Are you going to round up or down? Is a [3.47:1] a [3:1] or a [4:1]?
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.Why not just round up if the decimal is 5-9, and down if it's 1-4?
(´・ω・`)Ordinary rounding, I suppose.
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyNo matter what we are removing Fetish Fuel right?
Also depending on the discussion on what acceptable, can curator saved aritciles be deleted?
FF is still in the process of moving, so once that is done, they can safely be deleted.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.And, since this is an important subject, those thresholds are based on what? I mean, given the divergence in ratios, lumping 2:1 and 1:1 (I think) together sounds somewhat "let's not do a thin"-ish compared with the presence of some 11:1 rations. I hope this is more than just yet another Idontlikethisness.
Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?What about 3:1 and no curator?
The new It Just Bugs Me!
Crown Description:
Don't bother to say "all of them". Name specific Troper Tales pages that should be axed. An "UP" Vote means you think it should be cut completely. A "DOWN" vote means it should be kept. "I don't care for this page" is not a reason to cut it. "This page is unsalvagable. Kill it with fire" is. PLEASE bullet point pro and con examples if there are more than one.- Cut
- Cut
- Keep
- Keep
- Cut: Neither of the examples shows the trope. They are a spam e-mail and boasting about penis size.
- Cut: There is zero reason for this to exist unless it became a comedic page itself mocking spam and entertainment examples. Seeing as it isn't funny... and is an ego trip it needs to go
- Keep: Has only 2 entries. At this point, there's no telling whether it'll be a dick-measuring contest or not.
- Cut: Violently creepy hatred.
- Keep: Needs to be redefined, the creepy hatred removed, but could be a valid place to express childfree beliefs... although there really is a rather significant difference between child hatred (i.e., what the article is about) and wishing to remain childfree.
- Cut: Any examples that don't involve child hatred would be by definition not examples on the trope. Since we don't want child hatred and we don't want off-topic examples, it's hard to see what possible good examples this page could have.
- Volunteering for curator: Losing Streak
- Volunteering for curator: A Groupie
- Cut: For exactly the reason mentioned above. These diapers need to be taken out to the trash.
Only one example which is actually pimping an off-site ficlet. Yeah, nobody's gonna miss that one.
Cut: All valid examples would be "I have such-and-so nationality" which would be on the main page anyway.
*Cut: Purely Dude, Not Funny!. Only one giggle-worthy entry on the whole page, that "oak tree" story.
- Keep: There is little to no Black Comedy on the page, and most of it is video game lingo and memespouting.
- Cut: Psychotic streaks abound!
- Keep: Psychotic streaks? You mean the one with the giant discussion about it? We can remove that. I will be willing to keep future ones away.
- Keep This could only be passable if limited to RP or fictional examples ONLY.
- Keep It could serve for discussion that originates in stuff like, say, Guantanamo, if an adequate person brings it in and if it is moderated/watched/something. I mean, I'm sure more than one Troper has had a neighbor picked up for "conversation".
- Cut: Animated Trope. Can't even occur in Real Life, so any example would fall under Fetish Fuel.
*Cut: Even though Real Life examples could be argued to illustrate the trope, it's a little creepy to have a page that only consists of people discussing how they stare at boobs.
*Cut: While not solely an animated trope, real life examples are inherently problematic to talk about. - Keep: We don't have a generic trope for boob bouncing and not all examples in the main trope are animated; issues with Trope Decay don't need to go here.
- Keep: Any female who has ever gone out without a bra knows this trope very much occurs in real life. There are currently no examples of Fetish Fuel.
- Keep: Half of the examples (and there's only four to begin with) are clearly roleplaying characters. This page has had plenty of time to get out of hand, and it hasn't really.
- Keep: There's plenty of examples of stalkers tropers have known. It's when the stalkers are the ones writing the examples that it gets creepy, and usually they're accompanied by several other Tropers calling them out on it.
Cut: This is and can only continue to be entries that are basically "I fell for this Schmuck Bait oh and look... now you did too."
