There are subjectives, and then there are these. While you may believe a work fits here, and you might be right, people tend to have rather vocal, differing opinions about this subject. Please keep these off of the work's page.
Consider the other section as a dumping ground for places and things that we know suck, but don't fit into any other category.
Important Note: Any additions need to be considered objectively horrible. A restaurant with a few bad reviews and mostly average reviews doesn't qualify; same thing goes for infomercial products. Also, don't include products that have been mentioned on other pages, such as toys. Bad infomercials are not considered this trope; place those into the Advertising page instead. Likewise for bad automobiles; they should go onto the The Alleged Car page under the Real Life folder.
open/close all folders
The World War 2-era Blackburn Botha torpedo/patrol bomber, of which the government test-pilot's assessment began with the words: "Entry into this aircraft is difficult. It ought to be made impossible." The rest of his report consists of tearing multiple aspects of the design a new one in his efforts to show why.
Nor was it just the Botha. Blackburn in general had had a long history of producing what one aviation writer called "damned awful to fly aircraft" which were also aesthetic horrors, and to the very end of the war it continued to miss the mark, turning out aircraft which were either lemons or which would have been astoundingly good if only they'd been ready three or four years earlier. It took until the 1950s for Blackburn to finally turn out an aircraft that was a winner in every way, but the Buccaneer had to wait until it was almost ready for retirement to show its mettle on the battlefield (in Iraq, 1991). Although given that its original design mission had been delivery of nuclear bombs onto Soviet naval strike groups and high-value shore targets, this is probably just as well.
The Christmas Bullet, brainchild of "Doctor" William Whitney Christmas. Famous for having wings that flapped like a bird (in 1918), it cost the Army not one, but two prototype engines and killed its own pilots. To top it all off, he got Congress and the Army to pay for it. Christmas was a con artist and "the kind of man they write songs about" according to one author.
Haribo released a sugar-free version of their famous Gummy Bears, but despite the warnings on the packaging, people still had horrible experiences with it. The product either caused heavy diarrhea or flatulence, sometimes even Potty Failure, due to it containing maltitol, a sugar substitute that the human body cannot digest properly. If some of the reviews are true, then it even caused hospitalization. The only positive thing is that it works as an impressive colon cleanser and weight loss treatment. You can watch professional stunt eater L.A. Beast eat an entire 1-pound bag of it to predictable results here. It also led to many hilarious Amazon reviews.
In 1996, the FDA approved selling food made with Olestra, a fake-fat ingredient that could completely replace the fats and oils in many foods. Unfortunately, the idea soon proved too good to be true. Olestra has a nasty habit of depriving the body of its ability to absorb vitamins and other vital components. It also came with a host of unwanted side effects, including abdominal cramping, gas, and loose bowel movements. Olestra is not approved for use in several countries including Canada and the U.K., but despite this, it remains on the FDA's approved list, and the initial warning labels were even removed in 2003. TIME magazine included Olestra in its list of the 50 worst inventions.
When we watch infomercials, we're never sure if the products are as good as they claim to be without a second opinion. While there are in fact several products which are quite useful and worth the price, these... aren't. Here are a few examples.
The Infinity Razor claims to be a razor which never requires replacement or sharpening. In reality, it's an overpriced disposable razor that dulls quickly.
The Steam Buddy is intended to dewrinkle clothes easily, and looks to be a cross between an iron and lint roller. If you like getting your garments wet and still leaving them wrinkled, then by all means, get one now.
The MXZ Pocket Saw is an "An Seen on TV!" product that claimed to be able to cut through anything, including brick, glass, tile, and drywall. To its credit, it can... provided you have the strength and endurance of a dozen men and don't mind working at it for a long time. The commercial for it was deceptive to the point of false advertising: a careful eye could spot that several of the items it was supposedly sawing through had already been cut. As Attack of the Show demonstrates, it's not even useful for cutting through a lamb's head.
A similar as-seen-on-TV product is the Open-X, which really does work quite well. Funnily enough, it also comes in annoying clamshell packaging; unlike the marketing agency that promoted Package Shark, though, the marketers for Open-X were very much aware of the irony, and even pointed it out on the packaging.
The Emery Cat is a cat toy that is basically a rest with an emery board on it, filled with catnip on it, advertised to prevent owners from having to clip their cats' nails all the time. A great idea... that's very poorly executed. The board is VERY flimsy and is easily breakable, the emery board isn't scratchable enough, and the whole thing can just flip over very easily.
Smooth Away is a hair removal system where the user takes a pink buffing oval thingy and rubs it against needed areas. Unfortunately, it doesn't work. The buffing system can remove dead skin cells, but not hairs, the whole thing can irritate, or even SWELL certain areas (such as lips), and the whole "exofilating skin" effect is actually done by leftover crystals from the buffer.
HeadOn, which is known for ads being deliberately unclear about its purpose but considers itself a homeopathic medicine, is almost entirely paraffin wax. You would literally get the same result rubbing a candle on your forehead.
