Follow TV Tropes

Following

Is this an example?

Go To

Do you have trouble remembering the difference between Deathbringer the Adorable and Fluffy the Terrible?

Do you have trouble recognizing when you've written a Zero-Context Example?

Not sure if you really have a Badass Bookworm or just a guy who likes to read?

Well, this is the thread for you. We're here to help you will all the finer points of example writing. If you have any questions, we can answer them. Don't be afraid. We don't bite. We all just want to make the wiki a better place for everyone.


Useful Tips:

  • Make sure that the example makes sense to both people who don't know the work AND don't know the trope.
    • Wrong: The Mentor: Kevin is this to Bob in the first episode.
    • Right: The Mentor: Kevin takes Bob under his wing in the first episode and teaches him the ropes of being a were-chinchilla.
  • Never just put the trope title and leave it at that.
    • Wrong: Badass Adorable
    • Right: Badass Adorable: Xavier, the group's cute little mascot, defeats three raging elephants with both hands tied behind his back using only an uncooked spaghetti noodle.
  • When is normally far less important than How.
    • Wrong: Big Bad: Of the first season.
    • Right: Big Bad: The heroes have to defeat the Mushroom Man lest the entirety of Candy Land's caramel supply be turned into fungus.
  • A character name is not an explanation.


Other Resources:


For best results, please include why you think an example is iffy in your first post.

Also, many oft-misused tropes/topics have their own threads, such as Surprisingly Realistic Outcome (here) and Fan-Preferred Couple (here). Tropers are better able to give feedback on examples you bring up to specific threads.

For cleaning up examples of Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard, you must use their dedicated threads: Complete Monster Cleanup, Magnificent Bastard Cleanup.

Edited by Synchronicity on Sep 18th 2023 at 11:42:55 AM

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1226: Apr 9th 2015 at 3:23:46 PM

edited 9th Apr '15 3:35:23 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
#1227: Apr 9th 2015 at 3:32:26 PM

Not that flexible. The Worf in The Worf Effect needs to actually be an established character, not just a stock celebrity known for being good at something.

Community played with and lampshaded it when Jeff's ego was blown out of proportion by people telling him, "You're more handsome than Ryan Reynolds. You're more handsome than the guy who's famous for being handsome."

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#1228: Apr 12th 2015 at 6:43:56 PM

Can an alternate hairstyle for a character count as a One-Scene Wonder in a particular episode? I initially thought that the trope was specifically about characters, but now I'm not so sure.

MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#1229: Apr 12th 2015 at 7:16:00 PM

[up]No, One-Scene Wonder is very clearly about characters. So an example about a hairstyle would be shoehorning.

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#1230: Apr 12th 2015 at 7:42:14 PM

The page in question is YMMV.My Little Pony Friendship Is Magic S 5 E 3 Castle Sweet Castle, by the way. If it's not an example, could someone else do the honors? I already deleted it once before, and I'd prefer not to be seen as Edit Warring.

EDIT: The forum seems to be inserting "-%20" near the end of the link, breaking it, and I'm not sure why.

edited 12th Apr '15 7:47:56 PM by MrL1193

MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#1231: Apr 12th 2015 at 7:57:39 PM

The forum seems to be inserting "-%20" near the end of the link, breaking it, and I'm not sure why.

This is a bug.

Anyway, I removed the example from that YMMV page.

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
SetsunasaNiWa Parole Model Since: Apr, 2015
Parole Model
#1233: Apr 13th 2015 at 10:32:53 AM

An example of Lethal Chef?

edited 13th Apr '15 10:34:42 AM by SetsunasaNiWa

SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
#1234: Apr 13th 2015 at 10:37:06 AM

[up] I don't think so, unless there's an implication that, without Yukie's guidance, Chris would have made something absolutely disgusting. There's a big difference between "Lethal Chef" and "overdid it on the cumin".

edited 13th Apr '15 10:37:22 AM by SolipSchism

SetsunasaNiWa Parole Model Since: Apr, 2015
Parole Model
#1235: Apr 13th 2015 at 12:02:54 PM

[up] Will making it explicitly about Cola soft drink and stir-fry mushrooms suffice? She also starts by squandering oil and then nearly burning it, I've clipped that to avoid excessive length.

edited 13th Apr '15 12:03:33 PM by SetsunasaNiWa

Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#1236: Apr 13th 2015 at 12:07:24 PM

If she's "in training", then it would be expected that she'd make mistakes. Still sounds chairs-y. To be considered a Lethal Chef, the character must regularly perform feats of culinary horror, or at the very least do it once while placed in charge of the kitchen and then never be allowed near the place again.

edited 13th Apr '15 12:08:37 PM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
SetsunasaNiWa Parole Model Since: Apr, 2015
Parole Model
#1237: Apr 13th 2015 at 12:35:54 PM

[up] Note that I'm after Defied Trope, not straight play.

Not that I'm going to force this in or overturn any opinions, but to me this one feels much better than what current PlayingWith.Lethal Chef has to offer. Yukie sees it coming, and skillfully subverts it. I'm thinking of this as not the common cheap gag Characters as Device Lethal Chef. Note that smoothest justifying detail about the Cola idea coming from awareness of her lover's preferences. Chris would end things in disaster, which she absolutely doesn't want, since she's going to act the housewife role in the nearest future (another detail that didn't fit initially). Handle it poorly in training, and it's going to continue in the real deal.

