Follow TV Tropes

Following

Real Life section maintenance (New Crowner 19 Feb 2024)

Go To

Note: If a newly launched trope was already given a No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only designation while it was being drafted on the Trope Launch Pad, additions to the proper index do not need to go through this thread. Instead, simply ask the mods to add the trope via this thread.

This is the thread to report tropes with problematic Real Life sections.

Common problems include:

Real Life sections on the wiki are kept as long as they don't become a problem. If you find an article with such problems, report it here. Please note that the purpose of this thread is to clean up and maintain real life sections, not raze them. Cutting should be treated as a last resort, so please only suggest cutting RL sections or a subset thereof you think the examples in question are completely unsalvageable.

If historical RL examples are not causing any problems, consider whether it would be better to propose a No Recent Examples, Please! (via this forum thread) for RL instead of NRLEP. If RL examples are causing problems only for certain subjects, consider whether a Limited Real Life Examples Only restriction would be preferable to NRLEP.

If you think a trope should be No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only, then this thread is the place to discuss it. However, please check Keep Real Life Examples first to see if it has already been brought up in the past. If not, state the reasons and add it to the crowner.

Before adding to the crowner:

  • The trope should be proposed in the thread, along with reasons for why a crowner is necessary instead of a cleanup.
  • There must be support from others in thread.
  • Any objections should be addressed.
  • Allow a minimum of 24 hours for discussion.

When adding to the crowner:

  • Be sure to add the trope name, a link to where the discussion started, the reasons for crownering, whether the restriction being proposed is NRLEP or LRLEO (and in the latter case, which subject(s) the restriction would be for), and the date added.
  • Announce in thread that you are adding the item.
  • An ATT advert should be made as well (batch items together if more than one trope goes up in a day).

In order for a crowner to pass:

  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • There must be a 2:1 ratio
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple extra days to see if any more votes come in
  • Once passed, tropes must be indexed on the appropriate NRLEP index
  • Should the vote fail, the trope should be indexed on KRLE page

Sex Tropes, Rape and Sexual Harassment Tropes, and Morality Tropes are banned from having RL sections so tropes under those indexes don't need crowner vote.

Crowner entries that have already been called will have "(CLOSED)" appended to them — and are no longer open for discussion.

After bringing up a trope for discussion, please wait at least a day for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

NRLEP tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

LRLEO tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/LimitedRealLifeExamplesOnly via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%The following restrictions apply: [list restriction(s) here]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

Notes:
  • This thread is not for general discussion regarding policies for Real Life sections or crowners. Please take those conversations to this Wiki Talk thread.
  • Do not try to overturn previous No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only decisions without a convincing argument.
  • As mentioned here, the consensus is that NRLEP warnings in trope page descriptions can use bold text so that they stand out.
  • The [[noreallife]] tag doesn't currently work. This is a deprecated tag that was introduced many years ago — originally, it would have displayed a NRLEP warning banner when you edited the page. However, there's been some staff conversation (Feb 2024) about what a new technical solution might look like, so we'd advise against deleting these from pages, at least until we have a decision as to whether it'll be fixed or replaced.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Mar 8th 2024 at 10:49:13 AM

BeerBaron from Pennsylvania Since: Mar, 2012
#12801: Sep 27th 2022 at 10:45:51 AM

[up] The Load has, by my count, eight "general" examples that could probably be cut outright. There are also a couple of ZCEs and the De Gaulle example comes across as perhaps controversial. One is an explanation of a completely different trope, The Peter Principle.

MissConduct (Lucky 7)
#12802: Sep 27th 2022 at 10:57:06 AM

I'd crowner The Load. I'd say it's a bit of a narrative/characterization trope, and it's attracting poor examples, and the Charles de Gaulle one, ROCEJ might be a harsh descriptor but that example certainly looks like it was written by someone with an axe to grind against him.

I'm going to bring up Little Miss Badass again because I didn't realize it was at the end of a page and tropes brought up at the end of a page tend to get lost.

     Little Miss Badass 
Little Miss Badass, for instance, also has a lot of weblink-only examples, gushing (like that Greta Thunburg one and the Varsha Vinod one) and lots of excessive italicization. Also, some examples are "little girl did something heroic in a life or death situation once" and others are "little girl is a trained athlete/martial artist/something" - I know that like basically all badass tropes this trope is poorly defined, but would both of these archetypes count as this trope?

