Follow TV Tropes

Following

Not a trope about swords or stones Crowner Changed 10/24/11: Sword In The Stone

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Dec 24th 2011 at 11:59:00 PM
DoKnowButchie from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Since: Jan, 2001
#1: Mar 3rd 2011 at 6:58:09 PM

First of all, there's the fact that the trope name is one "The" away from becoming the title of two works. I wouldn't have a problem with that if the trope were actually about swords stuck into stones, but the trope is a tad broader than that: it's about "certain special items that only an attuned person can use". What's more, the name would be better served attached to a trope that's actually about swords in stones.

So I suggest a split: one one hand we remove the examples that involve "items that only an attuned person can use" into a new trope (assuming we don't have it already), and we keep Sword In The Stone as a trope about stories that use Swords in Stones as a homage to the Arthurian story.

Avatar art by Lorna-Ka.
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#2: Mar 3rd 2011 at 7:23:25 PM

So this is basically something that only its Chosen One(s) can acquire or wield? Isn't that Loyal Phlebotinum?

Hmm, at < 100 wicks, let's classify the usage. Gimme a few minutes to tally them up...

Emphasis on a literal something-in-a-stone:

Emphasis on something only usable by its chosen one(s):

Both of the above, not necesarily Arthurian reference:

Deliberately Arthurian reference (the Sword In The Stone):

Mistaken for The Sword In The Stone, the work:

I have no idea:

Exempt:

edited 3rd Mar '11 8:42:09 PM by Stratadrake

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
Ookamikun This is going to be so much fun. from the lupine den Since: Jan, 2001
This is going to be so much fun.
#3: Mar 3rd 2011 at 7:47:54 PM

Yeah, I agree with splitting.

Have The Sword In The Stone be the name for homages on that, while have "items attuned to a specific character" be... Character Specific Attuned Item?

Death is a companion. We should cherish Death as we cherish Life.
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#4: Mar 3rd 2011 at 8:32:31 PM

Done analyzing the wicks.

BTW, how does "only usable by its chosen one" compare to Loyal Phlebotinum?

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#5: Mar 3rd 2011 at 8:33:32 PM

[up][up][up] It looks like there is some confusion happening.

I think a rename is in order here. There's some misuse going on and it shares its name with a work, so it seems clear that the title is bad.

edited 3rd Mar '11 8:33:42 PM by troacctid

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#6: Mar 3rd 2011 at 8:43:25 PM

I had a little difficulty sorting the wicks into each category.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#7: Mar 4th 2011 at 6:48:54 AM

Only the Chosen May Wield?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
SomeSortOfTroper Since: Jan, 2001
#8: Mar 4th 2011 at 11:04:09 AM

^ Before checking every page, I know that that must be the name for one trope. It immediately calls to mind a particular trope.

I will now actually check that the thread is about that trope.

EDIT: Yes it is. I want that name.

Loyal Phlebotinum is a subtrope, possibly even just a sister trope. The "loyalty" is stricter behaviour while "the chosen" is a dropped requirement.

edited 4th Mar '11 11:12:00 AM by SomeSortOfTroper

BlackWolfe Viewer Gender Confusion? from Lost in Austin Since: Jun, 2010
#9: Mar 4th 2011 at 6:01:19 PM

Chosen By The Phlebotinum?

But soft! What rock through yonder window breaks? It is a brick! And Juliet is out cold.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#12: Mar 5th 2011 at 8:18:55 AM

Sword In The Stone was a pre-existing phrase before the movie, or the book. In fact the book took it from one of many versions of the King Arthur story.

It's the most famous example.

It's the most parodied example.

The example is known almost exclusively for selecting the king and/or Chosen One.

It's achieved cultural osmosis status.

It's not an uncommon way to describe this trope by people off wiki. I've had authors describe a plot development as a "Sword In The Stone scenario" or "like the Sword In The Stone".

Because of the above I think the best thing to do would be to tighten the description to attuned artifacts that are evidence of a character's role. (ie, being able to wield this weapon means he must be the chosen one, or he's the special sidekick who will support the chosen one, or whatever.)

Maybe add "Scenario" to the end.

By the way, has there been any evidence of misuse?

edited 5th Mar '11 8:19:49 AM by Sackett

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#13: Mar 5th 2011 at 8:50:57 AM

It's not always thought of as this trope. It's often mistaken for Excalibur these days.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#14: Mar 5th 2011 at 10:06:24 AM

By the way, has there been any evidence of misuse?
People are confusing it with "Swords in stones." [1]

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#15: Mar 5th 2011 at 2:13:35 PM

[up] But are those just some old sword stuck in a stone?

Or are they swords that are attuned to their owner, and the ability to pull it free proves the person is the hero or whatever?

Going by the count in the post you cited, among those identified, about 1/2 are attuned, 1/4 are homages to Arthur (meaning that they are lampshading this trope), about 1/3 emphasize the sword in the stone part (and I checked a couple of those, the All Myths Are True one really ought to be considered an Arthur homage).

[up][up] When someone says: "Sword in the Stone" they always mean the sword that gets pulled from the stone to prove Arthur is the true king.

When they say "Excalibur", they might mean the sword in the stone, or they might mean the sword given Arthur by the lady of the lake. So there is confusion, but it's only confusion when we use the sword's name. When the sword is called the Sword In The Stone, then we know which Excalibur they mean, and people know that the sword in the stone is the one that proves who is king.

