Follow TV Tropes

Following

Real Life section maintenance (New Crowner 19 Feb 2024)

Go To

Note: If a newly launched trope was already given a No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only designation while it was being drafted on the Trope Launch Pad, additions to the proper index do not need to go through this thread. Instead, simply ask the mods to add the trope via this thread.

This is the thread to report tropes with problematic Real Life sections.

Common problems include:

Real Life sections on the wiki are kept as long as they don't become a problem. If you find an article with such problems, report it here. Please note that the purpose of this thread is to clean up and maintain real life sections, not raze them. Cutting should be treated as a last resort, so please only suggest cutting RL sections or a subset thereof you think the examples in question are completely unsalvageable.

If historical RL examples are not causing any problems, consider whether it would be better to propose a No Recent Examples, Please! (via this forum thread) for RL instead of NRLEP. If RL examples are causing problems only for certain subjects, consider whether a Limited Real Life Examples Only restriction would be preferable to NRLEP.

If you think a trope should be No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only, then this thread is the place to discuss it. However, please check Keep Real Life Examples first to see if it has already been brought up in the past. If not, state the reasons and add it to the crowner.

Before adding to the crowner:

  • The trope should be proposed in the thread, along with reasons for why a crowner is necessary instead of a cleanup.
  • There must be support from others in thread.
  • Any objections should be addressed.
  • Allow a minimum of 24 hours for discussion.

When adding to the crowner:

  • Be sure to add the trope name, a link to where the discussion started, the reasons for crownering, whether the restriction being proposed is NRLEP or LRLEO (and in the latter case, which subject(s) the restriction would be for), and the date added.
  • Announce in thread that you are adding the item.
  • An ATT advert should be made as well (batch items together if more than one trope goes up in a day).

In order for a crowner to pass:

  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • There must be a 2:1 ratio
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple extra days to see if any more votes come in
  • Once passed, tropes must be indexed on the appropriate NRLEP index
  • Should the vote fail, the trope should be indexed on KRLE page

Sex Tropes, Rape and Sexual Harassment Tropes, and Morality Tropes are banned from having RL sections so tropes under those indexes don't need crowner vote.

Crowner entries that have already been called will have "(CLOSED)" appended to them — and are no longer open for discussion.

After bringing up a trope for discussion, please wait at least a day for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

NRLEP tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

LRLEO tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/LimitedRealLifeExamplesOnly via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%The following restrictions apply: [list restriction(s) here]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

Notes:
  • This thread is not for general discussion regarding policies for Real Life sections or crowners. Please take those conversations to this Wiki Talk thread.
  • Do not try to overturn previous No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only decisions without a convincing argument.
  • As mentioned here, the consensus is that NRLEP warnings in trope page descriptions can use bold text so that they stand out.
  • The [[noreallife]] tag doesn't currently work. This is a deprecated tag that was introduced many years ago — originally, it would have displayed a NRLEP warning banner when you edited the page. However, there's been some staff conversation (Feb 2024) about what a new technical solution might look like, so we'd advise against deleting these from pages, at least until we have a decision as to whether it'll be fixed or replaced.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Mar 8th 2024 at 10:49:13 AM

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
MissConduct (Lucky 7)
#14778: Jun 25th 2023 at 3:32:21 PM

Crowner for June 25 - July 1:

Naked Nutter - Gossip, Too Controversial, nudity-related so Sex-adjacent

cwallace135 Since: Oct, 2022 Relationship Status: Singularity
#14779: Jun 25th 2023 at 3:39:02 PM

The Teetotaler is Characterization and Too Common. There are plenty of real people, myself included, who simply refuse to drink alcohol for various reasons.

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#14780: Jun 25th 2023 at 4:01:57 PM

I said this in the locked pages thread but I think it would be easier to just put all of the called crowner items in the sandboxes we have and then swap them in.

Macron's notes
MissConduct (Lucky 7)
#14781: Jun 25th 2023 at 7:25:00 PM

[up][up]yeah, The Teetotaller is Characterization and Gossip.

Parental Abandonment is Gossip, Too Commpn, and Too Controversial.

Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#14782: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:43:58 PM

[up][up][up]As a teetotaller myself, I agree that The Teetotaler is too common and attracts gossip.

Kirby is awesome.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14783: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:44:59 PM

God, why are people so intent on keeping Washington D.C. Invasion? I guess the description allergy strikes again :/

This is making me wonder how it's used on the wiki. Do people use it just for evil invasions? I'm gonna do a wick check tonight.

Edited by WarJay77 on Jun 25th 2023 at 12:45:48 PM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#14784: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:49:02 PM

[up]Washington, DC was invaded in real life before.

It was during the War of 1812 in retaliation for the American forces burning down York (which would later become Toronto upon incorporation in 1834).

This explains why there are votes in favour of keeping real-life examples for Washington D.C. Invasion.

Edited by Nen_desharu on Jun 25th 2023 at 12:49:52 PM

Kirby is awesome.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14785: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:49:55 PM

I'm aware of that, Nen.

But this is a trope about villains. It's a morality trope.

Hence "description allergy".

Edited by WarJay77 on Jun 25th 2023 at 12:50:08 PM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#14786: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:52:18 PM

[up]I strongly agree.

