Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help (alt titles crowner 8/13): Did Not Do The Research

Go To

DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
#151: Aug 24th 2012 at 3:35:40 PM

Perhaps I should specify:

  • Inaccuracies (Tropes) used in media in general (Omnipresent Inaccuracies)
  • Inaccuracies (Tropes) used in particular genres (listed by genre)
  • Specific inaccuracies (Tropes) utilized primarily by particular media.
  • Miscellaneous Inaccuracies (Examples) in works using particular media.
    • Works with several misc. inaccuracies (examples) (should not be needed)

Personally, I do see worth in categorizing inaccuracies (trope) by genre/medium if certain inaccuracies are used primarily in that genre/medium.

The reasons why I'd set up examples pages by medium is in anticipation of the Loads And Loads Of Examples that this merge will generate, as well as preventing the index itself from being overwhelmed by the same. Because we're going to have a lot of cleanup to do to get the new Tropes. So much that I'd ask for a standing Special Effort to keep this project going.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#152: Aug 24th 2012 at 3:39:05 PM

We are already splitting the examples. By subject. We don't want to list inaccuracies, except when they are useful for YKTTW, and that works only when they are split by subject.

The index stays on the main page.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
#153: Aug 24th 2012 at 3:59:33 PM

We seem to have a misunderstanding in progress.

What do you mean by "subject", then? That's too broad of a term and not standard from what I remember.

If the "subjects" are going to be on separate pages, then you're creating defacto Trope pages based on those subjects, bypassing YKTTW.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#154: Aug 24th 2012 at 4:06:16 PM

Subject is for example "physics", "biology". Notice that "inaccuracies by subject" isn't any more of a trope than "inaccuracies". Also, we had a previous crowner that decided that. It's linked from the current one.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
#155: Aug 24th 2012 at 8:25:05 PM

My apologies. I forgot that we already had that format on the Artistic License – Indexes. And that DNDTR was a "no example" index.

Still, that begs the question of how we organize the pages outside of the Artistic License – Indexes. Granted several of these currently on the Did Not Do The Research page can be considered subtropes of currently listed subjects, but some are not. Perhaps we can prepare by adjusting the master index to the extent that we can (i.e. those Licenses that can be classified under an extant subject).

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#156: Aug 27th 2012 at 10:27:19 PM

I imagine the page as like this -

Media get all sorts of things wrong. Here are some tropes that cover that:

Miscellaneous inaccuracies go into the following subpages until they have been built into trope pages:

edited 27th Aug '12 10:27:33 PM by Routerie

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#157: Aug 28th 2012 at 8:18:39 AM

^Pretty much the desirable state.

Also, Inaccuracies Index is now in the lead.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#158: Aug 28th 2012 at 2:03:49 PM

Will we apply the changes to Artistic License – Indexes to Somewhere This Index Is Crying as well? It's basically the same subpages, but under a different name (and there was previous consensus to turn the latter into the former).

Same question with Art Major Biology, which had consensus for merging into Artistic License – Biology AFAIK.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#160: Aug 29th 2012 at 8:39:28 AM

Calling crowner in favor of Inaccuracies Index.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#161: Aug 29th 2012 at 9:28:16 AM

Did the preliminary stages of the merger. Now we need to do, since I am getting crosseyed:

  • Decide on what to do with Space Does No T Work That Way and Art Major Biology - my idea is to merge the latter into InaccuraciesIndex.Biology and to keep the former.
  • Change Artistic License to reflect the previous crowner. My idea here is:
    • Ditch the index.
    • Expand it to inaccuracies as well as intentional errors.
    • Clean up the wicks.
  • Edit Inaccuracies Index and subpages to reflect that they have accidental as well as deliberate things.
  • Merge the Somewhere This X Is Crying and Artistic License X into Inaccuracies Index.X:
    • Copy the source into the subpage and set the page type.
    • Move indexes over to Inaccuracies Index, except for the entries in that index.
    • Holler to get the discussion moved, if any.
    • Cutlist subpages.
    • Redirect the page to Inaccuracies Index.
  • Clean the wicks up:
    • Resolve double redirects.
    • Delete or move wicks to fitting places.
    • Cutlist de-wicked and de-inbounded redirects.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Telcontar In uffish thought from England Since: Feb, 2012
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#163: Aug 30th 2012 at 12:36:26 AM

Any X Does Not Work Thast Way / Xologist Is Crying / Artistic License X page that takes both examples and subtropes should have its examples moved to the appropriate Inaccuracies Index.X page. The question is, what to do with the index once its examples have been moved elsewhere?

I agree that Space Does Not Work That Way should remain as an index. However, Its name encourages people to use it as a trope. We should rename this and similar Inaccuracies Index subindexes to discourage potholes and trope use.

