Follow TV Tropes

Following

Named after a work: Muppet

Go To

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#1: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:23:32 AM

Muppets is a trademarked term referring specifically to The Muppets as created by Jim Henson and now owned by Disney. That and the articles only have the definite article "the" separating them. How about we call the trope something like say... puppets? Marionettes?

To make it more confusing, Muppets redirects to The Muppets and not Muppet.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:24:31 AM by Ghilz

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#2: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:33:23 AM

Muppets are not any puppet. It's a very specific type.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#3: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:34:48 AM

Yes, the kind that specifically appears on The Muppets show/movies. It's a trademark anything else literally can't be called a muppet

To quote the other wiki:

The legal trademark on the term "Muppet" is currently held by The Muppets Studio, a division of The Walt Disney Company, although Sesame Workshop and The Jim Henson Company continue to use the term on their characters with certain permissions from Disney.

Either you rename the trope, or we have to remove all the non disney non jim henson examples to fit the actual definition.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:37:48 AM by Ghilz

Gillespie Talkative Loon from Western Canada Since: Sep, 2011
#4: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:03:24 AM

Well what kind of name could be used if not Muppet? I see your point but I don't think there's really any other word for them. They aren't just puppets, and all of the entries on the list are derived from the Jim Henson ones anyway. I agree that the redirect oughta be corrected though.

[The rest was unintelligible.]
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#5: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:07:24 AM

Yes, Muppet is a trademark, but in conversational English it's used to refer to the specific style of puppet used in the Muppets. Works like Avenue Q that use the same style are called muppets by the general public. Just because something is a trademark doesn't mean that the majority of people care. Nor will they stop using the word in whatever generic form they feel like.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
20LogRoot10 Since: Aug, 2011
#6: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:10:55 AM

The trope's correct as-is; there's no need to pretend a word isn't used the way it is just because of trademark law.

Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#7: Oct 12th 2011 at 12:26:42 PM

Actually, in fairness to the OP, I think Muppets are pretty much always used to refer to the creation of Jim Henson and his workshop.

In the first ten pages for a Google search simply on "muppet," I have found the following references to something other than Jim Henson's Muppets:

  • Urban Dictionary - slang for "a stupid person."
  • A blogger that just goes by "muppet" (all lower-case).
  • A Pascal-based physics program called M.U.P.P.E.T.
  • Wiktionary confirming the Urban Dictionary definition.
  • Wired referring to Warren Ellis as a muppet (don't think they mean either the "stupid" definition or the one touted here).
  • Someone's pet Boston Terrier.
  • A website for "Muppet Labs," which, among other things, promotes the use of INTERCAL, programming's Real Life answer to the Joke Item.

Everything else has been either a dead link or something related to Jim Henson (including a fanart reimagining various muppets as characters from Doctor Who... aw, crap, just inspired yet another stupid WMG, didn't I?).

At any rate, if the generic "floppy felt puppet" didn't appear at all in the first ten pages of a Google search, when someone's pet dog did, I have to suspect that there's merit to saying that "muppet" is not actually a generic term for that type of puppet.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#8: Oct 12th 2011 at 1:08:28 PM

Google probably isn't the best source for this. Google search is based on most relevant. When most people are Googling for muppets they're looking for Kermit and Miss Piggy, so that's what Google is going to pop up. Those muppets are hugely popular. Of course they're going to drown out everything else on the Google search. I'd be shocked if they didn't.

The telling thing is that when works like Avenue Q are discussed, the characters are called muppets even when they have no ties to Henson.

edited 12th Oct '11 1:11:26 PM by shimaspawn

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#9: Oct 12th 2011 at 1:42:46 PM

Well, what source would one look for, then, to find out whether people use "muppet" to describe such puppets not made by Jim Henson's Workshop?

I just tried Googling "Avenue Q Muppets" to see any instances where those puppets were referred to as muppets (as opposed to simply being compared to The Muppets), and I've found two interviews with puppeteers from the show (and one of those, Stephanie D'Abruzzo, only used the word in reference to her 19 years working on Sesame Street), two reviews of the show on Yelp, a couple blogs describing them as "muppet-like" (which wouldn't count to me), one would-be script writer who cited it as inspiration for a "muppet film noir script" (really), and a public access show's website in San Fran. That's again the first ten pages of a Google search... that's five examples of specifically calling them "muppets" (instead of a direct comparison to The Muppets) in a hundred links.

I see the point that Google would naturally be predisposed towards favoring The Muppets on a search for the term. But unless I can see a good amount of "in-the-wild" evidence of use as a generic term for this type of puppet, I'm inclined to agree with the OP. While I think OP should have brought a bit more evidence to the table, I think it backs up their assertion so far.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
defunctzombie Since: Feb, 2010
#10: Oct 12th 2011 at 2:21:01 PM

Muppets are like popsicles. They're both trademarked, but are you really going to call that box you bought from the dollar store "frozen confectioneries"? No. Just like how I'm not going to call the things from Avenue Q "marionettes with puppet features".

