Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / TheNotLoveInterest

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
AkiraxAtsukifan Since: Mar, 2012
Mar 23rd 2014 at 12:28:04 AM •••

I don't understand how this trope works. This just seems to be slapped onto the Fan-Preferred Couple to justify the official couple if any. If two characters are extremely close, then wouldn't that mean they would be under Heterosexual Life-Partners: Or Platonic Life-Partners? I just find it rather annoying how most of the examples lists are mainly yaoi/yuri pairings that happen to be popular even though they are all already written under Heterosexual Life-Partners.

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2014 at 2:48:13 AM •••

Eh, I don't see much of the stuff you are citing. This trope is about someone fulfilling the Love Interest role but not being an actual Love Interest.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Jan 9th 2017 at 9:33:03 AM •••

What does it mean "fulfilling the role of Love Interest"? The role of love interest is, as a name suggests, being romantically involved with character, either by being a couple, or falling in love with him, or being someone he falls in love with. The Not-Love Interest as the name suggests isn't any of these things. The definition is so imprecise that it can mean anything and if it's just "A character that isn't love interest" then... for me it sounds like Chairs

Luisdalas Since: Sep, 2023
Apr 5th 2024 at 2:30:35 PM •••

It's especially strange when they decide to include family members, when it's obvious that they don't fit the role of love interests to begin with.

I think the trope should only be for characters who under normal circumstances would be love interests, but for some strange reason, they are only platonic.

Luisdalas Since: Sep, 2023
Apr 5th 2024 at 2:28:28 PM •••

Honestly, direct family members such as siblings or cousins should not be included as an example, as they are obviously never intended to fulfill a role similar to love interests.

Lunarsand Since: Jan, 2019
Apr 2nd 2024 at 11:41:52 PM •••

Can Denji and Power be placed here or not? I mean, there are the boob-touching scene (after which Denji decides he doesn't want to grope boobs anymore and doesn't want to ask Power for nasty stuff) and the dubious content when Power is afraid to bathe or sleep by herself, but Denji makes it explicitly clear in his thoughts that he isn't attracted to her.

blueflame724 Since: May, 2010
Jun 16th 2014 at 11:33:38 AM •••

I myself am also confused by this definition. I'm interpreting it as more "narratively speaking, the character considered most important to another one, like a family member or a best friend". So, for me it sounds like it may be the deuteragonist, Heterosexual/Platonic Life Partners, or morality pet. Yet the definition makes it sound like it was almost going to turn into a romantic relationship and it didn't.

I treat all living things equally. That is to say, I eat all living things
johnnye Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 23rd 2013 at 4:02:03 PM •••

A lot of the examples here are "Someone is introduced as if they were going to be a love interest for the main character, but they never get together."

The Heat is a good example of what I mean: there's a secondary character who flirts a bit with Ashburn, they get a couple of minor Will They or Won't They? moments, and in the end, They Don't, and nothing much is made of this. It's just an office flirtation that didn't go anywhere.

Is that what this trope is supposed to be about? There are problems with that concept in itself, but most of the examples seem instead to be any sort of close relationship between two characters that isn't a romantic relationship. I'm not sure either of these things are tropeable, but I'm also not sure which this page is supposed to be about — or if it's something else entirely.

Lullabee Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 10th 2010 at 5:53:50 PM •••

I have to say I don't really understand this one. Is it merely that a character is used, in a Characters as Device way, the way one would use a love interest, or does it also require that the characters are Like Brother and Sister, The Straight Will And Grace, or something similar? If there is Ho Yay between the two characters, one has a minor implied crush on the other, or their relationship is in some other way shown to be not purely nonsexual and nonromantic, does it cease to be this trope?

For example, Withnail And I is a bit like a romantic comedy between two Heterosexual Life-Partners. Their relationship is quite explicitly nonsexual and nonromantic. However, Withnail has a line implying that he might harbor a crush on the titular "I". Does that make it not this trope?

Edited by Lullabee Hide / Show Replies
Earnest Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 23rd 2010 at 6:45:52 PM •••

Basically, this trope points out that certain roles and dynamics are frequently shared between the hero(ine) and the Love Interest, or that characters in these dynamics frequently evolve into a romantic pair. This is so common that when that is averted, you get two characters that share a very close relationship without wanting to make it romantic. Quite simply, in fiction you don't often get characters in deep and emotional relationships that aren't romantic, so viewers are taken aback when the relationship never becomes a romantic one.

