Follow TV Tropes

Following

Not Tropeworthy: The Great Player Versus Player Debate

Go To

FSharp Useful Note Since: Jan, 2019 Relationship Status: What is this thing you call love?
Useful Note
#1: Dec 18th 2023 at 3:38:10 AM

To-do list:

Move The Great Player Versus Player Debate's contents to Analysis.Player Killing. Any subjective wicks can be moved to Scrappy Mechanic if they do not fit Player Killing. Any wicks that do not fit another trope should be deleted.

    Original post 
The Great Player Versus Player Debate is a debate over whether player characters should be able to attack each other at all times, or only when certain conditions are met. It cannot be a trope because it pertains to discussions and opinions that occur outside of the game itself. However, there is a mention of "a PVP system that is somewhere between 'consensual only' and 'completely unrestricted,'" which could be a trope.

In addition to the "Not Tropeworthy" reason, the page is also "Not Thriving." There are no examples on the page. However, a Wick Check reveals 3 examples from work pages and 14 other mentions of the page, including potholes. It may not have been necessary to check all the wicks that aren't examples. However, because they make up the majority of wicks, and there are less than 50 of them, I have checked them all. Here are the results:

  • Examples
    • Correct use (1/17, 6%)
    • Partial context (1/17, 6%)
    • No context (1/17, 6%)
  • Other Wicks
    • Correct use (4/17, 24%)
    • No context (6/17, 35%)
    • Misuse (1/17, 6%)
    • Miscellaneous (3/17, 18%)

A few things could be done with this page. Perhaps a Crowner could be made with the following options:

I am leaning towards making the page YMMV because it's about differences of opinion.

Wick Check

    open/close all folders 

    Correct In-Universe Example (1/17) 
Absolute Sword Strata:

Tropes associated with Rockwald:

  • The Great Player Versus Player Debate: PvP is unrestricted in the game, but Player Killing is frowned upon. Shisou tries his best to alleviate the issue. His dev-guild, the Sleeping Forest is one of the largest guilds in the game, to the point it's assumed its members are everywhere. Its members are required to only engage in PvP in Colosseums, after being attacked, or in agreed-to duels; and if a Sleeping Forest member witnesses griefing behaviour, the guild answers by sending squads of appropriately-named Punishers to return the favor.

    Partial-Context Example + Work Page (1/17) 
Guild Wars:
  • The Great Player Versus Player Debate: PvE and PvP are segregated. Some players and guilds only focus on one or the other, and the strategies for each are vastly different.
    • Guild Wars 2 is similar, limiting PvP to specific areas and events. The addition of WvW in Guild Wars 2 blends both, however, allowing large scale PvP battles in large open maps dedicated to the gamemode.

    Zero-Context Example + Work Page (1/17) 
Star Pirates:

    Correct + Not an Example + Trope Page (4/17) 
Compare The Great Player Versus Player Debate, which is this spread into MMORPG paradigms. One of the major issues of The Great Player Versus Player Debate. Some games have both a PvP mode and a PvE mode. In some cases, the two modes occur at the same time, like in most MMORPGs. In World of Warcraftnote , the player character can be busy with a quest vs. computer generated monsters in an outdoor zone, and be ambushed by enemy players nearby. This can be either irritating or exhilarating, depending on your mood and tolerance for fellow players, forming the basis of The Great Player Versus Player Debate.

    No Context + Not an Example + Subpage (1/17) 
Video Games:

    No Context + Not an Example + Trope Page (2/17) 
City Guards:
  • On the other side of the coin, some of the guards in earlier Ultima games were just way stronger than your characters, at least at first. In addition, many MMOs use City Guards which are pretty well leveled, largely to keep PVP from getting out of hand.
PVP Balanced: See An Adventurer Is You and The Great Player Versus Player Debate.

    No Context + Not an Example + Work Page (3/17) 
  • BoxxyQuest: The Gathering Storm:
    • Take That!: Basically every website gets slammed for something.
      • In GameFAQs, the player is sent to collect four orbs, each related to an aspect of video games: plot, puzzles, platforming, and player-versus-player combat. The first three are at the end of a long and complex system of dungeons. The last one is sitting in a random field outside of town being guarded by a literal baby.
  • City of Heroes:
Player-vs-Player combat was limited to restricted areas and is not necessary for game or level progress, although certain bonuses could be gathered by risking yourself in these areas.

    Misuse + Not an Example + Subpage (1/17) 
Dragon Nest:

    Miscellaneous (3/17) 
Pages Needing Wicks: GIFT Wicks:

VideoGame.Ultima Online

Amonimus: note 
  • The Great Player Versus Player Debate: No examples, not a trope.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Dec 22nd 2023 at 3:09:52 AM

Welcome to Corneria!
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#2: Dec 18th 2023 at 5:33:34 AM

Opening.

