Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion DethroningMoment / LiveACtionTV

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
drdoo22 Since: Sep, 2015
Jan 10th 2017 at 2:49:10 PM •••

Tyler FG: The George Lopez Show: Ok, so George finds out his daughter is dating someone he doesn't like. So after arguing with her a bit, she says she is almost a woman and she can do whatever she wants. What does he tell her? He basically tells her to get out and he won't come looking for her. Ok, so she runs away and he starts to feel like crap. What does his wife tell him? It wasn't his fault and he was trying to protect her. If I was her, I would've fucking kicked him out. Let me remind you everyone was acting like it was no big deal, and nobody called him out on it at all. How he's even likeable as a character anymore is beyond me.

Did this troper even watch the episode? The boy George had a problem with was a sociopath who not only vandalized his dad's factory/George's work, but wanted to use Carmen for sex, even admitting that IN FRONT OF GEORGE. So yeah, George was protecting Carmen, and Carmen was being completely immature about it.

smootim Since: Jul, 2014
May 7th 2015 at 3:31:53 PM •••

Unsigned DMOS for Smallville

  • 'Up to this point while there were a few things I didn’t like but Smallville was generally an enjoyable show. Then came Bound, the episode was filled to the brim with the The Unfair Sex and Informed Wrongness to bring across its Antivicious message that woman are the fairer sex that it completely ignores continuity. I generally don’t nitpick a show even with tv tropes if I like the show I like it and if I don’t I don’t. but this episode made it impossible to watch Smallville without doing it. Basically they’re trying to show that Lex has finally started his journey to the dark side because he likes to have meaningless flings. Despite the fact that one: every relationship he’s ever had with a woman physical or other wise have betrayed him. And two: the only woman who were shown to have a problem with this were a crazy stalker and a woman who cheated on her fiancé with a man she met at a bar both of whom were presented as more sympathetic then Lex. Finally Lex never manipulated any of these woman in fact they wee both shown to be completely compliant in fact they sought him out. It reach the point where the Clark trusted the man who tried to kill his friends and family over Lex because of how he treated those woman.

Ecclytennysmithylove Ecclytennysmithylove Since: Nov, 2013
Ecclytennysmithylove
Mar 31st 2014 at 9:39:41 AM •••

Unsigned DMOS posts:

Malcolm in the Middle

  • What makes this so infuriating is that the show already went over the stress Malcolm is put through because of his family. Heck the entirety of season two lampshades the final.
    • In Therapy Malcolm fakes an emotional breakdown in order to get out of the Krelboyne class' Medieval Week. He did this because in addition to his high class schedule Lois keeps signing him up for extra curricular activities while making him help Reese and Dewey with their homework. In the end they have a tearful makeup however in stead of stopping this unrealistic course load she starts punishing him if he doesn’t work faster as seen in Evacuation. And in Tutoring Reese she forces him tutor Reese to improve his lousy grades. Season 5 ended when Malcolm steals Reese’s girl friend. Everyone repeatedly mentions how Malcolm betrayed Reese and likely killed him yet last season when Reese stole Malcolm’s girl a season earlier no one bat an eye. Finally the clincher was Grandma Sues the family can get tired of Malcolm and exclude him from their activities yet in Reese vs Stevie it’s not fair that Malcolm spends more time with his friends and takes their side over his own brother.

That '70s Show

  • Jackie and Hyde break-up, the biggest reason concerning Hyde not being able to commit to marriage. Then when they are about to get back together a stripper shows up and claims to be his wife. And he stays married to her! Now the only reason they brought this character on was for a new Ms. Fanservice (On a show with Mila Kunis!) and to set up Jackie/Fez. Now you can set up Jackie/Fez... however the show hadn't brought up this pairing in a good four seasons. If Jackie/Fez was supposedly endgame, why put her with Hyde in the first place? Besides a lot of people liked Jackie/Hyde and they didn't even get a dignified break-up. Honestly Hyde's actions felt like just a big Fuck you to Jackie. (Plus his wife's actress was awful).

