Follow TV Tropes

Following

Audience-Alienating Premise cleanup

Go To

Audience-Alienating Premise is "interesting" because it can be used to either complain about shows you don't like ("Work X is a failure because it's about X, which is stupid) or gush about shows you like ("Work Y is a great work, but unfortunately many people were scared away because it's about Y, leading people to miss out on its greatness"). This, naturally, leads to lots of shoehorning.

As far as I know, the major criteria for AAP are:

  • The work is a commercial failure, which requires the work to have been released for a sufficient amount of time and be for-profit.
  • The failure is because the work's premise scared the audience off or made them lose interest.

But "the premise scared people off" is highly subjective, and "is a commercial failure" is a relatively recent addition (if it even is an official criterion - it's not currently in the trope description, although it's been used as an edit reason for some example removals), leading to many non-examples being Grandfather Claused in. So I think it could use a cleanup.

Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#276: Jun 14th 2021 at 3:17:28 PM

Bringing up the following example from Sonic X:

  • Audience-Alienating Premise: The concept of the show where Sonic, despite being the titular character, would not receive much screen time in favor of a human kid character who comes off as annoying and uninteresting to the majority of the audience definitely was not gonna win over a lot of fans of the franchise.

RustBeard Since: Sep, 2016
#277: Jun 14th 2021 at 3:18:25 PM

This was on the YMMV page for Lolita:

  • Audience-Alienating Premise: Downplayed. It's a novel written from the perspective of an offending pedophile, though despite the stigma it's still considered a classic of modern literature. Some still view it poorly, see Misblamed for more information.

First off, tropes can't be played with. Second, wasn't Lolita successful?

WackyPancake from My computer. Since: May, 2011
#278: Jun 14th 2021 at 3:23:44 PM

I'd say Lolita counts. It's by all accounts a great book and not at all pro-pedophilia, but the very premise makes less informed people think it's some sort of pedophile fantasy and that has cast a shadow over it. Even this wiki at one point considered cutting the trope page until it was realized that it does not glorify pedophilia at all and the main character is meant to be disgusting.

Remove the "downplayed" part, though. Can't play with a YMMV trope.

"I like girls, but now, it's about justice."
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#279: Jun 14th 2021 at 4:00:18 PM

It's pretty successful... but also banned in a lot of places because its subject matter is so off-putting. It definitely fits something. Probably Overshadowed by Controversy if nothing else.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
RallyBot2 Since: Nov, 2013 Relationship Status: I-It's not like I like you, or anything!
#280: Jun 16th 2021 at 7:32:16 AM

[tup] to moving the Lolita example to OBC (with a rewrite, of course.)

Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#281: Jun 16th 2021 at 7:33:25 AM

Bringing up the following example from Greenland:

WoodKnapp94 Since: May, 2020
#282: Jun 16th 2021 at 9:23:36 AM

[up]The movie doesn't even have anything to do with the pandemic, and on top of that, other entries on the same page say it got great reviews for a disaster movie, and the audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is 64%... I don't think it counts.

PlasmaPower Since: Jan, 2015
#283: Jun 18th 2021 at 7:25:17 PM

YMMV.Metroid Prime Federation Force

  • Audience-Alienating Premise: Most fans of Metroid generally point to the exploration and sense of isolation as the series' hallmarks, so an installment that ditches all of that for a more action-oriented, Co-Op Multiplayer installment that doesn't even star the main character became a hard sell for them. It being five years since the last installment in the franchise, which itself was widely regarded as the worst entry in the entire series, only aggravated the issue. Even among those who didn't mind the idea of a spin-off game and weren't part of the intense backlash weren't impressed by the announcement.

Does this check out? The only audience is ever mentions is the fans.

Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!
Anddrix Since: Oct, 2014
#284: Jun 19th 2021 at 10:26:23 AM

Bringing up this example from AudienceAlienatingPremise.Film:

mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#285: Jun 19th 2021 at 10:36:54 AM

[up] Sounds like it counts due to being a financial failure.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#286: Jun 19th 2021 at 2:43:49 PM

It might need to ease up on the bashing, though.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#287: Jun 19th 2021 at 3:17:26 PM

Yea it counts but it can definitely be rewritten with a more neutral tone.