I voted in making Washington D.C. Invasion NRLEP anyways because the trope is supposed to be about villainous invaders (and British forces during the War of 1812 are not considered villainous for the purposes of this trope).

Edited by Nen_desharu on Jun 25th 2023 at 12:53:06 PM

Kirby is awesome.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14787: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:53:00 PM

Right, "evil invaders" was the point I was making tongue

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#14788: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:53:48 PM

[up]I just corrected my statement to be "villainous" rather than "evil" but my point still stands.

Kirby is awesome.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14789: Jun 25th 2023 at 9:55:54 PM

Anyway, if the wick check shows misuse then I suppose it doesn't matter how the crowner goes, since it'll end up in TRS anyway.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#14790: Jun 26th 2023 at 3:35:47 AM

I mean, yeah, it seems weird to make it NRLEP because of a definition that I would give better than 50 percent chances of being changed.

cwallace135 Since: Oct, 2022 Relationship Status: Singularity
#14791: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:13:36 AM

I’m pretty sure that Second Place Is for Losers is Gossip, Too Controversial, Too Common, and possibly Characterization. The trope seems to be about In-Universe reactions to getting second place, so when it’s applied to real life, it seems like it’s Too YMMV, since many people have differing opinions on second place.

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14792: Jun 26th 2023 at 10:16:58 AM

self thump due to accidental duplication when editing, real post below

Edited by WarJay77 on Jun 26th 2023 at 1:18:25 PM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#14793: Jun 26th 2023 at 10:17:58 AM

[up][up][up] Well, TBF I wasn't even considering TRS until literally last night because the crowner made it sink in that people don't see this trope right.

[up][up] I mean, besides maybe the Buzz Aldrin one the others are either just poking fun at situations where second place is losing, or a quote from someone who thinks this way.

Edited by WarJay77 on Jun 26th 2023 at 1:18:32 PM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WELCOME_BRIGADOR Precursor from Solo Nobre Since: Oct, 2019 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Precursor
#14794: Jun 26th 2023 at 11:36:13 AM

I apologize if there's a post somewhere that covers military natter, but is there one? I do think there is a difference between 'weird ballistics and trick shots' and war nerds spamming a page.

GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#14795: Jun 26th 2023 at 2:20:11 PM

I changed the Apologizes a Lot crowner entry to Apologises a Lot because the latter is the primary name for the trope, meaning it would be the one to list on the index and not the redirect.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#14796: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:06:47 PM

I want to bring up No OSHA Compliance to be potentially made NRLEP

It has an entire subpage for Real Life examples.

The thing is, the trope isn't about literally breaking regulations, or protocols. It's about a specific aesthetic. Big industrial spaces that are dangerous and unsafe and exist to be dangerous and unsafe for story reasons or for style points.

While the examples are like "They ignored reports that X was a danger and then Y disaster happened" or "Company Y was cutting corners!"

There's probably a further discussion to be had about how many non real-life examples are actually correct, but that's for another thread. The real life examples are definitely encouraging Trope Decay.

Edited by Ghilz on Jun 26th 2023 at 9:09:35 AM

AlicornGaia Adora, the High Priestess from Local sun temple Since: Sep, 2019 Relationship Status: The captain of her heart
Adora, the High Priestess
#14797: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:19:44 PM

Now that you mention it, yeah it seems better to mark it as NRLEP under narrative trope and too common.

Too common because well…

Narrative because it requires a place to just nice be unsafe for that part of the story.

"I just need one of you to come here to give your life to the sun god. It will be for the monkey city's glory."
miraculous Goku Black (Apprentice)
Goku Black
#14798: Jun 27th 2023 at 11:32:49 AM

Alright I'm bringing up OvershadowedByControversy.Real Life. The whole Thing as is is an absolute ROCEDJ clusterfuck. And often really random for what's a media site.

We're taking about Roman emperors, extramarital affairs on random polticians, the actions of us presidents, events and locations ? And just generally controversial people. The whole Thing is just a mess.

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#14799: Jun 27th 2023 at 11:59:16 AM

I'd like to point out that on The Coroner Doth Protest Too Much, only the bottom real life folder was deleted (the one in the "Suicide" example section). I'm pretty sure this was an oversight and the other two such folders should also be removed, but I figured I ought to confirm this first.

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
costanton11 Since: Mar, 2016
#14800: Jun 27th 2023 at 12:36:39 PM

[up][up] It also seems like it’s too common.

18th Feb '24 11:27:30 PM

Crown Description:

Vote up to either forbid all real life examples (No Real Life Examples Please) or forbid real life examples for specific subjects (Limited Real Life Examples Only); vote down to Keep Real Life Examples. To add a trope to a No Real Life Examples Please index or the Limited Real Life Examples Only index, its crowner option must meet the following criteria:
  • Stable 2:1 ratio needed for NRLEP or LRLEO
  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple of extra days to see if more votes come in.

After you bring up a trope for discussion, please try to wait at least a day or so for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

If an item has a (CLOSED) note, there is no need to vote on it: the result has already been decided and it's no longer up for discussion.

Total posts: 15,951
Top