These are what we call the 'YMMV items.' Things that some people find in this work. We call them 'your mileage might vary' because not everyone sees these things in the same way. This starts discussions in the trope lists, a thing we don't want. Please use the discussion page if you'd like to discuss any of these items.
Fans of anime are more or less always made to look like Otaku.
Played for Laughs, but Nerds and Fandoms are common targets for quick jokes. Cue Flame War in the comments between people offended by this, Trolls, people who simply see it as a joke and others who legitimately hate nerds.
They also don't seem to be shy about letting Jenny McCarthy have it. Ever since she jumped on the bandwagon of "Medical Vaccines Cause Autism," the writers have had multiple articles calling her a untalented moron who's talking about subjects way out of her depth and potentially endangering a lot of people in the process.
Half the time Japan is mentioned, the writers can't resist the urge to put "Japan" and "weird" in the same sentence.
Aquaman is considered a Scrappy by the site.
Even site commenters themselves, whenever they and the authors are at odds. Proves that Hatedom can go both ways.
At the time of typing, 99% of hate is directed at "Title Guy" or "the Title Editor", due to the horribly mismatching titles he/she uses for Photoplasties.
Archive Binge: Those little "Recommended" links at the bottom of each page are diabolical. Even worse now with the "This day in Cracked" sidebar that shows articles released on that day, going back to the site's formation.
Some Articles have a tendency to come out as being poorly researched, reactionary, or just plain bashing you over the head with "X IS WRONG" and will sometimes even mock the people who argue with them. Thankfully, since there are so many editors and writers on the website, this is uncommon, but sadly, not unheard of.
Any time Boba Fett or Star Wars' Expanded Universe are mentioned, expect the writers to go on a rant on why they suck and no one should like them.
Most any article on sexism/feminism, racism, or most other social issue will be anvilicious. Part of the reason Christina H was so despised early on was that she attempted to tackle many of these issues, which wound up coming across as fairly hamhanded.
Admittedly, however, some accusations of anviliciousness come from people in the Cracked comments section who feel that if the authors advocate that they not hurt people or try to rise above baser instincts, the authors must be "manginas" who secretly wish to get into someone's pants. Some of this might be defensiveness on the part of commenters who chafe at the idea that they might have to treat people better than they're doing. That's why this is a YMMV trope.
Broken Base: The Photoplasty contest, an old tradition of the site, as of late 2012 or so. The main reason for the divide is an increasingly large number of the contests being 'true fact' style contests that amount to posting some fact over a picture. Themes tend to run either into the pop culture spectrum (little known facts about movies or music) or shocking facts like statistics on corporations or social justice issues. The divisive bit is that, as of lately, the fact-based ones will feature facts previously mentioned in Cracked articles.
There are some fans that come to be entertained and informed, who are lambasted by those who come strictly for the humor when they complain about an article's Critical Research Failures and misleading claims in the comments.
Browser Narcotic: The trope actually got its name from this XKCD's alt-text, which used the term to describe Cracked.com (although TV Tropes itself was used to illustrate the phenomenon). Now especially true with Cracked's Random Article button.
This article's #1 spot lists three Sonic games in reverse chronology, calls Sonic Unleashed a spinoff when it's a mainline game, and claims Shadow from Shadow the Hedgehog is Sonic with a dark redesign (not accusing Shadow of being a palette swap, claiming that Shadow is literally Sonic, whom Sega tried to reinvent as a gun-wielding badass).
The list "4 Insane Pieces of My Little Pony Fanart (By Grown Men)" reads like it was written by spending 5 minutes on Google, some highlights are:
Having a entry on a trollfic/crackfic writer who's not even active anymore, and presenting it as said author being serious.
Apparently in Wreck-It Ralph, Vanellope's game is called ''Candy Crush''. The author apparently also thinks Calhoun is a Player Character in a home video game, even though she's the main NPC in an arcade.
This article, at best, contains some hypotheses that are still heatly debated amongst linguists, and flagrant falsehoods at worst.
#5 claims that gendered languages are directly related to sexism... despite that it was disproved already. For example, German, Icelandic and Dutch are gendered languages, yet Germany, Iceland and the Netherlands are egalitarian countries.
#4 cites a study of very loose intellectual rigor that tries to prove Language Equals Thought, but ends up simply asking the same question in a different context.