Merseyuser1 Since: Sep, 2011
#288: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:00:22 AM

Would this count as examples: Live Action TV

  • Alcatraz, a 2012 drama seemed good on the surface, but the premise of returning prisoners to jail was itself one that seemed questionable (if people wanted to see this, wouldn't they see a documentary? was one critic's logic). Set in a Crapsack World with characters who are difficult to like including the protagonists, it was fairly formulaic, and got average reviews at best.
  • Falling Water, a 2016 Fox drama was a hard sell due to its concept of three people sharing the same dream, a High Concept in itself. It didn't get good reviews from the critics despite an All-Star Cast, and ended after two seasons.
  • Reckless 2014, about a police sex scandal was a difficult enough sell due to its premise, but also a character whose questionable morality in her profession as a lawyer and the entire plotline surrounding the sex scandal meant it only lasted one season. Despite the fanservice of Anna Wood, it was a difficult show to market, and faded into obscurity after a single season.
  • Spitting Image, at least in its 2020 Continuity Reboot was a hard sell due to making jokes about the ongoing pandemic and jokes that only really made sense if you were a politics geek. It was a hard sell for many people, and received negative reviews. Also, it was uncertain if it was intended for new audiences or a continuation adding to the problems.
  • Sun Records was a historical drama Mini Series launched in 2017. However, the premise was difficult to accept due to the characters being devoid of personality and historical blunders, meaning it neither appealed to historical or music enthusiasts, and the show generally didn't know who it was aiming to.
Western Animation

Edited by Merseyuser1 on Jun 20th 2021 at 7:06:47 PM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#289: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:02:00 AM

None of those describe the shows getting bad ratings or lack of viewers as a result, the closest is the first one which only describes bad reviews- and people have to watch a thing to review it.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Merseyuser1 Since: Sep, 2011
#290: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:07:23 AM

[up] Sun Records did get poor reviews, though, would that qualify? I've had a look through several reviews from critics, even though IMDB viewers seemed to like it; Critical Dissonance maybe?

Edited by Merseyuser1 on Jun 20th 2021 at 7:09:14 PM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#291: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:08:16 AM

No, "poor reviews" might have nothing to do with the premise. This trope has nothing to do with after-viewing opinions.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
ImperialMajestyXO Since: Nov, 2015
#292: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:09:33 AM

[up][up] Do any of the reviews specifically cite the premise as a reason they didn't like it?

Merseyuser1 Since: Sep, 2011
#293: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:10:03 AM

[up][up] Fair enough.

Does poor research on a period of history or it being a very sanitized version count for this trope, or even the period of time itself?

Edited by Merseyuser1 on Jun 20th 2021 at 7:10:17 PM

ImperialMajestyXO Since: Nov, 2015
#294: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:10:53 AM

[up] It can, but it doesn't automatically do so.

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#295: Jun 20th 2021 at 11:11:29 AM

It can if such a premise alienates audiences. That's what the trope is about. That's all the trope is about.

Edited by WarJay77 on Jun 20th 2021 at 2:11:42 PM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WackyPancake from My computer. Since: May, 2011
#296: Jun 20th 2021 at 1:04:17 PM

The Brothers Flub did famously flop, but I have no idea why the premise would be alienating on itself.

"I like girls, but now, it's about justice."
PlasmaPower Since: Jan, 2015
#297: Jun 22nd 2021 at 11:54:09 AM

This is the only entry on YMMV.Archie Meets The Punisher.

  • Audience-Alienating Premise: Readers of The Punisher and readers of Archie tend to have little overlap, so the initial response from both fandoms was confusion. Despite (or because?) of this, the comic is viewed favorably by both fandoms for the most part.

Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!
RallyBot2 Since: Nov, 2013 Relationship Status: I-It's not like I like you, or anything!
#298: Jun 24th 2021 at 5:56:51 PM

[up]Misuse; cutlisted since it was the only example on the page.

Merseyuser1 Since: Sep, 2011
#299: Jun 26th 2021 at 11:49:44 AM

Does this example from AudienceAlienatingPremise.Film fit, or need cutlisting, or a rewrite:

  • Tulip Fever was a 2017 Period Piece romantic drama starring Alicia Vikander and was something of a Box Office Bomb, grossing $2.4million against a production budget of $25million. The plotline of Your Cheating Heart felt more like a movie version of a Lifetime Movie of the Week, plus the title was an Intentionally Awkward Title; anyone expecting it to be about the history of the Netherlands' most iconic plant would be left disappointed, for the tulip mania was more a historical backdrop than the focus of the movie the title suggested. Also, it was fairly slow-paced and despite an All-Star Cast, it didn't appeal to those who wanted a Period Piece on tulip mania and there was accusations of severe Artistic License – History while romance fans didn't enjoy the Darker and Edgier tone of the romance (the plotline was about an artist commissioned to do a painting of a woman but ends up having an affair with her) and the Your Cheating Heart plotline. In short, it was a hard sell for historical genre fans and romance fans, being a movie that fell in between two stools, and it was basically a Lifetime Movie of the Week on a Hollywood budget without the Special Effects Failure and aesop they usually have. The movie got a lot of negative reviews and was one that was difficult to market to due to not knowing who to aim for as the target audience.

Edited by Merseyuser1 on Jun 26th 2021 at 7:50:13 PM

jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#300: Jun 26th 2021 at 12:44:06 PM

I still think you’re focusing way too much on the quality of the work itself, and not why it alienated audiences. Also, Your Cheating Heart is no longer a trope.

back lol

Total posts: 595
Top