Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion YMMV / SuicideSquad2016

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
GuiRitter Since: Dec, 2010
Apr 25th 2020 at 3:36:36 PM •••

About the Big-Lipped Alligator Moment entry. Seems to me like whoever wrote that took the line a little too seriously. It's obviously more like a mocking remark or something like that.

AsakuraX Since: Oct, 2012
Oct 20th 2019 at 12:59:09 PM •••

So, I just noticed (after all these years) that one of Joker's best known lines in this film "I'm not gonna kill ya, I'm just gonna hurt ya...really, REALLY, bad." is very similar to Jack Nicholson's line in 'The Shining': "I said, 'I'm not gonna hurt ya, I'm just gonna BASH your brains in."

Since Nicholson also portrayed Joker, is this perhaps Leto calling back to another well-known Joker actor?

Clanger00 Since: Oct, 2011
Oct 8th 2018 at 3:57:51 PM •••

The Idiot Plot entry is really really long now. Would it be a good idea to move this stuff to its own page like with Prometheus?

Edited by Clanger00
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Jan 10th 2017 at 2:06:55 PM •••

This is edit-warred over:

  • Idiot Plot: Considering the movie is predicated on the already shaky idea that a group of criminals would make a suitable black-ops team, the fact it is propelled further by many stupid decisions is impressive. Notice how many of them are made by Waller herself and the people who had to signed off on her bad decisions. In order:

Dr Sleep, like I said I'm happy to compromise here but you just keep removing it... which is a problem because it removes the context that makes this Idiot Plot, instead turning it into several examples of What An Idiot. It needs something there to tie it together. I initially added the fact that the basic idea is a shaky premise (in terms of intelligence) for the exact opposite of the reason you seemed to get... the point is that if audiences will accept that, they're already in line with the Willing Suspension of Disbelief. Alternatively, we'd have to enter a new bullet point mentioning that the recruiting of Badass Normal criminals is a poor idea (especially since it's no more disposable or untraceable than a regular black-ops squad).

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them. Hide / Show Replies
DrSleep Since: Sep, 2014
Jan 12th 2017 at 9:50:12 AM •••

Sorry about the deletions, I didn't mean to be so brusque with my editing :( And I apologize in advance if the following post is less than coherent.

To clarify my comment about the "shaky premise": I felt that your reasoning (that if audiences were willing to accept such an inherently ludicrous premise, then they were already willing to suspend their disbelief) was...implicit to a certain degree?

People already know that "recruiting a bunch of criminals as a disposable Black Ops team" is an unrealistic idea so it doesn't really need to be pointed out. In my opinion audiences will buy into a film with an inherently unrealistic premise as long as the film follows its own internal logic and the characters' motives and decisions are consistent and reasonable within the context of the film. A movie (in this case Suicide Squad) enters Idiot Plot territory when both film and characters fail to follow the movie's own logic and their own characterization.

So this is how the entry is written currently:

  • Idiot Plot:
    • The Enchantress is only freed because June Moon is such an incompetent archaeologist that the very first thing she does upon finding The Enchantress' tomb is break open the bottle containing her.
    • Meanwhile, the only reason that Waller falsely believes that she can control The Enchantress is that Enchantress inexplicably left her heart in the tomb. Why her heart was cut out in the first place is never explained, nor is there any reason why she wouldn't simply carry it with her.
    • Waller's dossier on the Enchantress includes an image (and presumably hints to the whereabouts of) Enchantress' brother. Considering how little control she has over Enchantress, even if she doesn't think that information is important there's no reason to include it.
    • None of the people Waller is presenting to finds it the least bit unnerving that Enchantress, Waller's proof of how capable her team would be, is barely controlled and her human host says that she can't do that again directly in front of them.
    • When Enchantress goes to free her brother, Flag doesn't report it. Forgivable since he's in love with her, but... yeah. Less forgivable is the fact that other than Flag watching her, there is zero surveillance on Moon/Enchantress. And Moon doesn't let anyone know that Enchantress took her over, especially since it seems harrowing for her.
    • By the way, that attempt only worked because Waller was asleep and didn't notice her phone ringing. And because Waller had virtually no security measures protecting the brother's heart.
    • When Enchantress makes her duplicity clear, Waller decides to stab the heart. Yay... except she just stabs it repeatedly with a tiny instrument, giving Enchantress enough time to, in this case, survive getting her heart stabbed. Even if Waller didn't plan for that possibility, given her incredible power, her being off her leash for even a few seconds could cause catastrophic damage. You would think she would have means to instantly terminate her. You know, like she does for everyone else in Suicide Squad..
    • Waller is in Midway City. The entire mission is to get her out. There is no reason she couldn't be overseeing this from a safe location.
    • After the extraction takes place, Waller gets into a separate helicopter than the Suicide Squad, which means she has zero help when the helicopter is shot down. This leads to her capture and Enchantress using her brain to attack several secret targets and create tempting illusions for the Squad when they show up.

So maybe this is how the entry should start, to clarify how the plot only happens because several major characters are idiots.

  • Idiot Plot: The movie's plot revolves around a constantly-escalating series of bad decisions, mostly made by Waller and her staff.

I'd also add the following:

  • Good Idea: keeping the incredibly powerful witch at bay and on a leash by keeping her heart in an explosives laden brief case. Bad Idea: keeping the incredibly powerful witch's brother on a shelf in your closet accessible to anyone. (Moved up from What An Idiot)
  • The helicopter crew for Waller's extraction from Midway City fire off bright chaff despite not facing a conventional foe, and all it does is draw attention, resulting in its crash. (Moved up from What An Idiot)
  • Waller actively wanted Rick Flag and Dr. Moone to get involved, even though he's her handler and thus the person who will have to put her down if she slips her leash. Anyone with half a brain would realize that's a task you want to give to someone objective. (Moved up from What An Idiot)

I'd then move the following down to What An Idiot since they deal with bad decisions not related to Waller and her staff and are thus "less" connected to the plot

  • The Enchantress is only freed because June Moon is such an incompetent archaeologist that the very first thing she does upon finding The Enchantress' tomb is break open the bottle containing her.

So the final entry would look like this:

  • Idiot Plot: The movie's plot only happens because of a constantly-escalating series of bad decisions, mostly made by Waller and her staff or the government
    • The only reason that Waller falsely believes that she can control The Enchantress is that Enchantress inexplicably left her heart in the tomb. Why her heart was cut out in the first place is never explained, nor is there any reason why she wouldn't simply carry it with her.
    • Waller's dossier on the Enchantress includes an image (and presumably hints to the whereabouts of) Enchantress' brother. Considering how little control she has over Enchantress, even if she doesn't think that information is important there's no reason to include it.
    • None of the people Waller is presenting to finds it the least bit unnerving that Enchantress, Waller's proof of how capable her team would be, is barely controlled and her human host says that she can't do that again directly in front of them.
    • Good Idea: keeping the incredibly powerful witch at bay and on a leash by keeping her heart in an explosives laden brief case. Bad Idea: keeping the incredibly powerful witch's brother on a shelf in your closet accessible to anyone.
    • Waller actively wanted Rick Flag and Dr. Moone to get involved, even though he's her handler and thus the person who will have to put her down if she slips her leash. Anyone with half a brain would realize that's a task you want to give to someone objective
    • When Enchantress goes to free her brother, Flag doesn't report it. Forgivable since he's in love with her, but... yeah. Less forgivable is the fact that other than Flag watching her, there is zero surveillance on Moon/Enchantress. And Moon doesn't let anyone know that Enchantress took her over, especially since it seems harrowing for her. There's also the fact that Flag uses Moon/Enchantress on the initial mission despite knowing at this point she's a security risk.
    • By the way, that attempt only worked because Waller was asleep and didn't notice her phone ringing. And because Waller had virtually no security measures protecting the brother's heart.
    • When Enchantress makes her duplicity clear, Waller decides to stab the heart. Yay... except she just stabs it repeatedly with a tiny instrument, giving Enchantress enough time to, in this case, survive getting her heart stabbed. Even if Waller didn't plan for that possibility, given her incredible power, her being off her leash for even a few seconds could cause catastrophic damage. You would think she would have means to instantly terminate her. You know, like she does for everyone else in Suicide Squad..
    • Waller is in Midway City. The entire mission is to get her out. There is no reason she couldn't be overseeing this from a safe location.
    • After the extraction takes place, Waller gets into a separate helicopter than the Suicide Squad, which means she has zero help when the helicopter is shot down. This leads to her capture and Enchantress using her brain to attack several secret targets and create tempting illusions for the Squad when they show up.
    • The helicopter crew for Waller's extraction from Midway City fire off bright chaff despite not facing a conventional foe, and all it does is draw attention, resulting in its crash.

