Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

Crossover-Enthusiast from an abaondoned mall (Lucky 7) Relationship Status: Chocolate!
#4801: Feb 27th 2021 at 1:01:28 PM

Presumably, since it hasn't opened yet.

Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#4802: Feb 27th 2021 at 1:25:58 PM

I kinda wanna swap the image on Equivalent Exchange with a closer crop, since the blue outfits of the soldiers are distracting. Is this drastic enough to warrant a thread?

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/fma_ee.png

Crossover-Enthusiast from an abaondoned mall (Lucky 7) Relationship Status: Chocolate!
#4803: Feb 27th 2021 at 1:41:21 PM

...I honestly don't really get that image, anyway.

Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4804: Feb 27th 2021 at 6:24:21 PM

I like the pic/caption combo on that page, but it would help to have a pic of Edward without the spear beforehand so it's clear that he pulled the materials out of the floor to make the spear.

rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#4805: Feb 28th 2021 at 8:27:11 AM

[up]With the hole in the floor, it's kind of obvious IMO. [tup]Closer crop.

Edited by rjd1922 on Feb 28th 2021 at 10:27:42 AM

Keet cleanup
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4806: Feb 28th 2021 at 6:33:06 PM

Here's all of the suggestions from the last two crowners that still need threads:

As a side note, is there any way we can tell people to not make any new threads? We're at over 90 threads right now, and we still have all of these threads that need to be made eventually.

back lol
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4807: Feb 28th 2021 at 6:35:18 PM

[up] Not without some kind of switch to turn off new threads...announcements don't seem to make a lot of difference.

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#4808: Mar 1st 2021 at 8:19:31 AM

[up][up] If an image is strongly voted down in the suggestion thread, does it really need a separate thread? I mean, if it's a 50-50 split then a thread makes sense; but if nobody really likes the image, then what's the point of opening a discussion on it?

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#4809: Mar 1st 2021 at 9:53:39 AM

The hopes that someone will come up with a better image based on why the suggestion failed. I can't really say if a majority of these accomplish that.

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#4810: Mar 1st 2021 at 10:11:13 AM

And sometimes the image might better fit another page, like how the image suggested for Hollywood Dress Code was seen as better fitting Unmoving Plaid than the current.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#4811: Mar 1st 2021 at 12:37:04 PM

Double post but different subject. "Not If They Enjoyed It" Rationalization has a note not to pothole the image since the source is a hentai doujinshi. However, the image is potholed to the source of the doujinshi, Fate/stay night, which I assume is fine. Should the note be rephrased or something (like "don't link to the doujinshi or make a page for it") to avoid confusion?

EDIT: Might be worth mentioning that BreakingTheFourthWall.Fan Works also has a NSFW doujinshi as its source and links to the work from which the doujinshi was derived, but does so in the caption without potholing the image itself. It also namedrops the doujinshi, though.

Edited by mightymewtron on Mar 1st 2021 at 4:00:15 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4812: Mar 1st 2021 at 12:52:41 PM

[up] I don't necessarily object, but at the same time I wonder if it's kosher to provide any sort of wick in the first place. Thoughts from anyone else?

Edited by Willbyr on Mar 1st 2021 at 12:53:11 PM

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4813: Mar 1st 2021 at 1:16:28 PM

Related question. I added a note to the "don't change the pic" entry on Image Pickin' Special Cases saying that making changes to certain pages' pics in that list would get you instantly suspended, but there are pages in other lists, especially the "no pic" list, that should probably merit the same warning, such as Brother–Sister Incest, Lolicon and Shotacon, and Parental Incest. Maybe we should have a separate category for such pages; thoughts?

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#4814: Mar 1st 2021 at 1:21:37 PM

[up] Maybe you can add some other symbol to those that shouldn't be changed, similar to the * that denotes former "no pic" pages? Though I assumed that changing any of those pics without approval leads to a suspension.

Edited by mightymewtron on Mar 1st 2021 at 4:24:15 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Kappaclystica 『  』 from The 'hood (of a pasty upper-middle class suburb) Since: Jan, 2019
『  』
#4815: Mar 2nd 2021 at 11:21:19 AM

A recent thread by rjd1922 messed up the formatting; the title of the article he wants to change the image for is Manga.School Live.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4817: Mar 2nd 2021 at 4:26:32 PM

I asked this a week ago, but I believe my question got missed: What’s our policy when it comes to using comic strips/webcomics in regards to how much of the overall image is used? If two panels of a four-panel comic were used, but said two panels took up a bit more than half of the image, would that be copyright-violating?

back lol
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#4818: Mar 2nd 2021 at 4:39:43 PM

[up] I think it's about halves, regardless of the number of panels. The image on Saving Christmas was a single-panel that had to be cut in half to avoid copyright issues.

[down] Ah, right, misremembered it but the point still stands.

Edited by mightymewtron on Mar 2nd 2021 at 8:04:11 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4819: Mar 2nd 2021 at 4:57:18 PM

Saving Christmas wasn’t a single panel, but the panel used takes up more than half the strip space-wise.

back lol
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4820: Mar 3rd 2021 at 2:14:35 PM

Just a heads-up, the thread for Deadly Rotary Fan can be closed, with the suggestion instead going on the Image Suggestions thread.

back lol
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#4821: Mar 3rd 2021 at 2:37:13 PM

[up] It had a previous thread, albeit an inconclusive one.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
ShinyCottonCandy Industrious Incisors from Sinnoh (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Industrious Incisors
#4822: Mar 3rd 2021 at 2:37:39 PM

I see that a new image was added to Hollywood Nerd just over a month ago. Thing is, it had an IP link in the top-page comment. But that link wasn’t a thread, just a general link to the policy that demanded it pulled. So I don’t know if this warrants a “Changed without discussion” thread or not.

SoundCloud
AjWargo Lord Barglebroth, Come For Your Souls! from Westfeild, New Jersey Since: Dec, 2014
Lord Barglebroth, Come For Your Souls!
#4823: Mar 4th 2021 at 12:33:16 PM

Hey, I’d like to open a thread for Red Riding Hood Replica. Our current image is one of Ruby Rose, but it was determined she’d fit the Super Trope Little Red Fighting Hood better. I’d like you to help determine a suitable replacement image.

Check out my fanfiction account here!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#4825: Mar 5th 2021 at 3:15:41 AM

The OP of the recently-created thread titled “Dark Deception Image” says that they want to find an image for a page they want to create, but they don’t provide any images or ideas themselves.

back lol

Total posts: 9,729
Top