Do you have trouble remembering the difference between Deathbringer the Adorable and Fluffy the Terrible?
Do you have trouble recognizing when you've written a Zero-Context Example?
Not sure if you really have a Badass Bookworm or just a guy who likes to read?
Well, this is the thread for you. We're here to help you will all the finer points of example writing. If you have any questions, we can answer them. Don't be afraid. We don't bite. We all just want to make the wiki a better place for everyone.
Useful Tips:
- Make sure that the example makes sense to both people who don't know the work AND don't know the trope.
- Wrong: The Mentor: Kevin is this to Bob in the first episode.
- Right: The Mentor: Kevin takes Bob under his wing in the first episode and teaches him the ropes of being a were-chinchilla.
- Never just put the trope title and leave it at that.
- Wrong: Badass Adorable
- Right: Badass Adorable: Xavier, the group's cute little mascot, defeats three raging elephants with both hands tied behind his back using only an uncooked spaghetti noodle.
- When is normally far less important than How.
- A character name is not an explanation.
- Wrong: Full Moon Silhouette: Diana
- Right: Full Moon Silhouette: At the end of her transformation sequence into Moon Princess Misty, Diana is shown flying across the full moon riding a rutabaga.
Other Resources:
For best results, please include why you think an example is iffy in your first post.
Also, many oft-misused tropes/topics have their own threads, such as Surprisingly Realistic Outcome (here) and Fan-Preferred Couple (here). Tropers are better able to give feedback on examples you bring up to specific threads.
For cleaning up examples of Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard, you must use their dedicated threads: Complete Monster Cleanup, Magnificent Bastard Cleanup.
Edited by Synchronicity on Sep 18th 2023 at 11:42:55 AM
So I swapped in the sandbox for TheReasonYouSuckSpeech.Web Original, and I see that most of the bad examples were pulled from the Atop the Fourth Wall page. That said, two of the page's six examples are bad and need to go, and I don't know for sure how many examples we need to keep them on a separate page. I want to say it's seven, but I can't find any policy pages discussing it. Does anyone else know for sure?
Edited by Serac on Dec 2nd 2019 at 11:02:51 AM
Removed those examples.
From Ghetto Name:
- One of the characters in NW by Zadie Smith is a black lawyer called Natalie. Her parents named her Keisha, but she didn't think that it sounded very professional.
Seems like it fits. "Keisha" is one of those names with an African-American association, I think.
Edited by Twiddler on Dec 2nd 2019 at 4:20:15 AM
I'd like to remove this example from YMMV.Pokemon Sword And Shield:
- And You Thought It Would Fail: Between the many controversies surrounding Sword and Shield before its release note , a lot of people were sure the games would suffer a hit in sales compared to previous titles. The games defied expectations, selling six million copies in just one week, becoming the fastest-selling games on the Switch to that point, and received generally positive reviews from critics. Fan reception was also more positive than what was expected, though the games still remain highly contentious.
From a quick look over the period of drama, it seems that even the most infuriated of the detractors begrudgingly accepted that a financial hit or severe fanbase exodus was very unlikely, and thus this Contested Sequel controversy does not qualify for And You Thought It Would Fail.
Edited by Albert3105 on Dec 2nd 2019 at 9:00:14 AM
I also wonder if And You Thought It Would Fail is one of those tropes that, like Overshadowed by Controversy, has a minimum time limit to qualify.
Edit: Doesn't seem to currently have have a minimum time requirement, just that the game be actively derided before release, which it was due to things like Dexit.
However, I think it fails as an example because of part of the definition:
Given that Pokémon is an established goldmine of a franchise two decades old, I'd say it's well past the point of And You Thought It Would Fail
Edited by sgamer82 on Dec 2nd 2019 at 8:06:45 AM
I went ahead and pulled it.
- Most Writers Are Male: Don't write women from ignorance, stereotypes, and/or in unsympathetic ways (either in the form of misogyny or over-sexualization).
I don’t know if this fits the Bad Writing Index, since Most Writers Are Male is more of a statement than a trope. Plus it’s redundant, since Unfortunate Implications is already listed.
Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!Agreed. I think this example on Billy Hatcher and the Giant Egg is misuse, not to mention having two YMMV potholes:
- Crapsaccharine World: Morning Land could be interpreted as this, seeing as how you can usually find some sort of terrifying Mook hiding right around the corner. And honestly, how bright and cheerful would you be if you were faced with the chance that you may never see the light of day again?
Edited by rjd1922 on Dec 2nd 2019 at 11:10:48 AM
Keet cleanupThat could probably be removed on the basis of Speculative Troping.
Alternative Character Interpretation is YMMV; an example that hinges on it shouldn't be on the main page. Edit: Oh, you already pointed out the YMMV pothole. Well, the "could be interpreted as" is some Examples Are Not Arguable failure.