- Cut: Ego stroking, misogyny, and Unfortunate Implications. Needs to burn.
- Keep: No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix.
- Cut:(Yes, your superior intellect is totally the reason you're alone. Some of these examples fall more under Insufferable Genius.)
- Keep:(Meeting somebody else that never leaves their house and believes he/she is incredibly intelligent.)
- Keep: Can be kept out of the disturbing and sociopathic areas with Curation. Judging from the page, there is more self Lampshading and self evaluation of how they acted online as opposed to "I am dark and evil and want everyone to die because they were mean".
- Keep:: There isn't any anti-humanity, blatantly negative or hostile contributions anywhere, just people talking about how they used to think in the past.
- Cut: We already have a dating service: Troper Dating Service
- Cut: Creepy pedophilic/ephebophilia undertones.
- Keep: If people are waiting, they're not doing anything creepy
- Keep: Most of the entries are about two teenagers already in a relationship. Can be easily monitored by prohibiting entries about unrequited affection.
- Cut: Misogynyfest.
- Keep: Most of the examples seem to be neutral towards women but negative towards the guys they go for instead. Could be salvaged with curating.
- Cut: Most of the examples are aversions under the nature of "I used to be like this, but now I'm smarter". Single Woman Seeks Good Man is the trope they're looking for.
- Keep: The badly placed examples can be zapped. There are still many examples left to illustrate the trope.
- CUT. Cannot happen in real life!!!
- Keep: There's one example currently and it's about someone with what is presumably a birth defect.
- Keep: There aren't any on the page right now, but this could be used for tropers who use this trope in their art or have a specific character who lacks nipples/genitalia.
- Cut: Too much ego-stroking, too little amusing anecdotes.
- Keep: A few laughworthy examples show potential for salvation if ego-stroking is purged and details are kept discreet.
- Implications of child pornography among other illegal activities. See the link to Lolicon in one entry about illegal porn.
- We are not interested in where tropers hide their porn or how much of it they have.
- A lot of "illegal" porn is rather arbitrary, and considered unobjectionable by many tropers who don't object to porn generally
- Child porn entries can be removed by curation, so can ego-stroking.
- Most of the page can be summed up with "most people keep their stash on a computer, not in a box in the closet anymore"
- Volunteering for curate: A Groupie; Alex The Pretty Good; Vorpy
- Cut: dick measuring contest
Full of "Subversion " and "averted by this troper" - Keep: Hardly any dick-measuring to be seen (though some "prudisher than thou" mentality)
Simple aversions/subversions can be cut by a curator. The "victim of this trope" stories illustrate the trope even better.
Cleaned-up version: Sandbox.TalesNerdsAreVirgins
- Cut: The trope is "There are no therapists." There are, in fact, therapists extant in reality.
*Keep: There are therapists, but not everywhere. As per the main page - Japan doesn't suffer those with genuine psychological issues well. Jake Adelstein's Tokyo Vice provides a firsthand account of the Japanese perception that those who claim insanity are either faking it or beyond cure, and as such are to be outcasts or locked up. - KEEP: I had a Keep example in here earlier that was deleted. While there may be therapists extant in SOME PARTS of reality, that is taking an overly literal reading of the content. In other parts of reality there are no therapists, no GOOD therapists (and anyone who's ever dealt with a bad therapist or psuedotherapist can testify to how horrific the results of that can be: bad therapy is WORSE than none), or no therapists being utilized. And there are situations in which therapy is, sadly, incredibly inadequate or has to be very careful to cause more good than harm.
- Keep: There are no examples talking about anything sociopathic, illegal or going into extreme detail why evil turns them on. Mostly just humorous chatter.
- Cut: We should be getting rid of it, no matter where it is or when it is.
- Cut: Only a sister version of Fetish Fuel.
- Keep: None of them are in the beyond inappropriate/creepy range.
- Keep: No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix.
- Keep: The only example is humorous, not creepy or fetishistic.