I would prefer either Useful Note or Definition Only. If people want it cut, that's fine too.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#3: Dec 18th 2023 at 5:44:24 AM

This is pretty much Analysis.Player Killing, so either cut it or redirect to Player Killing. The YMMV aspect can be handled by Scrappy Mechanic.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Sid-Starkiller Since: Jan, 2021
#4: Dec 18th 2023 at 7:55:27 AM

Per[up] I kinda like the idea of reworking into an analysis page for Player Killing

number9robotic (Experienced Trainee)
#5: Dec 18th 2023 at 11:09:47 AM

My vote to make it an analysis page for Player Killing. [tup]

Thanks for playing King's Quest V!
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#6: Dec 18th 2023 at 11:29:53 AM

[tup] Make into an Analysis page.

back lol
StalkerGamer Memetic Loser Mother Since: Dec, 2021 Relationship Status: Love is an open door
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#8: Dec 18th 2023 at 1:24:21 PM

I'm in favor of Amonimus's proposal. I don't think the page is worth keeping separate from those pages.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
RandomTroper123 She / Her from I'll let you guess... (Not-So-Newbie) Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#10: Dec 18th 2023 at 10:36:02 PM

Is it good as-is or it needs more proofreading to fit Analysis/?

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#11: Dec 19th 2023 at 9:09:22 AM

Analysis page for me

Kirby is awesome.
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#12: Dec 19th 2023 at 1:04:32 PM

I think Analysis.Player Versus Player is probably a better choice than Analysis.Player Killing, but otherwise agreed with the idea of de-troping this.

Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#13: Dec 19th 2023 at 1:38:21 PM

[up]I agree. It can also include examples of player characters not being killed per se.

Kirby is awesome.
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#14: Dec 19th 2023 at 2:02:41 PM

It seems like there's agreement that this page's test belongs on an Analysis page even if there's some disagreement regarding which trope's Analysis page it should be moved to, so we could vote on which trope's Analysis page would be the target of the move.

Maybe it would also be worth disambiguating the old name between the new Analysis page and Scrappy Mechanic per what Amonimus said about at least some of the subjective examples fitting the latter.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#15: Dec 19th 2023 at 2:10:51 PM

Player Versus Player can mean a lot of things including just competitive multiplayer with leaderboards, while Player Killing is more specifically targeting other players online. Despite the title, The Great Player Versus Player Debate is about pros and cons of players getting killed in public areas in MMO without their consent. At least, how I read it.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
GastonRabbit MOD Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#16: Dec 20th 2023 at 9:52:20 AM

Since this is a wick-starved page, I hooked a crowner sooner than usual.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
FSharp Useful Note Since: Jan, 2019 Relationship Status: What is this thing you call love?
Useful Note
#17: Dec 20th 2023 at 5:34:40 PM

I notice that the Analysis main page says "Each analysis page comprises several essays." However, if we were to move The Great Player Versus Player Debate to Analysis.Player Killing, the page would contain only one essay, making it unfit for the Analysis namespace. What should we do about this? I hesitate to change the definition of an entire namespace, but there seems to be no better place for this page. I also don't think it makes sense to write a second essay on Player Killing just so this can qualify for the Analysis namespace. Perhaps someone who is more familiar with the Analysis namespace could tell me how important it is for an Analysis page to have multiple essays.

Edited by FSharp on Dec 20th 2023 at 8:39:22 AM

Welcome to Corneria!
JHD0919 One-Track Mind (he/him) from a 12-pack of Diet Coke (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Abstaining
One-Track Mind (he/him)
#18: Dec 20th 2023 at 6:48:28 PM

[up]The page says "Each analysis page comprises several essays," not "Each analysis page must consist of several essays." It's not wiki policy for an Analysis page to have more than one essay.

I'm lovin' it. (My Troper Wall)
AbsoluteRainbow Absolute Rainbow & the tales between worlds from Hanoi, Vietnam Since: Jul, 2023
Absolute Rainbow & the tales between worlds
#19: Dec 20th 2023 at 6:51:12 PM

[up][up]+[up][up][up][up]

Put it in Player Killing. Anything YMMV moves to Scrappy Mechanic.

Edited by AbsoluteRainbow on Dec 20th 2023 at 9:51:35 PM

Absolute Rainbow
GastonRabbit MOD Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#20: Dec 22nd 2023 at 1:08:32 AM

Calling in favor of moving The Great Player Versus Player Debate's contents to Analysis.Player Killing. As previously mentioned, any subjective examples can be moved to Scrappy Mechanic.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#21: Dec 22nd 2023 at 1:54:42 AM

We're done, so locking up.

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Add Post

20th Dec '23 9:50:24 AM

Crown Description:

  • The Great Player Versus Player Debate is a debate over whether player characters should be able to attack each other at all times, or only when certain conditions are met. It cannot be a trope because it pertains to discussions and opinions that occur outside of the game itself. However, there is a mention of "a PVP system that is somewhere between 'consensual only' and 'completely unrestricted,'" which could be a trope.
  • In addition to the "Not Tropeworthy" reason, the page is also "Not Thriving." There are no examples on the page. However, a Wick Check reveals 3 examples from work pages and 14 other mentions of the page, including potholes. It may not have been necessary to check all the wicks that aren't examples. However, because they make up the majority of wicks, and there are less than 50 of them, and all of them were checked.
  • What should be done with The Great Player Versus Player Debate?

Total posts: 21
Top