And for What An Idiot:

  • The Enchantress is only freed because June Moon is such an incompetent archaeologist that the very first thing she does upon finding The Enchantress' tomb is break open the bottle containing her.
  • Did nobody seriously see Griggs give Harley a phone and loudly proclaim that it's from the Joker right in front of them?

Your thoughts?

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Jan 25th 2017 at 6:49:43 AM •••

Sorry about that, I forgot about this.

So I asked here about overlap between What An Idiot and Idiot Plot.

The gist of it is that What An Idiot is broader, specifically for any instance where a character does something stupid and the audience has better ideas. Idiot Plot is when the plot is furthered by these idiotic moments. So basically, any idiotic moment (doesn't matter by whom... in fact, the more idiots, the better) go under Idiot Plot, and idiotic moments that don't affect the plot directly go under What An Idiot.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
DrSleep Since: Sep, 2014
Jan 26th 2017 at 5:23:00 PM •••

So...pretty much all the listed examples go under Idiot Plot, since they all make the plot possible (Moon breaking the bottle turns her into Enchantress, Griggs giving Harley the phone gets Joker involved)

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Feb 7th 2017 at 10:17:35 AM •••

More or less, yeah.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
manhandled &)$;@9?@4$/8&;’ Since: Feb, 2012
&)$;@9?@4$/8&;’
Aug 22nd 2016 at 10:06:44 AM •••

You know this Joker has been butchered if he fails to make Complete Monster by the end of his DCEU tenure.

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad Hide / Show Replies
Silverblade2 Since: Jan, 2013
Aug 23rd 2016 at 10:21:46 AM •••

Why? I haven't seen the film but Tropes Are Not Good and CMs are not necessarily better than anti villains.

Edited by Silverblade2
Riley1sCool Since: Dec, 2014
Aug 25th 2016 at 12:42:25 PM •••

Joker doesn't need to be a Complete Monster to be a good character. While Leto's performance is strictly YMMV, Joker isn't always absolutely monstrous.

manhandled Since: Feb, 2012
Nov 5th 2016 at 7:06:48 PM •••

To be honest my thought (in OP) had more to do with questioning the punch of the Complete Monster title.

For example, in Halo's Sadie's Story, we have Kinsler, and he's pegged as a Complete Monster... but I tried Googling "halo kinsler", and the YMMV tab of the Halo 3 ODST page where he's listed is on the first page of results, suggesting obscurity. What good is the punch of that title if you barely know the bearer?

Edited by manhandled I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
Riley1sCool Since: Dec, 2014
Aug 25th 2016 at 12:37:37 PM •••

Griggs has been on and off for The Scrappy. What's going on with that?

Hide / Show Replies
MGD107 Since: Feb, 2015
Sep 1st 2016 at 11:58:20 AM •••

He's built up as an unpleasant, abusive warden who exists to make us feel sorry for Quinn and Deadshot.

