Then again, a good chunk of the hate comes from the inclusion of aliens in the plot.
Daniel Craig as James Bond. He's blonde! He can't drive a stick! He wore a freaking life-jacket on a boat to the press conference announcing he was Bond!. Oh, wait, Casino Royale was the best Bond movie in years. My bad. Can't wait for Quantum of Solace. Wait, Craig cut off part of his fingertips? Oh, dear god...
Epitomized by the website Daniel Craig Is Not Bond, which garnered some media coverage when even the press jumped on that bandwagon. Even when the press and most of the fans declared him a fine Bond and Casino Royale was profitable and well-received, the site never once gave him an inch. To the point where Daniel himself commented on it and said he wished they'd all just hurry up and decide if they liked him or not and quit their bitching.
The site has moderated it's stance from it's earlier ethos - it sticks to it's basic idea but emphatically says it's NOT a Daniel Craig hate site, describing him as a talented actor who they simply feel was miscast and marketing itself as a refuge for those who buck the conventional wisdom that Craig is the best Bond ever and prefer the older movies and feel the that the current owners of the Bond franchise are pushing the Craig era by denigrating those earlier films.
Quantum of Solace is eerily similar to Licence to Kill in this respect. What these people do not realize, is that Craig's Bond is by far the one closest to the source material in Ian Fleming's literature. The same was true for the earlier films starring Timothy Dalton as Bond.
For the record, a significant portion of the people who don't like Craig as Bond feel that while Casino Royale was a fantastic movie, Craig's still a terrible Bond. Great action star, sure, but a bad James Bond. Skyfall changed a few minds, but dissers still exist.
Pierce Brosnan has even come out and said that Daniel Craig is a good Bond.
Mission Impossible got it big time with the 1996 movie, turning Jim Phelps, the main character of the TV series for 8 season, into a ruthlessly savage villain.
The Old Republic, though, suffers from this with too many examples to keep track of. Graphics, animation, combat, dialog, lore, all are being listed as ruining the game FOREVER. The true irony in this? People were saying this before the game was even released. Imagine that.
The Incredible Cross-Sections books are often accused of bringing in excessive Techno Babble and heavily lambasted by some fans for that reason.
Wookieepedia copied Transformers Wiki's Ruined FOREVER page and applied it to Star Wars.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars has probably gotten more than its fair share if only because it was a television production upgraded into a feature film, an entirely different medium. The series itself has gotten a lot more supporters because it is being looked at as a television show, not a film.
It still gets a lot of hate for contradicting previous canon (and occasionally fanon) when it would be very easily avoidable.
Fans of the series seem to be having this reaction with the recent cancellation...and then the revelation that not only will the bonus content be JUST TWO story arcs, but one of the cancelled story arcs was about BOBA FETT.
There's a rumour now going around about how this bonus content will be released: ONLY on Apple TV, with a "special" Star Wars app, for only a LIMITED time over the holiday season. Considering barely anyone even HAS Apple TV, imagine how fans of the show took this. Yeah. As it's just a rumour currently, though, there's still hope it's not true.
To say that Star Wars Kinect is a complete bastardization of everything good about Star Wars and the absolute worst part of the Star Wars Franchise to date just because of the dance-off mode alone is a HUGE understatement!
And now Disney has bought Lucasfilm. Filming hasn't even started and the release is scheduled for 2015, and already are cries of RUINED FOREVER because Disney will clearly turn Leia into one of their Princesses and make her MARKETABLE and ANIMATE it and make it KID-FRIENDLY.
For what it's worth, this reaction was pretty short-lived. After getting over the shock, many realized that anything bad Disney could do to the brand (like sub-par sequels or exploitative merchandising), had already happened under Lucasfilm. If anything, getting George to be more hands-off would be an improvement. There's still lingering doubt over Disney's announced plans to pump out sequels every two or three years, risking it becoming a Franchise Zombie, but the overall tone of the fandom seems to have become that of cautious optimism (especially considering how another of Disney's acquisitionsworked out VERY well).
Speaking of EA, guess who Disney passed on the rights to Star Wars video games to? And while you're at it, just try and imagine how the fans took it?
New Buffy movie reboot... WITHOUT JOSS WHEDON?! BLASPHEMY!!!! (Admittedly, in this case; it's not so much that it's not Joss Whedon, it's that it is Fran and Kaz Kuzui, who own and "ruined" the first movie and had no actual creative input on anything past that.)
It was revealed that in an early treatment that the Turtles were to be re-imagined as part of an alien race. Jokes about Bay not even allowing the franchises name to stand in his way only served to fuel the negative reaction. It was later confirmed that the Turtles aren't going to be aliens after all, and even though the official title has been confirmed to be just Ninja Turtles, the Turtles will still be the teenage mutants we've come to expect.
Still, some fans may still think it's going to be ruined forever due to the director being Johnathan Liebesman, who's previous movies were subject to mixed reviews. Combine that with executive producer Micheal Bay's vocal hatedom and well a lot of fans are already declaring it certain to be an epic letdown.
Megan Fox has been recently linked to the movie having reconciled with Michael Bay after their public fallout. For those who already feared the worst her involvement is the final nail in the Ruined Forever coffin. Should she officially be announced as the new April, the outcry can only be imagined.
This just in: She has! Bay...you just...suck. Fuck you, Bay. Fuck you.
The next Spider-Man film won't be directed by Sam Raimi and will feature a new cast, with a story taking place earlier than in 3, with an English actor as Peter Parker?! A reboot only years after the first film!? KILL! KILL! KILL!!!
This seems to be starting to turn around somewhat thanks to the very strong fanbase built around Andrew Garfield because of The Social Network and a general love for Emma Stone...but we shall see.
The fact that most hardcore fans despised Spider-Man 3 has definitely helped them come to terms with the reboot.
While the majority of reaction has been positive, to say the least there are at least a few fans (even Frank Oz held some degree of the sentiment) of The Muppets who are crying this after Fozzie Bear introduced "fart shoes." Even if the joke was making fun of lame humor.
Remakes, Any kind, will always have this response. Double points if the remake is a PG-13 movie based on an R Rated movie. TRIPLE POINTS if the R rated film in question was a horror film.
The Film of the Book for World War Z isn't shot in documentary style, the zombies are fast, and there is a central character instead of a series of vignettes about the end of the world. RUINED FOREVER!
Yeah! We got one of the most badass villains in Iron Man 3, the Mandarin, and he's going to kick as- Wait, he's not really the Mandarin and just a washed up drunken actor? YOU RUINED MARVEL MOVIES SHANE BLACK AND KEVIN FEIGE!