Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9701: Apr 24th 2024 at 9:14:19 AM

Regarding the Self-Harm discussion upthread: I think this is another application of the "if it can be illustrated without it that is probably preferable" guideline that is already written down for nudity and what I previously said is my stance on gorn.

For example, Driven to Suicide and its subpages show selfharm or its aftermath, either explicitly or implied via visuals, for obvious reasons. I don't think Goths Have It Hard is a policy violation, but I'd entertain images without it.


Regarding the "work page image flood every time there's an opening", I, uh, don't really like them personally (I'm very team 'if it ain't broke' and generally only start threads to upgrade from a screencap or teaser poster if it was very unindicative or otherwise bad, and they can get tedious), but it's not against the rules. I will just remind folks that the thread cap is both to make things manageable for the staff, who are never going to have unlimited time and brainpower to close threads, and encourage the creation of threads that address genuinely problematic images ~ if there are 5 slots, the goal shouldn't be to take them up immediately with minor quibbles.

Edited by Synchronicity on Apr 24th 2024 at 12:20:54 PM

Tylerbear12 Just a guy. from The Green Hills. Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
Just a guy.
#9702: Apr 25th 2024 at 9:54:53 AM

Is it just me or does the images on Even the Guys Want Him and Even the Girls Want Her fail to demonstrate their respective tropes? According to the page, it's specifically about how a man/woman is so attractive that even women/men who are normally attracted to the opposite sex are falling in love with them. Neither image seems to indicate that the boys/girls in it are also attracted to the opposite sex or whatnot.

Edited by Tylerbear12 on Apr 25th 2024 at 11:55:38 AM

petersohn from Earth, Solar System (Long Runner) Relationship Status: Hiding
#9703: Apr 25th 2024 at 10:38:42 AM

[up]Given that there is an entire row of guys/girls who are attracted to that character, I think it works. I don't think that the casual reader would assume that in this show Everyone Is Gay.

The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9704: Apr 25th 2024 at 1:30:47 PM

Yeah, if it had been like one person having a same-sex crush on the guy/girl then I would be like "that's just an lgbt character", but being able to pull multiple same-sex fans more strongly implies they have the type of attractiveness the tropes are about. The tropes are also documenting more cisheteronormative attitudes where Everyone Is Gay would not be the default assumption. (and as usual, perfect, enemy of good, etcetera.)


Image Pickin' Special Cases thing: Drives Like Crazy drove from "Pics from non-content policy compliant works" to "Multiple threads".

Edited by Synchronicity on Apr 25th 2024 at 5:04:59 AM

Drope Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: Is that a kind of food?
#9705: Apr 25th 2024 at 6:04:16 PM

Jesus. I've been waiting for days for the forum to be under the 60-thread limit, and I don't think it's possible to start a thread in time unless I stay here and press F5 repeatedly. And I don't have the time for that.

If possible, I would like to request a thread for Cognizant Limbs to be opened at some point because the current image is just a Wall of Text.

Edited by Drope on Apr 25th 2024 at 6:07:10 AM

Original the Signature. Do not steal.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9706: Apr 25th 2024 at 8:23:43 PM

I've also been waiting for a slot.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#9707: Apr 25th 2024 at 8:40:14 PM

I know we already have seven pinned threads, but I do wish there was a way to more easily manage Characters/ swaps that only involve one or two images; there's been quite a few threads like this lately. If there's any way to amend that I can think of, maybe have a lower [tup] limit required for such threads (which isn't really defined anyways, but tends to be around 7≥).

back lol
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9708: Apr 25th 2024 at 8:44:52 PM

We also have a lot of "Changed Without Discussion" threads lately and it honestly feels kinda weird to me that we need to open threads instead of just blanket reverting, going to discussion only if the new image warrants it.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Twiddler (On A Trope Odyssey)
#9709: Apr 26th 2024 at 1:45:17 AM

[up] An image changed without discussion can just be reverted (and the "image changes" notifier sent). A recent example

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9710: Apr 26th 2024 at 1:52:14 AM

Really? Because I've seen people get told off for not bringing it to IP before. Told to basically wait and make a thread even if the image should absolutely be reverted (unless it's pure vandalism)

Edited by WarJay77 on Apr 26th 2024 at 4:53:12 AM

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#9711: Apr 26th 2024 at 6:58:30 AM

Policy question: the OP on the Moments image cleanup thread says to make a thread if you have a specific suggestion. However, I have replacement suggestions for two Moments subpages of the same work, so two questions:

  • In the interest of not hogging thread slots, is it okay to do them both in a single thread?
  • If so, should I link the thread to the main page for the work or to one of the Moments pages?

Drope Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: Is that a kind of food?
#9712: Apr 26th 2024 at 7:07:29 AM

[up][up][up][up][up]Agreed, Character pages just take too long to deal with because they're often only of interest to a small subset of tropers, which contributes to the slowness due to lack of engagement. Trope page images should have some sort of priority somehow.

Edited by Drope on Apr 26th 2024 at 7:10:49 AM

Original the Signature. Do not steal.
Synchronicity MOD (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9713: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:09:56 AM

(Just made a bunch of space)


A reminder that bumping a thread with nothing to add is not helpful. I understand the desire to get some of these moving, but just saying 'bump' doesn't help that and in fact may just lead to the thread being overlooked because I might just see recent activity and assume it's actively being discussed. Things like listing crowner options and hollering, or at least asking if an option has received consensus, are better ways to do this.

Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9714: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:27:23 AM

There's no point bumping an IP thread, since they all fit on two pages, those who are looking at threads can effectively see all of them anyway.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9715: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:28:54 AM

I Dk, I think it can help. It's more to try and advance discussion, the same reason people bump stuff on TRS even though the same logic applies.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9716: Apr 26th 2024 at 10:33:36 AM

By same logic I see bumping in TRS counterproductive, but I'll drop here before it goes offtopic.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Nethilia Girl Gang Disaster (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: A gay little love melody
Girl Gang Disaster
#9717: Apr 26th 2024 at 2:13:58 PM

It's kinda rude that I had an image suggestion for the TLP I'm working on here in the IP thread, and not in the actual TLP.

I know a lot of them have been going through there, but I didn't request one. This particular TLP is still in proposal and only a few days old; it's not even old enough for the minimal launch. It'd be a lot more polite to speak over there instead of immediately suggesting here; if I didn't follow that thread, I'd have no idea.

TLP isn't the same as the main trope pages and people working there ought to be given a chance to work things there instead of votes here, especially when they've yet to ask for that. Folks there are still working on it and I would have appreciated the poster offer the picture there instead of here.

Edited by Nethilia on Apr 26th 2024 at 2:17:05 AM

I know more about obscure 1990s Middle Grade Literature novels than most people.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9718: Apr 26th 2024 at 2:18:22 PM

I'm personally of the opinion that people have been taking too many TLP images to IP anyway. It was never a requirement, and still isn't. In the past all images would be suggested on the drafts, and a thread would be made if no consensus could be reached. I especially don't think we should use the suggestion thread for it.

I actually argued this here weeks ago because of the backlog issues. Anything we can do to prevent excessive use of IP is good in my book.

Edited by WarJay77 on Apr 26th 2024 at 5:20:51 AM

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9719: Apr 26th 2024 at 2:32:44 PM

I'd rather leave TLP matters to TLP. Since crowners can be linked in TLP, the picture choice can happen there as well.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
ilovewildkratts1 from a peaceful and quiet meadow (Experienced Trainee) Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
#9720: Apr 26th 2024 at 3:28:19 PM

[up][up][up] I'll admit, I had advised the sponsor of the original Peer as Teacher draft to take an image through IP to get consensus from other tropers and make sure it was good, lest it just get sent to IP anyway if someone deems it to be low-quality or unfitting.

If IP is continuously getting clogged (and it currently is; the max thread count has already been reached), I'll make sure to leave out that advice in the future if tropers reach out to me about improving their drafts.

Kaito is an alien and he is kinda spacey, coming from the universe to party and go crazy!
Nethilia Girl Gang Disaster (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: A gay little love melody
Girl Gang Disaster
#9721: Apr 26th 2024 at 3:39:54 PM

[up] In this case, it wasn't the sponsor who did the (nuked) draft that offered the image in the IP thread, hence my irritation. The suggester hasn't interacted with the TLP proposal at all.

Edited by Nethilia on Apr 26th 2024 at 3:40:19 AM

I know more about obscure 1990s Middle Grade Literature novels than most people.
Drope Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: Is that a kind of food?
#9722: Apr 26th 2024 at 4:50:30 PM

I agree that TLP matters should stay in the TLP unless permission is given by the sponsor or the sponsor itself wishes to use IP.

The TLP thread should also work with itself to find a suitable image, unless that ends up fruitless and IP becomes the last resort.

Edited by Drope on Apr 26th 2024 at 4:52:47 AM

Original the Signature. Do not steal.
FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
#9723: Apr 30th 2024 at 8:20:16 AM

Didn't Think This Through is now on multiple threads.

I'll also agree with the sentiment that bumping a thread with nothing to add is disruptive, since it makes checking recent activity a slog, and can make it easy to miss when a threads needs to be clocked.

Edited by FernandoLemon on Apr 30th 2024 at 12:22:45 PM

I'd like to apologize for all this.
Bullman "Cool. Coolcoolcool." Since: Jun, 2018 Relationship Status: Longing for my OTP
"Cool. Coolcoolcool."
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9725: May 1st 2024 at 10:19:56 AM

No spoiler tags above examples, so no

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup

Total posts: 9,728
Top