 character page attached to it (Bucky).
To me it all looks cumbersome. Here's the proposed structure:
Main Character Index > Heroic Organizations > Avengers & Their Allies (Captain America | Iron Man | Thor | Black Widow | The Hulk | AoU Recruits | Spider-Man | Bucky)
Steps to do that:
- MCU: Avengers Initiative - rename to MCUAvengersAndAllies done
- Add a list of all Avengers (old, new) and allies with appropriate references to this page (currently only 6 OG avengers listed) done
-
MCU: New Avengers - rename to Characters/MCUAvengersAoURecruitsstep removed per discussion - MCU: Spider-Man - keep the page but detach it from New Avengers and reattach directly to Avengers & Allies done
- MCU: Avengers – Allies - move Ant-Man's section directly to Avengers & Allies page (too short to warrant a separate page) done
delete, move sections of 3 minor characters to Shield or Citizens pages (they really don't belong here) done, but content moved to the Avengers page as well - MCU: Bucky Barnes - keep the page but detach it from Avengers Allies and reattach directly to Avengers & Allies done
- MCU: Hawkeye - delete, merge the information back to Avengers & Allies (the page is 12 343 symbols long, no idea why he got a separate page in the first place; all others are at least around 20k s long and many are over 40k; all memes aside, this is not rational). done
/Discuss /Status updated
Edited by Asherinka Hide / Show RepliesI'd be totally up for that, the only reason why it is the way it is now is because everything was one page once and got split when it got too long over time, but if someone only now created those pages, that's the way it have been organized from the beginning.
As the whole project is a trimming down of the pages, I approve. Pages like Hawkeye, which shouldn't have been split in the first place, certainly can be repatriated back.
Also, don't hesitate doing a bit of clean-up in the process, like with indentation, it's always a good opportunity.
This seems much more organic than the current structure. The only questions I have are whether Black Widow should be merged back to the Avengers page if Hawkeye is getting merged and whether Black Panther's page should be listed under the "Avengers and Allies" page.
I disagree with the "AOU Recruits" name ("New Avengers" is what's used in-film but we could go with something like "Recruits"), but I agree with pretty much everything else. I think it's preferable to keep things in-line with their in-universe name as opposed to going somewhat meta.
Also, I'm thinking that the characters could be listed on the "Avengers and Allies" page should have Hawkeye, Ant-Man, Sharon Carter, Erik Selvig, and Helen Cho, plus details on the Avengers as a collective team. Should be more than enough content for a single page.
Edited by KingClark@DustSnitch Black Widow's page is 19k symbols.. I don't have a strong opinion on that. As I've written below, there are 17 characters with pages longer than 25k symbols (and their list hasn't changed since 6 May), I would keep those. Now we also have 5 more individual pages that are shorter (Black Widow, Rocket, Drax, Yondu - 19-23k and Hawkeye - 12k). Hawkeye stands out, but I believe if the rest are to be merged back, the same decision should be made about all four of them.
@KingClark Upd Let's simply keep the "New Avengers" then.
I believe though that Sharon Carter should be moved to the SHIELD page, while Erik Selvig and Helen Cho - to Citizens (just like Jane Foster). They are not Avengers, and all heroic organisations are technically Avengers' allies. Not a reason to list minor characters on the Avenger's page.
Edited by AsherinkaPlease see MCU: Avengers and Allies. Anyone willing to check the formatting?
Upd I moved three remaining characters to this page as well.
Edited by AsherinkaOne more suggestion. There is a list on IMDB with screentime of all characters in each MCU film: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls066620113/?sort=list_order,asc&st_dt=&mode=detail&page=1
It can be used to highlight specific characters on pages like this: Avengers: Infinity War. I.e. for IW all characters with at least 5 minutes of screentime are currently highlighted.
