Follow TV Tropes

Following

Removing Gushing from the Wiki

Go To

So. Personal opinions on the main wiki aren't allowed, be they gushing or bashing. Now, bashing gets tolerated even less than gushing, and that makes sense; it leads to more flamewars.

But that doesn't mean we have to live with all the gushing either. This thread can serve as a center for keeping it in check. One function might be to alert people to pages that are really heavy in gushing, to the point that it's not just a quick fix and will need some assistance.

ArthurEld Since: May, 2014
#1276: Oct 31st 2023 at 9:54:01 PM

Aren't the rules a bit different for Sugar Wiki? I'm not sure how exactly they interact with the purpose of this thread, but I think gushing is to be a bit more expected there.

AegisP Since: Oct, 2014 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
#1277: Oct 31st 2023 at 10:34:10 PM

[up][up] Yeah, you are misunderstanding the point of the thread. Getting rid of gushing where it doesnt belong.

Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
Ayumi-chan Aramis from Calvard (Apprentice) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
#1278: Oct 31st 2023 at 11:01:24 PM

I see then.

Edited by Ayumi-chan on Nov 1st 2023 at 2:02:31 AM

She/Her | Currently cleaning N/A
AegisP Since: Oct, 2014 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
#1279: Oct 31st 2023 at 11:03:49 PM

[up] We literally are not allowed to do that. That's the section for gushing and its modifying someone else's opinion. We are not allowed to remove it unless its CREEPY gushing as in porny or gushing for underage characters or making apology of awful people.

EDIT: Oops [nja]'d. Glad you understand.

Edited by AegisP on Oct 31st 2023 at 11:04:32 AM

Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
Ayumi-chan Aramis from Calvard (Apprentice) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
#1280: Oct 31st 2023 at 11:04:59 PM

[up]Duly noted.

She/Her | Currently cleaning N/A
SpaceKABOOM Since: Jul, 2016
#1281: Nov 6th 2023 at 7:41:36 AM

Bringing up more "The [Insert Trope Here]" examples.

Given how vast and huge the Japanese media is, this is absurd even for Go Nagai and Devilman. I'd just cut it.

Mecha genre deconstruction existed since at least Mobile Suit Gundam, which predates this more than 15 years. I'd cut it.

Mons Series is a very wide genre and not everyone's favorite is Pokemon. Shin Megami Tensei came first, made tropes, and is still active, so I doubt it's the only Trope Codifier. It is the most successful franchise, and that's already explained well on the page. I'd cut it.

Platform Fighter seems reasonable. Mascot Fighter is doubtful. The King of Fighters was already out and pretty successful. Massive Multiplayer Crossover is highly doubtful when definition allows other media like comic books. Even within video games there're major successes like Super Robot Wars and Capcom VS. I'd rewrite it that it was a codifier for Platform Fighter and remove the rest of gushing.

I don't think this work has that much visibility. I'd associate stick figures with xkcd and I also don't think that one is that big. I'd cut it.

This gushing doesn't fit the tone of formal and matter-of-fact description in the page. Tabletop RPG link is repeated in the first sentence and there's a great paragraph about why and how it's such a influencial work. I'd cut this.

Yu-Gi-Oh! The Abridged Series came out first. It's what The Abridged Series is named for. It is not a Trope Codifier. I say cut.

Reymma RJ Savoy from Edinburgh Since: Feb, 2015 Relationship Status: Wanna dance with somebody
RJ Savoy
#1282: Nov 6th 2023 at 9:19:41 AM

[up] I agree with most of that, though I think Smash Bros' page could say it's the most well-known Mascot Fighter.

Stories don't tell us monsters exist; we knew that already. They show us that monsters can be trademarked and milked for years.
ShinyCottonCandy Best Ogre from Kitakami (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Best Ogre
#1284: Nov 9th 2023 at 7:43:07 AM

[up]Perhaps it's just my lack of exposure, but that reads like an Overly Narrow Superlative.