There are plots in other works where Lethal Chefs are subjected to training. Training usually ends hopelessly, but those moments aren't episodic aversions per "natural mistakes", are they?

edited 13th Apr '15 1:28:48 PM by SetsunasaNiWa

Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#1238: Apr 13th 2015 at 12:50:05 PM

Defied Trope requires that a character be aware that a trope is occurring or is likely to occur and take steps to prevent it. Some degree of Lampshade Hanging is often present.

If Alice decides to give Bob a shot at cooking, observes that Bob is using a mixture of cola and baking soda, and then tells him to get out before he makes everyone's stomach explode, then it might count as a defied trope.

Again, the question is whether it's merely a case of "Bob being a novice or clueless cook" versus "Bob being a hilariously awful cook". That must be settled for the trope to even be in context. It sounds like your example could qualify.

edited 13th Apr '15 12:50:39 PM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1239: Apr 15th 2015 at 10:02:04 AM

From what I can remember of Majikoi, it's not an example. Not being able to cook well and making mistakes while actually learning how to cook isn't the same as being a Lethal Chef. She's just inexperienced with cooking, not someone who'll create poisons from perfectly ordinary and safe ingredients.

Made me think of a recent episode in Kiniro Mosaic, where Isami mentioned that her best dish was fried eggs, burnt to a crisp, just to get out of helping with cooking (or baking, more specifically). Would that count as Exploited Trope?

edited 15th Apr '15 10:04:07 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#1241: Apr 15th 2015 at 11:22:20 AM

As a reminder, Lethal Chef does not need to prepare literally toxic food, but the food must at least be spectacularly inedible. A poor chef serves burnt toast. A Lethal Chef serves the charred remains of something that used to be bread. A poor chef serves undercooked pasta. A Lethal Chef serves frozen pasta.

edited 15th Apr '15 11:29:03 AM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
#1242: Apr 15th 2015 at 1:01:23 PM

I think really bizarre ingredient combinations are a common way to play it too. Like Raine from Tales of Symphonia. She's established as a terrible cook. In one skit (at least, I think it was a skit; it may have been a cutscene, but I doubt it) she talks about how cooking is a science, and science requires you to take risks and experiment with unusual combinations in order to come up with brilliant ideas. And then she proposes that since cake is normally sweet, it would be a good idea to try a spicy cake. Reactions are unanimously horrified at the idea.

I think a proposal to add cola to a stir-fry could qualify someone as a Lethal Chef unless it somehow turns out good.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#1244: Apr 15th 2015 at 1:08:36 PM

I have a feeling that Cordon Bleugh Chef was proposed with the intention of being distinct from Lethal Chef without anyone actually reading the latter trope, because as it stands they overlap pretty significantly.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1245: Apr 15th 2015 at 1:10:33 PM

Well, the distinction I've used is that Cordon Bleugh Chef is for weird ingredients and Lethal Chef for the outright dangerous ones.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1246: Apr 15th 2015 at 1:17:08 PM

Yeah, that's the impression I get as well. It would also include characters who actually know what they're doing, but the results aren't palatable to more "normal" people, the way I understand it.

Check out my fanfiction!
SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
#1247: Apr 15th 2015 at 1:43:39 PM

Actually, I completely forgot about Cordon Bleugh Chef. I withdraw my last statement. :x

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#1248: Apr 15th 2015 at 11:28:51 PM

The best way to distinguish is thusly: Akane Tendou is a Lethal Chef, since everything she makes is both horribly tasting and inedible due to mixing stuff that should never be mixed and/or sometimes including truly inedible "ingredients" into the recipe (not sure how much of the explanation's exact details is canon or fanon, though), unless she happens to use a super-awesome ingredient like the magical water from Ryuugenzawa. Meanwhile, Orihime Inoue is a Cordon Bleugh Chef, because her dishes are mainly horrible in taste due to weird ingredient choices, but are technically edible, if only because she and at least one other character are perfectly capable of eating it (and actually like the taste!).

edited 15th Apr '15 11:30:26 PM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1249: Apr 16th 2015 at 4:18:54 AM

Like everything in Ranma ½, her cooking is exaggerated in fanon. She's still clearly a Lethal Chef in canon, though, for about half the manga or something like that. After that she actually learns to make an edible curry, but they're still very leery of allowing her to cook at all. But that's a side note for this thread. I agree with the overall explanation.

Check out my fanfiction!
dsneybuf (Not-So-Newbie)
#1250: Apr 24th 2015 at 10:55:57 AM

I don't know if this seems like the right place to ask about entries on YMMV pages, but I had a question about YMMV.The Sound Of Music listing "The Lonely Goatherd" as a Big-Lipped Alligator Moment in the movie, and feared asking it there would seem like natter.

Could someone who's seen the play (or The Sound of Music Live!) more recently/often than I have please remind me how its context of "The Lonely Goatherd" makes the song seem more plot-relevant than the usage in the movie? One of the movie's Blu-Ray bonus features tries to dispute its apparent lack of importance to the story by pointing out that it marks the first time Max hears the children sing, kicking off his efforts to get them to perform in the festival. All I remember about "The Lonely Goatherd" in the play/TSOM Live! indicates that it took place at the point where Julie Andrews sang "My Favorite Things".

edited 24th Apr '15 10:59:36 AM by dsneybuf


Total posts: 31,612
Top