30 Rock

  • "Double Edged Sword" for the Liz/Carol (Matt Damon) breakup. He was an OK guy, but this episode had him take a level in jerkass to make a point, a point that is invalid, about "dating yourself is a double edged sword". Carol feels like Liz doesn't respect his job as an airline pilot, which devolves into a borderline abusive route that makes him force the passengers to wait at the gate for hours and hours unless she apologizes. There's rule of funny and then there's just being a mean spirited writer. Every passenger was suffering and Carol wanted Liz to respect him. No, you have a job you fucking asshole, you are abusing passengers because you're fighting with your girlfriend. No one points this out and his crew is supporting him on this. Is the aesop just "You never question your captian or crew, just lay back and take it while they make you suffer for petty reasons"? Also worse is when he pulls out a gun on Liz for "Sky Law" and she pulls a senior citizen as a body shield. What the fuck is wrong with them!? They're both a Karma Houdini (Granted Liz was defending herself) and Carol is still employed! This is why I like My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic and shows that don't rely on being mean, horrible people to be funny.

Breaking Bad

  • At the end Walt admits he doesn't need to kill the fly. This episode shows how obsessive Walt is becoming, now things are going well for him he won't accept the smallest flaw.

Edited by 108.35.129.10 "I told you PCs were unreliable." Darwin, The Amazing World of Gumball
PhantomDusclops92 Slayer of YMMV complaining magnets Since: Oct, 2010
Slayer of YMMV complaining magnets
Mar 1st 2014 at 2:56:22 PM •••

fluffything: My DMOS for Pawn Stars is when it's revealed that Corey has never seen any of the Star Wars films. Now, I can understand if he's not a fan. I can understand if he had never seen the films in general. My main problem is that he didn't know the basic plot of the film. Considering that Star Wars is a huge franchise and that the plot in general is essentially It Was His Sled due to the numerous parodies, references, homages, and whatnot that have occured over the years, it's very difficult (if not impossible) to not know the basics of the films (The only exception being if you lived in some remote location far from any access to Star Wars-related media). How...Just, how?

I find this one to have a very filmsy reason for being disliked, and I say it because I know a lot of people who doesn't know the basic plot of Star Wars.

Number one fan of characters that appear only once and ultimately were a recurring character either in disguise or trying a new image. Hide / Show Replies
TJack Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 13th 2014 at 6:51:54 PM •••

I was just here to say the same thing. Ignoring for the moment that it is very possible for somebody to be blissfully ignorant of a piece of media, even one as ubiquitous as Star Wars, this is a DMOS how exactly? Somebody doesn't know something they should know? That's like saying a show sucks because a character on it doesn't like pizza.

triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 27th 2012 at 9:29:30 AM •••

Cut entries:

  • Buscemi: Sportsnation: Basketball's 101 Most Disrespectful Moments may be the worst thing that's ever aired on any ESPN network (worse than The Decision). For one, most of the clips are simply dunks (apparently it's "disrespectful" to get an easy basket) instead of something like a flagrant foul or a brawl. Also the commentary is awful (it's mostly just the two hosts saying "That's disrespectful" for an hour), the music consists solely of ten-second loops of the same two songs, half of the clips feature Duke or North Carolina, the audience consists of brain-dead teenagers who will react to anything and no one in the room seems to know what disrespectful means. This is a clear example that ESPN will air anything nowadays, no matter how low quality.

  • Balmz: Americas Funniest Home Videos: One video had a kid with diarrhea crying in the toilet while the mom is filming and laughing. How is that funny? The only sympathy for the kid in the clip was from the family dog. Worse it won the 10,000 dollars. Yeah good thing you have the money because the kid will need it for therapy after this. Also how are kids or people vomiting funny? Laughing at someone who is sick and humiliated is just wrong.
    • fluffything: Now, I may be in the minority when I say that I tolerated the Fuegelsang/Fuentez era of AFV and found some moments pretty funny. That being said, their "Seven Deadly Sins" special contained a moment so awful and disgusting it nearly made me swear off the series forever. The episode in-and-of itself is fine at first with each segment of clips focusing on a different sin (a pretty clever idea, I must admit). But, then we get to the theme of "Pride". What sort of clips do they decide to show their audience? Why, babies vomiting of course. I want to watch people getting into wacky situations. Not change the channel the moment "Junior" decides to literally show us what he had for breakfast. Have the producers forgotten the show is called Americas Funniest Home Videos and not "Babies Barf-O-Rama"?

  • sillygolem: Over time, Top Gear has veered more toward scripted "reality" that now James May says he now plays a character instead of himself. However, this came to a head with the test of the Tesla Roadster, which included a fake break-down. Tesla is now suing the show over this segment. The icing on the cake? It was immediately followed by a segment declaring a hydrogen-powered Honda the real future of cars, even though hydrogen development has been all but dropped over fuel supply issues.