Edited by AsherinkaI've checked the length of all MCU (movies only) character pages (or sections) as of today in symbols (without spaces), and this is what I've got:
74744 | Loki | Has a separate page | |
65814 | Tony Stark | Has a separate page | |
55328 | Steve Rogers/Captain America | Has a separate page | |
54455 | Thanos | Has a separate page | |
42652 | Peter Parker / Spiderman | MCU: New Avengers | |
40849 | Ego | One-off villain | |
40709 | Sgt. James "Buck" Barnes | MCU: Avengers – Allies | |
39854 | Agent Phil Coulson | Has a separate page | |
39747 | Thor | Has a separate page | |
35994 | Dr. Strange (+ Cloak of Levitation) | MCU: Masters of The Mystic Arts | |
32137 | Star-Lord | MCU: Guardians of the Galaxy | |
31514 | Ultron | One-off villain | |
29269 | Hela | One-off villain | |
28801 | Killmonger/Erik Stevens | One-off villain | |
27030 | Dr. Bruce Banner /Hulk | Has a separate page | |
26092 | Black Panther | MCU: Wakanda Government & Military | |
25670 | Agent Peggy Carter | Has a separate page |
Here's a proposition: create separate pages for characters who are (or soon will be) in more than one movie (i.e. not Ego or Ultron, for instance), have long sections on general pages (> 25k symbols) and don't have separate pages yet, namely: Spiderman, Bucky, Strange, Star-Lord and Black Panther.
Edited by Asherinka Hide / Show RepliesYeah, good suggestion! Especially for Spider-Man, Black Panther and Strange since those are also main characters. But yeah, I vote to do it for all characters you suggested!
See MCU: Bucky Barnes, MCU: Spider-Man. Upd + MCU: Doctor Strange, MCU: Black Panther
I'm not quite sure if it is a good idea to split the Guardians though.
Upd Created by others as of 01 June 2018: MCU: Star-Lord, MCU: Ego the Living Planet. Mission completed )
Edited by AsherinkaDoes Meredith Quill have a character sheet? I can't find her.
Hide / Show RepliesIn the work pages, what do the bold character names mean?
Hide / Show RepliesThese are the main characters, or "most important" characters, and they are bold so that you can find them faster in the list.
The latest Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episode (5x11) introduced Ruby, a new villain, daughter of General Hale and a leather-clad masked assassin. Where should her entry be placed?
I've created a page for "Avengers and Their Allies". If you want, I could fill it up with all the tropes for the Avengers from the Avengers Initiative page & redirect all the characters to their relevant pages, all by the end of the week. Thoughts?
dmcreif made a bunch of arbitrary edits on many pages like removing the species stat and the foreign voiceover actors with asking first. Should we revert his edits and give him a warning for disruption?
Hide / Show Repliesi agree. that kind of stuff is uncalled for. Especially for movies with such intricate world building and international fanbase
Really late, but we can revert the edits if it's necessary.
He/His/Him. No matter who you are, always Be Yourself.I actually appreciate removing the species stat if characters are simply human. Most Writers Are Human, after all, so there's no reason to clutter character entries and bring these pages to breaking the character limit with something people will assume default.
Edited by DustSnitchI'm thinking of mixing the Kamar-Taj and Sanctum Sanctorum pages into one page called "Masters of the Mystic Arts" or "Sorcerers," so that most of the cast of Doctor Strange is on one page.
I'd like feedback, but I'll just go forward if there isn't a response to this in a week.
Hide / Show RepliesI agree, I don't really see a reason to separate those into two pages. I'd vote to call it "Masters of the Mystic Arts".
I think the New York City Citizens page is getting too long. Any ideas on how to split it?
Hide / Show RepliesSplit it so the Peggy Carter characters are separate. Seperated by areas of New York. Or shows or movies they appear in.
The Inhuman Royal Family Page has next to no tropes and at current is useless. I believe it should be deleted and any tropes being moved to the main Inhuman page. Thoughts?
The individual Star Wars films have a system where if you press the Characters page, it leads to an index and therefore specific parts of the film spanning character page.
Should the MCU films use a similar system?
With LM Ds now impersonating agents (May, so far) and having tomato surprises, we have to consider how we handle it on the character pages. Do we treat LMD!May as May or do we treat them as separate individuals?
About me: Nature Lover, Combat Medic, Genius Bruiser, Grey and Gray Morality, The Alcoholic, Weapon of Choice, Hot Scientist, FOR SCIENCE!I propose creating another page for Supernatural entities.
Right now we have Dormammu and both Ghost Rides in the Others page. With the 3 of them there are enough to merit their own page.
The ghosts currently in the Gifted page would also be a better fit there.
Hide / Show RepliesIf we mix it with the Kamar-Taj page I think it could work. I'd suggest it in the Repair Shop first though.
I think things were better when characters were organized by their respective films. I think this new way of filing characters is confusing and hap-hazardous.
Hide / Show RepliesI strongly agree with this. The new arrangement is incredibly confusing and I think incredibly counter-intuitive considering the amount of individual series of movies and shows there are in the MCU.