#2 says that culture and opinions are a product of language, not the inverse.
#1 also contains the patent nonsense that some languages don't contain any future tense. To elaborate, some languages may not have any verb conjugation for the future, but it's still evident which time period is being referred to by virtue of context.
The article "5 Movie Happy Endings That Are About to Go Horribly Wrong" has this to say about Monsters, Inc.: "First of all, we're explicitly told that the energy produced by laughter is '10 times more powerful than screams.' That's all well and good, but the monster world doesn't exactly appear to be in the grips of an energy crisis." Except we're told several times that they are, and this was part of the villain's motive.
#1 from this article is actually from the Brazilian equivalent of The Onion ("Jornal Sensacionalista", literally "Sensationalist News"). A bit of an understandable mistake though because not only was there a language barrier, but apparently their source was a US site that also thought the incident was real.
This articleclaims "You'll note that, despite having one-tenth of the population of New York, you're a lot more likely to be the victim of a violent crime in Columbus, Ohio." when the graph directly above shows the opposite.*Note for "annual crimes per 1000 residents" New York got 9.07 for violent crime and Columbus got 7.67.
In addition, the article was written in 2014. It contains the line "They voted the controversial Proposition 8 into law in 2008, and same-sex marriage has been illegal in California ever since." The very Other Wiki article it links to states that the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional in 2013.
It claims that the original study linking it to thinness in the egg shells of peregrine falcons was false, without providing a link. In truth multiple studies have shown the egg shell link (in multiple bird species), and other toxic effects of DDT build up in ecosystems.
It claims that DDT was banned world wide when only the agricultural use of it was banned. It is still sprayed in house holds in many malaria afflicted countries.
Although malaria deaths did rise after the partial ban on DDT, there were other factors involved, such as the insects becoming resistant to the chemical.
This article makes tons of mistakes with animal relationships (claiming that Gastornis is close to kiwis and ostriches when it's really closer to ducks, and Hyaenodon close to raccoons when it's equally close to all carnivorans), confuses the "classic" saber-toothed felids with the saber-toothed sparassodont ("marsupial", in the article's words) Thylacosmilus, serves up an unhealthy serving of Anachronism Stew (Gastornis and Andrewsarchus actually died out long before the Pleistocene), makes unwarranted assumptions about ancestor-descendant relationships, and implies that dinosaurs are cold-blooded.
This article closes by saying "when The World Cup inevitably makes its way to the United States"... half the comments section is sure to point out it already did in 1994.
This article about life in South Korea attempts to make a point about plastic surgery, showing a picture of a group of girls with highly identical faces. However, that picture was actually photoshopped to make all of the girls look similar, and in reality they actually look completely different. Which was explained on a pagethat the Cracked article put a link to, directly underneath the picture.
Crosses the Line Twice: If Daniel O'Brien did any of the things he writes about in his column, Charles Manson would be freaked out. Swaim is the Only Sane Man in comparison, which is kinda funny considering the role reversal in the web series Agents of Cracked. Case in point: his apology to the Pennsylvania town where he recreated The Hunger Games at the youth center.
It was after the fact, but in a list "5 Ways To Enjoy Terrible Winter Olympic Events", it mentions that luge and skeleton is easy, because it's like a sled. Right after the death of Nodar Kumaritashvili during a crash while luging. It could've been an unfortunate coincidence that the article was posted at that time since it takes a while for them to actually post them. Which, in a ridiculously meta twist, was a "Funny Aneurysm" Moment itself, due to the same thing happening in Agents of Cracked, involving the death of Nicholas Cage.
Swaim's 7 Words You Can't Say On The Internet video, which includes him doubting that a lot of Scientologist figureheads are lurking in 4Chan threads. And then Anonymous declared war on Scientology...
This article about recently discovered scary organisms at one point has the caption "Huh. Apparently Spider-Man can beat Batman. Thanks, Nature!". A few months later, in Death Battle, Spidey goes up against the Caped Crusader and wins.
This 2010 article: "Don't worry, Michael [Biehn], we're pretty sure you got out of the [Alien] franchise just in time." Yeah, about that...
