To-do list:
- Not Safe for Work is now a Definition-Only Page, so examples are not allowed and must be removed, but inline wicks that simply reference the term can stay. Sandbox.Not Safe For Wick Cleaning can be used to keep track of cleanup.
I brought this up a few months ago at ATT and didn't get much a response [1]
. This is mostly to figure out what this page is. When I first came across this page, I expected it to be a Definition-Only Page simply because there really isn't a single answer for what qualifies as NSFW -> there's no real discernable pattern for examples to follow. This was part of the reason why NSFW Webcomics was cut not too long ago [2].
And looking at the example list that's there is not helping to change my mind: many ZC Es, examples that boil down to "the term NSFW was mentioned in this work", and examples that amount to "work mentioned porn".
If this is supposed to be a trope, then this example list is beyond bad, but given how the page is written, the poor example list, and the past convo around NSFW Webcomics, honestly I don't think this should be a trope. (And I genuinely have no idea what to make of DarthWiki.Not Safe For Work, either.)
If we do decide this is indeed a valid trope, then the example list is going to need to be cleaned up and filled up. We'd also have to decide on what constitutes a valid example to begin with. If not, then cut the example list and go though the wicks (there's over 1k) to remove any wicks using it as a trope.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 19th 2023 at 3:01:49 AM
(she/her)
the Retromancer
That's just informal name for certain Media Classifications and Content Warnings. I'd say make Def-Only and yard Not Safe For X parody examples.
TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
The only good fate for this article is as a Definition Only about the phrase.
Edited by andrewthetroper on Aug 16th 2023 at 5:34:19 PM
The pessimist sees a dark tunnel, the optimist sees a light, the realist sees two lights and the engineer sees three idiots.
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
Also, since pings don’t work in opening posts, ~amathieu13
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
Calendar enthusiast
Huh, I'm surprised this isn't already def-only. Make it so.
Ukrainian Red Cross
Am I a weirdo?
Yeah, I agree this should be definition-only.
Bigotry will NEVER be welcome on TV Tropes.
Just stoic wisdom.
![[tup]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/thumbs_up_emote.png "[thumb up]"){kind=small}
Amon's proposal.
Edited by Yindee on Aug 16th 2023 at 4:24:06 AM
Vehicle-Based Characterization | Grief-Induced Split | Locker Mail
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
I agree with making this definition-only. It's a preexisting term and I think it would be useful to have a page defining it, but I don't think we should allow examples.
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
How sweet it is
for Definition Only
Captain of USS Bajor
Make definition-only, and make a new trope for parodies of the term, like Not Safe For Parody or something.
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
Making a new trope would be a job for TLP, not TRS.
Edit: Clarified this post.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 16th 2023 at 4:15:56 AM
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
She / Her
to Amon's suggestion.
❀ Mint, Nuts, and Waffle ❀
Def-only
Hi
+1 for definition-only.
Agreeing with definition only.
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
Easy def only
Kirby is awesome.
He/Him
Definition-Only
To-do list:
I brought this up a few months ago at ATT and didn't get much a response [1]
. This is mostly to figure out what this page is. When I first came across this page, I expected it to be a Definition-Only Page simply because there really isn't a single answer for what qualifies as NSFW -> there's no real discernable pattern for examples to follow. This was part of the reason why NSFW Webcomics was cut not too long ago [2]
.
And looking at the example list that's there is not helping to change my mind: many ZC Es, examples that boil down to "the term NSFW was mentioned in this work", and examples that amount to "work mentioned porn".
If this is supposed to be a trope, then this example list is beyond bad, but given how the page is written, the poor example list, and the past convo around NSFW Webcomics, honestly I don't think this should be a trope. (And I genuinely have no idea what to make of DarthWiki.Not Safe For Work, either.)
If we do decide this is indeed a valid trope, then the example list is going to need to be cleaned up and filled up. We'd also have to decide on what constitutes a valid example to begin with. If not, then cut the example list and go though the wicks (there's over 1k
) to remove any wicks using it as a trope.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 19th 2023 at 3:01:49 AM
Vehicle-Based Characterization | Grief-Induced Split | Locker Mail