Your example, and indeed Heterosexual Life-Partners could be considered a sister or sub trope. It's not that they're "the wrong gender", their relationship just never goes that direction (by choice or chance).

johnnye Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 23rd 2013 at 3:56:18 PM •••

It never goes the direction of... not being romantic?

I don't get this trope either.

Freya Since: May, 2009
Dec 7th 2011 at 9:42:00 PM •••

Can we give this trope a different name? Or how about make this trope an index instead of a trope? That way, rather than listing examples, we can just put "Romantic" Two-Girl Friendship etc. under this and not have all the confusion about what exactly this trope entails.

Hide / Show Replies
lexicon Since: May, 2012
Jan 23rd 2013 at 12:18:04 PM •••

You're right. This sounds more like it should be a list of tropes that blur the line between romance and something else like friendship or family. It appears as though every example would fit from Heterosexual Life-Partners, Platonic Life-Partners, "Romantic" Two-Girl Friendship etc.

Edited by lexicon
ccoa MOD Ravenous Sophovore Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
Feb 6th 2012 at 3:00:37 PM •••

Is this line really essential to the trope?

The Hero may have an actual love interest, but they will usually be less significant than this character.

It seems like it's artificially narrowing the trope by saying that if there's a love interest, they will usually be less important than the Not Love Interest.

Edited by ccoa Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
ccoa MOD Ravenous Sophovore Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
Feb 6th 2012 at 1:52:58 PM •••

Removing bad examples, disputed examples, and Zero Context Examples (that may not be bad, but certainly need clarifying):

Zero or Confusing Context:

  • Soul Eater: Pick a meister-weapon combo. Any meister-weapon combo. Especially Black Star and Tsubaki.
  • xxxHolic's Watanuki and Yuuko, with Yuuko as the Alice and Watanuki as the Bob.
    • Watanuki and Doumeki might fall into this; Watanuki is definitely the Alice in Doumeki's life, but unlike in the more straightforward example above, the former does not seem to appreciate (or even notice) the role he plays in his friend's life.
  • Opinion is divided on whether this describes Jinto and Lafiel from Banner of the Stars.
  • Tasha and his little-sister-turned-evil in Witch Hunter.
  • Fullmetal Alchemist: Anime only — Ed and Winry.
  • The Lord Of The Rings' Frodo and Samwise.
    • Merry and Pippin.
  • For Sherlock Holmes, it's Watson. See the QuotesWiki for one particularly noteworthy instance. Some adaptations have Irene Adler fulfill this role instead. This is Lampshaded remorselessly in the 2010 TV Sherlock series, along with a liberal dose of Ho Yay.
  • Bunny Manders (who despite the name is male) for AJ Raffles in the novels of E.W Hornung.
  • In Septimus Heap, Septimus and Jenna.
  • For Lieutenant Bush, Horatio Hornblower is his Not Love Interest. It sort of works both ways, but Hornblower is too neurotic to ever admit it.
  • Laurence and Temeraire in Temeraire. Note that they're not even of the same species.
  • Jack Aubrey and Stephen Maturin of Patrick O'Brian's Master And Commander novel series. Oh, yes.
  • Ivanhoe and Rebecca.
  • Life On Mars pretty much just is the love story of Sam and Gene. Well, when it's not being a Time Travel Police Procedural Fish out of Water Mind Screw about Police Brutality...
    • According to Ashes to Ashes 3x04, "Gene <3 Sam", or so says the graffiti Alex spies on a wall.
  • Ando fills this role for Hiro on Heroes.
    • Nathan and Peter Petrelli. Oh my God, Nathan and Peter Petrelli.
  • Quite a few of them on Lost, particularly Claire for Kate and the Man In Black and Jacob for each other.
  • Lorelei and Rory are this to each other in Gilmore Girls.
  • Similarly, but with a dollop of dysfunction, Veronica Mars and her father, Keith.
    • A stronger Veronica Mars example would be Veronica and Wallace.
  • Reno and Billy in Anything Goes.
  • Most male/female partnerships in the Resident Evil fit this to a T. The ones that do develop a romantic element usually don't end well.
  • Justified for Sophie in Tales of Graces because even thought she is not Asbel's love interest she is still the heroine.
  • Yuri and Flynn of Tales of Vesperia fame.