Bumping this query
Edited by Twiddler on Dec 2nd 2019 at 10:37:37 AM
From the dialogue alone, looks to me like a classic example of Rhetorical Question Blunder? What's making you doubt?
It’s less “mistaking a rhetorical question for a non-rhetorical one” and more “not getting what the answer is supposed to be”.
Edited by Twiddler on Dec 3rd 2019 at 1:15:56 AM
Is the Answer to This Question "Yes"?
Trouble Cube continues to be a general-purpose forum for those who desire such a thing.Oh, thanks!
From that trope page:
Is that pothole being used correctly? It’s like poking a hole in a metaphor, but not necessarily out of being Literal-Minded. So in this analogy, is the literal-mindedness the important part of the trope (i.e. not recognizing a rhetorical question for what it is), or does it extend to other reasons for the metaphor failing, like an Analogy Backfire?
...Probably making this question more complicated than it needs to be by posing it through analogy.
Ok, tl;dr: is “not recognizing a rhetorical question as rhetorical” the key part of Rhetorical Question Blunder?
Edited by Twiddler on Dec 3rd 2019 at 1:33:29 AM
Can we have a look at this example from My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic S5 E16 "Rarity Investigates!":
- Unfortunate Implications: The efficiency with which Wind Rider threw together and implemented a scheme to discredit Rainbow Dash implies that she's not the first promising rookie that he's sabotaged. Also, his lack of remorse and conviction that "you have to play dirty" may say some unsavory things about the conduct of earlier generations of Wonderbolts.
I believe that a) this is not what Unfortunate Implications covers as a trope, and b) the whole example is speculative anyway.
And it's not cited. Three strikes, it's out.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"The answerer not understanding the question was rhetorical is their blunder. But I think not recognizing what the answer *should* be falls under it, too. So you have Is the Answer to This Question "Yes"? followed by Rhetorical Question Blunder.
Found this entry on Pokémon Sword and Shield and wasn't sure if it's actually a case of Harsher in Hindsight:
- Harsher in Hindsight:In the Tokimeki PokéLive! and TwinBee story "Prophecy of Failure!?", it's revealed that Climate Change wreaked havoc in Shizuku Osaka's World (Earth) in the future, making most of the planet uninhabitable and with many species going extinct. In this game, it's revealed in Galarian Corsola's Pokedex entry that it was eradicated by Climate Change in the past.
Edited by dragonfire5000 on Dec 3rd 2019 at 4:46:01 AM
It's already on the fanfic YMMV page.
Yeah, cut it. Sword/Shield is completely unaffected by something that happened in fanfiction.
Edited by Tabs on Dec 3rd 2019 at 5:00:59 AM
I suppose Harsher in Hindsight might be appropriate on the fanfic page, but I'm not sure it belongs on Pokémon Sword and Shield.
Edited by dragonfire5000 on Dec 3rd 2019 at 4:53:58 AM
If the opportunity arose, I'd suggest having either a notability requirement, a within-the-franchise scope requirement, or a "ridiculously specific" requirement for the three hindsight tropes. That'll have to wait until TRS clears its backlog, but I think it'd make the items much more meaningful.
As an example, one game I follow has a Hilarious in Hindsight that basically says "Ms. Fanservice got a Hot Witch costume for the game's halloween event. A fan artist once drew her in a Hot Witch costume." That's not worth caring about. On the other hand, someone predicting the names of the Switch Pokémon games as Sword and Shield very shortly before the official announcement is at least a little amusing, especially given that it was presented as a hoax.
SoundCloudHeya. Someone wrote this in Harsher in Hindsight in Metal Gear Solid.
- Liquid desired to murder Big Boss in revenge for either allegedly being knowingly given the inferior genes by Big Boss or being told by Big Boss repeatedly that he was inferior, and hated Snake partially for stealing that chance. Liquid's voice actor, Cam Clarke, would later voice a character who attempts to avenge his father after discovering that he was murdered by his uncle in Kingdom Hearts II.
Thing is, this is not related to Metal Gear Solid at all, which is why I cut it (admitedly with a very bad reason from my part, "how is that tragic?"). It feels like random trivia about voice acting since it has nothing to do with the future of Metal Gear Solid or a Kojima work. User PF put it back on without an edit reason.
I felt I should ask here first.
To win, you need to adapt, and to adapt, you need to be able to laugh away all the restraints. Everything holding you back.
I asked for a clarification on All Gays are Promiscuous over at ATT in light of the entries being removed. Kinda moved the crux of the discussion here since there weren't that much responses from other tropers and it kinda got derailed with what gay is supposed to mean in the trope's context, whether it means a homosexual man or same-sex attracted individuals in general.
Edited by Elfkaiser on Dec 2nd 2019 at 3:17:35 AM