In 2007 David Wong wrote this article about what an ultra-realistic war simulation game would look like, featuring such elements as mistakenly destroying civilian targets under the erroneous assumption they were enemy buildings, accidentally killing civilians, deploying chemical weapons "Geneva convention be damned" and CIA field agents who operate according to their own agenda and obstruct the player at every turn. It even includes a lengthy Apocalypse Now reference. The article was obviously intended as a joke, but then five years later Spec Ops: The Line was released...
Hype Aversion: Cracked's in-article plugs for their De-Textbook (mostly added in by editors) have become so common that, more often than not, the top comments for any given article with such a plug will be complaining about it.
Their article titles more and more frequently use certain phrases to entice a click, to the point that it's very easy to get sick of it. "6 myths about X (you probably believe)", "5 things you didn't know about X" are huge offenders.
Internet Backdraft: The comments section exploded after John Cheese posted this article It's kind of a long story to explain, but the short of it is that a chunk of the comments section, who make a lot of tongue-in-cheek puns and meme jokes and already had a bit of friction with John Cheese, considered it a pretentious, arrogant attack on their community, but most were willing to shrug it off. However, it was then made much worse when John posted this tweet (and others like it) towards the entire comments section in response to some trolling and death threats he received on Facebook and Twitter, which sent the rest of the comments section into a full-blown rage. It then spread over to the forums, causing longtime members to be banned for posting anything that could be considered even remotely pro-comments section (which David Wong wrongly insisted was just filled with nothing but punk teenagers with a high sense of entitlement, and then called the readers cockroaches) or anti-Cheese, regardless of legitimacy or level-headedness. This blog goes into deeper detail.
"Drinking game: While reading the comments, take a shot whenever you see a comment complaining about the Iron Giant entry."
After Adam Tod Brown posted the article "6 Holiday Traditions No One Actually Enjoys", there was a moderate backlash in regards to a contentious joke he'd made in the article itself* he suggested that women with lottery ticket addictions weren't actually female. There was also some annoyance with the fact that saying that no one actually enjoys the things put on the list is not entirely accurate, to the point where it can be argued that people who don't like some of the entries are in the solid minority.
Robert Evans underestimated the number of Pro-Life readers the site had when he posted this article.
The jokes about autism in this article generated plenty of angry comments.
Iron Woobie: John Cheese is showing signs of this with his article about how not to pass on the abuse to your kids that you suffered as a child. He uses his horrible childhood as an example. A lot of Cheese's articles show him to be this, as he was not only abused as a child, but also had substance abuse problems and lived most of his life in poverty. Some of his stuff is like a humorous self-help lecture.
Magazine Decay: Not so much "decay" as a shift, since the content is still good, but the website seems to get less and less funny every day
There's a large amount of people that take the writers' harmless (if sometimes a little mean-spirited) jabs at various fandoms seriously and agree. The most blatant example would have to be their various stabs at the Star Wars' Expanded Universe.
The writers themselves have fallen victim to this on occasion as in this article which uses Alec Baldwin's scene from Glengarry Glen Ross to describe how one might become a "better person", when David Mamet has openly said he intended that scene to show what was wrong with rampant capitalism and cutthroat sales tactics.
More specifically: David Wong's point in the article ultimately boils down to "You are only the sum total of the valuable skills that you can provide the world." A valid message, but he apparently missed the fact that Glengarry Glen Ross is all about salesmen knowingly selling worthless real estate to gullible customers, and Alec Baldwin's big speech is meant to inspire them to sell more worthless real estate. The whole point of the speech is that the salesmen only care about how much they can outdo each other, and never question whether or not their work is valuable.
While Cracked is an American site with much of its contents revolving around American culture, a substantial number of readers are from other countries.
A fair number of people enjoy Cracked not for the comedic articles, but the more introspective and philosophical articles. And while they're never taken seriously, there are quite a few scientific and technology based articles which are actually rather informative.
Christina wrote this article. How do you hate someone who wrote that?
Retroactive Recognition: A strange example: one Photoshop contest featured someone who looked very much like Soren Bowie. A few days later, Soren made an article explaining that yes, it was him in the photo (he'd made it during one of his previous jobs).
The Scrappy: Due to the massive, often divided fandom for the website, there are a quite a few depending on who you ask:
Christina had a very bad habit early on of writing articles that beat readers over the head with the fact she was a woman, followed by a habit of making list articles grounded in opinions (but presenting them as facts). Most readers agree she has since been Rescued from the Scrappy Heap and left the mantle for...