SoundCloud
FirstAidRules First Aid Rules from House Since: Sep, 2020 Relationship Status: Singularity
#1285: Nov 9th 2023 at 7:46:06 AM

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RebornAsVillainessStory

Here's the article. The article notes that My Next Life as a Villainess didn't come first but it codified a lot of the stuff we know today, except for Katarina being clueless to the whole negating doom flags thing.

Hi!
FirstAidRules First Aid Rules from House Since: Sep, 2020 Relationship Status: Singularity
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#1287: Nov 9th 2023 at 8:21:44 AM

Technically, Transformers is the first Transforming Mecha according to Wikipedia when it was still known as Diaclone.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
FirstAidRules First Aid Rules from House Since: Sep, 2020 Relationship Status: Singularity
#1288: Nov 9th 2023 at 10:03:59 AM

All right, Transformers can stay, but what about My Next Life as a Villainess? While it wasn't the first "Reborn as Villainess" Story but it did codify a lot of things about the genre, though Katarina is oblivious to the fact that she negated her doom flags and how many people are in love with her.

Edited by FirstAidRules on Nov 9th 2023 at 10:04:13 AM

Hi!
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#1289: Nov 9th 2023 at 11:33:04 AM

To be honest, I'd rather get rid of "The Trope" from descriptions unconditionally. If a work is a Trope Codifier, it should say so in an example and have a proper paragraph about how it's success inspired similar works.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Reymma RJ Savoy from Edinburgh Since: Feb, 2015 Relationship Status: Wanna dance with somebody
RJ Savoy
#1290: Nov 9th 2023 at 1:45:51 PM

I would go with "The populariser and Trope Codifier", it was the first to achieve any kind of mainstream success, insofar as a web novel aimed at otaku can be termed "mainstream".

Stories don't tell us monsters exist; we knew that already. They show us that monsters can be trademarked and milked for years.
AegisP Since: Oct, 2014 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
#1291: Nov 11th 2023 at 2:49:38 AM

Self Thump: Wrong thread.

Edited by AegisP on Nov 11th 2023 at 2:50:54 AM

Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
PlasmaPower Since: Jan, 2015
#1292: Nov 12th 2023 at 11:38:51 AM

YMMV.Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory

The last sentence seems like a Justifying Edit to me.

Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
molokai198 Since: Oct, 2012
#1294: Nov 13th 2023 at 6:01:29 PM

The page for Suikoden III has this line at the end:

Also, the manga adaptation is awesome incarnate, as this wiki itself will tell you.

I think this should just be replaced with an acknowledgment that there is a manga adaptation without any judgment on its quality.

MyFinalEdits Officially intimidated from Parts Unknown (Ten years in the joint) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Officially intimidated
#1295: Nov 13th 2023 at 6:05:03 PM

Agreed.

135 - 169 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
SpaceKABOOM Since: Jul, 2016
#1297: Nov 18th 2023 at 1:29:43 AM

Replying to the comment #1289, I'm also in support of getting rid of "The [Trope Thing]" unconditionally. Most of the examples I cleaned up are repeating things from description at best and simple gushing at worst, sometimes not even being Trope Codifier. There should be more effort put in description than "The [Thing]".

AegisP Since: Oct, 2014 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
#1298: Nov 18th 2023 at 2:26:45 AM

I ironically I agree, but there should be LESS effort as in, its such a lousy description, it should just be removed and never used, hence making less effort by removing and not allow "THE piece of media" anymore.

Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#1299: Nov 18th 2023 at 3:57:55 PM

I am also strongly in favour of removing "The [GENRE]", "The [THING]", or similar out of work descriptions.

Edited by Nen_desharu on Nov 18th 2023 at 6:58:25 AM

Kirby is awesome.
mightymewtron Lots of coffee from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Lots of coffee
#1300: Nov 19th 2023 at 12:46:34 AM

I say it's fine in at least a paragraph explaining its impact, but I don't mind the "THE [x]" at the top as long as the explanation comes later. It kind of clues in the reader, "Oh right, it's that thing."

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.

Total posts: 1,441
Top