We have several pages in the Hollywood Style index that need to be managed in this manner. Some are equivalent to Inaccuracies Index.X. Some serve as indexes. Some are outside terms.

If we must apply our course of action to Hollywood X pages that currently work as Artistic License X pages, the following articles must have their examples put on the appropriate Inaccuracies Index.X page.

However, the following articles (some Hollywood, some Artistic Licence,) are currently indexes, and the large Inaccuracies Index page could use subindexes. I think we should pick a standard name format ("Inaccurate X Tropes"?) for these subindexes.

The following is an outside term and should be retained, even if its examples and subtropes go elsewhere:

edited 30th Aug '12 2:00:56 AM by Routerie

spacemarine50 Since: Mar, 2012
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#165: Aug 30th 2012 at 2:06:10 AM

And we'll then change that page to Inaccuracies Index.Ships.

Let's also compile a comprehensive list of the new subpages.

edited 2nd Sep '12 4:11:18 PM by Routerie

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#166: Aug 30th 2012 at 8:11:42 AM

^I am going to say that, since we only voted on the Artistic License – Indexes subpages, that we are only moving these pages as for now. The others will need more discussion.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
mlsmithca (Edited uphill both ways)
#168: Aug 31st 2012 at 2:51:51 PM

Question: how should the Artistic License - Whatever entries in trope lists be reformatted? If they're linked to from trope descriptions, obviously they can just be replaced by the appropriate entry in the Inaccuracies Index, but if, for example, Artistic License - Astronomy (to use an example that is now redirected to Astronomy) appears in a trope list, by what should it be replaced? Or should the entry just be cut altogether?

I ask as I'm running into quite a lot of these in getting rid of Did Not Do The Research wicks (and probably created a few soon-to-be-renamed wicks along the way - sorry).

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#169: Aug 31st 2012 at 2:54:27 PM

If there is a trope for these, replace. Otherwise: Delete.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
mlsmithca (Edited uphill both ways)
#170: Aug 31st 2012 at 4:01:45 PM

Fair enough, but, for example, InaccuraciesIndex.Astronomy would show up in a trope list as Astronomy, which reads as though the trope being invoked is astronomy itself (fascinating as the physics of celestial objects may be, it's not exactly a trope), not misrepresenting astronomical principles either due to ignorance or for dramatic effect. How should it be formatted in a trope list - if it should even be included at all?

For that matter, since I'm finding Did Not Do The Research in trope lists on main work pages, YMMV pages, and Trivia pages - as big a sign as any that this renaming did not happen before time - are the Inaccuracy tropes YMMV, Trivia, or neither?

edited 31st Aug '12 4:04:03 PM by mlsmithca

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#171: Aug 31st 2012 at 4:03:09 PM

It is not supposed to be in a trope list. Any such entry shoudl be changed to a proper trope or deleted.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
mlsmithca (Edited uphill both ways)
#172: Aug 31st 2012 at 4:04:39 PM

Got it. Concentrating on Did Not Do The Research for now (A-L and X-Z done so far), but I'll keep my eye out for Artistic License - Whatever wicks as well.

edited 1st Sep '12 11:11:15 PM by mlsmithca

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#173: Sep 2nd 2012 at 3:58:10 PM

The index now has a very long list of tropes, but it actually only tracks a fraction of all our inaccuracies tropes. For example, we have an entire index just devoted to gun error tropes, few of which appear on the main Inaccuracies index.

Should we try to expand the main index to list every subtrope? Or should we go the other route and move tropes to the sub-indexes where possible?

We might also talk about standardinzing the names of these subindexes, preferably to names that cannot be mistaken for tropes. I suggest modeling it after the main index - Inaccuracy Tropes.Physics etc.

edited 2nd Sep '12 4:05:24 PM by Routerie

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#174: Sep 3rd 2012 at 12:02:54 AM

What is this? Just leave it at Artistic License: Subject.

This is accomplishing nothing except making work. You do recall that we went though a massive undertaking over months to get it to Artistic License?

In any case "Inaccuracies Index" is an awful choice, no matter what the crowner says.

Let's come back to this in maybe a year or so, or when absolutely everything else has been finished.

I've set Did Not Do The Research to perma-red. That was the real complaint, right? Misuse of that link?

edited 3rd Sep '12 12:19:31 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
spacemarine50 Since: Mar, 2012
#175: Sep 3rd 2012 at 1:35:37 AM

Why did you wait until now to post that, after some work has been done?

PageAction: DidNotDoTheResearch
6th Jul '12 4:50:07 AM

Crown Description:

Note: None of these entries are mutually exclusive. Please exercise judgment

For the record:

Total posts: 177
Top