- Cut: A lot of the anecdotes are about young girls being abused/sexually harassed because they developed earlier than their peers. They're really sad, but that's not exactly what the trope is.
- Cut: Tropers waxing philosophical about how preeettty they are. Though it has clearly been established that a vigilant Wiki Curator can fix cancer, world hunger and man's inhumanity to man, this might be one of the very few things even they cannot save. Then again, others would have it that this page too has, (everybody together now...)
- Keep: No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix.
- Has led to creepy revenge fantasies - see edit history.
- We have pages for Troper Works, so we don't need troper tales for that.
- Several quality examples from original characters, including one from The Sims and another from role-playing, would be lost.
- Current page has no bad examples.
- Curation can prevent future bad examples.
- Cut: TV Tropes Is Not A Dating Site, ego-stroking.
- Keep: No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix. (Such as Vorpy, who volunteers.)
- Keep: "I met a nice guy today. He helped me out". People other than the writer can be a Nice Guy.
- Since almost all the Troper Tales give credentials for their smarts, they can't be accused of not being smart enough to qualify for the trope, unlike many of the intelligence tropes on this crowner.
- Community-building
- Nothing that would be out of place on the main page aside from being a troper tale — as wth fictional examples, they're all "X is smart and kinky" with evidence
- The good: "This coat is cool/I saw a cool coat"
- The bad: "I'm a badass and I wear one."
- Nothing offensive if sex itself isn't adjudged offensive.
- Community-building
- May be salvageable if kept free of Fetish Fuel-style TMI, anything overly explicit, general uncalled-for nastiness, and people primarily bragging about themselves.
Keep: Squick is subjective. In any event, this crowner is intended to address TT pages that attract creepy or otherwise undesirable posters, not "posters who have had accidents" Volunteering to Curate: Agent0042
- CUT: Wangst, ego-stroking, and a really disgusting salad toss.
- Almost entirely comprised of people making fun of how actually having the page would be really creepy. Just "almost" becuase there's that "This troper is writing a fic about Sonic The Hedgehog masturbating to Blaze, much to Amy's horror, to the point that Amy is Driven To Suicide" bit.
- As of now, there aren't any actually Troper Tales on the page—and if there were, no one wants to hear about your date.
- CUT: Ego trip Beyond the Impossible after the first few entries, bragging place.
- CUT: Past the creepy sex stuff is a random list of actors and singers whom the troper swoons over that's not very interesting to anyone else
- CUT: Merely Complaining About Ships You Don't Like.
- Fetish Fuel But More Specific. Guys talking about why they love boobs? There's the aim of TV Tropes, and then this. . .
- Keep: Can be funny. (Mainly I'm thinking of the "Dear god, I just enthusiastically christened another man's balls." one.)
- Con: Remove last entry and make notification page is about Karma Houdini that you've seen, not done.
- Keep: No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix. Gay people do exist in real life though, and there is nothing wrong with listing RP examples if people want to.
- CUT: One person brags about punching himself in the balls. Sensible person snarks. The end.
- KEEP: That little example is funny enough to merit it's existence.
- Cut:(Ego-stroking on how Badass and dangerous tropers think they are)
- Keep: (Psychotic Smirks appearing in places where violence is not part of the situation, like a video game or bowling)
- Cut: No one listed here sounds particularly badass, just jerkass...es.)
- Keep: Result of vandalism that occurred back in November (checked history).
- Keep: Inaccurate examples can be curated.
- Cut: Snowflaking hub.
- Cut: Unless you're a character in an RPG that uses a two-axis Good-Evil/Chaotic-Lawful arrangement, it doesn't apply to you.
- Keep: "My dog is Chaotic Evil./ My toilet is Lawful Good" In other words, Alignments applied to non-humans.
- Keep: It's harmless.
- Keep: Also can provide interesting tales about how someone played with Character Alignment when making a character for their own R Ps.
- CUT. Two childish rants is all this page consists of.
