Follow TV Tropes
We don't do wick cleanups just for the sake of them. Wick repair is a very work intensive process and without someone committed it won't get done at all.
No opinion on Ryona.
Putting this out there in advance, so that I don't create a page for it that will eventually be removed.
Unwilling Service is a Pokemon ficseries I'm writing, which involves three Trainers having certain body parts enlarged, and from there, being rendered completely naked and getting molested every now and then. They themselves are teenagers, there is no actual sex, but so far, Ellen and May have each been fondled by someone younger than themselves. Before that, May also winds up escorting a young swimsuit-clad boy through a forest while completely naked herself for the first time.
Here are all three stories that are currently taking place simultaneously:
Any word on whether that story would be appropriate for TV Tropes or not?
edited 16th Jan '18 2:16:10 AM by SeaRover
You'll want to take it to the review thread.
Not sure if I was supposed to post here before removing it, but I removed a recommendation for the fanfic Freedom off of FanficRecs.The Loud House because it was added by the author, and if I understood the author's note correctly, features NSFW content involving a minor (Lincoln's eleven).
edited 12th Feb '18 8:52:50 PM by Crossover-Enthusiast
I'd like to ask whether this Play-by-Post Game and Forum Role Plays, Anime Female Wrestling, also known as AFW (here's the link), is safe enough to have it's own page or not. It's a long-running roleplaying forum about female wrestling. It also contains quite a lot of adult contents as well as explicit sex scenes. While normal wrestling matches are prevalent there, the more risque matches, also known as hentai matches, also exist. Even so, none of the characters depicted there are under eighteen.
Still, there's also kawaii wrestlers (an equivalent of cruiserweight) who appear small and cute even though they're also eighteen and above.
EDIT: Whoops, I guess this one should go to review thread.
edited 22nd Feb '18 5:34:28 PM by MaliciousOats
So I already posted this up on the Trope Repair Shop before I was directed here as a potentially more appropriate spot to raise the concern in regards to the Ephebophile trope page.
This page really doesn't seem to serve a purpose on the site or contribute much beside naming the term, distinguishing it from pedophile in a weirdly specific and defensive manner, and then listing a whole heap of quotes, some of which involve underage rape.
It's a bad look, and it does nothing for us. We don't have a pedophile page, and I don't see why this one should get a free pass. I suggest we just get rid of it.
We use it to talk about characters who are. We have to put a difference between that trope and Would Harm A Child (who is used for pedophiles).
Alternatively, we could make it a full out trope and list examples there.
edited 1st Jun '18 7:38:47 PM by KazuyaProta
I believe it used to be a full trope page before it was wiped clean and locked. I'm just wondering what purpose it serves even if it's just meant as a category to put things under. Not everything needs a trope, and I don't feel this does. It just looks to me like it will invite, and has already invited, all sorts of unpleasantness. Just a cursory glance at the quotes will tell you this:
"You're so sexy... *nosebleed* I can't wait to rip all your clothes off, mount you, and rock your world! *horny panting* I'll ride you like a racehorse!!! Oh, this is going to be so much fun!!!"
That's directed at a 13 year old character.
We could remove the quote pages then.
I prefer that option to your first suggestion, sure.
I just don't see much cause for keeping the page in general, it seems like a needless distinction from Would Hurt a Child in general.
edited 1st Jun '18 7:55:32 PM by SR3NORMANDY
Would Hurt a Child is sort of limited to minors under 14.
edited 1st Jun '18 8:05:22 PM by KazuyaProta
I see that's the case, but I still don't see why this page needs to exist if we're going to cut it down to almost nothing anyway so that it meets standard.
This page feels like a left-over from before the big clean-up effort, and not really something that needs its own Trope. It just feels in bad taste.
Not quiite the right spot, this thread is more about ongoing progress on a task (as goes the projects forum), but decisions are made in that thread over in Content Violation Discussions. So just post there for extra attention to discussion.
Just stopping by to say that I agree with cutting the quotes page. And every other page that quote is associated with.
My mistake, I'll direct the attention there.
I'm thinking we should clean up Intercourse with You. It's a legitimate, common trope, and I want the page to stick around. I don't even want it to get an Example Sectionectomy. Writing about songs that are about sex can be done properly, and how can I object to the trope itself when I myself am an avowed fan of Steel Panther and This is Spın̈al Tap? But the thing is, some of the examples get gushy and go overboard on description, which isn't for a site that aims to be Family Friendly. Some of them even include tidbits about musicians' actual sex lives; that's definitely not for this site. I'd really appreciate some help.
I found an example on Pokémon Anime - Original Series Cast that seems to be worded in a fairly questionable manner.
Ms. Fanservice: Out of Ash's female friends, she has the skimpiest outfit and she has been in multiple◊ bikini◊ scenes◊ and as a mermaid. Also Masamitsu Hidaka, one of the directors of the anime, has stated that Ash's female companions basically serves as eye candy for the boys. She's also stated to be ten, making things extra kinky.
Of course, there is nothing wrong with pointing out that a kid in an anime for kids is intended to be fanservice for those kids but "She's also stated to be ten, making things extra kinky." is probably not the kind of commentary TV Tropes approves of, right?
I'd remove that last bit, the picture links, and call it acceptable.
The Contemptible Cover example section could use some good scrubbing. Too many of them violate the Weblinks Are Not Examples rule, which is particularly bad here given that the content hidden behind them is often Brain Bleach-level unsafe. Content Warnings should be no excuse for this.
MonsterClown.Real Life has had, for a very long time, a link to "Ouchy the Clown"'s sex site. I've just been putting up with it, but when I read the page just now, I realized how uncomfortable that example makes me. I was just about to remove it myself, but after reading No Lewdness, No Prudishness, I had a change of heart and decided to ask first. I am pretty sure this goes against site rules, but I want to get a second opinion.
Edited by DrNoPuma on May 2nd 2019 at 5:47:56 AM
Good call; I scrubbed the link and changed the parenthetical a bit.
After cleaning up the wicks to Main.Debbie Does Dallas and Film.Debbie Does Dallas, I request that the latter be locked so no one can create it. I'm not sure if this should go to the locked pages thread, but I'm just curious.
Film.Deep Throat also had some wicks before I removed them... maybe it should be locked from creation as well.
Tarzoon: Shame of the Jungle seems to cross the no lewdness line. At the very least, the page picture for the work probably needs to be cut, for showing naked breasts and a penis.
Started an Image Pickin' thread.
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?