Follow TV Tropes
The Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment exists to prevent tropers from making agenda-based edits or bringing up irrelevant controversial issues, but it's not always obvious if something breaks the rule or not. This thread serves the purposes of:
See also the thread "Trump and ROCEJ" for the specific topic of tropers sneaking their political views (not just views regarding Donald Trump, despite the title) onto the wiki.
Edited by Someoneman on Jul 24th 2019 at 8:26:42 AM
Worth noting that despite the title, the "Trump and ROCEJ" thread is about all current political figures, not just Donald Trump.
This thread is linked from the Administrivia page, so we might as well use it.
Does anyone actually care if the pages on Mein Kampf and the like are obviously biased? I came across another work of that type (though by an author with a small amount of actual talent) and the page is quite obviously written from a perspective opposite the work's, to say the least.
EDIT: Sorry, misread the thread title and posted something not related to misuse of Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment.
Edited by dragonfire5000 on Oct 2nd 2019 at 8:03:41 AM
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?