- Creepy and fetishistic, and also Fetish Fuel But More Specific.
- CUT: More sexual bragging and overshare.
- CUT: Almost nothing but ego-stroking and creepy responses, and potentially fetishistic/sexual. (Fetish Fuel But More Specific?)
- Cut: Seems to be entirely made of joke entries
- Keep: The jokes aren't really that bad
- Pro: Nobody cares about your mental condition or how small you are.
- Con: Actually highlights issues of discrimination and prejudice and is in tune with the actual trope page mission. Needs a ton of cleanup (especially the constipated dude, man, TMI) but I'm going in to clean it up now.
- Volunteering for curate: A Groupie
- KEEP: Just curated and organized page. Removed a lot of the BAWWWWW stuff, sequestered stuff that couldn't be removed to skippable sections (e.g. people upset with Aspergers people can skip that part).
- Not all examples are hyperbolic Saw meets FetishFuel entries.
- Like Incest Yay, the problem is potential, not actual. This one's had plenty of time to go bad if it was going to — several years. It hasn't yet.
- Most of them don't specify what degree of cousin-hood is involved.
- Most are simply about crushes on a cousin.
- Only taboo in certain regions.
- Only illegal in about half the US, and even then, only when 1st cousins are involved.
- Requires superhuman powers, therefore, impossible in real life
- Could validly apply to rps, and other personal media that doesn't fit on the main page.
- The non-canon speculation and fanwanks would be moved to the WMG or YMMV page for the appropriate work. Troper Tales is for personal experiences with the trope.
- Pro: Illegal activity in the US and some other countries and boasting.
- Pro: This is TV Tropes, not "I do drugs all the time am I cool yet?" tropes.
- Con: Not all possible drugs are illegal and it is not the point of this Wiki to make a statement that Drugs Are Bad. If we want that, there's a Drugs Are Bad troper tales page. Needs example cleanout but can work. I'm working on it right now.
- Con: Not all description of personal experience is "am I cool yet" bragging.
- Keep: Some of these examples aren't very Narm, and are kind of touching. Sympathy Fishing is not bad all of the time.
- Potential ego-stroking and nice guy-ing.
- Cut: How "accidental" these are come into question, and it's just creepy. Not enough entries that are simply funny anecdotes.
- Keep: There are plenty of good, legitimate examples that shouldn't be thrown out with the bathwater.
- Besides, the trope is accidentally drinking breast milk. Not fetishizing it.
- CUT: Ego-stroking, potentially fetishistic.
- No problems a vigilant curator can't fix. (no curators at this time)
- Only has one example anyway.
- Keep: The trope isn't inherently sexual, no reason that the TT page will be once the single bad example is deleted. It's not ego-stroking, sociopathic, or sexual.
- Cut: Without locking, no point in keeping a page with no good examples. Can be recreated later if someone has a good example.
- Keep: The above mentioned disgusting entry no longer exists and has been replaced with a more simpler example.
- Cut: Much not-so-accidental stuff and fantasizing here. And a ton of me-me-me ego stroking and creepy sex stuff, some underage.
- Cut: Many tropers forget that this trope is about helping the people who are mean to you, and turn it into a bitchfest instead.
- Keep: Nothing a curator can't fix (up for grabs, whoever wants it)
- Cut:Describing yourself as moe is not moe. It's disingenuousness, which is the antithesis of moe.
- Keep: Some things can be Moe that you've seen in real life.
- Cut: Self-demonstrating and after reading this page you'll need some
- CUT: We do NOT need a Troper Tales page for this!
- Keep: Doesn't actually contain examples that end up in sex, just subversions.
- Not overtly sexual and less self-woobie-ing than might be feared
- No problems a vigilant Wiki Curator can't fix
- CUT: Objectification and creepy, as well as being Fetish Fuel
- CUT: Superpowers don't exist in Real Life, and there's way too much ego-stroking over mundane things in here. I see no way curation could fix this.