The entries were cut because the shows are not works of fiction, and in the case of the first entry was complaining about an entire programme.

Hide / Show Replies
ading Since: Jan, 2011
Jan 19th 2014 at 7:06:48 AM •••

Well, the Top Gear entry is referring to a staged segment. Does that count?

I'm a Troper!!!
PhantomDusclops92 Slayer of YMMV complaining magnets Since: Oct, 2010
Slayer of YMMV complaining magnets
Nov 13th 2013 at 1:41:05 PM •••

Shadow200: I don't normally bother watching late night talk shows but recently I found out that The Jimmy Kimmel show had a segment where Parents sent in videos as pranks of them telling their kids that they eat all their Halloween Candy. And the kids none of the appear to be older than six. How do the kids react? Upset and crying over what happened and the audience is laughing at them. WHAT THE FUCKING HELL!! These are little kids! We're suppose to find them crying funny?!

Another entry which haves to be cut as it's not a work of fiction. It's also wrong, because everyone knows that making little kids crying are the funniest thing in the world.

Number one fan of characters that appear only once and ultimately were a recurring character either in disguise or trying a new image.
romanatorX Since: Mar, 2012
Aug 16th 2012 at 3:28:17 PM •••

Can we split the Star Trek Voyager and Star Trek Enterprise examples into two different parts? As it is, you can only post 1 dethroning moment of suck for the ENTIRE franchise.

Hide / Show Replies
triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 6th 2012 at 3:52:43 AM •••

Examples are meant to be from works of fiction. This doesn't read like one. Never mind the fact it's complaining about an entire programme:

Edited by triassicranger
McKnight Since: Oct, 2009
Jan 18th 2012 at 3:01:41 PM •••

Okay, is there some kind of rule against elaborating beyond one or two sentences about what makes a moment suck?

lightning37 Since: Dec, 2010
Jul 4th 2011 at 4:35:23 PM •••

If iCarly gets its own page, what other shows should, as well? Doctor Who and Buffy, perhaps?

OldManHoOh It's super effective. Since: Jul, 2010
It's super effective.
Jul 3rd 2011 at 11:58:49 AM •••

Deleted this on June 21,

  • Gyrobot: Just airing it out, the curbstomp final between the Bruins and Canucks. The subsequent riots and depressing news is just salt in the wound.

Then again today:

  • Gyrobot: The Humiliation Conga that is 2011 playoffs for Vancouver, a Curbstomp match followed by a riot which tarnishes their reputation on ice and the city? Nothing more humiliating than that.

I don't watch "the playoffs", but why would what sports teams get up to be exempt from the "No Real Life Examples"?

triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 19th 2010 at 1:01:35 AM •••

Some things that were removed from the page when I was bringing it into line with the new guidlines:

  • The ending of the reimagined Battlestar Galactica. It was a show that was surprisingly down-to-earth and realistic despite being set on a spaceship and following humanity as they desperately ran from a bunch of robots intent on finishing the job they started when they nuked the shit out of the humans, and even as the series went onand more and more spiritual elements entered the fray never seemed too out of hand. It ended with a nice, big, UTTERLY FUCKING RIDICULOUS Deus ex Machina in the form of Starbuck, accompanied by two more (Head Baltar and Head Six), who jumped the fleet to the planet that would become Earth, revealed she was an angel of God then fucked off forever. It was an utterly horrid ending to one of the best science fiction series on TV.
    • While the ending was indeed a huge leap away from the gritty realism, the most baffling part for this troper was the resolution of the 'secret of the opera house'. They spend two fracking seasons foreshadowing it with prophetic dreams, as something where Hera gets abducted by 6 and Baltar, and what comes off it in the end? Not only is it a minimal threat for Hera (the abduction she was just rescued from was a lot longer and more serious, and Cavil using a girl 1/4th his size as a human shield is pointless, even if he could have reasonably killed her without totaly screwing his own race), it is not only over in a few minutes (lengthened by a forgettable speach from Baltar that really shouldn't have impressed Cavil), but also has NO effect on the story whatsoever. Before the scene, the Cylons wanted to destroy Galactica. During the scene, they call a truce, but it's blown and they go right back to wanting to destroy Galactica.
    • Most egregiously, the end of the otherwise quite decent second-season episode Epiphanies, in which Laura Roslin was essentially shot in the cancer was the original point at which the show turned away from its Darker and Edgier "naturalistic science fiction" premise and willingness to take risks. It's unsurprising that the show's quality suffered a major dip for the rest of the season.
    • I thought the destruction of the spiritual stuff as ambigious was a bad move, but what really pissed me off was the survivor's utterly fucking ridiculous decision to abandon all technology. Yeah good luck surviving without medication for your chronic illnesses, you utter morons! Not to mention the fact that the inevitable collapse means the loss of all records from the events of the series, letting the whole shebang happen again, whereas building a new civilization founded on the knowledge of the journey would actually, I don't know, stand a chance at subverting the cycle?
    • The destruction of the Pegasus always left a bad taste in my mouth, because of the utterly fucking stupid tactics Lee Adama used. Leaving all your Vipers behind? Taking Pegasus right into the middle of the Cylon fleet? And then losing it, after Pegasus had previously escaped a Cylon trap involving three basestars and being hit by multiple nuclear missiles? Under Lee's command, no less? It's true that the Status Quo Is God, but sacrificing a Battlestar that's bigger, more heavily-armed and boasting a better tactical advantage (the ability to make new Vipers) is just stupid all around. Nice job breaking it, Lee.
    • Sacrifice. Just... Sacrifice - or rather, its final scenes: after nearly two seasons of Billy and Dualla's on/off relationship and the episode's opening scene where he gives her his graduation ring, Billy gets gunned down by the terrorists. So in the end, while Billy lies on a slab at the morgue with no one but Laura to mourn him, Dualla goes and checks on poor Lee who wasn't even hurt badly. Granted, Billy's actor wanted out to star in his own series - which didn't really go anywhere for him - but the horrible lack of setup for this development (scenes teasing Lee and Dualla's future relationship were filmed but cut for time) coupled with how little Dualla had interacted with anyone else at a personal level made her look like a cold, heartless bed-jumper who seemed all too glad Billy was removed from the picture so the Lee/Dualla pairing could unabashedly burn on-screen time. This troper was just too glad to see her blow her brains out - again, little to no foreshadowing to that twist either - nearly two seasons later after serving no purpose other than as Lee's obstacle to overcome before hooking up with Starbuck... again.
      • Removing Billy was the biggest case of WRITER-INDUCED Die for Our Ship this troper has ever seen in a show. And they expected you to take it completely seriously! Billy was one of the few genuinely kind-hearted characters, and he's gone with barely a word. The kicker: They never mention him more than once or twice afterwards, EVER again. Throughout the entire series. They act like he was never there and Lee/Dualla were supposed to be a couple from the get-go.
      • Anastasia Dualla is one of the series' biggest D Mo S given human form. At least the third season finale made Lee Adama's formerly unbearable character more dimension. That other bitch never had a chance.
    • This troper was hooked on the original "Battlestar: Galactica", when Cmdr. Adama had a scene in the original episode where he was heartsick about leaving people behind to die because he simply didn't have room on the ships for them. Then I stopped watching the show completely when about 6-8 episodes later, they re-did "The Dirty Dozen" with a crew of "the worst criminals in the galaxy" who were being held on the "prison ship". If Adama had known about the prison ship in the original episode, he would have spaced these guys in a heartbeat to make room for more women and children. It represented a complete D Mo S on the part of the writers and producers of the show.
folder:Buffy The Vampire Slayer
  • And then sent her little sister to him for safety! In the same episode! Seriously!
    • As someone who can't get past that aspect of the Thomas Covenant books, I feel the need to defend Spike. In his mind, he wasn't raping Buffy. He was trying to engage in the same rough sex they had been having the entire season. I think the hypocrisy of this was only realized after the fact which is why it's not really addressed much after this episode. If everyone involved really felt he had been trying to rape her, don't you think Willow would have blown him the frack up?
  • And you want to know what the worst part is? The very next episode, she was worrying about where he had gone to! Remember when this used to be a feminist show?
  • From that same episode, Tara's cruel, meaningless and wasted death.
    • Tara was my favorite character. I felt betrayed for days after that.
