Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#76: Feb 12th 2012 at 9:44:38 PM

Didn't we already have that standard in place for Image Pickin'?

Fight smart, not fair.
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#77: Feb 12th 2012 at 10:03:59 PM

Yes, I believe so.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#78: Feb 12th 2012 at 10:07:03 PM

Yep, we did. The only difference is now there's a warning.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#79: Feb 14th 2012 at 1:55:04 AM

IMO if we find an image that is better making a thread to see if others think so too is worth opening a thread... Otherwise people will just change the image themselves.

...Its not like we are overloaded here with threads (only 300 which is not much at all.) Very much against this here TRS however is fine.

Its just going to let JAFAAC rule all pages....

edited 14th Feb '12 2:02:01 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#80: Feb 14th 2012 at 6:03:54 AM

[up] I believe that it's fine as long as you have a concrete suggestion. If you start a thread with "I don't like this image, but I have no idea what else we could do", that's no good. That's basically what the IP sticky already says.

That said, I think the Big Box you see when you start an IP thread could use some improvement. It is literally asking for proof that an image is JAFAAC. I also think this Big Box should link to the aforementioned IP sticky.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#81: Feb 14th 2012 at 9:16:20 AM

Yes, if you have a better image and post it in the OP, you're good. If you just post "I think we could do better" not so much.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#82: Feb 14th 2012 at 9:22:45 AM

What do we do when an image is clearly bad but we don't have an improvement suggestion? I am asking because I couldn't give one in the thread about Monster.Doctor Who - although I wasn't suggesting a pull there.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#83: Feb 14th 2012 at 9:23:43 AM

Oh that is not what the message in the new thread page says... But [up][up][up] and[up][up] I completely agree with.

edited 14th Feb '12 9:24:17 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#84: Feb 14th 2012 at 9:24:21 AM

There you had a concrete argument why it was bad and pullworthy. Pullworthy doesn't need a replacement. It just needs you to state why it's worse than no image.

[up] That is what the page says. Thread require evidence. In the case of here's a suggestion for an image you're providing evidence that there are better images by suggesting one of your own.

edited 14th Feb '12 9:25:54 AM by shimaspawn

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#85: Feb 14th 2012 at 10:04:28 AM

If you think the image is bad, you should start a thread if and only if you a. provide a replacement suggestion or b. are proposing that it is worse than having no image at all.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
FinalStarman from Clinton, Massachusetts Since: Nov, 2011
#86: Feb 21st 2012 at 8:43:46 PM

Maybe this was covered already, but is it still okay to make Image Pickin' threads if you want input on which image to put on a page? Or whether your suggestion is okay? Under the big scary new thread header, those options are not covered. And there isn't quite the sense of urgency in Image Pickin that there is in Trope Repair Shop.

edited 21st Feb '12 8:57:07 PM by FinalStarman

I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#87: Feb 21st 2012 at 9:00:14 PM

I'll see about adding that into the list somewhere.

edited 21st Feb '12 9:00:56 PM by Willbyr

FinalStarman from Clinton, Massachusetts Since: Nov, 2011
#88: Feb 21st 2012 at 9:01:24 PM

[up] Ninja'd by you understanding what I was about to clarify. surprised

Yet another edit: I have also made a new thread about that in the Tech Wishlist. Um… I hope that's a valid thread. Good thing the Policy Notice doesn't extend to that subforum.

edited 21st Feb '12 9:05:18 PM by FinalStarman

I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#89: Feb 22nd 2012 at 4:20:11 AM

Here's what I was planning on adding to the list; does this address your question?

  • If you have an image that you think could work as a pic, you can suggest it; however, keep the quality criteria above in mind. Also, if you think it might fit a certain page, make sure that page doesn't already have a pic.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#90: Feb 22nd 2012 at 4:23:21 AM

Change "you can suggest it;" to "you can suggest it in an IP thread;" and it should be fine.

Also, what is the policy re IP threads like this and especially this one?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#91: Feb 22nd 2012 at 6:16:12 AM

[up] Both of those are valid threads, especially the latter. I'll make a note in the list.

EDIT: Changes made; how's it look?

edited 22nd Feb '12 6:41:54 AM by Willbyr

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#92: Feb 22nd 2012 at 9:18:08 AM

Looks pretty good for it.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#93: Feb 23rd 2012 at 5:42:06 AM

ETA: I just noticed that the Create IP function doesn't have a "Controversial Change" option in title-searching. Should it be included, given that it was added to the Criteria For Valid Image Pickin' Threads OP?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#94: Feb 23rd 2012 at 5:57:53 AM

Yes, "Controversial/Improper/Disputed Change" should be added (whichever of those three would be most adequate). We also need to add NSFW and Spoiler, and Copyrighted needs to be changed to Copyrighted/Watermarked. Also, there should be an Other category for the stuff like suggesting a pic, size limit, or fan art that merits a thread.

edited 23rd Feb '12 6:02:51 AM by Willbyr

FinalStarman from Clinton, Massachusetts Since: Nov, 2011
#95: Feb 23rd 2012 at 8:29:07 AM

I once made a thread to ask whether or not something was SFW. A thread called "NSFW" would give the wrong idea. So I kinda miss thread title creation, unless "Needs help" is the kind of generic thread title we like to see.

I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#96: Feb 23rd 2012 at 10:19:13 PM

The current IP pre-made title also lacks the ability to suggest an improvement without finding a problem with the original. Which I am marginally okay with since I suppose it prevents the "I just don't like it". Though that seems to raise 2 issues:

  1. People can now just change images without taking it to IP. Coz they can't take it to IP. Coz IP can only adress the 5 or so issues that are predefined. How are you going to tell someone "You should've taken it to IP when the system is made to not let them adress an issue.
  2. It prevents someone from suggesting an image that is even better than an other okay or even good image. Sometimes people find images that are just better and more illustrative, but that doesn't mean there's issues with the current image. Since you can now only make an IP thread to denounce a problem with a current image and not to suggest a new one, that can be an issue. Or not, but I guess that it means don't aim to improve an image.

Lastly, there's no message to make an IP thread for a page with no image. Are those verboten now? Coz the header makes it seem so.

edited 23rd Feb '12 10:23:22 PM by Ghilz

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#97: Feb 23rd 2012 at 10:52:55 PM

"Suggestion" is one of the stock thread titles, though, isn't it?

edited 23rd Feb '12 10:53:55 PM by troacctid

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#98: Feb 23rd 2012 at 10:58:44 PM

Nope, not on the list atm. BTW, Fast Eddie added "No Image" and "NSFW"

edited 23rd Feb '12 10:59:18 PM by Ghilz

JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#99: Feb 24th 2012 at 8:47:09 AM

Yeah, a generic "suggestion for improvement" might be a good addition to the list. I definitely think the list itself is a good idea; it forces people to identify why the images needs to be changed.

EDIT: I just checked it and "Suggestion" is on there.

edited 24th Feb '12 8:48:06 AM by JapaneseTeeth

Reaction Image Repository
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#100: Feb 29th 2012 at 6:49:57 PM

Here's a list of pages whose images or image subjects are considered set in stone by administrative request. (I'm reposting this in this thread so that it doesn't wind up in the Morgue, where I wouldn't be able to update it.)

If this list is missing anything (that is, you find a page with an image and an administrative note telling you to not touch it), let me know.

edited 29th Feb '12 6:55:52 PM by ShadowHog

Moon

Total posts: 9,742
Top