During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.
Specific issues include:
- Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
- A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
- Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
- Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
- Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.
It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.
Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:
Please see the Frequently Asked Questions and Common Requests List before suggesting any new entries for this trope.
IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.
When voting, you must specify the candidate(s). No blanket votes (i.e. " to everyone I missed").
No plagiarism: It's fair to source things, but an effortpost must be your own work and not lifted wholesale from another source.
We don't care what other sites think about a character being a Complete Monster. We judge this trope by our own criteria. Repeatedly attempting to bring up other sites will earn a suspension.
What is the Work
Here you briefly describe the work in question and explain any important setting details. Don't assume that everyone is familiar with the work in question.
Who is the Candidate and What have they Done?
This will be the main portion of the Effort Post. Here you list all of the crimes committed by the candidate. For candidates with longer rap sheets, keep the list to their most important and heinous crimes, we don't need to hear about every time they decide to do something minor or petty.
Do they have any Mitigating Factors or Freudian Excuse?
Here you discuss any potential redeeming or sympathetic features the character has, the character's Freudian Excuse if they have one, as well as any other potential mitigating factors like Offscreen Villainy or questions of moral agency. Try to present these as objectively as possible by presenting any evidence that may support or refute the mitigating factors.
Do they meet the Heinousness Standard?
Here you compare the actions of the Candidate to other character actions in the story in order to determine if they stand out or not. Remember that all characters, not just other villains, contribute to the Heinousness Standard
Final Verdict?
Simply state whether or not you think the character counts or not.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:14:10 AM
Ok, to Vlad.
to Vlad Masters/Vlad Plasmius.
All right, that might be why I had reservations. Definite "no" then.
A cruel, sick joke is still a joke, and sometimes all you can do is laugh.Vlad
Please put the Vanellope writeup in the drafts
Yes to Deth and Tennyson. Cut Isaka,. No to Crumb and a very hard no to Vlad. I love that show and he most certainly doesn't count.
Edited by Bullman on Sep 12th 2020 at 10:10:59 AM
Fan-Preferred Couple cleanup threadI think the Vanellope writeup could be trimmed further. Here is my attempt:
- Wreck-It Ralph 2: Princess Vanellope von Schweetz is the ruler of Sugar Rush II: Whirled Tour and the evil Alternate Self of the original Vanellope. Desiring to be the only game in her arcade, Princess Vanellope painfully ripped out 56 other characters' power ups with her scepter, resulting in their arcade shutting down and Sugar Rush II getting sold to Bernie. Pretending to befriend the Vanellope of Sugar Rush, she captures and repeats the scepter process with her. Strangling Candlehead to get the other racers to do as she says, she later invades and attacks Sugar Rush to get her scepter back, fully willing to kill all the Sugar Rush racers and even sacrifice her own subjects when they turn on her. Blaming everything on Vanellope, she drives them both to the cord to throw her out and kill her.
I cut out the extraneous stuff and focused on the primary evil acts.
Also, to Crumb and Vlad.
Edited by MasterN on Sep 12th 2020 at 8:35:26 AM
One of these days, all of you will accept me as your supreme overlord.I've put an edited version of this writeup on Complete Monster Drafts. If Imperial Majesty XO creates another one, please replace mine with his.
...Huh. I brought that up about Isaka when I proposed the Jewel Dopant a year ago, and people didn't seem to think it was a big deal and he could keep since he died right after that scene and they never developed further on it. I'm not trying to be aggressive or confrontational or anything; just find it kinda weird how the opinion just flipped in a relatively small window of time.
Cut Isaka though.
Edited by finalsurvivor1 on Sep 12th 2020 at 12:01:22 PM
I like it, Master N. the Princess Vanellope Writeup. Don't know if writeups can be put to a vote but I give it a regardless
Edited by M1st3rSt3v3 on Sep 12th 2020 at 12:21:00 PM
I gotta say to Vlad. He just doesn’t seem to fit this. Aside from being comedic, he seems to have the Luthor syndrome too.
Also, that he does show compassion too (and not just in alternate timelines).
Edited by futuremoviewriter on Sep 12th 2020 at 10:48:19 AM
to Vlad. Good first EP, though.
