Follow TV Tropes

Following

Trope Launch Pad discard project

Go To

Per Ask The Tropers, this thread will be used to reduce the number of old, poorly written drafts on the Trope Launch Pad. We don't want to discuss on the drafts themselves because that will bump them and mix them with active proposals.

Sandbox for the project: Trope Launch Pad Discard Project
Sandbox for discarded drafts but viable ideas: Trope Idea Salvage Yard

The first sandbox page above contains drafts proposed in the thread that are still pending and drafts that we've decided to leave alone, either with no action or a bump.
The second sandbox page is for awful drafts but viable ideas. According to moderators, badly written but interesting/tropeworthy drafts should remain on the TLP. Rather than allow low-effort drafts to clog TLP, though, the salvage yard was opened to keep just the ideas behind them, in one place.

On this thread, we will mention which drafts we think are unworkable, add enough bombs, and discard (nuke) them. Discarding requires at least 5 bombs. Among the features of "unworkable" drafts:

  • There have been no edits for a very long time, or at all
  • The draft is low-effort, containing atrocious spelling and grammar and/or little to no examples, e.g. NEVER saw THAT coming (!), Nut-Chuks
  • The draft was seemingly created so the sponsor could complain
  • The topic is People Sit on Chairs, Too Rare to Trope, a search query created by mistake, etc. and therefore not tropeworthy
  • The topic is already sufficiently covered by one or more tropes or is a duplicate of a better-written TLP draft
  • The draft is problematic in other ways, such being closely tied to a page that has been historically problematic, e.g. Fetish Fuel, Complete Monster
  • There's no discussion currently occurring in the comments to improve the proposal

If we decide to discard a draft after discussion via this thread, whoever does so must provide the discard reason in the comment section of the draft, for transparency's sake. Those looking at the discards section won't think it was nuked for no reason.

Also, check out the sister project, Trope Adoption Drive, where good drafts put Up for Grabs or abandoned can be grabbed, given a bit more improvement, and launched.

Edited by Tabs on Mar 24th 2022 at 12:02:43 PM

Miss_Desperado https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YD2i1FzUYA from somewhere getting rained on by Puget Sound Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#501: Sep 21st 2019 at 7:25:12 AM

If not for this anchor I'd be dancing between the stars. At least I can try to write better vampire stories than Twilight.
Brainulator9 Short-Term Projects herald from US Since: Aug, 2018 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Short-Term Projects herald
#502: Sep 21st 2019 at 8:52:10 AM

[up] Nuked that last one.

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
ElBuenCuate Since: Oct, 2010
#503: Sep 21st 2019 at 7:43:27 PM

Sorry. I bombed and discarded the first one.

Miss_Desperado https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YD2i1FzUYA from somewhere getting rained on by Puget Sound Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#504: Sep 21st 2019 at 8:16:09 PM

[up] That's one of the ones we were planning on discarding anyway, so no harm done. And... welcome aboard, I guess?

Edited by Miss_Desperado on Sep 21st 2019 at 8:16:38 AM

If not for this anchor I'd be dancing between the stars. At least I can try to write better vampire stories than Twilight.
gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#505: Sep 22nd 2019 at 10:55:13 AM

I'm bombing Nick Fury Greeting, Sequel named differently and The unassuming villain due to being redundant.

Edited by gc10 on Sep 22nd 2019 at 8:00:40 PM

Miss_Desperado https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YD2i1FzUYA from somewhere getting rained on by Puget Sound Since: Sep, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#506: Sep 22nd 2019 at 11:56:57 AM

[up] When you say "redundant" do you mean Yes, We DO Have This One?

I gave supporting good guy who is always wrong a bombs-away bump. Now it has enough bombs to discard. Bye-bye!

If not for this anchor I'd be dancing between the stars. At least I can try to write better vampire stories than Twilight.
gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
ElBuenCuate Since: Oct, 2010
#508: Sep 22nd 2019 at 9:13:17 PM

[up][up][up][up] Thanks, been lurking here but decided to be involved.

So, I found these drafts.

Edited by ElBuenCuate on Oct 26th 2019 at 5:12:23 AM

gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#509: Sep 23rd 2019 at 2:09:55 AM

[up] I bombed Pundit Inverted V and Fork You. I discarded Delusional Relationship.

I'll check Bully turned Buddy later, but looking at the example, I personally believe it could simply be merged with Reformed Bully, by expanding a bit the meaning of the trope. Besides, some examples are already placed in both pages.

Edited by gc10 on Sep 23rd 2019 at 11:15:35 AM

Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#510: Sep 23rd 2019 at 9:19:41 AM

The draft's description is sparse, but as it is right now, it and Reformed Bully can be distinguished by the "goodness level" of the bully.

A Reformed Bully has become a nicer person but is not necessarily anyone's friend. Or even an important character.

A Bully Turned Buddy isn't necessarily any nicer. Maybe they're still a bully. An example that comes to mind is 13 Going on 30, where the future buddy is still mean, but the protagonist has developed into a backstabbing jerk over the years. The bully is not reformed in any way.

