Follow TV Tropes

Following

Queer Character, Queer Actor

Go To

SamCurt Since: Jan, 2001
#1: Nov 3rd 2022 at 10:28:29 AM

When I first came across Queer Character, Queer Actor, I take it to be used in the same way as Disabled Character, Disabled Actor, in that the character and the actor should be at a somewhat similar location on the LGBT+ spectrum, so the following hypothetical example would definitively count:

  • In The Adventures of Alice and Bob, Alice, a lesbian, is played by the openly lesbian Clara.

In the following case, I would read that as close enough to work:

  • In The Adventures of Alice and Bob, Alice, a lesbian, is played by the openly bisexual Clara.

However, on the trope page, I noticed a few examples like the following:

  • In The Adventures of Alice and Bob, Alice, a lesbian, is played by the openly nonbinary Clara.

Would the latter really be in the scope of this trivia trope? I personally don't think so, since homosexuality and nonbinary gender are not all that similar, but I admit I'm not all that familiar with the LGBT+ spectrum to decide on this. Can anyone here please give me some guidance?

Scientia et Libertas | Per Aspera ad Astra Nova
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#2: Nov 3rd 2022 at 11:00:17 AM

You're correct that sexual preference (and romantic preference), and gender identity are different axes on the spectrum, of which I think it is most accurate to recognize six: sex assigned at birth, actual physical sex, gender presentation (i.e. what they prefer to look like with clothes on), gender identity (generally correlates to pronoun preference), sexual preference, and romantic preference. (The last two tend to be the same but aren't always: there are even rare cases like heteroromantic homosexual where a person becomes romantically attached to people of the opposite sex but is sexually aroused by the same sex.)

A while ago I made this breakdown of some fictional characters in Ask The Tropers to help with the discussion that eventually spawned the character pronouns thread:

    Open for Explanation 
A basic "straight" character would be Himura Kenshin.
  • Sex assigned at birth: male
  • Sex: male
  • Gender identity: male
  • Presentation: male
  • Sexual/romantic preference: gynophilic (prefers women)

For Honjou Kamatari it gets a bit more complicated:

  • Sex assigned at birth: male
  • Sex: male
  • Gender identity: male
  • Presentation: female (he's a Villainous Crossdresser)
  • Sexual/romantic preference: androphilic (prefers men)

A stranger one, Pete Reston from Reign of the Seven Spellblades:

  • Sex assigned at birth: male
  • Sex: Varies by the day because he's a Sex Shifter.
  • Gender identity: Ambiguous. The English version uses he/him even after he comes out as a Sex Shifter, but the novels discuss probable dysphoric episodes (not mentioned in the manga), suggesting "demiboy" or "agender" would be more correct than "male".
  • Presentation: male
  • Sexual/romantic preference: androphilic (my guess, on the grounds that he's turning into a bit of a tsundere towards the cisgender male primary viewpoint character Oliver Horn)

And moving away from manga, Parvati Holcolm from The Outer Worlds, who was intentionally written as a homoromantic asexual (one of the edge cases I mentioned earlier).

  • Sex assigned at birth: female
  • Sex: female
  • Gender identity: female
  • Presentation: female
  • Sexual orientation: asexual
  • Romantic preference: gynophilic

So, getting back on topic, while technically it is accurate that an other-than-straight character played by an other-than-cisgender actor is an LGBT+ or "Queer" character played by an LGBT+ actor, they're queer on different axes of the spectrum, which does seem a little odd to me.

Edited by StarSword on Nov 4th 2022 at 2:31:31 PM

VampireBuddha Calendar enthusiast from Ireland (Wise, aged troper) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Calendar enthusiast
#3: Nov 3rd 2022 at 12:52:08 PM

Something I've noticed that goes beyond this wiki is that people are so used to the LGBT(etc) acronym that they act as if LGBT is all one thing, when Tness is entirely independent of LGBness. I've also seen individuals be referred to as LGBT, when they usually aren't T, and L, G, and B in this context are mutually exclusive. This also causes cognitive dissonance when lefties, particularly on social media, encounter transphobic gay people; again, they are so used to lumping together everybody who isn't cishet in one group that they have trouble with the idea that LGB people might not approve of T people.

The issue Sam raises is a manifestation of this. Progressives and lefties use the term LGBT so much that they don't realise the letters stand for different, orthogonal things, and mentally divide the world into cishet people and non-cishet people. So when someone writes an example like "Alice, a lesbian, is played by a transwoman", they don't realise those two things have nothing to do with each other - after all, lesbians aren't cishet and transwomen aren't cishet, so it's the same thing, right?

Star Sword's breakdown is extensive and pedantic, which is good (pedantic should not be a dirty word).

Hmm. I kind of feel like the trope could do with being split in two, one for shared sexual/romantic orientation, and one for shared gender identity/expression.

Ukrainian Red Cross
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#4: Nov 3rd 2022 at 12:57:16 PM

I, uh, certainly wouldn't just attach this to "progressives and lefties" since I'm pretty sure a majority of people do in fact understand that being trans and being gay are two different things. That's not the problem we have and it's honestly a very baseless and rude claim to make, especially without actual evidence.

The problem is that the trope lumps everything together, so thus far there's nothing that's actually stopping anyone from using examples like these even when they don't make sense. It's the trope's broadness that's at fault, especially if there's no measures in place to make sure people don't do these kind of things... Since technically speaking, these examples aren't actually misuse.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
VampireBuddha Calendar enthusiast from Ireland (Wise, aged troper) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Calendar enthusiast
#5: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:12:22 PM

[up]OK, I'll amend my statement to "a portion of lefties..." (right-wingers tend not to even recognise transgenderism and nonbinarity as existing. Iran does, but only to deny the existence of homosexuality).

In any case, the page shows that such confusion is clearly happening.

Ukrainian Red Cross
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#6: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:16:14 PM

Again, I don't think there's any evidence to support the idea that people are confused, I just think people like these LGBT+ related tropes and like to shoehorn the concepts everywhere, even when the result is ultimately nonsensical or waters down the actual meaning of the trope (as we saw with things like Badass Gay and Bi The Way). Combine that with the broadness of the concept, and...

I mean, we're using the term "queer", which is a broad term that could even be considered a general umbrella term at times. If being trans and being gay are both considered being "queer" in some way, then it only makes sense that people would think the trope allows for such connections to be made.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#7: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:27:12 PM

The sister trope, Disabled Character, Disabled Actor, doesn't seem to have the same problem. I don't see any instances of "This Deaf actor played this blind character" or "This diabetic actor played this paraplegic character". Regardless of who is making such a mistake outside of our editors, it is more useful to discuss how to reduce such misuse, since we seem to agree that this is a mistake.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
badtothebaritone (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Snooping as usual
#8: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:31:59 PM

I say we require that whatever "queer" aspects apply to the character need to also apply to the actor.

Edited by badtothebaritone on Nov 3rd 2022 at 3:32:14 AM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:35:43 PM

"The casting directors may not have been actually looking for someone queer to play such roles, but the actors were deemed best for the roles which may be because of the genuine portrayal. Note that though the actor and character may both be queer they may not identify the same way. In this way, the trope may be downplayed or sometimes invoked because of the casting directors wanting an openly queer actor in the role and settling for whatever they can find."

So, yeah, the trope in it's current state openly allows for mismatching connections. I think this would need a TRS fix.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#10: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:40:41 PM

Do we really want to be so exact? I am wary of being so detail oriented about a creator's sexuality, which might not even be clear to them let alone the public. I have no doubt the lesbian experience is different from the bisexual experience, but if they were just looking to cast a WLW role...?

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#11: Nov 3rd 2022 at 1:43:15 PM

That's a good question. I was mostly stuck on the trans part, which is obviously different from sexual orientation and shouldn't be lumped.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Hello83433 (Lucky 7) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
#12: Nov 3rd 2022 at 2:17:57 PM

I think an actor being a different sexuality than their character (so long as they're not straight) is an okay difference, but the trivia item should specify transgender characters being played by transgender actors or agender characters played by agender actors. Or simply, sexualities can be mixed and matched and gender identities can be mixed and matched, but the trope shouldn't mix the two together (unless the example is about multiple identities like a transgender lesbian character played by a transgender lesbian actor).

Maybe just adding a sentence or two like that would be enough to curb misuse?

CSP Cleanup Thread | All that I ask for ... is diamonds and dance floors
EmeraldSource Since: Jan, 2021
#13: Nov 3rd 2022 at 3:07:50 PM

Disabled Character, Disabled Actor does have a few examples of "character has OCD, actor has Parkinsons." But definitely Queer Character, Queer Actor suffers more from incidental examples rather than something chosen in tandem with the actor. Perhaps we need a clarification to try and keep the labels in the same direction, like a distinction between sexual preference and gender identity, but if it doesn't work maybe a split is needed.