Alright, since I just watched the movie to verify this dude on MB, I'm gonna suggest we cut this from Sherlock Holmes (1932):
- Complete Monster: Professor James Moriarty, following a decade of rivalry with Sherlock Holmes as a criminal mastermind, upon being sentenced to death congratulates his opponents for catching him before promising to ensure they will die first. Killing two guards whilst breaking out, Moriarty murders his prosecutor Mr. Erskine leaving his body hanging for Holmes to find. Building a gang from the most notorious foreign criminals and killers, Moriarty sets up Holmes to kill Colonel Gore-King of Scotland Yard, so he'll be sent to the gallows. Believing he's succeeded, Moriarty has his gang whip London into chaos, blowing up and shooting up businesses to distract the police from his real plan to rob the Faulkner Bank. To ensure their getaway Moriarty also kidnaps Alice Faulkner and Billy. Even when defeated, Moriarty attempts one final attempt to kill Sherlock Holmes.
The big thing? The racketeering gets one scene where it's played completely for laughs: it goes from Moriarty's American gangster lackey trying to intimidate the English pub owner and him not understanding the gangster's slang. Even after the gangster comes back to shoot the place up, the joke continues, with the pub owner and his friend getting slapstick bandages put on them to argue about whether one of them finished his beer or not, not traumatized at all by being shot at.
This leaves Moriarty's crimes as: killing his first target for his arrest, trying to frame Holmes and getting Gore-King killed along the way and kidnapping Alice and Billy. On that kidnapping note? It's seriously mellow. He makes Mr. Faulkner comply with him while he robs him by threatening to hurt Alice but that's it. Even when Holmes comes to confront Moriarty the worst he does is smack Billy on the head... no using anyone as a human shield or pointing a gun at anyone but Holmes.
All in all, I think he's too light, even for 1932.
Edit: oh right and the two guards I forgot about... still, I think he's measuring up quite short.
Edited by 43110 on Sep 12th 2020 at 2:09:48 PM
Based on that scene, I'd agree that the racketeering is Played for Laughs a little too heavily for comfort. to Professor James Moriarty.
to Vlad. He's a very complex villain to begin with. Not to mention that even in The Ultimate Enemy, he's not entirely bereft of everything that resembles sympathetic moments.
And I thought Isaka was already effed up to begin with... Sure, he's already a crazy serial killer who killed the Secondary Rider's family and ends up being an Asshole Victim to Accel Trial's finisher. It doesn't help that both Terui and Isaka were pawns to Shroud's plans to get back on Ryubee.
Like everyone else, I'll decide with cut on Isaka.
Cut Moriarty
What is the "Luthor syndrome?"
Wait Vlad. No absolutely not their.
The dude has a really large number of really goofy moments, shows some genuine redeeming qualities in ultimate enemy and well he's really not heinous enough. Hes pretty standard for the show. No worse then the norm.
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."Cut Isaka, cut Moriarty.
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM Drafts43: I'm not sure I agree with you on the entire racketeering scene being played for laughs. That bit you described most certainly is (as I mentioned in the effort post) but in the brief sequence we see, we also see Moriarty's men shooting up and blowing up several other buildings in the process.
Likewise the descriptions we're given afterwards describe London being thrown into chaos.
Still I understand if you don't feel its enough.
Depotholing and trimming Decker.
- Nightbreed: Dr. Philip Decker is far more evil than any of the actual monsters in the film are. He masquerades as a renowned psychologist, but is actually a masked, bayonet-wielding serial killer who butchers families (including the children), women he comes across, and anyone else he can get his hands on. He sees himself as a Death-like figure on a mission to stop the continuation of mankind. After Decker’s psychiatric patient Aaron Boone tells him his dreams of the Nightbreed civilization, he frames Aaron for his crimes and gets Aaron killed by the police. When he learns of Aaron's resurrection and the existence of the Tribes of the Moon, he tries to exterminate the civilization of magical creatures as the ultimate extension of his mission to cleanse the world.
Also, a quote:
Also cut Moriarty.
Edited by DemonDuckofDoom on Sep 13th 2020 at 4:06:55 AM
I must have missed that episode, but if that entry isn't misrepresenting anything, then yeah, that's an absolute disqualifying factor.
Edited by Awesomekid42 on Sep 12th 2020 at 10:30:09 AM