Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
#8626: Apr 26th 2023 at 6:36:05 AM

Probably not, since it doesn't say. Plus it's the whole strip.

I'd like to apologize for all this.
Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8627: Apr 26th 2023 at 6:45:27 AM

Just revisiting this one, as I don't think it got a direct reply.

Do we need to pull on copyright/usage grounds?

(Or, if not, does it look like a Poor Image candidate? I reckon it's borderline on that).

rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#8628: Apr 26th 2023 at 7:10:43 PM

[up]I don't think there's a copyright issue as it's a promo image.

Keet cleanup
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
#8630: Apr 27th 2023 at 4:36:05 PM

With the caption, sure. (Though I'd remove the chained sinkholes.)

I'd like to apologize for all this.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
GracieLizzy Since: Dec, 2012
#8632: Apr 29th 2023 at 3:32:01 AM

What's the forum take on re-suggesting a image from a recently closed/moved to the morgue thread? I don't feel my last suggestion on this thread got a fair consideration as it got locked before anyone commented on it and I thought it was pretty good.

Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8633: Apr 29th 2023 at 3:48:59 AM

[up] The pinned post suggests a minimum two week gap for other scenarios (thread closed without consensus). That feels like a reasonable starting point, it there's no other rule?

GracieLizzy Since: Dec, 2012
#8634: Apr 29th 2023 at 5:01:35 AM

Okie doke, I'll give it two weeks :)

selkies Professional Wick Checker Since: Jan, 2021 Relationship Status: Star-crossed
Professional Wick Checker
#8635: May 1st 2023 at 11:10:07 AM

Literature.Dangerous Liaisons has two images, one for the book and the other for the film, I suppose. Is that okay?

Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#8637: May 1st 2023 at 12:24:30 PM

Agreed, the film pic needs to go.

selkies Professional Wick Checker Since: Jan, 2021 Relationship Status: Star-crossed
Professional Wick Checker
#8638: May 2nd 2023 at 10:09:12 AM

Ok, removed it citing this thread.

Inky100 Unlucky rabbit's foot user from Uh... How do I describe it? Since: Dec, 2020 Relationship Status: is commanded to— WANK!
Unlucky rabbit's foot user
#8639: May 2nd 2023 at 11:29:32 AM

The image on Albums Index isn't cited anywhere in the Image Source pages. Does it fall under the Photography page or the Music one? (since it's out of The Beatles' Rubber Soul)

A lot of good you did me.
MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#8640: May 2nd 2023 at 1:26:49 PM

I'd put it in the Music subpage.

Macron's notes
ANonagon9 (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
#8641: May 2nd 2023 at 2:23:05 PM

In case I'm offline whenever spaces open up, Board Games and Hollywood Board Games have the same image.

Inky100 Unlucky rabbit's foot user from Uh... How do I describe it? Since: Dec, 2020 Relationship Status: is commanded to— WANK!
Malady (Not-So-Newbie)
#8643: May 3rd 2023 at 10:53:38 AM

Do we have permission for Airplane Arms?

The post that gave us that image: [1]

Otherwise, I've gotta remember Kiwi Blitz first panel of row 2 of Page 226.

Edited by Malady on May 3rd 2023 at 10:54:42 AM

Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576
GracieLizzy Since: Dec, 2012
#8644: May 4th 2023 at 2:47:24 AM

Here's the old discussion post for Airplane Arms:

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1325558847039680100

As far as I can tell the picture came from a blogspot link?

Here: pic

Edited by GracieLizzy on May 4th 2023 at 2:48:51 AM

JoeG Since: Jul, 2010
#8645: May 4th 2023 at 5:52:40 PM

I have a question about the use of images from single webcomics or comic strips. The rule of thumb I saw was that we aren't able to use more that 50%. How is this measured, by number of panels or by area? Suppose a webcomic consists of one large panel that takes up 75% of the area and three small panels that collectively take up the remaining 25%. If we measure by area we would be allowed to use the three small panels but not the one large one. If we measure by panel count the opposite would be true.

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Malady (Not-So-Newbie)
#8647: May 4th 2023 at 6:03:52 PM

[up][up][up] - I don't think we're legally safe, so Thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16832485740.63104800&page=1#1

Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576
mightymewtron Lots of coffee from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Lots of coffee
#8648: May 4th 2023 at 11:03:57 PM

Is the new image on Mature Work, Child Protagonists too similar to the one used on its work page? It's the same poster, just basically adjusted to a different size.

[down] Huh, I've been in past IP threads where work images were changed to avoid matching trope pages.

Edited by mightymewtron on May 5th 2023 at 1:36:34 PM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
#8649: May 5th 2023 at 6:13:47 AM

[up] I mean... yeah. But that's not a big deal. Work-trope duplication isn't an issue, trope-trope duplication is.

I'd like to apologize for all this.
Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8650: May 5th 2023 at 6:22:58 AM

A general question -

For plays, ballets and opera (especially the Older Than Radio stuff), some of the strongest images are likely to be posters or photos from specific productions. Posters are likely to have venue/company names in a prominent place.

Assuming that they are representative of the original work, and there are no copyright issues, is there any reason to avoid them?

Edited by Mrph1 on May 5th 2023 at 2:23:35 PM


Total posts: 9,763
Top