Side note: My argument about the Thunberg example wasn't that she wouldn't count, more so that the example was excessively gushy about her, which we don't want.

Edited by MissConduct on Sep 27th 2022 at 7:52:05 AM

badtothebaritone (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Snooping as usual
#12803: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:03:58 AM

Does being an online activist really count as badass? Not to disparage Thunberg as a person, but when leaders like Trump and Putin dunk on other people on Twitter and those people dunk back, that's generally not considered badass. Why is her case different? Is it just because people generally agree with her cause?

themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#12804: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:23:43 AM

[up] I think it might be her age. She's seen as an icon of activism among young people.

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
BeerBaron from Pennsylvania Since: Mar, 2012
#12805: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:25:17 AM

Just looking at the number of examples, "Too Common" would be the easy way to take care of both Little Miss Badass and Action Girl. However you want to define it, there are going to many examples in Real Life.

badtothebaritone (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Snooping as usual
#12806: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:26:54 AM

[up][up] I don't really see how that makes a difference. She is in no danger whatsoever. Most other teens who do what she does aren't viewed the same way.

Edited by badtothebaritone on Sep 27th 2022 at 1:27:28 PM

themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#12807: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:28:55 AM

[up] I also think it's because she was one of the first really big youth activists on climate.

Note, by the way, that I'm not defending the example, I'm just sharing my thoughts on why she is seen the way she is.

Edited by themayorofsimpleton on Sep 27th 2022 at 2:29:10 PM

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition from The Void (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#12808: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:30:02 AM

She's not just a girl who sits on Twitter, y'know. She led marches and spoke at the UN, which is pretty badass for a kid.

Edited by WarJay77 on Sep 27th 2022 at 2:30:16 PM

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
badtothebaritone (Life not ruined yet) Relationship Status: Snooping as usual
#12809: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:30:09 AM

[up][up] I wasn't trying to argue with you. I was just sharing my thoughts as well.

[up] Oh, I didn't know that. Impressive.

Still think the trope should be crownered, though.

Edited by badtothebaritone on Sep 27th 2022 at 1:32:22 PM

themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#12810: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:33:33 AM

[up][up] That too.

[up] Oh, sorry if it came off as a debate. FWIW I support crownering Little Miss Badass as well.

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#12811: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:48:09 AM

[up] x Give other thread participants a couple of days to discuss the proposal (as is occurring with Little Miss Badass and Action Girl).

Edited by Tabs on Sep 27th 2022 at 11:48:27 AM

laserviking42 from End-World Since: Oct, 2015 Relationship Status: You're a beautiful woman, probably
#12812: Sep 27th 2022 at 1:59:42 PM

Looks like we have two to crowner now (the requiste day to gather opinions has been observed):

I didn't choose the troping life, the troping life chose me
laserviking42 from End-World Since: Oct, 2015 Relationship Status: You're a beautiful woman, probably
#12813: Sep 27th 2022 at 2:21:05 PM

Re: The Load

As said before, it is almost entirely general examples, which can be deleted at any time (I'll do it in just a bit).

The De Gaulle example is a shoehorn in my opinion, as obnoxious as he was, De Gaulle did rally the French colonies to the Free French, and provided a rather large army to push the Germans out (it was primarily African and Arab, so we don't hear much about it). I'd vote for cutting it too.

I didn't choose the troping life, the troping life chose me
MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#12814: Sep 27th 2022 at 2:31:47 PM

^^ Added. Counting the accidental crowner item, we have about 15 items on the crowner. I think we should put everything after the last two crowner items in the new crowner once we swap it in.

Macron's notes
MissConduct (Lucky 7)
#12815: Sep 27th 2022 at 4:29:22 PM

Kicked Upstairs has a massive list of examples, even starting with "It happens everywhere, and in all walks of life", which makes me think it's very much Too Common.

Edited by MissConduct on Sep 27th 2022 at 7:40:36 AM

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#12816: Sep 27th 2022 at 11:25:53 PM

Edited the sticky so that the opening clearly states that cutting RL sections should be treated as a last resort.

Macron's notes
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
BeerBaron from Pennsylvania Since: Mar, 2012
#12818: Sep 28th 2022 at 6:25:42 AM

[up][up][up] I don't hate the Kicked Upstairs examples. Seems like someone took the time to make sure it was fairly well-written and organized. (And for something that has sections on both US Politics and Nazi Germany, it's impressive that it's not outright "too controversial")

There are a number of "general" examples that can be trimmed outright, anything talking about "most companies" or entire military branches.