    • Made even worse by the fact that she was moved to main cast credits for that episode. This troper threw an impromptu "Tara's a main character celebration" before she died. Afterwards I had a terrible bout of denial before an breaking down into an epic bitch fit.
    • Personally, I didn't mind. Her personality throughout S6 just annoyed me to no end.
    • At least that Season Six monstrosity was over in three minutes, how about a six hour stream of suck?... Smashed. Wrecked. Gone. Doublemeat Palace. Dead Things. As You Were. C-C-C-COMBO!
  • That entire, sick Willow-is-a-junkie plotline. How could they do that to Willow? Let me just say "Bored now."
    • The worst thing about that plotline is the underlying idea was actually good: Willow gained a great deal of power very quickly, and the idea of both having it go to her head and having her use it carelessly were set up well. And then they went from metaphor to literal, and... yeah.
    • About how Willow was there for Buffy after she was crying about Parker who she knew for like a week maybe, and then Buffy was bored about Willow being upset that Oz, Willow's longtime boyfriend left her. I know Buffy is supposed to be self centered but JESUS CHRIST, that is so awful.
    • Not to mention it adds a further Wall Banger to the Spike/Buffy thing. You'd think after the Parker ordeal Buffy would come to be a little more choosy about who she sleeps with.
  • Get It Done. Not to mention that the Slayer's origins are actually based in what looked like rape, Buffy-Stalin's speech really got to me. Buff, honey, a scared, young girl who never wanted this just killed herself. Would you mind showing her a little respect and not call her an idiot? Please and thank you.
    • This was a horrible speech from a horrible episode. Not only does Buffy essentially mock the girl's death, but decides to tear the entire group down and dismisses even her core group's contributions throughout the show's run. It really showed that Buffy at best could be oblivious to the contributions of her group, but at worst could disregard or be downright ungrateful for her friends' help. For me, Buffy's speech in this episode and her refusal in Empty Places to hear any alternative to her plan to fight it out at the vineyard (a plan that didn't seem to work out too well for the gang in the previous episode) made the mutiny against her seem somewhat justified.
      • Somewhat? Logically, it was definitely justified! She was being a terrible leader, and the fact that she turned out to be right, against all logic, was a moment of this for sure.
        • Even so, and all that may be true, however, after everything Buffy did for her and even committed suicide rather than allow Dawn to die, that ungrateful little brat turned against her sister and made her leave her own house. This troper barely tolerated Dawn to start with, but that was just unforgivable.
          • So, just because someone died for you means you should let them lead you all to a painful death?
            • Well it's not like Dawn was going to be involved in the campaign. Fine, she could have voted against the plan if she didn't agree with it, but she had no right to tell Buffy to leave the house. That coming from your own sister is a bitter pill to swallow. If one of the other girls had asked her to leave, Buffy could have defended her position, but because it was Dawn, Buffy was kind of powerless against it and it robbed her of any further willpower to keep fighting her corner. A bit of a low blow.
              • But Dawn didn't even tell Buffy to leave. Buffy threw a hissy fit and told her that she had to be in charge of everything or she would leave, Dawn just said "OK then".
Buffy: I can't stay here and watch [Faith] lead you into some disaster...
Dawn: Then you can't stay here.
  • The "loan shark" with a fucking shark head, bad suit and stereotypical Mafioso accent, trying to collect kittens from Spike to pay off Spike's gambling debts. The exchange from an earlier episode about playing poker with demons - with kittens as the stakes - was hilarious. How the idea of turning that joke into an actual plot-point (not to mention the fish-headed Mafioso demon) got past the story conference stage remains a mystery to me. "Aw, hell," someone may have said, "if we're gonna jump the shark, we might as well put the shark in the episode, too!"
    • If I'm not mistaken, that same episode also featured a Batman TV show-worthy freeze-ray, frosting a museum security guard who was featured on the TV news but yet was just being carried out as both Buffy and Spike arrived at the museum after walking across town to get there. All the good writers and show-runners must have been working on Firefly when that script got the green light... although how such howlers also made it past the cast and director is a riddle for the ages.
      • I don't think that was the same episode.
  • Xander leaving Anya at the altar was the episode that did it for this troper. Seriously Joss Whedon, just because you think 'gritty' writing means making sure none of your characters ever get real happy endings doesn't justify welding an Idiot Ball to Xander's face big enough for some serious Character Derailment. His later bs justifications of "taking it too fast" don't fit very well with other facts like how long the two had been living together, that they got a house together, and that XANDER made the proposal in the first place! This troper personally had to Handwave the whole episode as Xander suffering from magically-induced stupidity to get past it.
    • His fear for how it "might" turn out, if you think about it, are pretty much justified, seeing as his parents/the rest of his family came to the wedding...
    • This troper was FURIOUS after watching "Hell's Bells." Breaking up a marriage that you asked for just because you * might* turn out to be a jerk when you're older does not a good reason make. On top of that, in later episodes Anya is treated as if SHE'S the unreasonable one.
      • That's not to say that it was completely Xander's fault, either. Asking Xander to be perfectly okay with getting married after basicly being mind-raped is a little unreasonable. But then, it was expected that he'd be okay sharing a house with someone who tried to rape and kill him.
  • In "Once More With Feeling", Buffy sings "So one by one, they turn from me. I guess my friends just can't face the cold. But why I froze, not one of them knows... and never can be told." What? Why you complaining about your friends not knowing how you feel when you don't tell them! They're not mind readers!
    • Um... wasn't it obvious that she just didn't want them to feel guilty? She felt alone because no one knew, but she also didn't want to burden them with the knowledge.

