Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions 
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Due to its dubious legality in regards of copyright, AI-generated artwork will not be allowed as options in IP discussions. See this Wiki Talk thread for reference on the decision.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions 
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions 
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example  Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by Willbyr on Jan 20th 2024 at 9:11:31 AM

rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2676: Apr 1st 2019 at 2:52:00 PM

[up]It doesn't matter that Nintendo used the art in Ultimate; it still comes from different games. And speaking of consistency, much of that artwork is 2D art, some in art styles very different from the 3D models they use as Assist Trophies. If people want to see how the characters look in their home series, they should go to the character pages for that series.

Anyway, I was thinking that the image on Schrödinger's Question should use a screenshot from the remake. Not only is it in color, but it shows the options the player can pick.

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/firered_rival.png

Keet cleanup
Piterpicher Veteran Editor IV from Poland, for real (Series 2) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Veteran Editor IV
#2677: Apr 1st 2019 at 3:01:24 PM

[up]Agree about Assist Trophies, and agree about Schrödinger's Question.

Edited by Piterpicher on Apr 1st 2019 at 12:01:41 PM

Currently mostly inactive. An incremental game I tested: https://galaxy.click/play/176 (Gods of Incremental)
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#2678: Apr 1st 2019 at 4:10:20 PM

The Smash dialogue might be better on its own thread?

rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
DarthEnderX Since: Jun, 2012
#2681: Apr 1st 2019 at 4:42:24 PM

"It doesn't matter that Nintendo used the art in Ultimate; it still comes from different games. And speaking of consistency, much of that artwork is 2D art, some in art styles very different from the 3D models they use as Assist Trophies."

Is that an actual policy though? Because by that reasoning, every video game character page should be using the sprites and models directly from the game. But most game pages use the official art for the characters.

I don't understand why the people who make the game, choosing that art to represent those characters in the game, "doesn't matter".

Especially with Ultimate spirits, because you can tell with almost all of them that the images chosen for spirits are the images they based the assist trophy models on. Like, Alucard looks more like the art from Symphony they used for his spirit than he does like any of his sprites or models from the CV games.

When push comes to shove, you gotta do what you love, even if it's not a good idea.
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2682: Apr 1st 2019 at 6:50:28 PM

[up]The trophies that appear in Ultimate use their official Assist Trophy renders. The ones that only appear in Brawl don't have transparent backgrounds, but they could be made transparent (there's a whole cleanup project dedicated to this), and it would be great if someone could edit out the trophy bases too. There are better ways of making the images consistent, and characters shouldn't use the same art on different games character pages, like Isaac on Golden Sun Protagonists and Jeff on EarthBound: The Chosen Four.

Keet cleanup
DarthEnderX Since: Jun, 2012
#2683: Apr 2nd 2019 at 1:22:53 AM

Well, I'm certainly more bothered by the sloppy formatting than I am by the fact that the Spirits aren't being used. If someone gets images that are all transparent/don't have bases, I don't have any problem with that. I can standardize the image sizes myself.

When push comes to shove, you gotta do what you love, even if it's not a good idea.
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2684: Apr 2nd 2019 at 8:31:02 PM

I replaced the Schrödinger's Question image with the remake and updated the Image Source page.

Keet cleanup
LordGro from Germany Since: May, 2010
#2685: Apr 4th 2019 at 11:55:08 AM

I'm trying to find an image for a work page. Now I wonder—am I free to use an image that is in the public domain in the USA, but not in other countries?

Let's just say and leave it at that.
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2686: Apr 4th 2019 at 2:42:59 PM

[up]Most of the images we use are fair use anyway. If you mean something like a single-panel comic, then I'd think it's OK to use as long as it's public domain in the US, but I'm neither a lawyer nor a staff member.

Ambiguously Brown should be added to the "multiple threads" list.

Keet cleanup
Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#2687: Apr 4th 2019 at 3:48:39 PM

~rdj1922, why did you re-add the old Star Tours image under the examples line? There was no discussion to do so and it makes the page look extremely awkward.

Edited by Karxrida on Apr 4th 2019 at 3:56:20 AM

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2688: Apr 4th 2019 at 4:26:28 PM

[up]I said on the recently-closed IP thread that "Since they're technically separate rides, I think each section should have its own image," but I got no support or opposition to that proposal.

Keet cleanup
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#2689: Apr 4th 2019 at 5:12:10 PM

[up] That's a default "no consensus" state.

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#2690: Apr 5th 2019 at 1:52:11 PM

You can make an argument for a page split so the old image can be reused. I wouldn't be against that.

Regardless, I'm going to pull the old image again, if that's alright.

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2691: Apr 5th 2019 at 2:19:45 PM

[up]I don't see why the page has to be split just so both images can be used; both sections are relatively short. I would just like each section to have its own image, with the top one moved to "The Adventures Continue" section below.

Keet cleanup
rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#2692: Apr 6th 2019 at 7:24:54 AM

While I like the image on Closed Captioning in concept, the quality is really bad. Could someone find a higher-quality version?

Keet cleanup
RamenChef Since: Dec, 2017 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#2693: Apr 6th 2019 at 8:25:05 AM

Has Stephan Pastis given permission to use entire works as needed? (Also, is there a place where such artists are listed?)

thok That's Dr. Title, thank you! (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Non-Canon
That's Dr. Title, thank you!
#2694: Apr 7th 2019 at 8:12:22 AM

Is there a good way to set up a general image cleanup of a trope with multiple subpages? For example, I think it would make sense to look over all of the images on subpages of That One Boss in one fell swoop, but right now the current structure involves making one thread for each subpage at a time, and hijacking such a thread to handle all subpages doesn't seem particularly productive.

Obviously for some tropes such a project would be too vast to really make sense as one thread (for example, I wouldn't want to try doing a single thread to clean up the images on every Nightmare Fuel page), but for tropes with a relatively few subpages I think this might make sense.

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#2695: Apr 7th 2019 at 9:42:09 AM

We need to close some threads—we're hitting capacity.

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#2696: Apr 7th 2019 at 4:14:56 PM

RE the Closed Captioning pic - it's definitely terrible but I can't find a better quality version...probably warrants a thread.

RE Stephan Pastis - not that I'm aware of, and no.

RE subpage cleanup - dunno if that would be better for here or Short Term Projects.

Edited by Willbyr on Apr 7th 2019 at 6:16:04 AM

RamenChef Since: Dec, 2017 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#2697: Apr 7th 2019 at 4:21:10 PM

[up]Could a list of such artists be added to the OP, then? I feel like the list would be small enough to be enumerated there.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#2698: Apr 8th 2019 at 4:09:06 AM

[up] I only know of one such case off the top of my head, and that's xkcd. I believe the original statement was written as a general case...if there's others that have given their blessing, it would be helpful to know them.

Edited by Willbyr on Apr 8th 2019 at 6:10:30 AM

Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#2699: Apr 9th 2019 at 2:17:05 PM

For Good News, Bad News, eroock suggested a tighter crop here of a previous suggestion to increase attention to the trope. Gets a [tup] from me.

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other

Total posts: 9,722
Top