To-do list:
- Spiritual Successor is now YMMV and primarily refers to works that are perceived to be similar to previous works, regardless of creator intention.
In addition, Spiritual Adaptation has been merged with Spiritual Successor while works that objectively share creators are now covered by the Trivia item Creator-Driven Successor, so examples of Spiritual Adaptation (including on-page examples, which have been moved to Sandbox.Spiritual Adaptation until they're moved to Spiritual Successor's on-page example list) need to be moved to Spiritual Successor, while examples of Spiritual Successor that are known to share creators need to be moved to Creator-Driven Successor.
Example cleanup is being tracked using the Spiritual Successor Wick Cleaning sandbox.
In my Spiritual Successor Wick Check, I looked at 90 tropes, and only 2 of them were written in a way that could be classified as "objective". The rest were based on opinion, or described works that were in some way linked to the original...or didn't explain anything at all. There were a lot of those. Here's the quick results:
- Subjective: 19/90 or ~21%
- Objective: 2/90 or ~2%
- Same creators/continuity/etc: 29/90 or ~32%
- ZCE: 39/90 or ~43%
So, to recap: 19 of the 90 wicks checked were in some way based on audience opinion. 29 of them were works that probably could be considered derivatives of the original, thanks to having the same characters, creators, or in some way sharing a continuity. 39 wicks were classified as ZCE, meaning they never described why the connection existed or what it even was, or if it was intentional or not. That leaves only 2 wicks that could be described as "works objectively meant to take inspiration from another" without being directly related.
So, when I made the wick check, I thought it would result in me saying "Shunt this to YMMV!". But I'm not actually sure. It sure feels like it'd be better off as a subjective trope, but I'm not sure what to do with the pile of "same continuity" examples- do those even count as this trope at all?
So, that's that. What say you?
Edited by GastonRabbit on Jul 29th 2022 at 9:55:01 AM
Would Serial Numbers Filed Off cover that?
Or maybe something else on either the Derivative Works index or This Index Is Copypasted.
Or if that isn't enough, should we redo the crowner again if we've hit an impasse? I suppose we could have an option to retract the definition-only vote and retry the YMMV vote. If we remove this from Definition-Only Pages without making this YMMV, that would basically be a vote to do nothing with this.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 18th 2022 at 4:32:49 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Screw it, I'm redoing the crowner anyway because I hate it when threads hit an impasse due to a crowner decision, and it's been almost two weeks since the previous crowner was called.
I unstarred the thread for good measure.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 18th 2022 at 4:36:44 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.I don't think we need to remove it from Definition Only, the current definition is so muddled and meaningless that making it even YMMV seems sort of foolish. But, we'll see how this goes, I guess...
IDK if the thread was really at an impasse though, it seemed more like we were discussing making a new trope.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure PurenessWhy make a new trope when this one can be used? Alternatively, we could split off the examples for shared creators while still allowing examples for this.
Edit: I added that option.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 18th 2022 at 5:43:56 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Since JustaUsername has a good point about Spiritual Successor being a good name for examples of works from the same creator, I added another option for restricting Spiritual Successor to the examples that were being discussed (works that have the same characters/continuity as the original and/or have the same creator as the original) and making it Trivia instead of YMMV (because it wouldn't be subjective if we restricted it to these examples; it would be background information instead).
I think I've got things figured out with the new crowner now that the two new options have been added; I admit I might not have thought the previous one through, but I feel more confident about the current one as of the addition of the options related to works with the same characters/continuity and/or creator.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 18th 2022 at 5:56:38 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Not sure about Spiritual Successor name for Trivia, but there are a lot of cases of "Indirect Spin-Off" that could go to it.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupI've been watching the crowner off and on since I hooked it (mainly to see if the two newer options gained any more votes), and since it's been pretty unstable, I'm going to let it run for at least five days instead of three, so it'll be called no earlier than the 23rd.