Edited by triassicranger Hide / Show Replies
triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 21st 2010 at 2:27:21 AM •••

More things:

  • The Hungry Earth / Cold Blood. On its own the story wouldn't have been anything offensive, but after 7 episodes of wonderfully consistent fairytales and impressive character development, the sudden change to 24-inspired politics complete with hostages and something resebling torture was quite jarring. While the concept could have been pulled off well, the story seems like it was written for Tennant's doctor and one companion; Rory had no purpose in the story, which is especially saddening in context of what happened immediately before and after the episodes. Nice job breaking the combo Chris Chibnall, and whoever let him write that story.
    • Not to mention the pacing problems in Cold Blood. They rushed through a story that could have filled a two-parter on its own. There wasn't time to properly build tension or have a proper climax because they were too busy making sure that everything that had to happen happened.
      • In "Doomsday", it's mentioned that Harriet Jones is the President of Britain in Pete's World, leading the Golden Age over there. Which just raises more questions.
      • Actually, this also raises a wallbanger of its very own: when Pete mentions that Harriet's the president in that world, Ten sternly warns him to keep an eye on her. WHY?! See, up until then, this troper believed that Ten had removed Harriet from power on a spur of the moment decision, and actually regretted it when he took the circumstances into account some time later. And then along comes this episode, in which he decides "Well, she blew up a shipload of slavers that were either off to pillage another planet, or return with their armada to burn Earth to ashes... so she must be evil no matter what the circumstances or the universe! Pete, keep an eye on this woman who hasn't even encountered alien life yet, because I know she can't be trusted even though I've never met this version of her!"
      • This troper just figured he was miffed at her for ruining his moment. The Doctor regenerated, saved the world, sent the villains packing, and then Harriet goes and explodes them into snow to keep them from telling other people about Earth. She totally ruined his moment of look-at-me, I saved the day, and basically said that he was wrong to let them go scot-free. He's a guy who walks the time-continuum saving worlds from villains without anything to keep him accountable for his actions, and now he's Mr. No-Second-Chances. It's not noble, and it's not pretty, but it's plausible. And it's kinda almost human.
      • Well, the problem I had wasn't just that the Doctor ruined Harriet's career and Britain's Golden Age for the sake of his cocaine-addled ego, but the fact that he worried that the version of her living in Pete's world might be a potential dictator simply for being Harriet Jones. Is it human to hold a grudge against a someone you've never even met because they have the same name as the woman who punctured your ego all those many months ago?
      • Not that it was reasonable. Grudges are usually never reasonable; they're all emotion. But the clincher of it for me is the fact that the Doctor, in this post-Gallifrey scenario, doesn't have any accountability for his actions apart from himself and his companions, who are pretty interchangeable. Just look at what people do on the internet. Start with the trolling and end with the flames, and if you're really interested, go look at the viruses spread for no other reason than malice. Humans are practically completely anonymous online, and that gives them the freedom to do things they wouldn't do in a situation where the victim could do something about it. The Doctor is quite literally a man without a name, a country, or anyone to tell him no, with a time-traveling box, and that kind of power is very difficult to keep from abusing. What is it somebody says... "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
    • On the subject of Journey's End, after pulling the "this is the story of how I died" line with Rose at the end of Series 2, to spend the entirety of Series 4 building up some big tragedy for Donna, to explicitly say, again, that Tonight, Someone Dies, and then pull the exact same line trick again was something of a Wall Banger. Not that I specifically wished Donna dead, but I couldn't believe they'd do From a Certain Point of View twice.
    • "Planet of the Dead." Stealing is great if you do it for kicks, UNIT couldn't send an armoured car through the wormhole to tow the bus out...
      • This troper's girlfriend spent most of that episode shouting 'Send a bloody tank!' at the screen.
        • Tank?! Send the Tardis, they had it.
          • Yeah, we saw what happened to the bus: it got through in working order and able to protect the people inside. An armoured tank- something specifically designed to survive a beating- should have been absolutely fine. And they didn't need to pilot the TARDIS; they could have just heaved it through the wormhole. It's designed for trans-temporal and -dimensional travel, and it's certainly lived through worse.
          • Plus the point that the TARDIS is easily movable from the outside. Remember all those times its been loaded onto a truck by, like, ordinary humans?
    • The End Of Time: Turning the entire human race into John freaking Simm while dramatic pounding music blares in the background is clearly meant to be horrifying, but it came across as the most ridiculously absurd thing this troper had ever seen. I mean, they could've pulled a far more dramatic affect by just having people's eyes start bloody glowing and having them laugh evilly, or something...
      • And on that note, how about how The Master suddenly has control over LIGHTNING and can FLY. Really? I just couldn't get over the ridiculousness of the Book of Saxon part either. I was all pumped for a rematch of epic proportions, what I got was...well a DethroningMomentOfSuck.