I'm not entirely sure if it was a moderator, but the discussion thread about reorganizing things is here: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1457851228077461700&page=1
Yeah, this page is a complete mess and an eyesore, with no indication as to which characters go where.
^^ How so? The page names give pretty clear indications as to what kind of characters go on each page, and notes are being added on the index that tells who goes where. This was a necessary switch since there are many characters now whose most prominent appearances are not in the movie/series they first appeared in and organizing them in such a way no longer made sense.
It's nice for the universe as a whole, really shitty for people trying to look at character sheets from individual works.
I really don't like the changes but my objections got outvoted.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.New subpages would help the articles to become less cumbersome. If the Council of Nine and the Chaste have their own page, why not The Hand or Leviathan?
"New Avengers?"
I heard that after Infinity War there will be a New Avengers movie, so this title could be sort of confusing...
How about reorganising the page into something more akin to the Star Wars Characters page, splitting the characters off into sub-sections???
Since this a shared universe where the events in one character's movie affect the events of another character's movie, I have been thinking of doing the pages in a way that organizes them by the group they're associated with rather than by character franchise.
Hide / Show RepliesI'll start on some Sandboxes now. Please let me know what changes should be made.
- S.H.I.E.L.D.
- HYDRA
- Strategic Scientific Reserve
- United States Government and Military
- The Howling Commandos
- Technology Companies
- Asgard
- Extraterrestrial Heroes
- Extraterrestrial Villians
- Other Superheroes
- Other Villains
- Unsorted Characters
It doesn't seem that anyone is interested. I'm still awaiting suggestions on how to improve the sandboxes.
Edited by SatoshiBakuraLet's say I'm a new person to the MCU, having only watched one film...
How the heck am I supposed to find a specific character?
^ That's easy. I'll unmark all of the spoilers up to Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Season 1 of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D..
Look, we have many characters the cross over into other films or series (cough cough Howard Stark cough), and there are other film sheets with a similar design pattern to mine like Star Wars. In any case, these sheets are not meant to appeal to those who just started watching the movies.
^^ Did something similar by splitting the heroes and the villains while moving the non-affiliated to the Unsorted page.
Edited by SatoshiBakuraI will put Gordon in Unsorted Characters for now. I will move him when more of his personality and alignment is revealed.
I think we should go back to the way things were. I find this new system highly confusing!
A lot of the tropes on the new character profiles seem presumptuous. How much do we know about these guys and how much is from the comics that we assume will be left intact - ie, Black Panther being a king, Klaw killing his dad, Dr. Strange being a martial artist and being arrogant before his accident.
Why is Howard the Duck on this page instead of the Guardians Of The Galaxy sheet? He's only been in that one movie and, to my knowledge, there's no plans on putting him in others.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them. Hide / Show RepliesI am guessing the statement by James Gunn that they could appear elsewhere as well prompted it.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI never once heard that. In fact, I've heard the exact opposite, that he was put in as a joke and not to expect a lot from him.
And either way... I still don't see why that would get him on this page instead of the GOG one. I'm going to move it to the GOG page.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.So, where would we put characters like Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch? Should they go on the main character page, or should we create an Avengers-specific character page?
Home of CBR Rumbles-in-Exile: rumbles.fr.yuku.com Hide / Show RepliesThanos as the Bigger Bad vs. just Man Behind the Man: He's too directly involved with the plot to be the Man Behind the Man. I suppose he's technically the Man Behind the Man Behind The Man, but he had been directly involved in the plot since before his first appearance.
At the very least, the writeup was specifically about Man Behind the Man and made no indication that he's a Bigger Bad.
EDIT: I'm okay with the current writeup.
Edited by 156.33.241.8 Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Hmm. With SHIELD now confirmed, a question to ponder. Should we build a SHIELD page for the cast of the show specifically? Or should we build a separate page for all SHIELD characters, including those who don't appear on the TV show?
Home of CBR Rumbles-in-Exile: rumbles.fr.yuku.comThis page isn't needed, since we have a Character Sheet for each individual movie.
Hide / Show RepliesIron Man and The Incredible Hulk don't, and neither do the many third party characters like Maria Hill or Nick Fury. Ax this page, and you lose a lot of useful info.
Ironically we have to split it now anyway, since it's over 500K and on the list of "big pages that need splitting", so it might be worth revisiting this matter. Should we just straight out split it, or should we move the tropes for each movie to their individual character sheets and keep this only for franchise-wide things like SHIELD and original characters from the One-Shots?