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.I don't get the last crowner option and I think that's why it's getting downvoted. If it features the same characters and continuity, then it's not "spiritual," it's just a straight-up Spin-Off? It makes more sense if it's the same creative team doing something similar but with new characters in a new continuity.
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.That would explain why it's getting downvoted. I added new versions of those options that omit the "same characters/continuity" part while keeping the part about the creator(s) being the same.
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Surprised no one has suggested a Word of God requirement and keeping examples. Assuming the admission is common enough to warrant it?
It doesn't seem to vibe with what the wick check shows but might be worth discussing regardless.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?Yeah, I'm not sure that'd pan out. Like you said, there's no wicks of it, and WOG is often hard to come by anyway.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure PurenessYeah, we can't retool something into something it isn't being used as. An attempt to do that without checking for existing examples led to the demise of Suddenly Sexuality.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 18th 2022 at 1:09:25 PM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Sorry to ask for proofreading in TRS of all places, but the crowner description has "impasses" when singular "impasse" was meant.
Posting this comment to make public that I voted in favor of "Remove Spiritual Successor from Definition-Only Pages". I didn't upvote or downvote any of the other options.
135 - 158 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300It was a typo. I don't think I was completely awake at the time.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 19th 2022 at 4:50:43 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Fixed up another grammar issue in one of the options. It should no longer say "has the same has the same".
It happens.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope ReportQuestion. Since they're very closely related, would this effect Spiritual Adaptation in any way?
Yes, but Spiritual Adaptation doesn't have a wick check as far as I'm aware, so it's just going to sit alone until it gets one.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupRight, I only checked this one because...
Well, frankly, I think I was just sick of seeing it tossed around on every work page I went to.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure PurenessWait, what was the problem with making this Definition-Only? The concept is recognizable enough for Wikipedia to have an article on it. (Yes I know we're not Wikipedia but it's still noteworthy.) I don't see the issue there if examples are stripped on and off the page.
Also, wouldn't moving this to YMMV lead to overlap issues with Spiritual Adaptation?
Edited by Karxrida on May 20th 2022 at 1:48:31 AM
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?Honestly, if we make Spiritual Successor YMMV, I don't think there would be any problem with merging Spiritual Adaptation with it since the description for the latter makes the overlap obvious on its own, while the wick check for Spiritual Successor showed that Spiritual Successor's examples already overlapped with Spiritual Adaptation. There wasn't a wick check for Dewey Defeats Truman when it was merged with Failed Future Forecast via the thread for The Great Politics Mess Up.
Edit: I tagged Spiritual Adaptation's page with the same tag as the one on Spiritual Successor's page, because I don't see any problem with running a crowner for whether to merge the two. However, it'll have to wait until Monday because that's when the current crowner will be called.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 21st 2022 at 7:40:59 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Calling in favor of the following:
- Remove Spiritual Successor from Definition-Only Pages
- Make Spiritual Successor YMMV
- Split off a Trivia page for examples for works that have the same creator as the original, but not the same characters/continuity (name would be decided with another crowner)
Before we get to work on the third point, let's see whether we're merging Spiritual Adaptation with Spiritual Successor since concerns were raised regarding overlap.
Edited by GastonRabbit on May 23rd 2022 at 3:58:35 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.Some examples should be checked to see if they fall under objective tropes or Trivia items as well, particularly if they were made by the same creators.
Edited by nw09 on May 23rd 2022 at 1:02:17 AM
Crown Description:
Consensus was to split off a Trivia page for examples for works that have the same creator as the original, but not the same characters/continuity. What should its name be?
Yeah, that's the tricky part. Spiritual Successor was such a good name for a sequel/spinoff in all but brand name, hopefully we get a vote for a new name for the trope about successor works by the same creator(s).
EDIT: Maybe Creator-Driven Successor could work.
Edited by JustaUsername on May 17th 2022 at 11:49:55 PM
Some people say I'm lazy. It's hard to disagree.