- Pro: A list where guy tropers list which celebrities and fictional characters turn them on. Here's this, then thereeeeee's the TV Tropes site mission.
- Con: Below the list of celebrities is a list of personal examples that would make a decent TT page if patroled for egostroking.
- Volunteering for curate: Yamii Denryuu
- Pro: Self-congratulatory back patting and wangst from the people who wrote about themselve in most cases.
- Con: The entries about other people seem legitimate. A Wiki Curator could probably moderate it.
- Cut: Half Fetish Fuel, half "I Know someone who writes and here's what I got out of their writings."
- Keep: Tame compared with some of the other pages. Not all of the entries are of the sexual kind.
- A lot of asking for pity/reassurance, equating to ego-stroking.
- Cut: Nothing but ego-stroking. The only entry about someone else is "My friend has very big brown eyes, therye pretty". Also, check out Miss Mary Sue in the fourth bullet.
- Keep: Has the potential to be talking about other people and to have examples that don't seem made up completely.
- Cut: So how could this happen in Real Life?
- Keep: Everyone acknowledges this can't literally happen; they're sharing anecdotes of how it can damn well seem like it did.
- Pro for cut: People don't really need to know about your cup size. Also has the potential for more "Can I be your boyfriend?" responses.
- Con for cut: No really objectionable or problematic examples to date.
- Willing to curate: blamspam
- CUT: More "fun" with tropers' sex lives and TMI.
- But they can happen in RP Gs and Troper Works, as mentioned above.
- And pages for Troper Works don't cover Table Top RP Gs.
- Some Tropers have participated in theatrical plays.
- Narrative conventions can be and are projected in real life. And when it happens, it can provide some metaphysical or hillarious moments worth of sharing.
- We have pages for Troper Works, so we don't need troper tales for that.
- CUT: Sex TMI about a Porn Stash (which should go on that page were it to not be zapped for being underage)
- For cutting: A flame war waiting to happen, and many small ones have already happened.
- For Keeping: I am patrolling the article as we speak, and will only allow civil respectful entries to be added. All of the bad edits, arguing natter and disrespect have been ripped off the page. This page is no longer a problem.
- Cut: Obvious. Yet more ego-stroking and sexual TMI.
- Keep: You don't have to, and probably don't need to, go into the TMI details to share funny stories of how this happened in your life or R Ps. The majority of examples are tame and aren't "I cause this all the time"-ego-stroking.
- Cut: Shipping preferences and ego-stroking. Could become Flame Bait as well.
- Pro: A list where girl tropers list which celebrities and fictional characters turn them on. Here's this, then thereeeeee's the TV Tropes site mission.
- Con: Below the list of celebrities is a list of personal examples that would make a decent TT page if patroled for egostroking.
- Volunteering for curate: Yamii Denryuu
- Cut: Lost the meaning of the trope awhile ago (preferring non-human company), and now it's just a place to post how socially awkward you are.
- Keep: A Wiki Curator can monitor and fix.
- Narrative conventions can't happen in real life.
- We have pages for Troper Works, so we don't need troper tales for that.
- They don't need to happen in Real Life to have Troper Tales about them. The page can and should contain examples that occur in role-playing games or Troper works.
- Troper Works doesn't include RP Gs
- Things that look a lot like narrative conventions can happen in real life.
- For deleting:(Ego-stroking, also, a Troper Tales page when there's no main page. Why?)
- For Keeping: Quite a bit of it is praising other people instead of ego stroking, and ego-stroking examples can be curated out. And as for the second argument, its a subpage, since the CMOA page got too big.
- Possible sexism, may attract flame bait,
- Same problems as the Give Geeks a Chance page, it's basically a spot to brag about being a woman on the internet and receive all that geek attention.
- Contentless, there is nothing interesting about most of the anecdotes beyond "I am a woman who plays video games."
