Follow TV Tropes

Following

Half-Context WhiteAndGreyMorality Examples

Go To

KJsixteen BORK from The Alola Region Since: Apr, 2019 Relationship Status: Singularity
BORK
#1: Jul 2nd 2020 at 6:31:33 PM

I made this thread simply because I was bothered by how the examples of White-and-Grey Morality are detailed, both in its article and outside. The examples only describe how the "bad guys" aren't bad and mention exceptions, yet they said nothing about the good guys and why they're good in the first place, essentially ignoring the word WHITE in its name. Meanwhile, the other Shades of Conflict, Black-and-White Morality, Black-and-Gray Morality, and Grey-and-Gray Morality, have both sides detailed and analyzed.

These are a handful of WAGM examples that only describe the grey/antagonist side:

    open/close all folders 

    Anime and Manga 
  • Astro Boy: While minor human crooks and such may be genuinely evil, the Big Bad Dr. Tenma and related characters are just Well Intentioned Extremists. If a robot is portrayed as a villain, it's always due to a misunderstanding. This is in contrast to the rest of Osamu Tezuka's work, where pretty much everyone but the main character is always a bastard. Especially Rock.
  • Cardcaptor Sakura has no true villains either; in the first arc, the Cards are portrayed more as mischievous beings than truly evil troublemakers and are all subject to Defeat Means Friendship, and in the second arc, even the Big Bad Eriol is quickly hinted (and revealed at the end) to be much more of a Trickster Mentor. All the intelligent characters are presented as decent people, which underscores the "Humans Are Good" part of the trope.
  • Digimon Tamers proves that, yes, you can have intense conflict without anyone who is properly "bad." Every Big Bad is actually trying to prevent threats to their worlds, and you can see why they consider the other side to be bad news. Even the final Greater-Scope Villain is just a program acting on its orders; see Gone Horribly Right.
    • It goes even farther back, actually. In Digimon Adventure 02, almost all of the main antagonists (Ken, Oikawa, Blackwargreymon, even Arukenimon and Mummymon) are revealed to possess sympathetic traits or motives. Most, in fact, turn out to be pawns of the true Big Bad, Myotismon, who is a straight-up Card-Carrying Villain.
  • Dog Days: In any other show, warmongering Galette would be pretty clearly evil, but given that "warmongering", in this case, means "healthily appreciative of sporting activities", we've just got a bunch of friendly, polite Worthy Opponents instead.
  • In Fairy Tail, the majority of the major villains have reasonable and sympathetic motives. The first one is trying to release a monster so he can defeat it, which is the thing his teacher died doing; he merely wants to prove himself by surpassing her. Another notable villain was a slavemaster who spent 8 years building a tower to revive the most dangerous dark wizard in history because he was brainwashed into thinking it would bring about a Utopia. Both of these later pulled a Heel–Face Turn. Some later enemies, like the Oración Seis and Grimoire Heart guilds had guild masters and some members truly in the black morality pitch. However, most of the guild members were given sympathetic backstories and reasons for joining these guilds — like how Ultear's entire "evilness" is because of a misunderstanding in her childhood.
  • Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann: All of the major antagonists had justifiable reasons for their less than savory actions. Lordgenome tried to prevent the Anti-Spiral from finding about the existence of the human race, Rossiu tried to follow what he learned from his village, and the Anti-Spiral tried to prevent an Apocalypse How.

    Live-Action TV 
  • Star Trek:
    • Most of the five series heavily favored this trope. The show tended not to have very many truly evil people and the ones that seemed to be would get fleshed out or retconned later to be more sympathetic. Typically most people could be reasoned with and almost everybody was just looking out for their own if they weren't motivated by nobler intentions. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine skews furthest from this trope with the Federation becoming a bit greyer and the Dominion being darker than is typical of the other series.
    • The Next Generation-era Ferengi were universally motivated by greed, embodying the worst of crony-capitalism on a show that tended to favor capitalist utopias. Deep Space Nine, despite being overall darker, pulled the Ferengi into the gray range, even introducing a number of social reforms during their run and having the Alpha Quadrant be saved by a Ferengi.
  • The West Wing:
    • Most of the antagonistic politicians wanted what was best—they just had different opinions of what was "best" for America. At worst, they tended toward stupid corruption, greed, and tendency to stretch the truth. There were actual evil people like the Western Terrorists, but they mostly stayed off-screen and seldom lasted long.
    • Even corrupt characters often had redeeming qualities. Russel, for instance, is probably the morally second-worst person on the show who isn't one of those briefly appearing or off-screen terrorists mentioned above, but even he won't let the president bomb the wrong country on the mistaken belief that they'd developed atomic bombs of their own in The Warfare of Genghis Khan and is disgusted at hearing on the news about a woman in Turkey being executed for adultery in King Corn. The worst non-terrorist character is Robert Ritchie, who even goes so far as to not seem to feel any sympathy when he hears about a secret service agent being killed in the line of duty ("crime...boy, I don't know"). Aside from some terrorists and homophobic activists, Ritchie's the only complete villain on the show. Even the Christian right are portrayed as low and mean, but not pure evil.
    • For a discrete moment of Rousseau Was Right, see the end of "Evidence of Things Not Seen": the egg stands on its end.