Before I add this in to either this or the Film/Thor Character Sheet, I got to ask everyone's opinion on this:
Would Thor qualify as a Gentle Giant after his Character Development in the film Thor? Or maybe even before being humbled.
He is most certainly a polite gentleman who keeps his promises, before and after; but he is still headstrong and violent all the way through his character arc. I also noticed he has yet to receieve the Nice Guy trope that Steve has in his section.
Any thoughts on the matter?
Hide / Show RepliesSo, under what circumstances in the future should we take a character or organization under one entry, and split it out into its own folder? I'm specifically thinking in terms of Hydra: if Hydra shows up in a major role outside of Cap sequels, should it get its own folder?
Home of CBR Rumbles-in-Exile: rumbles.fr.yuku.com Hide / Show RepliesOnly if it gets too large. So far HYDRA's just appearing the First Avenger film and First Vengeance comic. SHIELD gets its own folder because there's many Agent characters. But there are only three HYDRA characters.
Edited by TuckerscreatorSince the folders were getting too large, I've separated them by movie. If you guys prefer the old version, message me and I'll send that format.
Also, if anyone is going to add the new non-SHIELD characters from Item 47, you could put them in Stan Lee's section and rename that folder "Other" or "Bystanders".
Edited by TuckerscreatorCan we stop assuming that the Marvel Loki is Sleipnir's mother? The original Norse Myths and the Marvel Universe are two very different things, and as a fan of both, I'd appreciate if people could try to keep them apart. </rant>
Where is the recent spate of insistance that the Super-Soldier serum was finished when the Red Skull took it coming from? Erskine explicitly says in the movie that it "was not ready", though he thought Schmidt's character played a bigger role in the way he turned out.
Hide / Show RepliesYeah, the reason it wasn't complete in The Incredible Hulk was because Erskine never wrote down the formula before his death. Only Rogers ever got the complete version.
http://marvel.wikia.com/Johann_Schmidt_%28Earth-199999%29
Read here. It says here that he was taken away to make the serum, and so Red Skull took it when he was brought to him "to finish the serum". If you have any deliberate evidence otherwise in the film, fine, but say what that is first. Until then, saying it is unfinished seems less accurate.
Edited by Gregzilla...Um, "the unfinished serum made Schmidt stronger, however it also caused a combustion reaction that horribly scarred his face, disfiguring its appearance to that of a hideous red skull."
Hitler gave Erskine to Schmidt "to finish the serum", and Schmidt said "screw that" and took it before it was complete. Do you need stronger evidence? It seems weird to be so stuck on this one point.
Are the individual character pages for other films necessary since we have this joint page that lists the same characters with the same descriptions and tropes?
And would it be helpful to organize the page differently after release of The Avengers by bringing Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk, Black Widow, Hawkeye, and Nick Fury to the top of the Heroes section, and maybe Loki to the top of the Villains? As of now, it's just in order of film release.
Hide / Show RepliesThat still seems most appropriate. Loki may be an Avengers antagonist, but he is primarily a Thor villain.
No reason was given for taking away the spoiler tags on many of the items in the characters, particularly Loki. They were spoilered so that people would not get spoilers too early on certain things. I mean, by all means, the Chitauri don't need a spoiler warning (they're introduced within the first FIVE MINUTES of The Avengers, BEFORE the humans even are shown), but Loki? I don't think that's really called for.
Hide / Show RepliesI took off many of them. The tropes themselves are not supposed to be covered up and many of the spoilers were shown in trailers, are now examples of It Was His Sled, or simply did not spoil anything at all. Is it really that much of a spoiler that Thanos is played by some obscure actor?
And honestly, Thanos' name should not be a spoiler since his picture is clearly visible. Comic fans will come onto this page and instantly recognize him. For the average non-comic reader, they have no idea who Thanos is anyway so seeing his name spoils nothing.
Monster hunter from a family of them. A bit like Van Helsing (or maybe the Belmonts). Her dad is Ulysses, another Marvel character. She had her own series and she was in Nextwave, but she's fairly obscure, I think?
I have a question: Wouldn't it make more sense to put Aldrich Killian and Trevor Slattery on the A.I.M. page? I guess Trevor can stay in the Mandarin page since he is somewhat connected to him and the Ten Rings with his appearance in Shang-Chi, but Killian is clearly much more affiliated with A.I.M.
Hide / Show Replies