Edited by Tabs on Sep 23rd 2019 at 9:25:20 AM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#511: Sep 23rd 2019 at 4:21:51 PM

Glad I found this thread, as someone who likes to scroll on mobile and accidentally clicks the last-page button too often. Here are a couple on the last page that we can probably get rid of:

Edited by Synchronicity on Oct 24th 2019 at 9:57:19 AM

gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
Malady (Not-So-Newbie)
#513: Sep 23rd 2019 at 6:19:42 PM

[up][up] - Bump to bomb, with Administrivia.Do We Have This One and a response?

Edited by Malady on Sep 23rd 2019 at 6:20:37 AM

Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576
gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#514: Sep 24th 2019 at 5:57:21 AM

[up]It's not necessary to justify every single bomb I think. An explanation is needed only if you're going to definitely discard the draft.

Hereditary secret bodyguard is poorly worked, too specific and already covered enough by other tropes, and didn't change since 2011. I bombed it.

Absurdly Correct, another identical draftwas launched before it. This one can be discarded.

Edited by gc10 on Sep 24th 2019 at 3:12:26 PM

Malady (Not-So-Newbie)
#515: Sep 24th 2019 at 2:22:01 PM

[up] - But bumping means more visibility and therefore more bombs to clear them out faster.

Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576
Brainulator9 Short-Term Projects herald from US Since: Aug, 2018 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Short-Term Projects herald
#516: Sep 24th 2019 at 5:40:41 PM

Bombed all that arrived today. Motion to discard?

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#517: Sep 25th 2019 at 9:34:40 AM

[up][up] Now that you made me think of that, you're right. We should do that more often.


I'm discarding Build a Skyscraper to reach the Sky, Evil is a mode and Hereditary secred bodyguard since they're redundant and already covered by existing tropes.

Edited by gc10 on Sep 25th 2019 at 6:40:25 PM

Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#518: Sep 25th 2019 at 9:50:27 AM

[up][up][up] I can't find the query now, but somewhere, it was said that bumping TLP drafts to get them bombed was frowned upon. Or maybe it was bumping multiple drafts at once to get them bombed. That's one of the reasons I created this thread. This way, we can quietly discard drafts that will never make it to tropehood, without bringing unnecessary attention to them on the launch pad itself.

gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#519: Sep 25th 2019 at 12:50:15 PM

[up] I'm sorry, I wasn't aware of that. I limited myself and bumped only 3 drafts, because I didn't want to crowd the TLP.

I think however, that instead of completely forbid bumping drafts for bombing, enstablishing a limit would be better. Sometimes drafts posted here stay for days before receiving 5 bombs, and considering the growing number of drafts per day (the TLP kept bouncing between 497 and 498 pages, because of continuously added/discarded drafts), it prevents this thread from actually reducing the drafts in the TLP.

That said, I'm not going to bump anymore drafts for bombing, if the rules don't allow it.


Edited by gc10 on Sep 25th 2019 at 9:55:58 PM

Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#520: Sep 25th 2019 at 1:01:04 PM

Reading through the TLP Guidelines, bumps for bombs isn't specifically disallowed. I'm just being careful. smile

gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#521: Sep 25th 2019 at 1:14:56 PM

[up] True, the TLP doesn't talk about that. But still, if you say that bumping TLP drafts to get them bombed was frowned upon at, it should be taken note nonetheless. Perhaps that could be more clearly and definitely discussed with the Mods? To have a clearer guideline on that?

ElBuenCuate Since: Oct, 2010
#522: Sep 25th 2019 at 5:40:58 PM

I found this drafts that I'm not sure if they are salvagable.

  • Peter Jackson Shot "I wide shot to present our main party." I don't know if we have that trope, but this draft a bad name, and only zero context examples.
  • It's About Time: "Characters reacting to the main couple finally hooking up."
  • Star Takeover: "The main actor ends with too much control over the production." Was mentioned that may be only an exagerated Wag the Director.

Edited by ElBuenCuate on Oct 26th 2019 at 5:13:18 AM

Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#523: Sep 25th 2019 at 8:57:43 PM

I dislike the stock phrase-y-ness and stub description, but I can see "It's About Time" be a trope where characters react approvingly to a couple becoming a couple. I can think of an example, too.

gc10 Human Bean from Pastastastan Since: Feb, 2019 Relationship Status: A cockroach, nothing can kill it.
Human Bean
#524: Sep 26th 2019 at 6:20:27 AM

[up][up]I bombed Star Takeover since I think it's redundant and unnecessary. For those other two, I'd rather look around the TLP or the tropes to see whether they're redundant or not.

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#525: Sep 26th 2019 at 1:50:59 PM

Redundant drafts, all of which I'm bombing:

Edited by Synchronicity on Oct 24th 2019 at 9:55:21 AM


Total posts: 2,437
Top