Follow TV Tropes

Following

Ambiguous Name: Lets You And Him Fight

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Feb 11th 2015 at 11:59:00 PM
acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#51: Aug 25th 2015 at 1:37:36 PM

I'd say the name is still ambiguous even if the definition issue was resolved.

If this trope is going to be solely for 'third party manipulates two separate opponents into fighting each other instead' then we need to make a 'in a cross over, heroes will fight for some reason' YKTTW to help the clean up.

Taking that one to the shop if there are no objections.

I'd also suggest tweaking the trope definition such that it doesnt use an Example As Thesis. The two people investigating the same case thing is an example of what the trope can be, but not a good definition per se. The iamge and stuff also implies the crossover dynamic, which is not required.

edited 25th Aug '15 1:45:22 PM by acrobox

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#52: Aug 30th 2015 at 4:21:53 PM

Sandbox

See Sandbox above for redefined Lets You and Him Fight that moves it away from the superhero crossover.

Ay other suggestions. 'm going to do a writer up for the Marvel Misunderstanding / Cross Over Throw Down or whatever we want to call the obligatory crossover battle.

edited 30th Aug '15 4:23:16 PM by acrobox

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#53: Sep 1st 2015 at 7:46:25 PM

Should I go ahead so we can close this one?

eyebones Since: Apr, 2004
#54: Sep 1st 2015 at 8:28:48 PM

[tdown]The current article is more entertaining. No fix required, I'd say.

For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. — H.L. Mencken
acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#55: Sep 1st 2015 at 11:38:47 PM

The current article isn't going away wholesale. I'm probably going to cut and paste most of it into the Cross Over Throw Down trope.

DarkPhoenix94 Since: Jan, 2015
#56: Sep 3rd 2015 at 10:26:14 AM

I never saw a problem with it, but I suppose I see the points being made.

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#57: Sep 4th 2015 at 12:25:57 PM

The other option i guess is to take Lets You and Him fight, the new version to the YKTTW and reword the current version into Cross Over Throw Down.

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#58: Sep 6th 2015 at 9:51:13 AM

I updated the Sandbox, to account for btoh tropes.

which one goes to YKTTW and which one becomes the new definition/name?

Should we do a wick check to see what Let's You and Him Fight is more commonly used for?

edited 6th Sep '15 9:52:01 AM by acrobox

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#60: Sep 15th 2015 at 1:26:31 PM

I personally think that you got it right in the Sandbox. But I guess a wick check wouldn't hurt.

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#61: Oct 1st 2015 at 2:00:21 PM

Agreed, though it'll pose as quite the task. Just checked the wick count and it's at 1053.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Artificius from about a foot and a half away from a monitor. Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Norwegian Wood
#62: Oct 1st 2015 at 8:56:19 PM

Something like "Amused antagonist, dueling deuteragonists?" Or "Mal's wrench," for the time it was used in Serenity?

edited 1st Oct '15 9:07:13 PM by Artificius

"I have no fear, for fear is the little death that kills me over and over. Without fear, I die but once."
Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#63: Oct 2nd 2015 at 10:50:16 AM

@61: Well, I think the usual rule is that if there are too many wicks, you can do a random selection (~10% or so).

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#64: Oct 2nd 2015 at 11:13:17 AM

[up] That sounds a lot feasible!

Unfortunately, I am in no position to check wicks, as I'm on a mobile at the moment, and I'm busy with other wick-related stuff for other pages. If anyone wants to volunteer, that would be awesome.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#65: Oct 5th 2015 at 7:03:07 PM

I already did a wick check earlier in the thread but I suppose making another a year later wouldn't hurt.....

Macron's notes
acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#66: Oct 5th 2015 at 8:50:15 PM

Actually hey, does the wick check actually matter at this point.

If we're already agreed to split off the tropes, shouldn't we just move examples that are one or the other into the new tropes?

What difference would finding the wicks make to the clean up effort?

edited 5th Oct '15 8:51:49 PM by acrobox

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#67: Oct 18th 2015 at 11:44:33 PM

Wick Check

Looking for versions that use one guy manipulating two others to fight so he doesnt have to (Type 1) vs. obligatory fight between heroes in a cross over (Type 2)

RESULT

  • 12 cases of Type 1 - people fighting because they've been manipulated by a third party,
  • 10 cases of clear type 2 - heroes fighting heroes in a crossover, with a few borderline cases (does the Bat Family Crossover count?)
  • 9 misuse cases of type 2, heroes fighting heroes, but no crossover or manipulation or just a ZCE
  • 2 cases of overall misuse

So its about even. Predictably on super hero works pages or crossover pages its used for obligatory hype crossover battle. On other pages its usually used for manipulating two factions into fighting each other. But there are also broader misuse cases that are hype battle between heroes with no crossover involved, but don't have enough plot context to know if its Headbutting Heroes, Defeat Means Friendship, Fighting Your Friend, Fighting the Lancer etc. But as maybe meant to be supertrope to all of those.

Thoughts?

Should we just migrate crossover examples to Cross Over Throw Down and throw out the ZCE or heroes fighting, but no crossover examples.

edited 18th Oct '15 11:52:34 PM by acrobox

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#68: Oct 20th 2015 at 6:04:46 AM

Looking at that sample, we could migrate the crossover examples to their own trope. Shouldn't hurt. As for the misuses, I think we could get rid of those.

Also, for the Smash Bros example, it's Brawl, not 64, as Pit wasn't in 64, but I digress.

Edit: [down] Sounds like a plan! [tup]

edited 20th Oct '15 7:42:02 AM by Berrenta

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#69: Oct 20th 2015 at 6:57:24 AM

You've done great work on that wick check! Yes, it clearly shows that those 2 meanings are the prevalent here. Type 2 deserves to be split as its own trope (Crossover Throw Down).

As for the non-crossover misuse, I'd support the idea of YKTTW'ing it, as a possible general supertrope to Crossover Throw Down and others.

Maybe we should have Crossover Throw Down go through YKTTW as well, just to polish it out.

acrobox Since: Nov, 2010
#70: Oct 25th 2015 at 2:54:49 PM

Well I sent it there, but I feel like its going to get bogged down in another level of committee.

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#71: Dec 30th 2015 at 11:46:38 PM

Where's the link?

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#73: Jan 1st 2016 at 2:23:15 PM

Locking as part of New Years Purge

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Add Post

PageAction: LetsYouAndHimFight
18th Oct '14 1:56:58 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 73
Top