Follow TV Tropes

Following

Rename (alt titles 5/15): Intelligent Gerbil

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Apr 15th 2012 at 11:59:00 PM
Nohbody "In distress", my ass. from Somewhere in Dixie Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
"In distress", my ass.
#1: Jul 20th 2011 at 1:27:19 AM

I've recently found and started keeping an eye on The Conquerors Trilogy, where one of the entries was about Intelligent Gerbil... except that it was using the trope wrong, so the entry was deleted.

Anyway, I went to look on the trope page itself, and at a glance more than a few people are using the trope to mean "looks similar to Earth animals", whereas the trope seems to me to be about aliens with behaviors of Earth animals that are given sapience.

As I'm not familiar with many of the sources, though, I can't really tell for sure if the examples actually fit the trope. Assuming I'm not misunderstanding the trope (entirely possible, but I doubt it), could someone give a hand cleaning this page up?

edited 20th Jul '11 1:27:40 AM by Nohbody

All your safe space are belong to Trump
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#2: Jul 20th 2011 at 11:57:26 AM

I've been planning on taking this to TRS myself. As came up in this conversation in World Building, it looks like your interpretation is pretty widespread, and it is definitely incorrect. The one-line definition of Intelligent Gerbil is what I quoted there -

The Intelligent Gerbil school of extraterrestrials basically involves taking a terrestrial animal, making it extremely anthropomorphic, bipedal, and sapient, but deriving the vast majority of its characteristics from the terrestrial animal's behavior.

- it is not about aliens that look like Earth animals.

Unfortunately, I'm not quite sure what to do here, as Intelligent Gerbil isn't just a term we made up ourselves.

Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#3: Jul 20th 2011 at 7:37:37 PM

Which gets more weight, a pre-existing term or in-wiki misuse?

I see no problem with, for example, a rename that ends with the article opening up that it is also called an "Intelligent Gerbil".

edited 20th Jul '11 7:38:24 PM by Stratadrake

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#4: Jul 20th 2011 at 7:50:51 PM

Which gets more weight, a pre-existing term or in-wiki misuse?

I'm reasonably certain it's supposed to be preexisting terms. The issue is that I'm not sure if this really is one or not - while we didn't coin it, I don't know if it's actually used off-site besides in the original essay that it came from.

Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#5: Jul 20th 2011 at 8:09:16 PM

Why don't we consult the all-knowing overlord?

  • intelligent gerbil: 198,000
    Aside from TV Tropes dominating the top three results (including this thread), most of the first page is about actual pet gerbils or rodents.

    • intelligent gerbil -tropes: 220,000
      Minus TV Tropes, almost the entire first page is still about pet care.

  • "intelligent gerbil": 1,080
    Wow. Just ... wow.

    • "intelligent gerbil" -tropes: 500

edited 20th Jul '11 8:11:45 PM by Stratadrake

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#6: Jul 20th 2011 at 8:19:50 PM

That seems pretty decisive, then. I'm now leaning towards a Trope Transplant, especially since we don't actually have a trope to cover what the misuse is.

Nohbody "In distress", my ass. from Somewhere in Dixie Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
"In distress", my ass.
#7: Jul 21st 2011 at 5:36:15 AM

I think I may have not made myself sufficiently clear.

From what I read, it looked like more than a few of the examples were only about appearance, and didn't mention anything at all about behaviors based on the Earth animals they vaguely resemble. That's what I was viewing as a misuse, not the degree of visual similarity to Earth animals.

All your safe space are belong to Trump
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#8: Jul 21st 2011 at 8:27:36 AM

If I may, the misuse argument at this point is only alleged (someone check and document your findings). On the other hand, Google reports that the pre-existing term is not in widespread use, therefore failing the requirement for pre-existing term immunity. Aside from here, I can't seem to find any Wiki articles on it whatsoever: A search for "intelligent gerbil" wiki -tropes scores less than 100 results!

edited 21st Jul '11 8:29:23 AM by Stratadrake

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#9: Oct 27th 2011 at 11:51:54 AM

Let me do a full check on all the wikilinks...

