Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help: Reality Is Unrealistic

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Mar 17th 2017 at 11:59:00 PM
MagBas Mag Bas from In my house Since: Jun, 2009
#1: Mar 13th 2017 at 8:08:25 PM

Reading the description and the examples this sounds pretty clearly YMMV. The first paragraph is "When exposed to an exaggeration or fabrication about certain real-life occurrences or facts, 'some people' will perceive the fictional account as being more true than any factual account. " (emphasis mine) The recent Interstellar example actually starts as "Some find " and, in the discussion page to Reality Is Unrealistic, a troper questioned "Are in-universe examples fair game?" and other troper questioned "Should this be considered Trivia, and not on the main page of works? I don't know if there are any pages where this is particularly cluttering, but it still seems as though it's less of a "Media convention" and more of a "Factoid about the real life repercussions of such conventions." "

edited 13th Mar '17 8:42:47 PM by MagBas

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#2: Mar 14th 2017 at 8:29:56 AM

Opening and clocking.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#3: Mar 14th 2017 at 9:03:29 AM

The RealityIsUnrealistic.General page, coupled with the RealityIsUnrealistic.Real Life redirect to the trope page, doesn't appear to be helping this confusion. Especially since it looks like much of the General examples are actually Real Life examples.

I always thought this was the inverse to Aluminum Christmas Trees, where it was "an element that does not exist in real life but is assumed to be real by audiences." The examples in the second paragraph seem to support this (e.g. the audience assuming characters could survive being shot in the shoulder when in reality they very well could die from such an injury).

edited 14th Mar '17 9:04:35 AM by WaterBlap

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#4: Mar 14th 2017 at 11:06:33 AM

I've always thought this trope and Aluminum Christmas Trees are YMMV. Plus I still can't get my head around the difference between both tropes; keep confusing them. The laconics are not helping matters:

RIU laconic: "Something that doesn't seem real, but is." ACT laconic: "Sounds fictional, but does (or at least did) exist."

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#5: Mar 14th 2017 at 11:15:59 AM

The laconic of Reality Is Unrealistic was changed unilaterally without an edit reason, so I don't think it'll be really helpful (though it does help explain some of the confusion).

It used to be "Thinking that something isn't real because of how it's portrayed in fiction," which is basically what I thought in [up][up].

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#6: Mar 14th 2017 at 11:58:48 AM

RIU: Something fictional is assumed to be realistic.

ACT: Something that's real is assumed to be fictional.

Does that help?

edited 14th Mar '17 12:04:19 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#7: Mar 14th 2017 at 1:35:12 PM

So RIU is when the audience thinks that inaccurate content in fiction is like the real thing, while ACT is when they think accurate content in fiction is fake. Makes sense, but the articles for both tropes would help avoid confusion if they were rewritten (the Russian Reversal pothole in Reality Is Unrealistic's fourth paragraph and the RIU pothole in Aluminum Christmas Trees's first paragraph come to mind).

edited 14th Mar '17 1:36:24 PM by Gosicrystal

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#8: Mar 14th 2017 at 1:59:45 PM

It's more like "people think that the fictional thing is the way it actually is/works/happens in reality." So people think horses walking go "clip-clop" (like you always hear in the movies) when that's actually only the way they sound on;y if they're both 1) shod and 2) on a hard surface like asphalt or concrete. In reality, a horse walking can sound all sorts of different ways, depending on the surface.

edited 14th Mar '17 2:00:58 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
MorningStar1337 Like reflections in the glass! from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
Like reflections in the glass!
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#10: Mar 14th 2017 at 3:56:36 PM

That particular one is. The Coconut Effect is a subtrope of Reality Is Unrealistic, dealing specifically with special effects.

edited 14th Mar '17 3:57:19 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
YourIdeas Since: Mar, 2014
#11: Mar 15th 2017 at 3:28:09 PM

The description for RIU reads as very YMMV but a lot of the examples, especially in General, do look a lot like tropes.

Like the example about dogs being portrayed as being totally colorblind in fiction when in reality, it's more that they see yellow and blues, but not really reds. Ask a sample of people and most are probably going to say that dogs are colorblind because it's what they've seen on film/TV.

There might need to be a cleanup, as some of the entries seem to fall more in line with one of the subtropes like Aluminum Christmas Trees, which honestly looks like it isn't a sub-trope of this as it's pretty much the opposite deal. The Wandering Son example under Anime for example reads much closer to ACT to me.

