To me, the trope looks like a cycle which involves bad things at certain points, and the heroes happen to be in these points...
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanYes, that's exactly what the current definition is. An example of correct use would be the Reapers harvesting organic life to replicate themselves every 50,000 years in Mass Effect.
For background, this was discovered when Madrugada went to create a YKTTW for the phrase's idiomatic meaning (currently Catch-22 Dilemma, which the fox is planning to launch soon) and initially called it Vicious Circle because Cycle was taken.
edited 8th Jul '13 8:19:04 AM by StarSword
I am not sure if that YKTTW would be served with this name. To me "vicous cycle" is more of "feedback loop" than "catch-22".
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLooking at a few of the wicks above, I see most of them being about an actual cycle that perpetuates or feeds into itself. Which is what the phrase means in common language to my knowledge. That the trope page says "Not to be confused with Cycle of Revenge (though such a cycle is often called this, and with good reason)," is a bad sign to me, since that's one of the most common vicious cycles.
It needs at least a rename.
I don't think Vicious Cycle is a good name for the above YKTTW either. Catch-22 is about bouncing between two or more impossibilities (due to each other), and not really a cycle. It's more about being locked out of the loop than the loop itself. But why not call it what it's currently called?
edited 8th Jul '13 8:34:44 AM by AnotherDuck
Check out my fanfiction!@3: Septimus and Duck pretty much nail it on the head — trope is misusing the very phrase it's based on. And over half of the articles I noted use it in precisely this context.
To be fair, all of these account for perhaps a 25% total misuse ratio. But that's still 1 in every 4....
edited 8th Jul '13 9:14:16 AM by Stratadrake
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.Agree with rename. Cyclical Event, perhaps?
edited 8th Jul '13 10:11:05 AM by StarSword
I disagree. It seems to me that the trope as it is should be merged into Eternal Recurrence, and the name sent to YKTTW as the basis for what it actually means idiomatically (a supertrope for Cycle of Revenge).
If we determine it should be kept separate, however, something like Doomsday Cycle should work.
edited 8th Jul '13 10:21:55 AM by Noaqiyeum
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableHow many examples of Eternal Recurrence should be here, anyway?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLooking at the two tropes, that seems reasonable. The difference between the two seems to be... minute at best.
edited 8th Jul '13 10:23:31 AM by Larkmarn
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.The YKTTW is going to be Catch-22 Dilemma. Just clarifying that.
For this one, Cyclic Event Pattern, perhaps?
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.That is a good name for Eternal Recurrence and not so good for this.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI think the current definition should be merged into Eternal Recurrence, and the current page should be used for what it's mostly used for anyway, i.e. what "vicuous cycle / circle" means.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!Proposal: Once Madrugada gets Catch-22 Dilemma launched, redirect Vicious Cycle to it (or possibly disambiguate) and split the use between Catch-22 Dilemma, Eternal Recurrence, Cycle of Revenge, and any other tropes that we may find it to have been mistaken for.
edited 8th Jul '13 11:20:29 AM by StarSword
A "vicious cycle" is something completely different from a "catch-22". One is a situation that keeps getting worse, one is a choice where both options are bad.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!...not exactly. A choice where both options are bad is a Morton's Fork (of which a catch-22 is merely a subset).
A vicious cycle is a problem with an obvious solution, the consequences of which include restoring the problem and sometimes making it worse.
A catch-22 is a purported solution which is not logically possible, because any attempt to use it creates a situation which prevents it. E.g. "To be judged insane, you have to ask for a psychiatric evaluation; anyone who asks for an evaluation must be capable of rational thought and therefore sane".
The two can be and often are related, in that a catch-22 dilemma may lock characters into a vicious cycle, but this is not necessary. For instance, a catch-22 may force characters to pursue a course of action which is detrimental but not cyclic, or the cycle may be forced by conscious decision, emotional reaction, or information deficit, rather than an endemic trait of the situation itself.
In other words, vicious cycles are invariably escaped by Taking a Third Option, and a catch-22 is one way to eliminate the third option.
edited 8th Jul '13 12:30:01 PM by Noaqiyeum
The Revolution Will Not Be Tropeable^ This. I'd say, go with the idea of
- trope transplanting Vicious Cycle to what it's used to mean outside the wiki,
- merge the examples that are simply "A cycle of events repeat continuously" into Eternal Recurrence, and then
- decide if the current definition of Vicious Cycle ("the heroes are up against a hard deadline to solve the problem because a recurring event is due to happen soon") is even a trope.
Sorry, I got confused somehow. Let's try that again:
Merge existing definition of Vicious Cycle into Eternal Recurrence, make a new YKTTW for Vicious Cycle's idiomatic meaning (which I believe would make it the supertrope of Cycle of Revenge), and split the wicks between appropriate tropes.
edited 8th Jul '13 12:27:01 PM by StarSword
No, we're pretty much on the same page. I'm just suggesting that there might be a third trope in play as well where the heroes have a deadline because an Eternal Recurrence reset is due and they're the only ones who can stop it.
That's what the current Vicious Cycle seems to be trying to be — at least it's the only thing in the description section that differentiates it from Eternal Recurrence ("The bad news is, last time this happened was exactly 999 years and 360 days ago, and our heroes become involved, usually against their will, in the next iteration. Two outcomes can possibly occur: either they accept (or are forced to accept) their destiny and continue the cycle, or they reject it.")
edited 8th Jul '13 12:30:39 PM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.So the Vicious Cycle trope is about the deadline, then? I would've thought that would be a required part if the plot is built around the Eternal Recurrence.
edited 8th Jul '13 12:34:49 PM by StarSword
Don't we have Cosmic Deadline Celestial Deadline?
edited 8th Jul '13 1:14:39 PM by Noaqiyeum
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableNo, that seems to be a spell duration thing ("At the stroke of twelve the spell will be broken", yadda yadda). This is more like (to borrow an example from SG-1: "A Hundred Days"), "We have to get off this planet before it clips the edge of that asteroid field like it does every 150 years." In other words, Eternal Recurrence dictating the actions of the characters.
edited 8th Jul '13 1:53:50 PM by StarSword
Huh. You're right. But I could have sworn... oh, maybe I was thinking of Regularly Scheduled Evil.
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableBump. Anyone up for a vote on Madrugada's proposal?
edited 14th Jul '13 3:49:44 PM by StarSword
Hoo boy, this one is a mess:
First, the description seems to me to be just "heroes discover that the impending End of the World is just the latest incarnation of an Eternal Recurrence" — The Same But More Specific.
But the bigger fish however is that the name is already well established as a synonym for "vicious circle": A self-reinforcing cycle ("feedback loop") typically along a downward spiral — Cycle of Revenge is a valid Sub-Trope for this definition. The term is also used as a synonym for a catch-22, as figuring out how to break such a cycle may (but not always) resemble one. (As an example, consider Final Fantasy X — an Eternal Recurrence due to You Kill It, You Bought It; there is no catch-22.)
In other words, the trope was named after something that has little (if anything) to do with its actual definition.
The usage of this trope is all over the place. The following is an excerpt from all 187 wikilinks:
Suspect misuse (22)
(Not involving an apocalyptic cycle as required by the current definition, but with such a murky definition it's hard to tell for sure)Misuse specifically for "self-perpetuating feedback loop" (27)
Zero Context Example
Other
It also has a few bad in-page examples, like the "cycle of isolation" cited under its Real Life section.
edited 8th Jul '13 3:06:06 PM by Stratadrake
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.