Fixing lewdness issues

I would cut that for sure.

It has been removed.

Could I get some feedback on this?

Maybe replace everything in that sentence after "going so far" with "by making her climax"? That might be marginally better.

Got another "loli" example, but in reference to lolita fashion. UsefulNotes.Lolita Fashion has several instances of "loli" being used as a shortform for said fashion, such as:

• Special mention goes to the Touhou Project franchise by ZUN [...] loads of characters dressed in some form of Lolita clothing, (with some characters progressively lolified in later releases)

• The lifestyle itself and the stereotype are exaggerated - some followers of the lifestyle go to extremes, lolifying most, if not all, aspects of their lifestyle[...]

Should this be changed to "lolitafy" or similar?

Works for me

i'm not really sure if the first example means that as in "making the character's clothes more fancy" or "making the characters look younger" as both can be argued for, but i'm assuming they meant the former. the latter is fine just changing it to lolita, though it might be better to just rephrase those entirely to avoid the awkward construct of "lolitafy":

• Special mention goes to the Touhou Project franchise by ZUN [...] loads of characters dressed in some form of lolita clothing (with later installments becoming more obvious about their lolita inspiration)
• The lifestyle itself and the stereotype are exaggerated - some followers of the lifestyle go to extremes, incorporating lolita into most, if not all, aspects of their lifestyle[...]

Edited by NoUsername on Dec 6th 2022 at 10:20:59 AM

Pretty sure it's as in "making the character's clothes more fancy", given the context. But yeah, good point, might be better to just rephrase the sentences

EDIT: and changed

Edited by Zanreo on Dec 6th 2022 at 1:59:56 PM

During the TRS for Sneeze of Doom, its been brought up that the page, and a few other sneeze related tropes might have relation to fanworks with sneeze fetishes. Could anyone please look into it?

I went through and cut the person's fetish fanfics from Sick Episode, Self-Induced Allergic Reaction, Freeze Sneeze, and Pepper Sneeze.

This is a cleanup thread, for the wiki pages. If another user in the thread bothers you, you can 1. ask them to reconsider what they've said 2. Holler for mod's opinion.

Edit: 'd, late, and Amonimus said it better anyway

Edited by WarJay77 on Dec 8th 2022 at 7:07:25 AM

Found a potentially questionable example on Bare Your Midriff:

• The Rappelz online banner ads likely on this page feature plenty of nice tummy shots.

Not only is it ZCE-ish and very general (not to mention the "likely on this page" part which might not be true months or years after whenever said entry was written), rather than describing specific characters from the game (and could probably be cut just for that), but does the "plenty of nice tummy shots" wording sound a bit skeevy even for a game with fanservicey character designs that uses said designs in their advertising?

EDIT: ...also, from the same page, pretty sure we don't need to be troping stuff like an actual person being filmed naked without their knowledge or consent (not to mention it's not even an example of that trope):

• Sportscaster Erin Andrews' peephole video: The video shows Ms. Andrews' ritual of ironing and curling her hair in the nude, along with her casual nudity lifestyle. Her stalker secretly shot the video through peepholes in her hotel rooms at the Nashville Marriot at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, TN and the Radisson Hotel in Milwaukee, WI..

Edited by Zanreo on Dec 13th 2022 at 10:56:21 AM

That second example can definitely go. The game on the first might be a valid example but it would have to be rewritten entirely from the ground up, "nice tummy shots" is creepy and it's practically a ZCE/general example. I think it should be commented out.

I'd like to bring this up from Death World because I'm not sure what to do with it:

• Felarya (NSFW), except everything is trying to eat you. Or just kill you. Or, you know, both. The writer specializes in vore, so, as expected, most of the flora and fauna in his magnum opus are based on one question: "How many ways are there for a creature to eat someone?" There's a creature for every possible method. How about gassing you and growing roots into you to suck out the juices? Or portals out of that hell being created by creatures who live between dimensions and will snatch you while you're in Subspace or Hyperspace for dinner? The ones on the low end of his hazard scale aren't safe, they just need to be near you to kill you as opposed to, say, creating a wind tunnel to suck you up from over a hundred yards away. It's amazingly creative. However, if you're not a voreaphile, the sheer number and creativity of ways you can suddenly find yourself in something's gut make it scary, not sexy.

Even aside from lewdness there's issues with this (calling it "his magnum opus" for one), but I think there might be a valid entry in here somewhere if this can be trimmed a lot? I did a tiny bit of a digging and this seems to have quite a bit of in-depth, elaborate world building given to it on its own wiki, but I don't know how much of that is just there to give a backstory for the fetish content. (I mean, the logo is a closeup of a mouth, not very reassuring.) From what I'm familiar with even a work page cut for violating the P5 can be troped on trope pages as long as the cutworthy content isn't mentioned but I'm not sure if something like this would go too far. Would this be an okay rewrite or should the whole thing be cut?

• In Felarya (NSFW), everything is trying to eat you, kill you, or both. Not even leaving the dimension is safe, as some creatures can attack you while in Subspace or Hyperspace. The ones on the low end of the world's hazard scale aren't safe, they just need to be near you to kill you as opposed to, say, creating a wind tunnel to suck you up from over a hundred yards away.

Again I don't know anything about this series and if it has anything that would violate P5.

Edited by greatpikminfan on Dec 13th 2022 at 2:25:13 AM

I mean, my first thought is to question whether it's even all that deadly - vore makes absolutely no sense to me even by fetish standards, but I do know that it's often portrayed non-lethally.

Also, yeah, cut that second entry and "nice tummy shots" entirely.

From what I understand, it's usually deadly by implication only.

For Felarya:

All of the monsters, 100% of them, are giant naked women so that's the porn context.

Vore in general is kinda 50/50 split on lethal and safe. Felarya is very much lethal.

Edited by Adannor on Dec 13th 2022 at 1:44:53 PM

And deleted and commented out

My main concern was if Felarya had an actual plot to it that wasn't just a setup for vore scenarios, since the entry made it sound like it might. It seems like it's a legit example otherwise since it does describe a world with lethal monsters, just that it needs some trimming. From my understanding if a work has a story that's not just an excuse for one-handedness it passes, especially if there isn't anything more explicit than nudity. (All as long as there's no pedo-pandering either.) Does my rewrite of the entry look good?

Per this post by sudrictoon, there have been concerns about inappropriate works being listed in the Iyashikei page. What works should we remove?

sudrictoon only mentions Danchigai and Chitchai Senpai Ga Kawaisugiru as problematic.

Edited by Amonimus on Dec 19th 2022 at 11:35:56 PM

I know that, but I’m referring to the other works outside those two.

Unless there's something suspicious in the descriptions on-page, there's nothing to check.

I see, My apologies, Just trying to be cautious and all.