Debated Examples:

  • Code Geass: Suzaku and Lelouch. They alternate between being Heterosexual Life-Partners and Foe Yay-tastic Rivals, have epic amounts of Ho Yay, and the show's plot is basically driven by their relationship. Nunnally could also be seen to take this role to Lelouch, though she's much less active in terms of plot.
    • Debatable as Lelouch and Suzaku are meant to fullfill Rival Turned Evil and while initially it means they care for each other, in the end Suzaku hates Lelouch. Their care for one another also never reaches how much they care for others in the story, or for their respective causes.
    • Cornelia feels this way about Euhpie.
  • Delenn and Lennier in Babylon Five.

Just Bad:

Seems more like Homoerotic Subtext or some other trope (no indication he fulfills other Love Interest type roles):

Not a love interest role:

  • In Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Short Round is Indy's real emotional center.

Edited by ccoa Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Camacan MOD Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 17th 2011 at 2:53:53 AM •••

As written, this is not a good example. This is a specific character with a special and specific relationship with the hero. They would be the hero's lover, normally, but that's not the way the story works. Here we seem to have something else: any and all relationships including strong loyalty and dedication. If there is an example in here, the whole section needs to be re-written, and re-written as per Example Indentation: strong suggestion of Thread Mode.

  • In One Piece, Zoro is perfectly willing to sacrifice his life and his dreams of becoming the world's greatest swordsman to save Luffy. He almost does it at one point and by sheer will, he manages to stay alive.
    • Luffy's relationship with his female crew members also applies. He attacked Arlong for the sole reason for making Nami cry, despite not knowing about her tragic backstory because he would have done it either way. He invaded Enies Lobby to save Robin, declaring war on essentially the whole world. Even with Vivi, he went through hell and more to defeat Crocodile and save her country.
      • Knowing Luffy, he'd probably do that for any one of his True Companions.
      • It also helps that, according to Oda, there will be no romance in One Piece at all, so basically every action that would be romantic in any other show would fall under this.
    • Luffy also goes through a ridiculous amount of pain, punishment and general suffering in the name of his older brother, Ace. Let's put it this way, the shippers were probably overjoyed at the revelation that the two aren't blood relatives.

Edited by Camacan
207.206.236.107 Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 12th 2011 at 11:54:43 AM •••

It seems like a lot of these examples are Male/Male but without Ho Yay, and thus not true examples of a Not Love Interest. A protagonists buddy is NOT an example.

piearty Hello world! Since: Oct, 2009
Hello world!
Jan 25th 2011 at 12:15:31 PM •••

Wow. Using Alex and Justin as names? Subtle.

Edited by piearty
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
Sep 2nd 2010 at 5:04:11 PM •••

Two items:

1. The description: Is it meant to say that Alex is supposed to be <pick one of: Little Sister, Foxhole Buddy, The Rival>?

2. Given that the page on The Other Wiki is "Romantic Friendship", is "Romantic" Two-Girl Friendship a Sub-Trope, or just a similar one?

Ketchum's corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced tactic is indistinguishable from blind luck. Hide / Show Replies
SomeGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 2nd 2010 at 6:32:36 PM •••

This description is nonsense. It makes several extremely broad and extremely narrow statements and ends up giving us very little useful information at all.

I've drafted a new description based on Earnest's capsulation above. It fits with the examples now, so I think we're OK. Sending the title to Trope Repair Shop, because I rather suspect the ambiguous title of The Not-Love Interest (as opposed to Romantic Friendship) is how we got here in the first place.

See you in the discussion pages.
Madrugada MOD Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 7th 2010 at 11:30:00 AM •••

Alex could be any one of those. Or something else. What Alex is not is a Love Interest.

Yes, "Romantic" Two-Girl Friendship is a subtrope; you have two girls in what has all the signs of being a romantic relationship, but they are not each other's Love Interests. The difference is that the "Romantic" Two-Girl Friendship is treated as "practice" for a real romantic relationship with a male Love interest; it is expected to be temporary. The Not-Love Interest isn't "practicing", and there isn't the same expectation that it will be given up for a real Love Interest — it often exists at the same time as a real Love Interest.

Edited by loracarol ...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Top