Do you not know that in the service one must always choose the lesser of two weevils!
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#14: Nov 3rd 2022 at 4:42:19 PM

Disabled Character, Disabled Actor I think has a terrain advantage of being a subtrope of Written-In Infirmity: either the actor's disability is so obvious it couldn't possibly be confused with anything else (e.g. a paraplegic actor playing a paraplegic character), or it's using an actor with one disability to portray a different disability with similar symptoms (e.g. The Good Wife with Michael J. Fox's Parkinson's written in as Louis Canning's tardive dyskinesia).

Whereas with Queer Character, Queer Actor, the actor might not actually be the combination of sexuality and gender identity they portray, but they might have the expertise to do it convincingly, while still letting the studio dodge accusations of Unfortunate Implications by casting a straight actor.

SamCurt Since: Jan, 2001
#15: Nov 3rd 2022 at 7:03:51 PM

Currently, I don't think splitting the trope is a good idea yet. We should just put in a Rule Zero in the trope description that requires the choice is explicitly (if not a match) or implicitly (matches mostly fall into this, especially if the creator is already out of the closet about it) used to improve the veritas of character portrayal.

However, if there's no improvement, or otherwise the page is long enough for a split, then split, first on the gender preference and gender identity axes.

Edited by SamCurt on Nov 3rd 2022 at 7:05:02 AM

Scientia et Libertas | Per Aspera ad Astra Nova
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#16: Nov 3rd 2022 at 7:10:56 PM

Explicitly or implicitly what, exactly? What is "this", aside from the basic concept of "the character and the actor have similar identities and backgrounds"? If you're saying that it needs to improve the portrayal, then that's adding meaning that doesn't currently seem to exist (or at least, meaning that isn't the end-all-be-all of the concept).

Also, not really what Rule Zero means...

Edited by WarJay77 on Nov 3rd 2022 at 10:11:45 AM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
bowserbros No longer active. from Elsewhere Since: May, 2014
No longer active.
#17: Nov 4th 2022 at 3:32:32 PM

Of note is that advocacy for separating the "T" from "LGBT" is pretty popular among transphobes, and a number of LGBT groups have pointed out that all letters of the acronym share common struggles in clashing with sexist and heteronormative societal expectations (even when accounting for the distinction between sexuality and gender identity), so I worry that the proposed split for Queer Character, Queer Actor would send the wrong message.

Edited by bowserbros on Nov 4th 2022 at 3:34:45 AM

Be kind.
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#18: Nov 4th 2022 at 3:54:44 PM

[up] Yeah, I don't think we need to split the page. I just think it is worth discussing whether examples of a sexually queer actor playing a genderqueer character or vice versa are valid. This page was supposed to be part of Actor-Shared Background, I believe.

Edited by StarSword on Nov 4th 2022 at 6:55:47 AM

VampireBuddha Calendar enthusiast from Ireland (Wise, aged troper) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Calendar enthusiast
#19: Nov 4th 2022 at 5:38:02 PM

I decided to do a wee wick check.

Most of these do look to be "LGB actor plays LGB character" or "Trans/NB actor plays trans/NB character", with just a couple of "Trans actor plays LGB character" or vice versa. Based on that, I withdraw my position that the trope should be split.

That said, my impression is that "Non-cis actor plays non-het character" and vice versa at least aren't in the spirit of the trope.

Ukrainian Red Cross
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#20: Nov 5th 2022 at 12:38:29 PM

[up] Regarding "can NB people be gay, bi, or hetero": that's one of the reasons I used "-philic" adjectives in post #2: it describes what a person is attracted to independently of their own gender identity.

That said, I know a trans woman who transitioned while married to a woman and uses the term "translesbian".

bowserbros No longer active. from Elsewhere Since: May, 2014
No longer active.
#21: Nov 5th 2022 at 12:46:13 PM

[up]I hear more lesbian trans women use "transbian" to describe themselves.

Anyways, while I don't think a split would be appropriate, I do support the suggestions that whatever queer aspects apply to the character should also apply to the actor, with some degree of flexibility such as a bi actor playing a lesbian character or an agender VA voicing a genderfluid character.

Edited by bowserbros on Nov 5th 2022 at 12:46:26 PM

Be kind.
Add Post

Total posts: 21
Top