The fact that there are so many examples does lend toward "Too Common", but on a quick scan, it doesn't actually seem too problematic.

Edited by BeerBaron on Sep 28th 2022 at 9:25:49 AM

techno156 from Lost in the wrong part of the internet Since: Jun, 2021 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#12819: Sep 28th 2022 at 7:49:56 AM

Is there a tag or something to show that a trope is NRLXP?

Asians Love Tea, as a stereotype, should probably fall under being too general to qualify, but since it doesn't have any real life examples (yet), it's unclear whether real life examples are already not barred from it or not.

BeerBaron from Pennsylvania Since: Mar, 2012
#12820: Sep 28th 2022 at 7:53:40 AM

[up] It appears at the bottom as an index if the trope has been added to one of the No Real Life Examples, Please! categories. Quite often, but not always, a line about "No Real Life Examples, Please!" and the reason why is usually near the end of the description.

Random thought, if that weren't enough, I wonder if a banner at the top like YMMV and Trivia tropes get could be helpful. "Real Life example are not allowed on this page" or something.

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#12821: Sep 28th 2022 at 7:57:25 AM

We used to have a red warning on the editing screen for NRLEP tropes but it's been broken for years now. An automated banner requires admin work.

For now, we have been adding there commented out tags to tropes we process. I think we have been doing that for a month now?

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/crowner.php?crowner_id=v03a7zda %%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

Macron's notes
MissConduct (Lucky 7)
#12822: Sep 28th 2022 at 9:00:04 AM

Re: Ye Olde Nuclear Silo, I'd axe the website links. In general I think we're not supposed to link to ads outside of the Advertising sections of pages, and only then when the ad is tropable.

N-Word Privileges seems incredibly controversial. I don't think it's really our place to be cataloging which words are and aren't okay and who can and can't say them (which, you know, changes nearly constantly). I know in these sort of discussions there's always discourse about who in the community has the right to allow or not allow these sort of words and if it's a blanket ban against outsiders or some groups can and some can't... it's just so controversial I think we really shouldn't have RL examples.

Edited by MissConduct on Sep 28th 2022 at 12:08:11 PM

ChloeJessica Since: Jun, 2020 Relationship Status: Awaiting my mail-order bride
#12823: Sep 28th 2022 at 9:21:44 AM

are any of the examples on Family-Friendly Firearms salvageable or can i cut them all as was my first instinct?

BeerBaron from Pennsylvania Since: Mar, 2012
#12824: Sep 28th 2022 at 11:10:26 AM

Ye Olde Nuclear Silo - Agreed with axing.

N-Word Privileges - Yikes. Gotta be Too Controversial.

Family-Friendly Firearms - "Non-Lethal" and "Laser" weapons come across as general and not really in the spirit of the trope. Those are still real life weapons (experimental, in the case of lasers) that do not make for "family friendly" violence. (Ever see someone get tased? You'll want to cover your kids' eyes.) The emoji example is the only one I could see keeping, though it could use some wording cleanup.

Mechanicalman450 Since: Mar, 2020
#12825: Sep 28th 2022 at 12:40:38 PM

Downvoted the following tropes with reasons:

  • Huge Guy, Tiny Girl: I believe the first three examples can be kept because they describe size differences between different sexes, within the same species.
  • Tiny Guy, Huge Girl: I believe the second last example can kept because it describes size differences between different sexes, within the same species.
Also, the examples described above provide more details compared to the rest of the examples, therefore I would remove the rest of the examples, but keep the aforementioned ones.

Edited by Mechanicalman450 on Sep 28th 2022 at 8:45:07 PM

18th Feb '24 11:27:30 PM

Crown Description:

Vote up to either forbid all real life examples (No Real Life Examples Please) or forbid real life examples for specific subjects (Limited Real Life Examples Only); vote down to Keep Real Life Examples. To add a trope to a No Real Life Examples Please index or the Limited Real Life Examples Only index, its crowner option must meet the following criteria:
  • Stable 2:1 ratio needed for NRLEP or LRLEO
  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple of extra days to see if more votes come in.

After you bring up a trope for discussion, please try to wait at least a day or so for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

If an item has a (CLOSED) note, there is no need to vote on it: the result has already been decided and it's no longer up for discussion.

Total posts: 15,945
Top