Definitely correct - aliens based on Earth animals in appearance and characterization

Related tropes using the term at face value

Other references to the term at face value only

Misusing the term entirely

Playing the name literally, correctness unclear

Mentioning only the visual anthropomorphism, characterization unclear

Too difficult / not bothering to classify

Little to no context

Indexes


So far we've got about 10 correct usages, 15 referencing it by name (that's a total of 25%), and a small selection which are missing the point entirely. The rest is a mixed bag that I can't quite figure out. Help?

edited 13th Apr '12 8:47:36 PM by Stratadrake

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
petrie911 Since: Aug, 2009
#10: Oct 27th 2011 at 2:57:17 PM

So, this trope is something along the lines of Alien Funny Animals or Alien Talking Animals, correct?

Belief or disbelief rests with you.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#11: Oct 27th 2011 at 3:30:43 PM

Sort of, but the key element is that they also act like the Earth animal they're based off of. A species of literal intelligent alien gerbils would not qualify unless they exhibited gerbil-like behavior, for instance.

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#13: Jan 11th 2012 at 1:16:50 PM

So the requirements are the following?

  • not human
  • sapient (having language, culture, and similar)
  • appears similar to earth animal
  • behaves similar to earth animal

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Myra Since: Oct, 2011
KaiserMazoku Since: Apr, 2011
#15: Mar 11th 2012 at 12:56:22 PM

I would support a rename. This title has always bothered me and by the looks of it is subject to rampant misuse.

abk0100 Since: Aug, 2011
#16: Mar 11th 2012 at 5:46:35 PM

[up]Where are you getting that from?

Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#17: Mar 12th 2012 at 8:59:37 AM

Post #9. 100% Wick Check, feel free to debate/fix any problems with the examples cited.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
pawsplay Since: Jan, 2001
#18: Mar 12th 2012 at 9:46:06 AM

The Bee People and Cat Folk references are mostly correct; in fact, those aren't just related, those are subtropes.

Mentions under Funny Animal, Petting-Zoo People, Rubber-Forehead Aliens and Starfish aliens look correct.

The mention under Kemonomimi uses, and restates, the definition of this trope correctly.

Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#19: Mar 12th 2012 at 8:48:33 PM

I feel obligated to point out that nowhere in my check did I label any group as "misuse" - I just tried to sort them by theme. For example, using the term at face value isn't a problem when you're listing compare/contrast tropes.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#20: Apr 12th 2012 at 5:56:55 AM

Clocking for lack of activity.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
ArcadesSabboth from Mother Earth Since: Oct, 2011
#21: Apr 12th 2012 at 2:06:04 PM

Out of the wick check, only the Alakazam Pokemon one, and the alien that looks like a bus-sized apatosaur with human psychology, appear clearly wrong to me.

Given that sorting misuse out of that wick check basically probably requires reading/watching each work to see if animal-like psychology is not present, finding a real misuse rate and correcting the wicks may be impossible.

Which isn't to say that those wicks aren't misuse. That the editors saw no need to describe alien psychology rather clearly shows they missed the point of this trope. And the name is neither clear nor widely used outside this wiki.

Given all that, I prefer a trope transplant over a strait rename. Move the original meaning to a new page with a new name, and keep Intelligent Gerbil, with its examples and wicks, as the supertrope to Insectoid Aliens and The Reptilians. I suppose it'd also be a subtrope to Petting-Zoo People. Perhaps use Petting Zoo Aliens as a redirect.

Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#22: May 12th 2012 at 7:31:34 AM

Bumping for votes.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#23: May 15th 2012 at 10:21:11 AM

Calling crowner in favor of renaming Intelligent Gerbil

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#24: May 15th 2012 at 10:25:45 AM

Please brainstorm names before hooking up a crowner. It works better that way.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#25: May 15th 2012 at 10:28:35 AM

[up] There's several names mentioned earlier in the thread, they're on the crowner now.

PageAction: IntelligentGerbil
12th Apr '12 6:20:40 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 59
Top