Follow TV Tropes

Following

Complaining: Annoying Laugh

Go To

Berrenta MOD How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#26: Jul 10th 2019 at 9:46:56 PM

Yep, calling in favor of both options: IUEO, while allowing intended audience reactions.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#27: Jul 11th 2019 at 1:01:41 AM

Intended Audience Reaction says not to list it in trope descriptions. Was I incorrect in adding an "In-Universe Examples and Intended Audience Reactions only" warning, or does the header for the example list not count as part of the description?

Edit: Also, I haven't done any cleanup yet. I just added the warning for now.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Jul 11th 2019 at 3:02:58 AM

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Brainulator9 Short-Term Projects herald from US Since: Aug, 2018 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Short-Term Projects herald
#28: Jul 11th 2019 at 4:03:36 AM

I mean, I meant for IAR examples to be backed by Word of God...

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#29: Jul 11th 2019 at 8:17:55 AM

What about changing the warning to "In-Universe Examples and Word of God-backed Intended Audience Reactions only"?

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
Brainulator9 Short-Term Projects herald from US Since: Aug, 2018 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Short-Term Projects herald
#30: Jul 11th 2019 at 12:50:10 PM

My idea would be:

"In-Universe or Word of God-backed Intended Audience Reaction examples only:"

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#32: Jul 11th 2019 at 12:57:56 PM

[tup]

Now to clean up the misuse.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Brainulator9 Short-Term Projects herald from US Since: Aug, 2018 Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Short-Term Projects herald
#33: Jul 11th 2019 at 1:05:34 PM

Me likey.

I have to go to work soon as of typing, but I'll see if I can weed out the bad examples.

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#34: Jul 23rd 2019 at 6:23:16 PM

Maybe tonight I can get started on this.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#35: Jul 23rd 2019 at 6:34:42 PM

I removed misuse and ZCEs from the Real Life folder. I left examples that were either Self-Deprecation or people referencing other people.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Jul 23rd 2019 at 12:08:30 PM

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#36: Jul 24th 2019 at 5:49:43 PM

I want to do cleanup, but I'm not sure where to start.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GastonRabbit Sounds good on paper (he/him) from Robinson, Illinois, USA (General of TV Troops) Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Sounds good on paper (he/him)
#37: Jul 25th 2019 at 2:42:22 AM

[up]Due to the trope now being limited to in-universe examples and Word of God-backed Intended Audience Reactions, it's probably safe to cut anything that lacks either a reference to an in-universe reaction, or Word of God confirmation that the laugh was supposed to be annoying.

Basically, anything that simply says a laugh is annoying (even if it says what makes it annoying), without saying if it was supposed to be annoying (either because another character says it's annoying, or if the creators confirmed that audiences were supposed to find it annoying) is misuse.

Unintentional out-of-universe examples might fit under Most Annoying Sound if its TRS thread gets it retooled into a Darth Wiki page about annoying sounds in general (instead of the current definition for sounds from video games and toys), but they don't fit this trope.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Jul 25th 2019 at 4:48:10 AM

Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#38: Jul 25th 2019 at 10:40:24 AM

[up] That's what I figured, but some are just the character's laugh, and I can't tell if those laughs are intentionally annoying or not. Leave them hidden, or cut 'em too?

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#39: Jul 25th 2019 at 5:27:22 PM

I'd rather cut it, but since we don't delete ZCEs, I would comment them out with a note starting with %% this trope is In-Universe Examples Only. Provide more context if it meets that criteria. Delete this entry if this doesn't. If it's potholed, though, I'd remove the link.

Edited by Tabs on Jul 25th 2019 at 5:28:20 AM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#40: Jul 25th 2019 at 9:02:37 PM

Slightly contradictory answers here, guys. Gaston basically said that if a trope doesn't explain the laugh as intentionally annoying, it should be cut, but wouldn't most of those examples be ZCEs? If so, then most of them would just be hidden, like Tabs said, but that's assuming these examples aren't misuse, but... well, the entire problem with this trope is that people are using it to complain about laughs they don't like. If the example doesn't state the laugh is intentionally annoying, it's most likely misuse, right? Or are they just ZCEs?

Ugh, I'm making my head hurt. I'm just going to go with what Tabs said, I guess, on the off chance these examples do fit...

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Tabs Since: Jan, 2001
#41: Jul 26th 2019 at 9:22:47 AM

Oh. I forgot to mention in my earlier post. If it's complaining, I suggest cutting. A ZCE I'll let slide by making it invisible, but a complaining ZCE is likely not in-universe. I did the same for angry/sarcastic Captain Obvious wicks (where neither the narration nor any other character commented upon the statement).

I still feel like I'm contradicting myself. How about: I would not miss ZCEs if they were deleted. 'Cause by this trope's nature, a ZCE is probably complaining. But if I'm feeling nice, I might comment it out.

Edited by Tabs on Jul 26th 2019 at 9:23:50 AM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#42: Aug 10th 2019 at 2:17:23 PM

Belated, but starting on those wicks.

Edit: Going through the main wicks, someone might want to doublecheck though, as I left some I'm not sure about, which seem to imply the laugh is intentional, but yet they may just be the audience's reaction...

Ones I left that may need a second opinion:

...Man, this'll be more difficult than I thought.

Edited by WarJay77 on Aug 10th 2019 at 5:42:21 AM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#43: Aug 10th 2019 at 3:13:56 PM

Update: Okay, I've checked and cleaned up every wick starting with Annoyance Tropes and ending before Characters.Aria The Scarlet Ammo so far, so if someone wants to jump in, that'd be where to start if not from the bottom.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#44: Aug 10th 2019 at 6:16:20 PM

Okay, down to 647 wicks, stopped at Characters.Paladins Front Line. Basically, anything that doesn't mention character reaction or intent is being chopped. ZCEs are assumed misuse.

Edited by WarJay77 on Aug 10th 2019 at 9:16:29 AM

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#45: Aug 11th 2019 at 1:16:01 PM

Tackling the YMMV pages. I did see at least one Annoying Laugh wick referring to in-universe interpretation, so that's safe. The few that I took care of so far also had wicks for Most Annoying Sound, so it's a two-birds-one-stone kind of deal.

Edit: YMMV is done, bringing us down to 622.

Edited by Berrenta on Aug 11th 2019 at 4:25:17 AM

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#46: Aug 11th 2019 at 1:22:03 PM

[up] Same here, a lot of wicks on Character pages were also Most Annoying Sound wicks.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#47: Aug 18th 2019 at 5:46:14 PM

Done with the Characters/ Wicks

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#48: Aug 31st 2019 at 9:47:23 PM

Ran through the one-off sections, or the sections that were small enough to do in one go.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#50: Sep 16th 2019 at 1:24:56 PM

All that remains to be cleaned are the Western Animation wicks. Anyone want 'em?

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

PageAction: AnnoyingLaugh
2nd Jul '19 4:25:51 PM

Crown Description:

The trope attracts complaining as it currently stands. These options are not mutually exclusive.

Total posts: 53
Top