He's the Hate Sink. Its only the The Scrappy when its unintentional.

MGD107 Since: Feb, 2015
Sep 1st 2016 at 11:55:52 AM •••

Um does this film really count as an example of Serial Numbers Filed Off to Guardians of the Galaxy? The similarities mentioned are quite vague and could apply to a lot of films (morally ambiguous characters, pop music sound track, heroes fighting a force well beyond them etc.) I thought the whole point of the trope was it was only for when it was clear they outright copied clear details.

I mean the main page itself even acknowledges that despite the trailers the two films honestly have little in common.

Edited by MGD107
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
Aug 22nd 2016 at 4:30:00 PM •••

Pulled this whole thing from the page. Far too much violation of Examples Are Not Arguable, complaining, and just plain bad example write-up. I honestly don't care enough to deal with it. It either needs to stay off the page or be rewritten to be less passive-aggressive.

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • Though one can forgive the filmmakers for wanting to avoid comparisons with Batman and The Dark Knight, the Joker arguably would have been a much more fitting Big Bad for the movie than the Enchantress. Given that he apparently has a massive criminal syndicate and military-grade hardware at his disposal, he could have been just as plausible a threat for Midway City as the Enchantress, while still being down-to-Earth enough to keep the movie from ping-ponging back and forth between being a crime thriller and a full-on High Fantasy film. Not to mention that it would have been much more plausible to see the Suicide Squad defeat him, the conflict would have made Harley's Conflicting Loyalties a central part of the film, and it could have made Suicide Squad the first movie to show someone other than Batman battling the Clown Prince of Crime.-Then recruiting Harley Quinn would have been an obvious mistake.
    • One could argue that the concept of the Suicide Squad itself was wasted. Besides the fact that the film fails to showcase the Squad actually function together, and making the final True Companions moments feel hollow, the film follows the Squad on their first mission, where everything that could go wrong does (Waller fails to control Enchantress and thus starts the whole mess, one member dies instantly after trying to escape, another manages to overide their explosive leash and temporarily escape, they fail to protect Waller who gets captured by Enchantress, resulting in them enquiring high-level military secrets and causing the destruction of multiple military bases). If the film instead showcased multiple missions to help build a sense of comradeship between them and demonstrate their competence, the film spends the bulk of its running time telling the viewer that this is a terrible idea and that supervillains should not be used for covert government operations.

Hide / Show Replies
TheMightyHeptagon Since: Aug, 2011
Aug 23rd 2016 at 2:55:33 PM •••

How about this?

  • They Wasted a Perfectly Good Plot:
    • The movie spends a good chunk of its running time building up the Joker as a dangerously psychotic criminal mastermind with a massive crime syndicate and military-grade hardware at his fingertips, but then makes him more-or-less incidental to the main plot—even though making him the Big Bad could actually have improved the story in many ways. Unlike the Enchantress, the Joker is actually down-to-Earth enough to fight the Badass Normal Suicide Squad on their own terms, yet he could still have been a very plausible threat to Midway City, and making him a major antagonist could have given Harley a much more developed character arc by making her Conflicting Loyalties—whether as a member of the Squad or as Joker's partner—a much more central part of the film.
    • The film sold us on a story about a team of ex-supervillains seeking redemption as a crack Special Forces team and becoming True Companions in the process, but there are a few problems with the presentation that made it very hard for that premise to live up to its true potential. The Extremely Short Timespan means that there's very little time to believably build the Suicide Squad up as Fire-Forged Friends, since they still barely know each other by the end of the movie. And because most of the running time is consumed by the Squad's very first mission—where everything that can go wrong does go wrong, and they're forced to save the world from another of Waller's recruits—we get very little time to see them functioning together as the hyper-competent team that they're supposed to be. It's a bit hard to cheer for the Squad when the movie seems to spend two hours telling us that recruiting super-criminals as soldiers is a terrible idea.

Edited by TheMightyHeptagon
Top