Maxim's 100 Cable Channels We Don't Want, for essentially the same reasons as AOL Radio's "100 Worst Songs Ever" list (see the horrible music subpage). Each channel's passage about it is completely uninformative and nondescript (i.e. The CW's passage reads "Name five CW shows. (This is a trick question. Your ability to answer will greatly affect your chances of being invited to our basketball picnic.)"), but it goes even further on its qualifications for being SBIH, as the passages are uninformative and nondescript if the channel has a passage at all; none of the channels between TBS ("Good for Seinfeld and Family Guy reruns. That's it.") and BBC America ("Doctor Who isnít very good. Everyone is lying to you. Trust us.") have any passage whatsoever, not even elitist nonsense (and no, the "joke" for HBO Signature doesn't count, since that wasn't formatted in the same way as the passages), and the last passage is for the entry after BBC America, Showtime 2 (never mind that except for the most insane cable providers, Signature and Showtime 2, along with the Plex and Encore sub-channels always come free with the main networks). Since these were the only ones after the 30th entry, that leaves 67 entries - approximately two thirds of the list - without a passage, and towards the end they call foreign language networks 'useless', when fans of those channels and natives of said foreign areas would definitely argue otherwise. At least the aforementioned AOL Radio list actually put uninformative nonsense next to every entry instead of giving up after the 30th entry. There are also numerous other flaws that are worth mentioning, such as how lazy the list is and how the "jokes" sometimes come off as elitist remarks (like SoapNet's passage, which says "Soap operas are perfect for people who donít know the Internet exists and/or canít afford a hobby."), but listing all the problems would practically warrant a page of its own.
TV show Kitchen Nightmares reached almost memetic status when it featured Amy's Baking Company, a bistro in Scottsdale, Arizona. The restaurant is a perfect example of how not to run a business in nearly every way possible. The owners are spiteful egomaniacs who believe everyone is conspiring against them and have no respect for their staff or customers. They've picked fights with customers who complained about the awful service they received, to the point where the police had to be called in. Over 100 staff members have been hired and fired since the restaurant's opening, many of whom were culinary school graduates who had more cooking experience than the owner. One girl was fired in front of the camera because she dared to question Amy (she was actually asking Amy to confirm the table the meal was suppose to go to). Sammy tried to defuse the situation by telling her that she isn't fired (which makes it the only nice thing he ever did in the episode). They've also employed deceptive tactics such as stealing pictures of food off the internet to put in their menus and filling their shelves with desserts bought from other bakeries. Husband Sammy even confessed to pocketing every tip meant for the waitresses, an action that is illegal in the U.S. To top it all off, Amy herself is an incredibly incompetent chef, taking hours to poorly cook a meal for a single customer. To date, it remains the only episode in the history of the US version where Gordon Ramsaycalled it quits and left before he could even begin to fix the place. The full Kitchen Nightmares episode can be viewed here. If you're wondering how they manage to get customers at all, it's because they are right next to a movie theater.
And since the episode aired, some customers have come curious if it's actually that bad. It is.
Magical Molly. A parody of how Puella Magi Madoka Magica would turn out if dubbed by 4Kids Entertainment, the "parody" simply consists of the following: create character/episode page, change Japanese names to American ones, apply mild censorship, rinse, repeat. There is almost no humor in the articles, and most of the "censorship" consists of very superficial things such as Family-Friendly Firearms and Never Say "Die", with no thoughtful insights as to what 4Kids would actually do to Madoka. And even that is removed at one point, defeating the whole purpose of the parody. Furthermore, the author often treats the characters as if they were simply the original Madoka characters with their names changed, which can be seen on the ask blog. There are even merchandise pages that, like the characters, mostly consist of official Madoka merchandise with the names changed; the wealth of fictional Magical Molly merchandise only further strengthens the Sonichu analogies. Most of the "original" art simply consists of Madoka Magica clip art hastily photoshopped over generic backgrounds, always using the same Impact font. The author recently tried to justify the page by subtly suggesting it was a rewriting/repackaging of Madoka rather than a parody, but the fact remains that it takes 4Kids' most reviled dubbing practices and does nothing to make them interesting or funny. For what it's worth, however, the author takes criticism quite well and seems to treat Magical Molly! as an Old Shame (even if he continues to update it).
Transsexual.org is a website owned by Jennifer Diane Reitz, a.k.a. Chatoyance, former webcomic artist now most infamous for her The Conversion Bureau stories. The same hatred of men that permeates her other works, unfortunately, radiates from this one. It claims to be full of advice for transgender people (mostly MtF) but it's actually full of offensive gender stereotypes, very outdated and outright false information, loads of misandry and creepy idealization of women, a autobiography of the site owner that's most likely complete bullshit, and an infamous personality quiz that pretty much labels anyone as mentally female. It even gives tips on how to cheat on psych tests for gender reassignment surgery (which anyone with a half a brain should never, ever do). There are numerous blogs and websites dedicated to warning people about the site, most LGBT groups want nothing to do with Reitz, and even Encyclopedia Dramatica of all places is openly disgusted by it. The worst part is that the site's name may end up luring in people with gender identity confusion, thus feeding this propaganda and misinformation to them at their most vulnerable (some have speculated this might be the page's actual purpose). The whole thing has been described by most reviewers as "if Buffalo Bill ran a advice website".