32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#11: Oct 12th 2011 at 2:38:33 PM

I'd like to point out, though, that one the first page of Google results alone, you only have four references to Popsicle-brand ice pops, while you have four (including one also referencing the brand) references to popsicle as a generic word for an ice pop, one to a band, one to a charity who use a generic popsicle as their logo, and one to a dog (because a single-word search inevitably turns up a pet named that word).

So in the span of one page of Google results, I've found almost as many results as to "popsicle" becoming generic as I did after ten pages of a similar search for "muppet."

Quite frankly, I think that shows, by comparison, that people generally aren't referring to felt puppets of that style as muppets.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#12: Oct 12th 2011 at 4:00:58 PM

I think we've got a supertrope for that, Kleenex Brand Tissue or something?

Fight smart, not fair.
20LogRoot10 Since: Aug, 2011
#13: Oct 12th 2011 at 4:13:18 PM

Brandname Takeover

Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#14: Oct 12th 2011 at 5:13:51 PM

Right.

Ultimately, whether or not to rename this trope comes down to whether or not a Brand Name Takeover has happened to The Muppets. I honestly think that it has not; you will find a few scattered references like that, but you'll be just as likely to find people calling random video game critters Pokemon regardless of what game they came from (including the oft-joked about pronunciation Pokey-man... which I didn't believe people actually did until my mom said it earnestly).

If it can be shown, however, that I am wrong and that "muppets" has gone generic, I'll withdraw my objections to the name used on the wiki.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
leurz Since: Oct, 2011
#15: Oct 12th 2011 at 5:21:36 PM

Try Googling "Muppet Style." That brings up tons of results for, well, muppet style puppets that aren't The Muppets. I think it's gone semi-generic. Not quite kleenex, since you need that extra qualifier. "Muppet type" works too. Even "muppet puppet" brings up some of the same results.

edited 12th Oct '11 5:31:26 PM by leurz

32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#16: Oct 12th 2011 at 5:51:18 PM

Except that "muppet-style" and "muppet-type" are making explicit comparisons to The Muppets. So by using those phrases, you are invoking the originals to make a comparison with the type.

You don't say "kleenex-style," "band-aid-style," or "popsicle-style." The fact that you have to modify it is proof that a Brand Name Takeover hasn't happened.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
20LogRoot10 Since: Aug, 2011
#17: Oct 12th 2011 at 6:04:34 PM

Unless there's another name for a Muppets-style puppet, I can't see renaming the page.

Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
leurz Since: Oct, 2011
#18: Oct 12th 2011 at 7:02:26 PM

[up][up]I'm pretty sure I'm not arguing against you. Maybe a rename would be appropriate if the rest of the world is using the term with qualifiers. Do I sense a new entry to the Sublime Rhyme index? wink

edited 12th Oct '11 7:02:48 PM by leurz

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#19: Oct 12th 2011 at 8:57:00 PM

Plus that doesn't change the fact that we have two article with pretty much the same title, and that Muppet often used to pothole or wick to an actual member of The Muppets.

For example

And I am only down to the letter C

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#20: Oct 12th 2011 at 9:04:41 PM

Other misuses:

Note that I am only calling misuse those that potholing Muppet as a work or for a specific member of The Muppet, not those that use muppet as a type of puppet even if its refering to a creation of Jim Henson.

edited 12th Oct '11 9:31:00 PM by Ghilz

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#21: Oct 12th 2011 at 9:29:08 PM

More Misuse. Remember, only 100 wicks, so each misuse is literally 1% misuse:

And that's all 100 wicks checked. 26 percent refer to the work rather than the trope. So can't say the name is working.

Some are outright sinkholes I have not included.

edited 12th Oct '11 9:30:18 PM by Ghilz

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#22: Oct 12th 2011 at 9:41:16 PM

Unless there's another name for a Muppets-style puppet, I can't see renaming the page.

Animatronic Puppet?

MetaFour AXTE INCAL AXTUCE MUN from a place (Old Master) Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#24: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:17:01 PM

^^ They aren't all animatronic. they may be, but animatronic is by definition automated. Many muppet-style puppets are completely operated by hand.. Muppet Style Puppet works.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:18:12 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#25: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:20:11 PM

[up] Then how about "Puppet" or "animatronic creatures"? That's what the Jim Henson Company calls them. Less someone's gonna tell me they don't know the name of the stuff they pioneered?

Speaking of which, what IS the definition of the page? So far the description includes Three Paragraph on the history of the Jim Henson company and The Muppets and the following definitions:

  • A character in a live-action series rendered by puppetry or animatronics.
  • A full body suit and an animatronic head.
  • Hand Puppet as a subtype.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:32:06 PM by Ghilz

SingleProposition: Muppet
21st Jan '12 3:35:54 PM

Crown Description:

Vote up for yes, down for no.

Total posts: 71
Top