Edited by triassicranger
triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 23rd 2010 at 2:20:55 AM •••

More things:

  • The attempts to rewrite the canon in regards to regeneration, portraying the process as horrific and emotionally devastating for The Doctor, when in the past it's been used as fodder for jokes (including several times in the revived series) and described as a natural part of a Time Lord's life. Which, in turn, made all the weeping and gnashing of teeth in this episode a bit much to take. It's not as if The Doctor is dying permanently, and while he may look different and have some new personality traits, he's still The Doctor and retains all those thoughts and memories afterwards. The companions might be sad about losing 'their Doctor', but to have a 903 906 year-old Time Lord throwing a temper tantrum about it contradicts some four decades of canon and derails the entire episode. Plus, it makes things that much tougher for the new guy.
    • This troper was going to disagree with you, saying that maybe the Tenth Doctor feels differently about regenerating than previous Doctors did, because he does have a different personality. Then, I remembered that Ten has been through a situation just like this before- The Family of Blood, when John Smith had to "die" to bring back the Doctor and save the world. When that happened, the Doctor explicitly said that he was everything John Smith was and more, but Joan rejected that explanation. Now at the end, Ten seems to be acting more like Joan than himself.
  • But the worst of all was The Doctor's 'Why Me?!?' speech bemoaning his fate to die regenerate. Not only was the rant unbearably whiny, self-centered and completely OOC, it also came across as RTD using The Doctor as an Author Avatar (" Look at all the wonderful things I've done! It's not fair that I have to leave!"), perhaps suggesting that his own departure isn't entirely voluntary. If the only reference to the Doctor's reluctance to regenerate had been Tennant's final line (" I don't want to go."), the whole premise, while flawed, would have had so much more impact. Instead, we get this drek combined with the most maudlin, cliched and drawn-out series season finale scenes I've witnessed in a long, long time, which sadly had the accumulative effect of making me almost RELIEVED that Tennant and RTD are done so we can move past the sentimental claptrap and get back to having fun.
  • The worst part might have been that, as part of the prolonged ending to the episode, Ten goes around basically saying goodbye to all of the companions he'd had during this regeneration, which went beyond touching goodbyes and into serious narm territory, as well as raising the question of why it took him so long to regenerate this time.
  • The worst part was the entirely arbitrary way the Doctor was "killed". He survives all the obvious death traps only to be killed because some moron has designed a radiation venting system which apparently requires that one side of it be locked, from the inside, at all times (i.e. a person has got to be standing in it). It was probably supposed to make his death seem more noble and tragic, but it just came across as stupid.
    • What really got me here is the actual death trap - you know, the control chamber/radiation vent made of Applied Phlebotinum glass so "the radiation can't escape." (Which is questionable in any case...) There was a visible crack between the glass door and the wall. What?
  • How about Martha and Mickey suddenly becoming a couple? "Gee, I'm so glad there was another black person on this show I could marry!" Not to mention that the last we'd heard, Martha was married (or at least engaged) to Tom Milligan. This troper was especially disappointed to see this happen in a show that has heretofore been quite good (at least in the new series) about treating interracial marriages as generally not a big deal.
    • It's not so much the race thing. It's just like they thought, "Oh no, the Doctor stole Mickey's girlfriend! The only way to make this better is for him to have introduced Mickey to his eventual true love!", ignoring the fact she was already engaged, as you mentioned. People have serious doubts for this relationship, as we have seen that Martha moves on from men pretty fast.
    • Or Micky was a pastor, and so "married" Martha to Tom Milligan. Please?
  • No mention yet of Season 3's narm-tastic finale? After seeing the Master conquer the Earth and convert it into a giant warship factory to eventually conquer the universe, the second episode begins with a badass Martha travelling the world, ostensibly looking for the parts of a gun capable of killing a Time Lord. She's captured by the Master and forced to kneel before him... and then stands up, ridicules the Master for believing the story about the Time Lord-killing gun, and reveals that she's actually... been telling people about the Doctor. That's it. Just wandering around telling stories. Then the people of Earth use THE POWER OF BELIEF to bring the Doctor back to fighting form (which is so much less ridiculous than UNIT having developed a gun capable of killing Time Lords). The Master threatens to blow up Earth, but the Doctor talks him out of it by pointing out that the Master's far too egomaniacal to kill himself. Less than ten minutes later, the Master kills himself by refusing to regenerate after being shot by his wife. Because everyone else in the room was entirely willing to let the man who killed 600 million people on a whim, enslaved the rest of Earth's population, and spent the last year personally making their lives a living hell live. Oh, and then the Doctor erases the last year from time so that everything the Master did never happened. Can Deus ex Machina get any more extreme?
    • Agreed. The Doctor preventing Jack from killing the Master when they were practically invisible also qualifies. As does the Doctor's pathetically weepy reaction to the Master's demise. The hero should never get teary-eyed about the death of a genocidal monster (even if said genocidal monster is a former friend and one of the last of the Time Lords).
    • And I know that Doctor Who has never been known for the quality of its special effects, but everything about the Gollum-ified Doctor was just offensively awful.

triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 19th 2010 at 4:51:20 AM •••

Does an entire season of 24 constitute as a single arc?

Edited by triassicranger
triassicranger Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 28th 2010 at 1:14:50 PM •••

Can we resolve this here and not on the main page please:

  • This troper has something of a love/hate thing for Sex And The City. The hate tends to bubble up during the moments that are blatant product placement for overpriced designer shit, but the absolute nadir was in "A Woman's Right to Shoes". Carrie loses her $500 Manolo sandals at a friend's kid's birthday party, and when the mother says that she can't afford to replace them (and since when is it custom to offer to pay for something lost or stolen at your place through no fault of your own?) Carrie gets all indignant at the implication that she's living a frivolous lifestyle. She rants about how as a single woman she doesn't get wedding presents, so she badgers the cash-strapped mother into buying replacement sandals as a "gift" for being single. This is a woman with a fucking warehouse full of shoes, who lives this lavish lifestyle ALREADY, and who will promptly forget about those shoes once she gets another pair next week. In any other show this would be treated as a George Costanza-like Kick the Dog moment but we're supposed to be happy that a stressed out mother is out 500 bucks so Carrie Fucking Bradshaw can have another pair of fucking shoes.
    • Seconded. This troper has hated Carrie and her whining "I'm getting married-to me" ever since that episode.
      • But the problem with hating Carrie for this is that it was her friend's responsibility. She forced Carrie to take off her shoes (something about not wanting dirty floors or something), and did absolutely nothing to help figure out who stole them or what else could have happened. Carrie wasn't just "indignant" for no good reason, either. The woman was utterly and completely rude to her on the phone. She basically said that she doesn't care at all that Carrie lost her very expensive shoes, and because she has kids, anything Carrie worries about is completely pointless. And it wasn't that she couldn't AFFORD the shoes (like all of Carrie's friends, she was wealthy), it was that she thought they were pointless, despite meaning a lot to Carrie.

Top