Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help: Jesus Saves

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Aug 24th 2014 at 11:59:00 PM
DCC Since: Jun, 2011
#1: Jun 26th 2014 at 10:51:52 AM

Jesus Saves has a rather hostile description—the first several paragraphs, and the picture, are all mocking the trope. In fact, the first bit, and the picture, are only a list of puns on the trope name/Christian slogan.

Details about why some people dislike a trope are usually better reserved for the later parts of a writeup, rather than dominating it, IMHO.

(I'm only talking about the trope writeup here; TRS is not the proper forum to debate the merits or flaws of Christian doctrines of forgiveness of sins.)

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#2: Jun 26th 2014 at 10:59:14 AM

Good catch. There's "we like funny" and there's "we're going to try to be funny at the expense of the trope description". This is the latter.

The whole trope description needs to be rewritten; it's never clearly defined what, exactly, the trope is. The first half is jokes, the second half appears to be a theology essay. But what's the trope?

edited 26th Jun '14 11:01:58 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#3: Jun 26th 2014 at 12:32:22 PM

I question the purpose behind this page myself.

edited 26th Jun '14 12:33:10 PM by Willbyr

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#4: Jun 26th 2014 at 12:37:14 PM

The trope is about a story using Jesus or one of the Abrahamitic gods as saviours in a plot.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#5: Jun 26th 2014 at 12:49:31 PM

The name, image, and first... dozen or so lines made me think it was about the stock pun where Jesus saves (by blocking a goal, or hitting CTRL+S).

The laconic made me think it was about someone taking advantage of religion and thinking they're going to heaven just for accepting Jesus.

The description made me think it seems to be about Christian Divine Intervention, nothing about "salvation" in the going to heaven or sinner sense.

So... yeah. That's an issue. Of the three, I think only the Laconic is really a trope. The first isn't a trope so much as a stock pun, and the third is just Divine Intervention but more specific. But I can think of plenty of examples where a religious person does bad because they believe they can be saved by accepting Jesus.

edited 26th Jun '14 12:52:15 PM by Larkmarn

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#6: Jun 26th 2014 at 1:19:30 PM

What a mess. I'm inclined to scrap the whole thing.

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#7: Jun 26th 2014 at 1:20:52 PM

Definitely Wick Check time. The earliest I can complete one is late Sat-Sun. Anyone faster?

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#8: Jun 26th 2014 at 1:22:12 PM

Yeah, even if we pick a tropeable definition and stick with it, I just don't think the name will ever be indicative. It's kind of like Battle Royale With Cheese... cool name, but it can mean too much it'll never be a GOOD name.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#9: Jun 26th 2014 at 6:48:33 PM

Wick check of usage:

That's all from the work pages. None of them seem to have a proper definition. I'm inclined to cut...

It has 52 wicks and 56 inbounds, by the way. Do we need to be concerned about those?

edited 26th Jun '14 6:51:36 PM by theAdeptRogue

tryrar Since: Sep, 2010
#10: Jun 26th 2014 at 7:05:26 PM

......what is this I don't even

Seriously though, the description is all over the place, and I can't parse what it's trying to say this trope is. And the wick check(thanks Rogue!) shows nobody else can either, so I agree on cut

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#12: Jun 26th 2014 at 7:19:40 PM

If there's a trope hiding here at all, I think it's the Laconic, something like "it's a plot point that Faith=Redemption and Lack of Faith=No Redemption for You! no matter what else you do."

50+ inbounds is more than we like to break, but honestly, I think that the joke may be a more solid trope than the theological one. It might bear running through YKTTW if we can come up with something that's got some meat to it.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#13: Jun 26th 2014 at 8:23:12 PM

If there's a trope hiding here at all, I think it's the Laconic, something like "it's a plot point that Faith=Redemption and Lack of Faith=No Redemption for You! no matter what else you do."

That just feels like Faith–Heel Turn writ large, maybe with some Discussed Trope on the side.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#14: Jun 26th 2014 at 8:42:06 PM

Mmmm... Not really. This isn't "Not having Faith makes you become evil or act bad." It's a redemption thing, not a behavior thing.

I think.
Maybe.

edited 26th Jun '14 8:42:17 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#15: Jun 26th 2014 at 9:01:25 PM

So... more like the inverse of Faith–Heel Turn where a character earns redemption by gaining (or regaining) their faith? Because that seems to be the only usage that sort-of makes sense.

ETA: No. Sorry, scratch that. We already have a trope for that — Heel–Faith Turn.

edited 26th Jun '14 9:03:24 PM by theAdeptRogue

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#17: Jun 27th 2014 at 6:01:48 AM

Hmmmmm...making it a redirect to Heel–Faith Turn might be the best thing to do.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#18: Jun 27th 2014 at 6:06:35 AM

Heel–Faith Turn has little to do with Jesus Saves save the religious aspects.

Jesus Saves, as I said, is about Jesus or other Abrahamitic gods literally saving someone.

Heel–Faith Turn is about faith or religious experiences flipping somone's allegiances.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
theAdeptrogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#19: Jun 27th 2014 at 7:09:57 AM

[up]Is that tropeworthy, though? The definition is very vague beyond the trope name being used in a literal sense anyhow.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#20: Jun 27th 2014 at 7:12:37 AM

[up] Well, it's tropeworthy in that it's Divine Intervention, which we have. Is it distinct? I can't see why it would be.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#21: Jun 27th 2014 at 7:13:13 AM

Yeah, I would think so. It's frequently used by religious works as a way to advance religion, for example, or to exploit religion for storytelling purposes.

That said, the wicks aren't very impressive and the description needs cleaning.

eta: Divine Intervention is more akin to a Deus ex Machina trope and more general insofar as it applies to any divinity.

edited 27th Jun '14 7:15:00 AM by SeptimusHeap

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#22: Jun 27th 2014 at 7:29:15 AM

Using Septimus's definition:

  • Jesus or other Abrahamitic gods literally saving someone

I think it's tropeworthy, recognizing that it is only a used in a niche category: Overtly religious or clearly allegorical works, or those that use an Abrahamitic-esque Crystal Dragon Jesus absolutely straight.

But as Too Rare to Trope says,

For an example, if a pattern is only visible in Ugandan literature in the 1970s, it's still a trope as long as it conveys some sort of message (even if that message is only understandable to readers of 1970s Ugandan literature),

It's never going to be a trope of legend, but I think we can get it to at least "Healthy" standards.

edited 27th Jun '14 7:34:45 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#23: Jun 27th 2014 at 8:46:51 AM

Any attempt to document religious literature expressing religious views would have to be carefully monitored keep out the type of snark that the current page is widespread on this page.

It isn't our job to mock religious or to debate theology.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#24: Jun 27th 2014 at 9:03:22 AM

Yes. And? That's no reason to not make the page.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#25: Jun 27th 2014 at 9:08:37 AM

I don't think that it's a widespread enough problem to warrant special measures, but yeah, this page will need a substantial description rewrite both for mocking and clarity reasons.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

PageAction: JesusSaves
22nd Aug '14 10:16:52 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 58
Top