- Entry after entry is "I'm a Deadpan Snarker in a Crapsack World" and musing on the morality of the world has tended to end in flame bait. Almost all of this is just saying "I was a cheerful kid, but that girl who rejected me in high school made me like this but I'm over it T_T"
- Choice example: "I am a overly intellectual misanthropist, and the few people who can talk to me without becoming lost in my sesquipedalian loquaciousness find that every word that leaves my brooding mind to slip past my perpetually down-turned lips is so wry, sardonic, and overly well backed up that they have no choice but to bend to my every argument when ever I choose to debate about morality, politics, and the nature of humanity."
- Entries and neither offensive nor disturbing. They simply present the way some tropers, for whatever reason, view the world around them, which is surely not the reason for cutting.
- The example given in "for cutting" point of view is not typical. Such rare examples of ego-stroking can be monitored.
- This can go NOWHERE good.
- There's nothing inherently wrong with the page. There's one
- It's been around quite a while and it hasn't gone bad yet. The possibility that it might sometime in the future is no reason to cut it.
- If it's trying to go somewhere bad, it will be stopped.
- Pro for cut: Most of it is responses to the examples of "OH GOD THAT'S HOT!"
- Con: No problems a vigilant curator can't fix.
- Volunteering to curate: blamspam
- Pro: A choice entry: "This troper isn't one, but sure finds them attractive. ;)" as well as one claiming to have doglike Cute Little Fangs. Has a lot of the problems the entries for the Eerie Pale-Skinned Brunette trope had before the name change.
- Con: Nothing a Wiki Curator can't monitor and fix.
- Willing to curate: blamspam
- There are no creepy or vastly inappropriate examples on the page that would merit a cut.
- This is not a Fetish Fuel But More Specific page either, after reading the examples. Some people may like it, but that's not what this page is about, making it so that new examples have to consist of more than "I think smaller breasts are hawt", meriting it's keeping compared to other pages.
- Snowflaking.
- Nobody even bothers to pretend this has anything to do with the trope, which is about thinking other people have the talent too.
- Cut: Doesn't really work with Troper Tales
- Keep: Actually, it does.
- Cut: Obvious complaining outlet.
- Keep: Allowing an abused population to speak out and possibly seek help.
- CUT: Bragging page for personal video game victories. Serves no other purpose.
- CON: Video Games exist to have fun. By their very nature that involves telling others of your stories when you preform incredible acts of skill - especially in today's age of internet gaming.
- Keep - Other than the general dislike for Anime-named Tropes, this had no reason to be put up here in the first place. The troper tales are clean and lack any extremely objectionable material.
- CON: There is no visible problem with this.
- CON: And the "Are you me?" conversation is really funny.
- Cut: Anecdotes... about homosexuality? Or at least anything that may seem like homosexuality? This is People Sit On Chairs. *Painfully.
- Keep: No problems so far, apparently.
- Keep: The current page doesn't seem to have any issues.
- Keep: If kept out of the "beyond inappropriate" and "illegal" categories, this trope can survive.
- Cut: If the trope was instead about males stuffing their underwear with their possessions, would it be kept?
- Sure, why not?
- Keep: Nothing wrong, and several examples are hilarious.
- Keep: Nothing wrong with this.
- Keep: It seems to just be some humorous anecdotes; not really a problem.
- Keep: Everyone's experience with the game is unique.
- Keep: It was decided to make the page before the game was released, so its not like its a natter dump.
- Keep: Tropers may try or discover things they wouldn't if they only played.
procedural note: Voting in the crowner will close at midnight board time (pacific). We'll also lock this thread at that point.
Pages having a 4 to 1 "cut it" ratio or higher will get moved out of the wiki to invisible storage, pending outcome of the "okay, now how do we implement this?" discussion.
Pages having a 3 to 1 ratio or less with a curator will pass out of this discussion as resolved.
Pages at 2:1 and 1:1 with no curator will be moved into another crowner for a focused discussion in a new thread. Hopefully that thread will be able to focus on finding a common ground for the opposing camps to agree on.
Everything with a 0:1 or less ratio is off the hook and goes back to being just another Troper Tales page.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty