Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Analysis Namespace.

Go To

ShinyCottonCandy Yo-yoshi! LEGO-shi! from LEGO Yoshi's Island Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Yo-yoshi! LEGO-shi!
Aug 16th 2020 at 1:56:33 PM

[up]I say we ask the mods directly as the next step.

YouTube | SoundCloud
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
Aug 16th 2020 at 2:11:09 PM

Conventionally, comments to declined cut requests occur on discussion pages where I have put the denial reason. Personally I think the page is not quite appropriate but the inbounds need to be sent somewhere.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
chasemaddigan I'm Sad Frogerson.
I'm Sad Frogerson.
Aug 16th 2020 at 2:30:07 PM

The Analysis page for Avengers: Age of Ultron reads more like an essay describing why Tony and Steve's character arcs were underdeveloped and not executed to their full potential. I'm pretty sure the Analysis subpage isn't supposed to be for stuff like reviews, so should this page be cut?

Chabal2 Fear me from Plains of Tolosa
Fear me
Aug 18th 2020 at 10:36:55 PM

Analysis.Space Fighter:

The A12 entry seems out of place, and several entries are self-admitted rebuttals to other entries, so the page looks like it's arguing with itself.

I don't know enough about the subject matter to make corrections, so what do we do?

Serac Spout Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
Spout
Aug 23rd 2020 at 9:48:27 AM

Analysis.Metroid Prime Trilogy needs the first-person writing removed.

jandn2014 Hangs around Image Pickin’ a lot from somewhere in Connecticut Relationship Status: Hiding
Hangs around Image Pickin’ a lot
Aug 23rd 2020 at 9:31:07 PM

I just found Analysis.Star Wars. While the page misused the namespace, as for it just describes the history of the franchise and doesn’t “analyze” it, there’s a lot of content on the page. Is there another page type that the page’s content could go on?

there's nobody here
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
Aug 24th 2020 at 4:46:00 AM

I don't think that page is out of scope for Analysis/, actually. Discussing how the franchise developed is certainly analysis. The current description at Analysis is a little work-centric.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Chabal2 Fear me from Plains of Tolosa
Fear me
Aug 26th 2020 at 11:35:39 AM

But Not Too Black has some use of "I" and using personal examples (I'm not sure those are allowed, even if they do illustrate the point).

alnair20aug93 👁💋👁 🧡 from Furrypines Relationship Status: Chocolate!
👁💋👁 🧡
Sep 13th 2020 at 9:59:02 PM

FPW is not allowed, you can remove the FPW, as most of the tropers are no longer around, but you could also retain the introspectiveness.

Mi batido trae a todos los chicos al patio.
alnair20aug93 👁💋👁 🧡 from Furrypines Relationship Status: Chocolate!
👁💋👁 🧡
Sep 16th 2020 at 3:26:26 AM

Done rewriting the Analysis page for But Not Too Black.

It's as if I'm the only one addressing the rampant First-Person Writing on wiki pages.

Mi batido trae a todos los chicos al patio.
jandn2014 Hangs around Image Pickin’ a lot from somewhere in Connecticut Relationship Status: Hiding
Hangs around Image Pickin’ a lot
Sep 26th 2020 at 7:46:26 PM

Analysis.Alien seems more like Fridge Brilliance to me.

Edited by jandn2014 on Sep 26th 2020 at 10:46:31 AM

there's nobody here
chasemaddigan I'm Sad Frogerson.
I'm Sad Frogerson.
Sep 26th 2020 at 8:24:35 PM

[up] I posted that on the thread a few months ago, but no one responded. I also recommended that the page be cut and the entry be moved to the Fridge page back then as well.

Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
Sep 26th 2020 at 8:55:18 PM

Analysis.Trials Of Mana is practically stillborn with the analysis of one of the six playable characters despite the release of the 2020 remake.

Edited by Nen_desharu on Sep 26th 2020 at 11:56:34 AM

Kirby is awesome.
Tomodachi Sour on the inside. Relationship Status: They grew on me like a tumor...
Sour on the inside.
Oct 22nd 2020 at 9:37:16 AM

Hi. I'm working on a Sonic 2006 analysis for Tv Tropes. I'm doing the analysis to explain why Shadow's story is an Author Saving Throw from the screenwriter's part, regarding Shadow's characterization and story in the previous game.

Right now is only a draft. I worked on it on Word, and then pasted it on the sandbox. Due to a lack of internet, I couldn't verify certain information and names, but most of the information is presented.

Could you guys check, and see if it works?

Tomodachi Sonic Analysis

Vindicated by History is for good products, not for bad games or movies with good ideas, as there are no bad ideas, only bad executions.
antenna_ears from California Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oct 23rd 2020 at 8:39:02 PM

Analysis.Hunter X Hunter consists of only a link to a youtube video, is that ok?

wingedcatgirl Watch that pink smoke swooce right in from The Murder-Free Hotel
Watch that pink smoke swooce right in
Oct 23rd 2020 at 8:40:13 PM

Nope. The analysis namespace is for analysis, not links to other people's analysis.

Sylvi& | it/they/she | plural trans catgirl | Trouble Cube | avatar by Madame Butterfly Knife
Dec 5th 2020 at 11:06:35 PM

Ended up lengthening the Analysis.Play Station Vita page after I saw it was just repeating info on the main Useful Notes page by removing said info over and expanding on it. I then saw it fit to do the same for the Wii U, and made so Analysis.Wii U. I feel like both pages work and feel more or less objective after spending the past few days tweaking them, but I wanted another opinion.

CyborgMaster Miss Whoever-You-Are Guy
Miss Whoever-You-Are Guy
Dec 11th 2020 at 4:53:25 AM

I just uploaded Analysis.Foundation Series, and this is my first analysis page, and the third major page I've uploaded to TV Tropes. Just want to check if my analysis is proper, and in what ways I could improve the quality.

I would put Neal Stephenson's quote from Cryptonomicon on Internet arguments here, but there's too little space to put it here.
GoldenCityBird from the UK
Dec 26th 2020 at 11:02:33 AM

I'm not 100% sure what Analysis.Brooktown High is trying to do (apparently it's a list of sources, which doesn't feel appropriate for the namespace), and it also has first-person writing.

Chabal2 Fear me from Plains of Tolosa
Fear me
Mar 6th 2021 at 11:34:34 AM

Analysis.The Worf Effect gives two examples of "how to do the trope badly". I agree with the points made, but (not watching either show) I'm not sure the specific examples are needed (or possibly could be moved to the description, minus the examples).

Analysis.The Smurfette Principle has huge amounts of examples, like a trope page to itself.

This is the only thing on Conviction by Counterfactual Clue:

There are numerous sites that catalogue the errors, but the one at http://brownencyclopedia.tumblr.com does a pretty comprehensive job.

No clue what Analysis.Comforting Comforter is trying to say.

Edited by Chabal2 on Mar 8th 2021 at 11:42:28 AM

chasemaddigan I'm Sad Frogerson.
I'm Sad Frogerson.
Mar 15th 2021 at 9:04:18 PM

Should the Analysis subpage for Family Guy have a look at?

The page is kind of a rambling essay about Stewie's Flanderization on the show. It reads more like somebody's personal rant, as there's a lot of first-person writing, grammatical errors, and it personally ends with the person admitting they just wanted to vent. It's also followed up by a bunch of sub-bullets of people adding their own two cents, which makes the page feel more like a mini blog post or forum thread.

So, do we cut this page? At the moment, it has over a thousand inbound links, but I'm not sure what could be salvaged.

Merseyuser1 from Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Mar 16th 2021 at 5:48:53 AM

I created Analysis.Alternate Continuity which isn't great; cut it or rewrite it entirely?

I'm not sure what to do with this page.

Mar 23rd 2021 at 3:46:42 PM

Content that was previously on Zack Snyders Justice League was moved to the analysis page, but there's some discussion on whether that's the appropriate place.

Synchronicity god-touched Relationship Status: I've got a total eclipse of the heart
god-touched
Mar 26th 2021 at 7:40:22 AM

Yeah, I posted that ATT then went to sleep and when I woke up people had already agreed to move it to Analysis, which I disagree with. Crossposting what I said in the thread:

From reading over what does go in Analysis pages, it does not seem like it should be there either.

for thoughtful essays that provide a greater depth and focus on the elements of tropes. Attempts to emphasize certain tropes over others, to detail historical context for trope use, or explain how some tropes impacted on the overall construction of a work are examples of issues that are not well suited for the main page format.

As it is, it's all historical context. There's very little in there about new tropes that pop up in the work. Is hosting that stuff in line with the wiki? People can read about it in focused articles like this.

Apr Trope Report | New Work Page Help
STARCRUSHER99 Another Troper with a ruined life from one of my unhealthy obsessions Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
Another Troper with a ruined life
Mar 26th 2021 at 7:59:17 AM

Yeah, that's fair - I only posted it there because at that moment that was the suggestion offered. Feel free to cut away.

You love your children. It’s your one redeeming quality. That and your cheekbones.

Total posts: 205
Top

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:

/

Media sources:

/

Report