    Video Games 
  • Chronicles of Tsufanubra features some genuinely morally depraved characters, but only in the backstory. Everyone in the present-day conflict is either doing what they think is best in light of what those earlier characters did, or is being manipulated.
  • Mega Man
    • Used tragically in Mega Man Zero. In the midst of this rebellion, barring the psychopaths (Copy X, Elpizo, Omega, and Weil), no one on either side is truly evil. The Zero series has some of the most sympathetic antagonists (Harpuia being #1) in the whole franchise.
  • Tales Series:

Edited by KJsixteen on Jul 3rd 2020 at 11:21:54 AM

Google Snake Game.
4tell0life4 Since: Mar, 2018 Relationship Status: Giving love a bad name
#2: Jul 2nd 2020 at 7:05:18 PM

Because it can safely be assumed that the good guys's side is "white" by default. Trying to describe them would be redundant.

We can never truly eradicate the coronavirus, but we can suppress its threat like influenza
KJsixteen BORK from The Alola Region Since: Apr, 2019 Relationship Status: Singularity
BORK
#3: Jul 2nd 2020 at 8:46:59 PM

Then by that logic, we might as well not describe the villains in BAGM because we can assume the black side is always evil. Except, that isn't the case 90% of the time, as the villains are equally detailed as the anti-heroes/gray side.

Edited by KJsixteen on Jul 2nd 2020 at 11:48:09 AM

Google Snake Game.
4tell0life4 Since: Mar, 2018 Relationship Status: Giving love a bad name
#4: Jul 2nd 2020 at 9:05:58 PM

[up] That's the thing: we seemingly like more to describe the negative-looking sides than positive ones.

We can say about the bad guys' side, whatever it is that they do that make them "bad". By contrast, it's basically "accepted" that the good guys will do good things by default; there's nothing "notable" to it.

And it's not a bad thing, mind you.

Edited by 4tell0life4 on Jul 2nd 2020 at 9:07:36 AM

We can never truly eradicate the coronavirus, but we can suppress its threat like influenza
KJsixteen BORK from The Alola Region Since: Apr, 2019 Relationship Status: Singularity
BORK
#5: Jul 3rd 2020 at 4:53:36 AM

I do admit it's usually easier for people to focus on the villain side rather than the hero side more, probably because of Accentuate the Negative or something like that.

That being said, I still find it (for a lack of a better word) unfair that most of this trope's examples are half-baked, yet the other tropes get both sides detailed. It's also pretty inconsistent if you ask me. A reason why that is a bad thing is because people would think the "not having bad guys" rule automatically means this trope, even if that rule also applies to Grey-and-Gray Morality and Good Versus Good, which is why I replaced the music example of WAGM, as the lyrics explicitly said there are no good guys, making it a case of GAGM.

  • Before: Dave Mason's "We Just Disagree."
    There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys. / There's only you and me and we just disagree. (Replaced on May 23rd, 2019)

  • After: Interestingly for a Melodic Death Metal band, Arch-Enemy's the conflict between KHAOS and the government CAN be this Trope, as KHAOS is portrayed as heroic, while the government's morality depends on the listener's view.

Edited by KJsixteen on Jul 3rd 2020 at 11:33:15 AM

Google Snake Game.
KJsixteen BORK from The Alola Region Since: Apr, 2019 Relationship Status: Singularity
BORK
#6: Jul 10th 2020 at 8:44:13 AM

Welp, it's been a week since this thread had a response, so I guess I'll move it to Trope Repair Shop.

Google Snake Game.
Add Post

Total posts: 6
Top