I think the issue is that some of the entries seem more YMMV than others which is almost based entirely off how ingrained the misconception is in our culture, though it seems iffy to have to try and weed out which ones are more 'well-known' than others.

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#12: Apr 2nd 2017 at 1:48:46 PM

I'll do a wick check for this later tonight if nobody else has already done one. I am seeing a lot of poorly made examples on the page, so this may just get moved to Short-Term for a clean-up at the very least.

Should we integrate the RealityIsUnrealistic.General page into the description (for tropers' reference when making examples? idk) or cut that subpage outright?

I expect a wick check to show misuse considering the fact that people in TRS were having difficulty, but if it doesn't then at least we can start scrubbing the page clean.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#13: Apr 2nd 2017 at 5:16:19 PM

Instead of finishing this wick check, I need to know what the difference is between this and Truth in Television, because their laconics are almost identical and TIT lists RIU as its opposite. Is it just that one is for tropes that are believed to be made up and the other is for everything else?

Below is a tentative wick check of 26 wicks. I believe this tentative wick check shows that we should discuss the connection with Truth in Television and the dreadful possibility that tropers might be misusing this as a stockphrase pothole.

Criteria My definition of a "good" or "good bpwe" example is any example that essentially followed Madrugada's definition of "something media made up is assumed to be the way it really is." In other words, "the audience thinks this is how it really is when in reality it is not like this." I also included parodies (there were none) and In-Universe examples. I also included wicks from trope descriptions, so long as it fit the aforementioned definition.

Note that I did not include Truth in Television here, but I did look at it, and it looks to be misuse (which is why I asked my question above).

My definition of "bad" (i.e. "misuse") is any example that essentially was not Madrugada's definition. This includes Aluminum Christmas Trees (i.e. "the audience thinks this is not how it really is when in reality it is like this," or "the audience thinks this doesn't exist when it does"). The Coconut Effect (there were none). Art Imitates Life or Truth in Television. And, people using Reality Is Unrealistic when they are trying to say "let's agree to disagree."

Descriptive Statistics (26 wicks total)

  • Good
    • Good: 2
    • Good (but poorly written example): 3
      • This is listed below as "good bpwe"!
    • Description: 2
  • Bad

Evidence

Substitute their own."""

edited 3rd Apr '17 2:59:43 PM by WaterBlap

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#14: Apr 2nd 2017 at 5:35:36 PM

Truth in Television: This really happens, this way.

Reality Is Unrealistic: The way it happens in media is not the way it really happens, even if a lot of people don't realize that.

Both of them are misused. A lot. Interchangeably, to mean "This can happen in Real Life. Maybe. "

edited 2nd Apr '17 5:42:54 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Getta Since: Apr, 2016
#15: Apr 3rd 2017 at 7:03:09 AM

[up] Both (and Aluminum Christmas Trees) have a certain "baffling truth" element in it. Just that the kind of "baffling truth" in each are different.

We don't need justice when we can forgive. We don't need tolerance when we can love.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#16: Apr 3rd 2017 at 7:29:39 AM

I think with Reality Is Unrealistic there is also the implication that the real thing is wacky enough that people think it's unrealistic.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#17: Apr 3rd 2017 at 7:59:56 AM

[up]That's actually Aluminum Christmas Trees.

Reality Is Unrealistic is more a catch-all for when people think that the way it works in fiction is the way it works really, to the point that they don't believe that it isn't. For instance, The CSI Effect is a specific subset of Reality Is Unrealistic. People thinking that shooting someone in the shoulder is both easy and relatively harmless, compared to shooting them elsewhere or that when someone is shot, they'll be blown back off their feet by the impact; or that all you have to do after a fight is say "But it was self-defense, officer!" and the nice cop will pat you on the shoulder and let you go home.

edited 3rd Apr '17 8:04:03 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#18: Apr 3rd 2017 at 10:20:24 AM

These tropes need to be on Canonical List of Subtle Trope Distinctions and Laconical List of Subtle Trope Distinctions.

We have Truth in Television paired with Justified Trope on Canonical List of Subtle Trope Distinctions, but these three ought to be explained together, I think.

edited 3rd Apr '17 10:20:48 AM by WaterBlap

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Josef5678 Psshhh... from Virginia Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Mu
Psshhh...
#19: Apr 3rd 2017 at 1:43:07 PM

[up]Seconding. After cleanup, that'll be helpful in the long run.

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#20: Apr 3rd 2017 at 2:56:52 PM

Here's the wick check. There is a lot of misuse confusing this with ACT and a decent amount of misuse confusing this with Truth in Television. That said, there is more general misuse than confusing RIU with TIT. (ACT > general misuse > TIT)

    open/close all folders 

    Criteria 
My definition of a "good" or "good bpwe" example is any example that essentially followed Madrugada's definition of "something media made up is assumed to be the way it really is." In other words, "the audience thinks this is how it really is when in reality it is not like this." I also included parodies (there were none) and In-Universe examples. I also included wicks from trope descriptions, so long as it fit the aforementioned definition.

Note that I did not include the wick from Truth in Television here.

My definition of "bad" (i.e. "misuse") is any example that essentially was not Madrugada's definition. This includes Aluminum Christmas Trees (i.e. "the audience thinks this is not how it really is when in reality it is like this," or "the audience thinks this doesn't exist when it does"). The Coconut Effect (there were none). Art Imitates Life or Truth in Television (i.e. "media portrays this as X, and that is how it really is"). And, people using Reality Is Unrealistic when they are trying to say "let's agree to disagree." Also, people saying Shown Their Work (essentially saying that this is accurate to reality).

"Neutral" could be bad or good, not that it actually is okay for the wick to stay the way it is. Obviously, this includes ZC Es, but it also includes the one index entry and the entry where RIU seemed to just be tacked on needlessly ("Tack On").

    Descriptive Statistics ( 50 wicks total) 
  • Good (11/50, 22%)
    • Good: 3
    • Good (but poorly written example): 3
    • Description: 4
    • In-Universe: 1
  • Bad (34/50, 68%)
  • Neutral (5/50, 10%)
    • ZCE: 3
    • Tacked on for no reason: 1
    • Member of an index: 1

    Evidence 
I'll fix the page links later (don't have time right now). But, here are the quotations.

Substitute their own."

edited 3rd Apr '17 4:42:53 PM by WaterBlap

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#21: Apr 3rd 2017 at 3:06:34 PM

Blap, what does "bpwe" mean when you use it in these breakdowns? (And by the way, I really like the way you do those. Very thorough!)

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#22: Apr 3rd 2017 at 3:18:53 PM

I'll work on the Canonical and Laconical list entries.

Canonical:

Aluminum Christmas Trees vs Reality Is Unrealistic vs Truth in Television

  • Aluminum Christmas Trees is when something mentioned in a fictional work is so goofy or ridiculous-sounding that people think it has to be made up. However, it really does exist or existed in Real Life at the time the work was made.
  • Reality Is Unrealistic: A trope has become so pervasive that people assume that it's the way something really happens in Real Life to the point that they expect Real Life to follow the trope.
  • Truth in Television: A trope accurately portrays the way something happens in Real Life, at least under certain circumstances or in certain situations.

Suggestions for tweaks are welcome. Are those acceptable as working definitions for this thread?

edited 3rd Apr '17 4:31:29 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#23: Apr 3rd 2017 at 4:21:14 PM

And for the laconical...

Aluminum Christmas Trees vs Reality Is Unrealistic vs Truth in Television

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#24: Apr 3rd 2017 at 4:26:15 PM

[up][up] Overall, that's a good start.

For Aluminum Christmas Trees, the only change I'd suggest is replacing "But" with "However,".

For Reality Is Unrealistic, there's something off about the abruptness of the last sentence in comparison to the previous one, and the first sentence could do with a bit of a rewording.

Truth in Television is good as is.

[up] Perfect. [awesome]

edited 3rd Apr '17 4:27:09 PM by Willbyr

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#25: Apr 3rd 2017 at 4:31:30 PM

"bpwe" means "but poorly written example." It's good, but breaks How To Write An Example in one or multiple ways. I included this because of my observations of the examples on the page of Reality Is Unrealistic. Essentially, I wanted to see if this was a problem on the page or throughout the wiki with this trope. This sample only has 6% (of the sample) "good bpwe" and so it's probably not as bad as the page itself implies.

Also, I'm good with both [up][up] and [up][up][up]

edited 3rd Apr '17 4:44:00 PM by WaterBlap

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty

SingleProposition: RealityIsUnrealistic
21st May '17 2:12:26 AM

Crown Description:

Vote up for yes, down for no.

Total posts: 60
Top