Which is why I say this isn't a bad name for a trope about an item that is attuned to a person, and so the ability to use that item marks the person as the Chosen One or whatever the special deal is for the user of that item.

edited 5th Mar '11 2:18:23 PM by Sackett

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#16: Mar 5th 2011 at 2:18:19 PM

If the confusion is about the sword's name, that means it's relevant to the trope name.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#17: Mar 5th 2011 at 2:20:24 PM

Yes...

Which is why I think naming it something with the sword's name, like "Excalibur Chooses The King" is worse then naming it Sword In The Stone.

Since you see... the name is the confusing part. No one is confused about what the Sword in the Stone is, or what the trope is that is associated with it.

The confusion is in one direction:

If I say: Excalibur -> Does he mean Sword In The Stone (sword that chooses the king), or does he mean the sword given by the lady of the lake (the powerful magical blade?)

If I say Sword In The Stone -> Ahh, he means the sword that chooses the King.

edited 5th Mar '11 2:23:12 PM by Sackett

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#18: Mar 5th 2011 at 2:25:24 PM

[up][up][up] The question is, if this trope has nothing to do with swords in stones, why are half of its wicks specifically referring to swords in stones? I seriously doubt that the "Sword in the stone" variation is the most common form of this trope by that wide a margin. If the trope name were working, we would expect it to attract examples whether or not they involve a sword being stuck in something, and that's not happening. Thus, it's not being correctly used.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
TBeholder Our future is a madhouse from chthonic safety Since: Jan, 2001
Our future is a madhouse
#19: Mar 18th 2011 at 3:57:47 PM

Since it's not always pre-"loyal" to someone specific and not always narrowed to the Chosen One, i propose simple Only The Worthy May Use.

After all, the trope is close in purpose and use to Only the Worthy May Pass.

...And even I make no pretense Of having more than common sense - R.W.Wood
MC42 Tempus Omnia Iudicat Since: Oct, 2010
Tempus Omnia Iudicat
#20: Mar 18th 2011 at 4:11:47 PM

There is no difference that I can discern from what this trope is supposed to be and Loyal Phlebotinum, except that might be used specifically for weapons, which is silly. Keep this page but rework it so it's about literal swords in stones, since the Arthurian legend has become homaged, parodied and played with enough that it can be its own trope. All examples of "weapon that only the chosen one can use" should be moved to Loyal Phlebotinum.

edited 18th Mar '11 4:22:51 PM by MC42

"Thorough preparation must lead to success. Neglect nothing."
jebuz I've been Bluelinked from Australia Since: Jan, 2001
I've been Bluelinked
#21: Mar 18th 2011 at 5:58:10 PM

If an example is "Only the chosen one can take the MacGuffin" but with no Loyal Phlebotinum, does this count as the trope? Because several of the "misused" examples would fit this description.

If this isn't part of the trope, it should be something.

Australia The country with a 2 party system But all the power with independents
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#24: Sep 22nd 2011 at 6:14:28 AM

Sword In The Stone was a pre-existing phrase before the movie, or the book. In fact the book took it from one of many versions of the King Arthur story.

It's the most famous example.

It's the most parodied example.

The example is known almost exclusively for selecting the king and/or Chosen One.

It's achieved cultural osmosis status.

It's not an uncommon way to describe this trope by people off wiki. I've had authors describe a plot development as a "Sword In The Stone scenario" or "like the Sword In The Stone".

I am not surprised at all that one third the examples use the actual "Sword Stuck In a Stone proves The Chosen One" scenario, since it's so massively referenced everywhere.

I haven't seen much evidence of misuse. Going by the count in the post listing examples, among those identified, about 1/2 are attuned, 1/4 are homages to Arthur (meaning that they are lampshading this trope), about 1/3 emphasize the sword in the stone part (and I checked a couple of those, the All Myths Are True one really ought to be considered an Arthur homage. The Wheel Of Time one is clearly an example of this trope as drawing the Sword is explicitly the prophecy that identifies the Chosen One).

Because of the above I think the best thing to do would be to tighten the description to attuned artifacts that are evidence of a character's role. (ie, being able to wield this weapon means he must be the chosen one, or he's the special sidekick who will support the chosen one, or whatever.)

Maybe add "Scenario" to the end of the name, so it's Sword In The Stone Scenario.

edited 22nd Sep '11 6:18:59 AM by Sackett

DoKnowButchie from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Since: Jan, 2001
#25: Sep 22nd 2011 at 7:47:39 AM

Again, the absence of several prominent fictional examples of the trope which are not swords in stones—Thor's Mjolnir, The Elder Wand from the Harry Potter series, the Vampire Killer whip in Castlevania, Kyle Rayner's Green Lantern ring (and possibly others), EVA Unit 01 in Neon Genesis Evangelion, (arguably) most weapons in Metal Gear Solid 4—very strongly suggest that the name and picture (which is Just A Sword And A Caption, with no indication that the sword is attuned to a particular user), and the Arthur-focused description are making people think that this trope is only about swords in stones.

Avatar art by Lorna-Ka.

AlternativeTitles: SwordInTheStone
24th Oct '11 4:47:41 PM

Crown Description:

Previous crowner showed consensus support for a rename.

Total posts: 43
Top