His "5 Supposedly Fun Activities Nobody Actually Enjoys" series of articles are also worth mentioning. Apparently many people do actually enjoy these activities, if the comments section is any indication.
It has gotten to the point where Adam Tod Brown articles usually end up with the top comments bashing him or something he said in the article.
In general, Adam Tod Brown has a tendency to, much like Christina H before him, write his opinions as if they were facts, or at the very least as if they were vast majority/unanimous opinions and nobody was simply pointing it out before, and does this even if his opinion is an extremely unpopular one.
Given that his columns are called "The People vs. Adam Tod Brown" it could be argued that writing contentious articles meant to generate a response is actually his intent.
Webcomics in general tend to suffer from this. Most readers still flinch every time they hear the words "White Ninja." Fatawesome is equally hated, and many readers don't care much for Basic Instructions either.
Luke McKinney. Starting with an article about sexism in comics, he's been writing articles akin to those found on social justice blogs, then dedicating articles to sniping at the comments sections of his previous writings. Though actually, he mainly made fun of the sexist comments.
John Cheese and David Wong are quickly becoming this for the members in the comments section, thanks to a certain incident. (See Internet Backdraft, above.)
JF Sargent. He wrote a poorly researched and condescending article on video game prejudices. After the comments pointed out the pure number of errors present, he responded by calling all the readers "privileged nitwits" and "virgins". Needless to say, this didn't get him any fans. This also earns plenty of "you're deeply misunderstanding this work" comments.
Kristi Harrison, for her article 5 Life Lessons From A Former Mean Girl. The comments bashed her for fishing for proof that she's a good person, not actually apologizing to those she's wronged (and making flimsy justifications for her behavior), and making bullying seem like it's not that big a deal (and ending up defending Chris Brown in the process). She also got hate for making fun of the mother of a special needs kid.
Almost everything written by David Wong. Just go see the Moment of Awesome page.
Most of Cheese's articles, particularly this article where he spells out quite clearly that parents can't control their kids indefinitely. The most you can do is educate them and recognize that they will make their own choices.
And then there's 5 Things Nobody Tells You About Being Poor, which is pretty much required reading if you buy into any of the various bits of mythology on poverty, like the poor being lazy. The article explains, in brutal clarity, how poverty is a self-enforcing cycle that manages to claw back any gains those trapped in it make.
Also: any well-off person in the modern world who honestly believes that they've never gotten any help from anyone is completely delusional. Civilized society wouldn't exist if people didn't help each other.
Unfortunate Implications: Their article on retarded supervillain schemes included the line: "Marvel's relationship to the Spider-ManClone Saga is like Germany's relationship to WWII: They like to pretend they never did anything so horrible, because its the only way they can continue living." All very funny, adequately sums up how mind-bendingly idiotic the Clone Saga was, except for one thing: Germany doesn't "pretend" that it never did anything so horrible, rather facing up to its atrocities and donating billions of Euros to Jewish groups and to Israel in "we're really sorry" aid. In fact, a huge part of German culture and national life is Vergangenheitsbewältigung (lit. "coming to terms with the past"), and it's something of a Berserk Button for Germans to suggest that Germany has denied its crimes under Adolf Hitler, as the article seems to imply.
They Just Didn't Care: The Top 8 Video Games of 2012. Eight different Cracked writers chose a game they feel represents 2012. Almost every entry admits they either aren't gamers or they haven't actually played the game they chose. Some games on the list didn't even come out in 2012 (One came out in 2009, and another came out in 2013.)
Harsher in Hindsight: Take a look at the main page image. Back in 1975, that could easily be Played for Laughs (and was indeed a dig at the then-current big-budget disaster movie Earthquake). After 9/11? Try looking at the plane hitting what looks like the WTC, complete with the all-too familiar ring of smoke and fire around the tower's midsection, without cringing.
Magazine Decay: The constant Executive Meddling in the later days, followed by the switch to a copycat of Maxim, followed by the outright termination of the mag.
Nausea Fuel: The last few years of the mag were rife with bodily function jokes, including a whole article on different types of farts and another on different types of puking.
Padding: The 2000s issues were rife with this: repeats from classic issues, a secondGodzilla (1998) parody more than two years after the fact, several song parodies...